* Posts by Dr Stephen Jones

266 posts • joined 11 Jul 2007

Page:

Microsoft: It's TRUE, you'll get Android and iOS apps in WINDOWS

Dr Stephen Jones

Excuse me?

@rtb61

Are you a Man from Mars?

Your idea that Apple and Google should be forced by law to publish every damn app submitted to them, by anyone, is... very interesting.

/runs for door

1
0

MEPs: Oi, Juncker! Hands off our science and research dosh

Dr Stephen Jones

Just a thought

Perhaps Juncker could reallocate some of the €906bn cash the EU spends on "aid"?

http://www.euractiv.com/development-policy/infographic-eus-development-aid-news-517818

Most of which goes to middle income countries, according to MPs, while children are drowning in the Med:

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/04/27/eu-aid-europes-budget-commons-report_n_1458122.html

Apologies for the Huffington link. The EU could spend our money a lot better.

3
2

Hi, Fi: Google JOWL-SLAPS mobile bigguns with $20/mo wireless service

Dr Stephen Jones

Re: creepy

Google already knows where every Android user is and if they have just visited their secret girlfriend.

This just takes care of the non-Android users.

6
2

FTC: All-powerful Google ABUSED rivals. So we did NOTHING

Dr Stephen Jones

Re: Google dominance

fanboy dan:

"The only "dominance" that Google can be accused of is making a MUCH better product than anyone else in the world. "

You don't want to RTFA so I'll spell it out slowly for you.

Google search advertising market share = 90%.

(Most of the media now depends on advertising, so Google owns digital media)

Google Analytics market share of the world's top 15 million websites = 98%

Google mobile OS market share = 85%

Google OTT video market share = 90%

Google Maps share = ? (Rivals are far superior, nobody uses them because of platform effects)

Thank fuck you're not in charge of competition law.

8
0

FCC chair heads into two-week political hazing period

Dr Stephen Jones

Re: Explaining law to Potts

"supply side economics chowderheads will appear out of a portal in order to preach their religion."

No doubt, but there are chowderheads of all religions on the internet. Your vanity - as the most righteous and caring person in the room - blinds you to some of your own defects.

I have replied to your other comment and do not need to repeat it. At issue is legislative intent and the legal authority of the agency. Just as I predicted, when challenged, you resort to self-righteous moralising.

0
2
Dr Stephen Jones

Re: Explaining law to Potts

"The Telecommunications Act was put into place in order to prevent Title II from having to be used to regulate data, amongst many other things...but it did not remove from the FCC the ability to place data services under Title II, should that be required."

My students would receive a Fail mark for attempting such an argument. I have explained why already in this thread. Most tutors would also deduct points for vanity and arrogance. You don't just get it wrong, but you think you can bluster your way using rhetoric. For example:

" there are countries out there that do, in fact, "protect" their citizens from "people like me". You know, people who understand the law, the spirit and intent of the law...

You have demonstrated you don't understand the law at all. You don't understand the separation of powers, the boundaries of authority, the idea of legislative intent. You steamroller over all of them.

"...the larger economic and political issues..."

I think you mean "The Larger Potts". I described your behaviour earlier. Whenever you're challenged, you use the rhetoric of moral superiority. You're doing it again.

"The types of folks who build nations only to benefit the indulgent few "

QED.

0
2
Dr Stephen Jones

Re: WOW! Why dont you just stroke him off while you're at it here!

No, not here, because the law is so clear. Legislative intent is not ambiguous in any way. Congress could have given data services their own Title. Congress discussed it, and strongly decided not to. It could have given data services their own Title. It didn't.

When an agency's authority is so clear cut and strictly delineated, there is no ambiguity. By trying to do Title II-lite the Courts said no. Twice. If you want an FCC doing Title II things, you need a new law.

"The current band of tyrants right now is in Congress. Both parties, scheming and back-stabbing for power."

Wow? Is this new? I thought it was called politics. I suggest some Shakespeare.

0
2
Dr Stephen Jones

Re: WOW! Why dont you just stroke him off while you're at it here!

You are technically 100% correct - as I have just explained to St.Trevor of Potts.

It is interesting and alarming that your post was voted down 0-6.

0
5
Dr Stephen Jones

Explaining law to Potts

"How come it's 'government overreach'?"

Duh. Because of the separation of powers in the US constitution, and the checks and balances built into the system that stop a Government agency exceeding its legal authority.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/02/09/how-net-neutrality-became-a-separation-of-powers-story/

Congress makes the laws, and if it wanted an agency to regulate data services, it would have written those powers into the law. As it is the Telcomms Act specifically excludes data services from Title II regulation.

Feeling virtuous and morally superior isn't a sufficient justification to rip up the separation of powers because you feel like it, or because you think the "many" are oppressed by the "few" (nice rhetorical turn there Trevor) which you seem to do on every political issue.

The Constitution is there to protect the people from people like you, basically.

"A government should work to prevent the concentration of power"

Maybe it should, but it does so by passing laws, and administering the laws that have been passed. Are all Canadians this thick?

0
5
Dr Stephen Jones

Potts Law

"I am sorry if sticking up for "the people" instead of "those who already have nearly unchallengeable power over tens or even hundreds of millions of individuals" bothers you. Actually, I'm not sorry. If that bothers you, you're probably a horrible, horrible person, and I'm actually pretty glad that I irritate you."

Potts Law states that:

Every net neutrality discussion at El Reg turns into an excuse for Trevor Potts to explain how he is a good person, on the side of the people, and everyone who disagrees with him is evil.

All Hail St Trevor - the saintliest man in the world.

0
4

Hurry up and just SLAP GOOGLE, MEPs fume at EU commish

Dr Stephen Jones

Most of the Left was once anti-EU for jolly good reasons. The EU favoured big business, and rewarded the corrupt.

One by one they got bought off. Roy Jenkins, Peter Mandelson and the Kinnock Family were very well rewarded. Today, even wanting to reform the EU is stigmatised, and the reformers our Out-ers keep quiet.

Peter Jay is Labour through-and-through, you will not read a better short summary of the EU than his foreword to Peter Oborne's Guilty Men pamphlet.

http://www.cps.org.uk/publications/reports/q/id-8/

2
1

EU: Competition Commissioner met Google chief Schmidt

Dr Stephen Jones

Re: Relax

@ratfox

"Almunia tried to solve this the Google way"

There, I fixed it for you.

0
1

Mummy, what's the point of Evgeny Morozov's tedious columns?

Dr Stephen Jones

Re: Evgeny Who?

I doubt that El Reg is paying him based on page views. Perhaps Worstall has some other motivation. For example, perhaps Morozov's contention is completely wrong, and Worstall wants to refute it?

Just a thought.

7
6

Australian ISPs agree to three-strikes-plus-court-order anti-piracy plan

Dr Stephen Jones

Re: But...

"How do I avoid being held responsible for the actions of other adults"

You have no authority in your own household. And somehow this is someone else's fault?

Wow.

If your children have been brought up not to tell right from wrong, then it sounds like you deserve everything that's coming to you in life.

0
2
Dr Stephen Jones

Re: Blimey!

"Top plan. So we'll have bankers, lawyers, politicians and media company excecutives out sweeping the streets pretty much all the time then? No?"

Sounds fine to me, although you are very soft on bankers. The punishment should fit the crime.

Piracy is largely conducted by the middle class and destroys working class jobs.

0
2
Dr Stephen Jones

Re: Blimey!

"When did Australia become a fascist state? So it's not just the UK whose politicians are a bunch of limp-wristed, greedy arseholes."

I dunno. You could try not stealing stuff? And paying for what you use?

With copyright infringement, the punishment should fit the crime. The economic damage is quite small in the individual action, but large in the aggregate. It is reasonable when most people pay to take some kind of action against repeat offenders.

Maybe a points system plus community service for people who ignore warnings and keep on stealing.

2
17

Google gets my data, I get search and email and that. Help help, I'm being REPRESSED!

Dr Stephen Jones

@Andrew Orlowski

What's your inside leg measurement?

0
0

Net neutrality: Someone WILL sue. So will the FCC's rules hold up?

Dr Stephen Jones

"You could make the case that in 2015 and with the internet having changed the telecoms environment so dramatically in the past 20 years that such a legislative effort would be timely. "

And you could equally make the case that by explicitly treating the internet differently in 1996 - regulating it as an information service, and not as a 1930s Bell telephone company - Congress changed the telecoms environment for the better.

The problem is lack of competition for lazy incumbents like Comcast. It isn't established that 1930s price regulation is the answer. Unless you're an activist who thinks all regulation is good.

3
7

FORCE Apple to support BlackBerry hardware, demands John Chen

Dr Stephen Jones

Re: I think this is the wrong sort of burden

"Packets are inherently have equal priority"

Arts Graduate Alert!

No they don't. Netflix and VoIP wouldn't work if they did. Like most people commeting on Net Neutrality you don't know how the interwebs work.

2
1

EU copyright law: Is the Pirate Party's MEP in FAVOUR of it?

Dr Stephen Jones

Re: No surprise - Pirates want free stuff.

"I want ... I want ... I want". Sort of proving my point, for me.

Justifying criminal hacking and theft because you couldn't wait for a shitty fratboy movie doesn't really help your cause. More hugs needed.

4
39
Dr Stephen Jones
FAIL

No surprise - Pirates want free stuff.

And kick and scream like spoiled brats when they can't get it.

Maybe they didn't get enough hugs when they were children?

3
47

EU net neutrality: Don’t worry, we’re now safely in the hands of … Latvia

Dr Stephen Jones

So Eurocrats want to control the internet

Because there isn't a thing they want don't want to control. Net neutrality sounds lovely but it's a gift on a plate to these corrupt idiots.

2
5

Arrr: The only Pirate in European Parliament to weigh in on copyright

Dr Stephen Jones
FAIL

@Fluffy Bunny

1998 called. It wants its argument back.

0
4

BT to gobble EE for £12.5bn – BTEE phone home

Dr Stephen Jones

@annihilator

"Remember when we owned that company?"

Yes I do. It took six months to install a line and you had a choice of two phones.

BT's pension liability is a black hole today. I am very glad that this is not my problem as a taxpayer.

9
5

El Reg Redesign - leave your comment here.

Dr Stephen Jones

Re: El Reg Redesign - leave your comment here.

I usually enjoy Lewis and Andrew's stories even when I disagree with them.

Can we also have a filter so I don't need to read whiney easily-offended commentards like Mahatma Coat?

3
1

Yes, Obama has got some things wrong on the internet. But so has the GOP

Dr Stephen Jones
FAIL

Definition of a "useful idiot"

"You will find few folks, except those with intellectual property interests, to disagree with this sentiment."

People with "intellectual property interests" include:

a) anyone posting a photo to Flickr

b) anyone posting a photo to Instagram

c) songwriters and musicians

d) any inventor

... to name a few. Which actually leaves only a few "folks" left. People who don't use the internet.

The genius of the corporate tycoons is persuading people they will be happier and more free once they have surrendering their economic power to the tycoons.

2
0

'I don't NEED to pay' to watch football, thunders EU digi-czar

Dr Stephen Jones

Good point. But somebody has to make it available in Estonia first.

No, wait. They do:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TV_4_%28Estonia%29

Looks like another Euro moron needs educating.

0
8
Dr Stephen Jones
Joke

Re: Good luck on that one.

You forgot the free beer.

It's bloody outrageous I can't get beer for free either. Who let THAT happen?

7
11

Net neutrality: EU's three-headed beast now at war with itself

Dr Stephen Jones
FAIL

Don't stop there A/C

They should also buy everyone free beer. And lashings of ginger beer, too.

The only "cost" is the so-called "profits" of drinks companies, so what?

4
4

Ex-EU digi supremo Steelie Neelie's net neutrality bid in tatters?

Dr Stephen Jones
Facepalm

Was never going to happen

http://www.laquadrature.net/en/faq-0

"We believe that it is impossible to effectively control the flow of information in the digital age by the law and the technology without harming public freedoms, and damaging economic and social development. This is what we call squaring the net."

"For the record, according to the online encyclopedia Wikipedia, squaring the circle is a classic problem of mathematics appearing in geometry. It is one of three major problems of the ancient world, with the trisection of the angle and the duplication of the cube."

"In the oldest mathematical text found, Rhind papyrus (~ 1650 BC.), The scribe Queen Ahmose already proposed approximate solution of the problem. However, we had to wait until 1882 for the German mathematician Ferdinand von Lindemann to show the transcendence of π, proving the impossibility of solving the problem of squaring the circle: it is impossible to construct, using only a ruler and compass, a square whose surface is exactly equal to the surface of a disk."

Yep, they look sane and sensible to me.

The nurse will see you now.

0
0

New Euro digi tsar 'H-dot' Oettinger to host sort-of-live Twitter chat

Dr Stephen Jones

Re: It gets better...

It employs more people that way.

0
0

European Commission decides it won't have a science advisor after Greenpeace pressure

Dr Stephen Jones

Post-modern science: choose the bits you like

Greens wanted a "Chief Scientist" who said the RIGHT things about climate change, but not the WRONG things about GM crops.

There's only once solution to this crisis in policy-based evidence making: appoint Steve Bong!

18
1

Why Comrade Cameron went all Russell Brand on the UK’s mobile networks

Dr Stephen Jones
FAIL

Fantastic idea, Dominion. Nurses and teachers will be well chuffed that their pay gets cut to pay for infrastructure costing billions a year.

You can always tell when the Guardian readers turn up - they're the ones who need to take their shoes and socks off to count past 10.

4
20

Weekend reads: Russell Brand's Revolution and Joy Division's Ian Curtis gets lyrical

Dr Stephen Jones

Johann Hari?

0
0

Meet Mr Gamification: He's got a NUDGE or two for you

Dr Stephen Jones

A "Gamification" PhD?

I feel I missed out.

Being able to speak fluent bullshit and agree to authoritarian social policies means you will never go hungry. The stupid, it hurts.

2
1

Economics prof denies digital pirates plundered €20bn from EU coffers

Dr Stephen Jones

Freetardonomics

Steal what you want, nobody is harmed.

3
24

CONSUMERISM IS PAST ITS SELL-BY DATE: Die now, pay later

Dr Stephen Jones

LSD-onomics

"For a government in a fix, tax revenue could be increased by encouraging consumers to borrow,..."

How exactly? Where would it be levied? If overall tax revenue were to increase, it would need to exceed the tax revenue lost from decreasing VAT, fuel duty, stamp duty etc as people buy fewer thigns, and the lower corporation tax as lots of companies (except banks) as businesses collapse. Presumably this would come from taxing savings. Well, this year VAT is £101bn, corporation tax £40bn, fuel duty £26bn. There isn't enough money to save to generate the interest to generate the tax to fill this shortfall.

"...so it should come as no surprise that previous, and sensible, restrictions on borrowing were relaxed."

Non-sequitur.

"The symmetry that requires the debt-ridden government to create consumers goes beyond evolving from the static to the dynamic at both ends of the process..."

More suicide-by-metaphor.

"...It follows that in order to be a better consumer it is necessary to borrow, so the banks also win at both ends of the system."

It doesn't follow at all, credit was relaxed so people spent more. We all know that..

"... necessary to borrow, so the banks also win at both ends of the system."

So the banks should have won. But these are the same banks that "won" by going bust, and are still indebted after central banks printed $1 trillion of money to wipe out their debts.

"Whoever coined the term Homo sapiens was way off the mark."

You said, it Mr Watkinson.

1
6
Dr Stephen Jones

Re: I for one look forward to this

@TimWorstall

Correct. This is a category error so fundamentally if a 16 year old used it a GSCE paper they would fail the exam.

I suspect LSD has had a large influence on the author's thinking.

4
1
Dr Stephen Jones

Satire?

" Secondly, in the long term, indefinite economic growth is not possible as it violates the Laws of Thermodynamics"

John Watkinson, you are Steve Bong and I claim my £5.

Or maybe this is Bong's weird uncle?

4
0

Want to see the back of fossil fuels? Calm down, hippies. CAPITALISM has an answer

Dr Stephen Jones

Re: Oil subsidies...

Oil and gas are enormous net fiscal contributors, they are not in any sense "subsidised". We put duty on the fuel, and tax their profits. If you removed fossil fuels overnight, taxes would have to go up, or drastic cuts would need to be made, or some combination of the two.

The real subsidies and crippling drain on the taxpayer arise from inefficient and uneconomic energy technology. Those wind installation literally would not be there without the subsidies. The oil rigs and gas plants would be.

8
0

Scrapping the Human Rights Act: What about privacy and freedom of expression?

Dr Stephen Jones

The ECHR predates the EU, it is not part of the EU, and so leaving the ECHR does not require leaving the EU.

Are all your observations on current affairs this good?

2
7

Euro chiefs: Hi Google. Here's how to REALLY protect everyone's privacy. Hello? Hello?

Dr Stephen Jones

Unfortunately, the world is full of useful idiots.

Pharmaceutical companies already have data by the boat load. What you will soon get is just-in-time insurance price hikes.

4
1

Comcast: Help, help, FCC. Netflix and pals are EXTORTIONISTS

Dr Stephen Jones

Re: Comcraps and Crime Warmer should BOTH be broken up

"Where is Google when you need them?"

Helping the NSA.

0
1

Bubble 2.0? Moneybags VC Andreessen warns profit-free startups: 'You will be VAPORIZED'

Dr Stephen Jones

"Now, when he talks, people listen."

You mean, people have stopped laughing at this?

http://ianmurdock.com/cloud/windows-as-a-poorly-debugged-set-of-device-drivers/

0
0

Big Content Australia just blew a big hole in its credibility

Dr Stephen Jones

Re: Pffft

"A film with an August cinema release doesn't appear on Blu-ray/DVD until Christmas. How many people with a desire to buy and cash on the hip will wait that long?"

Pathetic.

0
0

British boffin tells Obama's science advisor: You're wrong on climate change

Dr Stephen Jones

"if correct"

What do you expect? The prediction was made by Nick Stern, one of the biggest snouts in the climate change trough.

The same Lord Stern who got his numbers wrong, double counted the costs and didn't count the benefits.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/09/04/beyond_stern_climate_morality/

16
5

Kim Dotcom: You give me proof of govt corruption in my case, I give you MEELLIONS

Dr Stephen Jones

Re: UKIP ranter I expect

@Mad Mad Mad Mike:

I have just explained to you that tax evasion and tax avoidance are different. I'm sorry you still can't acknowledge that you confused the two, but at least now you may be a little wiser.

"The music and film industry have beyond any reasonable doubt broken many laws, including computer misuse (see Sony above), cartel operations etc.etc. I'm not saying Dotcom is any better, but he certainly isn't any worse."

Yep. Mad Mike's jaw is still moving. It must keep moving. It has to keep moving...

Mike, you're drawing a moral equivalence between industries that pay their labour, and pay their taxes, and Kim Dotcom, who doesn't pay the labour and doesn't pay the taxes.

You've just had the ethical emptiness of your argument handed to you on a plate, but you still think repeating the same argument you started with is going to work. Wow. Admit it, you're in new territory here aren't you?

0
5
Dr Stephen Jones

Re: Both Sides Wrong

"So, who is the crook.....both. Who is the bigger crook....the studios."

You so badly need that to be true, to find moral equivalence between the two, it hurts.

0
7
Dr Stephen Jones

Re: UKIP ranter I expect

"insulting is generally a sign of having no argument"

This is true, I have been very unfair.

1. Most 13-year-olds are capable of distinguishing between something that they can do, and something that is morally justifoable. Just because something is easy to do, that does not compel somebody to do, nor does it make that act ethically defensible.

For example: "It is easy for me to steal from Granny's purse. Because I can, I will, and it is OK". Most 13-year olds know this is not morally defensible. Similarly they will not justify theft because something they want is "too expensive".

So I apologise unreservedly to any 13-year old for comparing them to copyright activists.

2. Most UKIP supporters appear to have spouses, girlfriends and families, and have achieved some measure of career success. It is very unfair to imply they are socially maladjusted nerds who haven't got a girlfriend.

So I apologise unreservedly to any UKIP supporters for comparing them to copyright activists.

0
11

Page:

Forums