All that resolution....
... won't make a crap programme any better!
6874 posts • joined 19 Jan 2007
... won't make a crap programme any better!
"the nature of the connections was not described in the document."
Hmm: "Are you, or have you ever been connected to Al Qaeda, Hezbollah, Hamas, or have you ever watched a documentary about them on TV...?"
... really? Did I miss something? Exactly when was the following achieved?:
* involve mobile phone operators installing adult content filters on phones which will be switched on as the default unless the customer proves he or she is at least 18 years of age; and
* involve major internet service providers providing home network filters for all new home broadband services, which will be switched on as the default unless the customer specifies otherwise.
Unless by "achieved" they actually mean "comprehensively demonstrated to be utterly impossible to introduce or enforce"...
... is National "Overspend on Government IT Projects" day!
"one can't help but HOPE that Duncan Smith will be the latest and most high-profile victim of the Universal Credit catastrophe."
Reading books *while* crossing the road?! ;-)
Just as long as it's not an Illudium Pu-38 Explosive Space Modulator.
We don't need any Earth-shattering Kabooms!
... I thought that was Europa?
What Ofcom seem to be missing is that if you're streaming your content from one your Broadband Provider's "approved suppliers" (ie themselves or one they get a kick-back from) then your traffic is prioritised over someone who is streaming from a non-approved supplier.
This is the equivalent of having a "Ford Cars Only" lane on the motorway because Ford have struck a deal with the DfT to charge their customers a fee to use that lane and pay the DfT a percentage. Other cars aren't allowed to use that lane because their manufacturers aren't paying the Government for the privilege.
If they're so clever to "split the opposition" they should have included Kiddie Fiddlers and Terrorists because we "soft liberals" are so dumb that we can't see this tactic for what it is.
"if they are monitoring a know person surely this helps them to identify links to their criminal associates so they can be investigated too"
And if that person happens to call your number by mistake and you get identified as a "criminal associate" because of a False Positive, how are you going to prove your innocence (because you sure as hell won't be presumed innocent any more)?
Lots of things can be used for "a huge amount of good" like National DNA databases, ID Cards, country-wide ANPR systems, the fact that they also pi$$ all over fundamental liberties is just an unfortunate side-effect...
I wonder what would happen if somone's engaged in a bit of "one handed browsing"?!
Hmm, that operation has legs...
"It's Communism, so in any practical implementation you've got a self-perpetuating State which acts soley in the best interest of whoever they feel like, normally themselves."
Isn't it great that we, in the West, live in a free society so we don't have the same problems with a small elite running the country to suit themselves and the vested interests of their mates and financial backers...
So lots of money for ICANN for the application process, now they can look forward to even more money as businesses have to defensively register their domains with another load of suffixes!
Trebles all round!
Now we don't have to be corrupted by the eeeevilll porn and we can just enjoy the intelligent dialogue, magnificent acting and wonderful music without all the disgusting sex spoiling the fun!
(Icon because Cameron's ideas are a complete joke)
... I picked up a copy of The Space Merchants in a charity shop and, whilst reading it, I had to flick back to the front to check what date it was actually written because it seemed so appropriate for today!
A sad loss :-(
Miniature In-flight Navigator Gadget Eliminator
@YAC - I was just thinking that that building would make a great Secret Lair from where I could RULE THE WORLD!!!!!
(Mines the white canvas one with the long sleeves and extra straps...)
Aha! No, it wasn't Heinlein's Waldo, but you just jogged a memory because the story does refer to the device as a "waldo".
It was "More than the Sum of His Parts" by Joe Haldeman from his short-story collection "Dealing in Futures".
Thanks for your help!
I was going to cite a sci-fi story as Prior Art, but I can't remember the name of it (or even who wrote it, but it might have been Philip K Dick or Roger Zelazny) and I've not found it by searching :-(
IIRC it concerns someone who has lost an arm and had a cybernetic replacement, however suffers what would later be described in the Cyberpunk RPG as "Humanity Loss". He tries to get the surgeons to replace the rest of his body but they refuse, so he locks himself in a room with a computerised surgical device intending to carry out the procedure on himself.
The scientists stop him by hooking a lab tech up to a device which remotely controls the arm to punch himself on the chin (decapitating him!) and the arm is then connected to a Doctor who ends by saying something like "What miracles I shall perform..."
So can anyone remind me what the story is and who wrote it?
Boffin is certainly not demeaning, it's a term of respect and endearment for those clever "Back-room Boys" who come up with wonderful inventions like Radar, the Bouncing Bomb and other such things which are of use to those who actually need them.
People like Barnes Wallis or even Q from the Bond Films are archetypal Boffins and they would be honoured to be described as such!
... a huge abandoned city of cubes and cones, though?
You mean the mail service that, by using, you automatically give Google permission to read all your mails?!
... the first adopters of this will be those ladies who charge you several pounds a minute for a video chat.
... erm, at least that's what I've heard...
The reason there are those gangs "making a fortune out of smuggling cigarettes and alcohol" is because successive British governments have been stupidly greedy and keep putting up the tax on these products (IIRC something like 75% of the price of a pack of cigarettes is tax) to avoid having to put up other taxes.
You forgot to say the magic word...
I blame the Sirens...
.... it's not Howard Wolowitz with his "Hey, baby. How would you like to drive a car on Mars?" line...?
"In my experience that message is more likely to be in the Child ->Adult direction, in a suitably exasperated 8-year-old voice."
That reminds me of the picture I saw of a small child on the telephone (with one hand doing a face-palm) and the caption "No, grandma, double-click on the Internet Explorer icon..."
... "Excuse me, I'd like to escalate my complaint..."
... Oh ████!
A market I sell at used to be in a basement venue, the toilets of which emptied into a large tank that then pumped the effluent into the sewers. Unfortunately the day before the market the piping broke and the venue ended up ankle deep in....
They brought in a specialist cleaning company and by the next day you wouldn't even have known there was a problem except for the fact that the concrete floors were the cleanest they'd ever been!
... it can't buy you sense either!
Unfortunately, unlike BDSM, you don't get the chance to say "No" and have your choice respected.
There again, the EDL also seem to be of the mindset that "You're free to say or do anything you want, provided we agree with it..."http://www.theregister.co.uk/Design/graphics/icons/comment/unhappy_32.png
"They are not welcome online, that's all."
Unlike all those nasty pornographic sites that the Government wants to block by default...?
I don't doubt he would. It seems this was as much about intimidation as a fishing expedition.
That sounds like a challenge...
" it's easy to say "No concerns!" when you're not the one living there."
Meanwhile, thousands of people keep dying in road accidents or from lung cancer due to smoking or liver failure due to alcohol or...
... but they don't make for headlines which boost viewing/ reading figures.
That's exactly what I was thinking.
What is the difference between Jupiter and a Brown Dwarf? It's only the size of the original cloud of matter which would restrict the formation of a sun.
"what would you expect them to do if they DO strongly disagree with the sentence? Gather in a public place and wave placards in the air?"
Don't you know? This is what so many of them want to have guns for, to "protect" themselves from a government that can't be trusted!
(I'm not quite sure *when* they plan on starting the second American Civil War, but I'm sure it will be soon...)
"If I'm able to have the car drop me off, and then send it away to a car park, or back home; and summon it back to me when I want to go home myself, then I will definitely buy one."
Which still means that for a huge amount of time, the car will not be doing anything apart from taking up space.
The sensible and efficient model would be a self-driving taxi that you hire to get you to where you want to go and then which can go and be used by someone else meaning less vehicles on the roads, less traffic and less congestion, not to mention less fuel being burned.
"Hard to believe pornographers would be so sleazy."
It's not pornographers, it's lawyers, the people who will not only screw you, but then sue you for allowing yourself to be screwed!
"Then it seems that we need to change the laws and procedures"
Which will do damn all good because the Government will simply retro-actively change any bloody laws they like to make sure they're not in the wrong!
... it was convenient and let them do pretty much whatever the hell they liked without having to worry about allowing him legal representation or any other semblence of proper process...
I bet you would have said the same to Wilbur and Orville...
"As a college graduate with a blank resume"... your chances of actually *getting* that job are about the same as the proverbial snowball in hell.
A very interesting (if depressing) read.
Another example might be the way that, now that EA Games has taken over the Gamehouse Scrabble Game on Facebook, you no longer get the "Number of tiles left in the bag" feature for free, so if you're getting to the end of the game you can't (easily) figure out what tiles your opponent may have, instead you have to pay "just" £9.99 to buy the feature.
(Although there's already an add on for Chrome written by game fans which does this for free!)
Oh, well *that's* ok then.
It's not as if they were doing it deliberately...