@MikeyD85 - Re: Sweet...
> When piracy is easier than getting free content legitimately, you know there's a problem somewhere!
5514 posts • joined 19 Jan 2007
> The starwars program even today is largely a pipe dream but sometimes you don't actually have to deliver an effective weapon system to bankrupt your enemy and win
A system that Reagan was convinced to fund by a couple of Sci-Fi writers (Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle) and who probably also (when that turned out to be a total White Elephant) then came up with the ret-con argument that it was all a cunning ploy to con the Russians into trying to match it...
"... Lewis Page is in some way unbiased and objective about all this - is quite plainly rubbish"!
> That's what we want.
And of course TW wants us to believe that we can't get that *without* more globalisation (shipping raw materials all around the world to the cheapest place to make goods, then shipping those goods back around the world to people who can afford to buy them, thus increasing their carbon footprint) and capitalism (going for the cheapest way of manufacturing goods, without worrying about the environmental consequences of that cf my previous in brackets)...
What on earth are some people thinking? That if they vote for the Greens, suddenly all the nuclear power stations will be turned off? Builders will be told to stop construction on housing projects and start building yurts? Farmers will be forced to grow tofu?
FFS, people, they aren't going to be forming a bloody goverment, but at least we'll get some people in power who think that the Government snooping and spying on everything we do and everywhere we go and everything we look at and everyone we talk to.
Sure, not all their ideas are great, but would you prefer another five years of the Tories or the Red Tories or the even more Right Wing Purple Tories or the Yellow idiots who got shafted by the Tories?
Or, as I've said before, don't vote for a colour or a face, try going to http://voteforpolicies.org.uk/ and seeing who actually has policies which you agree with. You might be surprised...
... called Mondas?
(Terminator, because there's no Cyberman icon!)
"Punishment [n] the infliction or imposition of a penalty as retribution for an offence"
How about changing the parameters of the experiment so that, instead of just saying "If person 2 rejects the split neither of you get anything", you say "If person 2 rejects the split, neither of you gets anything and you *BOTH* have the amount of money you would have got taken away from you"?
That *would* be a punishment and, I think, would rather change the results since the split would probably be much closer to 50/50 (If person 2 says "give me more or I reject it", person 1 says "fine, you'll be losing more than me...")
Yep, Names Con says it all.
Is watching with interest.
(And probably hoping they can use this to retro-actively justify what they may be doing already...)
That says "FUCK OFF AND STOP TRACKING ME!"
Instead of voting for a face or a coloured ribbon, try looking at the policies you support and the ones you disagree with to decide how to vote: http://voteforpolicies.org.uk/
War dialling via an acoustically coupled modem (look it up, kids!) and then using research to find a back-door password.
Ok, the rest of the computing was pretty much BS and it was over 30 years ago 1983, but WTH!
> you saw it ten years (and more) after it was released?
Yes, I wasn't much into sci-fi when I was 4.
And, IIRC, at the time I hadn't seen Star Trek: The Slow Motion Picture, nor had I seen Alien (although I did see that a couple of years later at the school film club, even though I was only 16!) but I'd read a lot of classic sci-fi by Heinlein, Asimov, Niven and, yes, Clarke, but not the book of 2001, which I only read after I'd seen the film.
> you don't have to share my opinion, but you don't have to be rude about it either.
Excuse me, Mr Pott, I have a Mr Kettle-Black on the phone...
> I get the distinct impression you are coming to the debate over "2001 ending: Brilliant or Crap?" debate from the benefit [...]
Well you'd be wrong.
I first saw 2001 on the big screen when I was 14 in 1979 and whilst I may not have noted all the subtleties that I later learned about, I understood it.
Just because you didn't doesn't mean I have to share your opinion.
> it wasn't properly explained until the movie 2010
"No 9000 computer has ever made a mistake or distorted information" - HAL
"[...] there is something about this mission that we weren't told. Something the rest of the crew know and that you know. We would like to know if that is true." - Frank Poole
"Good day, gentlemen. This is a pre-recorded briefing made prior to your departure and which, for security reasons of the highest importance, has been known on board during the mission only by your H-A-L 9000 computer." - Recording in 2001
"I have come to the conclusion that for so many years films were made for the 12 year old mind that, at last, alas, our critics have emerged with 12 year old minds. " - The Lost Worlds of 2001 - Arthur C Clarke.
... Hoopy Frood!
So you'd prefert to take the state snooping into everything you do and everything you read and everything you write and everything you look at?
The difference between the Green's policies on this and seemingly everyone else's is that at least they would allow *us* to have some say in what is being done in our name, rather than the Big Brother Nanny State saying "this is for your own good, now stop worrying your pretty little heads about it, we know best."
> So banning nuclear power is fine with you.
So using Straw Man arguments is fine with you?
> We don't know what they'd do but - and this is important - neither do they.
ORLY? A quick google of Green Party Policy on Surveillance comes up with:
"The Green Party of England and Wales believes that illegal mass surveillance must be opposed. The Green Party will campaign against such surveillance and will act to protect whistle blowers such as Snowden who oppose illegal intrusion by the state."
I think perhaps you're thinking of UKIP where their policies are vague and ill-defined soundbites which generally depend on what Nigel F thinks will sound good in the media that particular day (unless he's changed his mind again in the last five minutes).
... this suddenly appears right at the top of the "organic" search results...
Oh, but Call me David is quite supportive of Freedom of Thought...
... Provided you're only thinking things that he approves of, that is.
No Thought Crime, No Crime Think? Double-plus good, proles!
Damn, how could we not have all realised that and objected before they did it?
Oh, hang on, we did, but they went ahead with it anyway because they don't give a shit what anyone else thinks.
Ah yes, I remembered the co-ordinates were (-2, -2) but I couldn't remember the name :-)
There was also a system in Amiga Frontier Elite where Gemstones were illegal and people would *pay* you to take them off your hands!
All you needed to do was buy a Viper and install a Class III Military Hyperdrive and you could stock up on Gems, Hyperspace to a system which would pay top dollar for them, rinse and repeat until you were stinkingly rich and could afford any ship or equipment you wanted.
Right on, Commander!
"... in connection with the Syria conflict had received advice on how to access extremist training and weaponry in Syria through online contact with other extremists based overseas."
Wow, you mean they didn't write letters and send them through the post...???
And then wait a *very* long time for all the updates and reboots to install over very narrow bandwidth...
The Gambler's Fallacy is that dice/ roulette wheels/ coin flips whatever have "memory", ie that if you get a run of Heads the next flip is more likely to be Tails.
Of course (unless you're using loaded dice or double-headed coins etc) this is nonsense since each event is not linked to the previous one, but people still believe it.
And let people know exactly what they're buying if they're going to use the stuff.
It looks like sanity is slowly breaking out.
Ford Prefect: ”Golgafrincham Ark Fleet. Ship B. Hold Seven: Telephone Sanitizer, Second Class.” And a serial number!"
Arthur Dent: ”Telephone Sanitizer”? A dead telephone sanitizer?"
Ford Prefect: "Best kind."
And, once again, TW cherry takes one small piece of the argument which he can pick nits from and uses that to try to imply that he's refuted the main argument instead of just ignoring it...
... the whole point of this article is for TW to be able to go "Nar nar ne-nar, nar! Told you so!!!"?
Possibly followed with an implication that, because *this* example has worked so well, we shouldn't to *anything* to try to alleviate poverty since the Free Market will do that so well for itself.
Of course there's the small matter that that article was from 2007.
Here's a quote from one written in 2012 Problems plaguing Kerala's once-thriving fishing industry:
* * * * *
"The state's fish production has fallen by 40,000 tonnes over the past nine years, though the volume of fish caught by mechanised trawlers has doubled to more than 2 lakh tonnes in 20 years, data from the state's Directorate of Fisheries shows. Traditional fishing fell nearly 60% during the period.
"The state has imposed a ban on trawling during the monsoon, but it seldom takes action on illegal trawlers,'' says Peter. "Often, we are out in the deep sea for days on single-engine-driven boats,'' says Arumugam, a fisherman. He says Kerala fishermen sometimes go as far as the Gujarat coast, and even towards the Gulf, looking for a good catch.
Kurup notes, "There has been an 80% decline in cat fish and black fish alone.'' He notes that bottom trawlers throw non-commercial fish and planktons back into the sea. "The seabed over the years will be filled with this garbage," he warns. The tropical Arabian coast is still home to at least 200 species of fish compared with Pacific and Atlantic coasts which have far less diversity.
"We need to device our own marine management systems and support the livelihood of traditional fishermen in the country,'' says Deepak Apte, deputy director of Bombay Natural History Society. Until then, for people like Johnson, casting the net is a game of dice.
* * * * *
In other words the Free Market has also created conditions whereby those fishermen who had benefitted from what TW describes, now find themselves unable to make a living because big, commercial operators have moved in, over-fished the area and screwed up the eco-system.
Again, I ask: Cui bono?
The US should *demonstrate* that their requests are "proportionate and necessary" not simply say "We say they are so Ner! And if you don't like it, we'll pick up our marbles and go home... so double Ner!"
> I've said absolutely nothing at all about any "trickle down" effect. That being where Steve-o goes and buys a new yacht with his billions and thus provides a living to a few carpenters.
Exactly! Meanwhile his products are being made by the cheapest labour possible, being sold by people who don't get paid much more and the profits go into his bank account and to those who are rich enough to be able to put spare money into shares to get dividends.
In the mean time we get the latest shiny-shiny which will rapidly become obsolete or break down and probably has no servicable parts in it (maybe not even a replaceable battery!) so we're induced (if not forced) to "upgrade" to "benefit" and so it goes on.
Translation: Let me cherry-pick one argument that I can nit-pick and use that to "disprove" her entire case.
Interestingly, TW doesn't mention this bit:
"Some economists argue that the reward for the state comes through taxation. This, in theory, is right. Innovation-led growth should lead to an increase in tax revenue – but not if the companies that benefit the most from innovations don’t pay much tax compared to the income they generate, not only as a result of loopholes but also because of their continual lobbying for tax incentives and tax cuts that they say they need to foster innovation. It’s not a coincidence that groups such as the National Venture Capital Association helped convince the US government to reduce capital gains tax by 50 per cent in only five years in the late 1970s – an “innovation policy” later copied by Tony Blair’s government. (A policy that even Warren Buffett has admitted has had no effect on investment but lots on inequality.)"
TW says "We're only making the observation that if we allow someone who has increased global growth rates so markedly to keep his pile of cash, then this will encourage the next person with an idea that might boost global growth rates to get on with it. This is not a moral nor justice "deserved rewards" style argument. It's a purely utilitarian one regarding incentives that induce people to try."
What he doesn't say is that, rather than the so-called "Trickle Down" effect that is supposed to make us all better off, what we actually get is a "Trickle Up" effect that concentrates more wealth into the hands of a minority, making it *more* difficult for others who want to try to actually get even one foot on the ladder because those at the top can manipulate the markets to undercut newcomers, not to mention leveraging their wealth into political influence.
"economics is is all about incentives and perhaps we might expect a professor of the subject to grok that"
And perhaps we can hope that TW will realise that there's a difference between the incentive to try and the incentive of those who have a monopolistic hold on the market (Google, Amazon etc) to ensure that nobody gets to successfully compete with them.
"Follow the lighted dots on the floor. Your code is red yellow yellow. Whenever you are assigned a path to follow it will be red yellow yellow, three dots side by side - go where those lights indicate."
- Enders Game
I was thinking the same thing.
How long before huge dicks start appearing on the walls of office buildings full of, well, huge dicks...?!
... which said *Batteries not included
A leading Data Protection MEP has to sign a document threatening him with jail just to find out what TTIP is about?
Something is *seriously* fucked up here!!!
And an innocent person would never freeze up under questioning, so they *must* be guilty...
If you're really that desperate to look at another bloke's wedding tackle, there's easier ways of doing it...
An article you've written that I can agree with, thank you!
But perhaps you could convince Nigel "I think we are going to have to move to an insurance-based system of healthcare" Farage of this...?
... off a short pier...
"My mind is going. I can feel it. I can feel it. I'm afraid."
- HAL - 2001 a Space Odyssey.
> No to mention the lighter fuel refills in small flexible bottle-shaped containers. Snip off the tip, light match and squeeze. Instant flamethrower!
Ah, we went one better: We'd get the Aerosol type refils which came with various adapters to fit different types of lighters. One of these was a cylinder which had a flange at the base and you could take a short (5 hole) piece of Meccano, put the centre hole over the adapter so it rested on the flange, then, with your fingers safely out of the way, use a lighter to turn it into a controllable flame thrower!
> Remember those balsa jobs where you had to assemble all the ribs and spars cover it in tissue paper and dope it.
Wow, that brings back memories of going into The Model Airport in Bristol and looking enviously at the massive 6' wingspan remote control gliders they had hanging up!
Alas I never got one of those, but I did have one (a KielKraft Conquest) which was a tow-line glider with a 30" wingspan. We had a golf course behind our house in Long Ashton which was virtually unused during the week, so in the holidays I'd take it up there and launch it down the fairways :-)
I'd say the next market for 3D printers will be the ones where you want short-run or low quantity plastic items which would be too expensive to get injection moulded.
An example would be small Board Games producers who want custom pieces for their games (rather than just coloured wooden blocks/ discs etc) but may only be producing a couple of thousand units.
As always, this may start off as a solution in search of a problem, but almost inevitably people find uses that you would never have thought of.
... you automatically and irrevocably consent to have your personal information sold to the highest bidder so it's far to late to start making a fuss about it now!
> 51% indicated that they would vote to leave the EU.
So well within the +/- 3% margin that such polls tend to have that the figures are actually the other way around.
Matt, as enjoyable as it is, eventually playing Chase the Goalposts with you, after repeated attempts to make you comprehend the difference between Matt Bryant's universe and the Real World, frankly gets rather tedious.
Please feel free, as always, to declare victory.