Re: No doubt everyone will being going outside to have a look.
... And make sure you've got rid of any large, walking plants...!
6046 posts • joined 19 Jan 2007
... And make sure you've got rid of any large, walking plants...!
... but where's he going to find room to put the full orchestra?
"You think they're pushing to put these into mass production but didn't do any testing apart from on quiet dual carriageways?"
No, but some American roads are vastly different from some British roads
.How do you think one of these would cope with a "Single Track Road with Passing Places"?
What about those "Unsuitable for HGVs" roads that idiots still drive lorries down because that's where their Sat Nav said to go?
Can the computers read "Road Closed, Diversion" signs?
If the navigation data is wrong, will the computers be able to cope with the changes?
Don't get me wrong, I do like the idea of these vehicles and I think they're excellent for urban/ motorway driving etc, however there's still a lot that needs to be taken into consideration before they're ready for a world-wide roll out.
... oh, sorry, yes it is...
"the only image we have of it is from a long time ago in a galaxy far far away (etc)"
It's so tempting to photoshop some scrolling text across one of the distant galaxies...!
"Some could argue that they haven't really seen any intelligent life inside our solar system, either."
Grams - Monty Python : The Universe Song :-)
... but were unexpectedly swallowed by a small dog ;-)
... someone's in line for an igNobel award...
And Arnold Rimmer found that in a past life he was Alexander the Great's Chief Eunuch...
... you can use fuel and energy more efficiently *without* needing to put on a hair shirt and walk or cycle everywhere...
.... the Yanks *told* us to do it, so it *must* have been ok!!
..to change the combination on my luggage!
"...we know that you can hear us...
"...for companies simply to offer consumers a choice between opting-in or opting-out of information sharing in its totality"
Absolutely correct, the DEFAULT should be "Opt out", offer me that and *then* I'll consider what benefits might be offered by opting in to e-mails, data sharing etc on an item by item basis!
... I'm sure that lots of other actually exploitative ads still appear, but since they're nothing to do with sex, they're ok in the eyes of American politicians.
And of course the fact that many of the ads that are being banned are placed by women who can work independently *without* having to deal with pimps and thus are safer from exploitation etc is ignored...
It's known as the "Dead Cat Bounce" (ie it's said that even a dead cat will bounce if it falls far enough)
There's always someone willing to look at the long term investment prospects and consider a share like that worth a punt even if it takes several years to recover its value.
Arrr, well that be because I'd not seen those when I'd posted me comment, me bucko!
Is this merely a co-incidence or because today be International Talk Like a Pirate Day, me hearties?
If you'd try doing a bit more research and looking beyond the headlines you might find the answers you demand I present you (but do you *really* want to find them...?)
In any case, it's clear there's no point in carrying on trying to have a reasonable discussion with you on this, so feel free to declare victory and keep on enjoying your prejudices.
"Sadly the majority of muslims do behave like the person who killed the US diplomat"
Islam is estimated to have something over one and a half *BILLION* followers world wide, around a fifth of the world's population.
If the "majority" (defined as > 50%) of Muslims behaved the way you claim, I think we'd have noticed it a bit by now.
Oh dear, and so we see the usuall trollish comments about Mohammed and Islam from ignorant idiots who believe what they read in the Tabloid Media without bothering to open their eyes (or minds) to any other point of view.
Can you not get it through your heads that a few fanatics are *NOT* representative of the whole religion of Islam any more than the idiots who made this film are representative of Christianity?
I have a Muslim family living next to me and I've not had problems with them diving over the wall wearing a Semtex waist coat and yelling "Allahu Akbar!" it's usually just their kids saying "can we get our ball back"...
It's called Unobtainium :-)
Assembled here the volunteers
In the days when lands were few
Here the ship sailed out into the blue and sunny morn
The sweetest sight ever seen
And the night followed day
And the story tellers say
That the score brave souls inside
For many a lonely day
Sailed across the milky seas
Ne'er looked back never feared never cried
Don't you hear my call
Though you're many years away
Don't you hear me calling you
Write your letters in the sand
For the day I'll take your hand
In the land that our grand-children knew
... we used to live in a house with a big picture window facing west and at certain times of the year in the evening, birds would see the reflection of the sun in it and fly straight into it thinking they were going in the opposite direction.
I'm just wondering if the same sort of thing is happening in Canada.
Is that outside or inside?!
... but what is this "again" business you refer to...?
Sounds rather like a Camera Obscura which would project an image onto a surface.
They've been around for rather a long time...
"...we have evidence that blocking Pirate Bay had little effect on BitTorrent downloading"
And we've also found that the Pope is a Catholic...!
"enables you to offer reasonable terms to obtain a share of the proceeds in order to keep the matter out of court"
How many people can afford to take on the sort of companies who want to abuse copyright by saying "well we looked (not very hard) couldn't find who owned the image, so we went ahead and used it"?
Unless you can get someone to take the case on a "no win, no fee" basis, you'll end up paying your legal representatives more money than you could ever gain from licensing your Intellectual Property even if you did win.
Oh it makes it hard for document(ary?) makers, does it? Well Boo Hoo!
If they want to use something and they can't find any copyright data on it they should assume that it *IS* copyright, not least because anything that *has* been released into the Public Domain probably says so pretty bloody clearly!
@AC - " there are plenty websites on the Net which demonstrate that practically nobody checked a signature"
I always used to and, in fact, I *still* check the signature strip even now.
I notice that a lot of US citizens who buy with a card in person don't bother to sign the card and automatically hand over another form of ID (eg Driver's Licence) even when it says "Not valid unless signed"!
Welcome to "Chip and Spin"!
And, of course, if you're the victim of a fraudulent transaction, we're going to claim (illegally) that it was *your* fault, that *you* were careless with your PIN and *you* have to prove your innocence...
Good idea, you start - http://news.discovery.com/space/could-space-junk-leave-us-stranded-on-earth-110902.html
the "Spy in the Sky" mini-drones from Judge Dredd will soon be putting in an appearance...
"I'm trying to work out how that's possible"
With careful design ;-)
So it's a double-ended strap-on then...?
... (although I'll probably be downvoted into oblivion for this) that it's not really a "car", more a giant rollerskate with a jet engine bolted on top of it!
The fastest car actually driven through its wheels is the Spirit of Rett which achieved an average speed of 414.5mph at Bonneville Salt Flats on September 21st 2010.
"We are charged per bag os it's a cruder form of being charged per kilo but is much cheaper to implement."
I don't know whether my neighbours think we're charged by the bag or something, but frequently when I put my rubbish out at night I find a couple of bin bags stuck in front of my wall.
I don't give a damn at the moment because there's no charging for rubbish disposal, but if I end up paying for it I can see a game of "musical bin bags" in the future...
"...the maximum fine per track for willful copyright infringement established by Congress is $150,000"
And since she wasn't fined the maximum or anything near it, she should be a *happy* little pleb when she thinks about what they could have done to her!!
The fact that the punishment is totally disproportionate to the actual damage *caused* is, it seems, completely irrelevant.
I'm not sure if you're trying to be funny, but anyway...
Carcassonne is a tile and meeple (small figurines) placement game where you're trying to build walled cities (as the original city) and roads and then place your people to control them. There is a range of expansions, but you don't need any of these to play the basic game which is family friendly (it's from ages 8 upwards, but it's not a "kids game" by any means).
You can pick up a new copy for around £15 and it's well worth a look as a good "gateway game" to get people into the idea that there's more to gaming than "roll the dice and move a counter"!
See http://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/822/carcassonne for some more details.
Unfortunately if you say "Board Games" to most people they'll think of Monopoly, Cluedo and... well, that's pretty much it.
Try Carcassonne, The Settlers of Catan, Ticket to Ride, Alhambra or Stone Age to mention but a few and you'll find that family board games can actually be enjoyable instead of being tedious and/ or ending in an argument! :-)
The cookie law is another example of well meaning but completely ignorant Eurocrats trying to pass a law to control something which they don't really have a clue about and then the British Government trying to gold-plate it and tell everyone "this is what you must do because we have to show the rest of the EU how it's done!"
Meanwhile, of course, much of the rest of the EU is looking at it and thinking "Sod that for a game of soldiers, ignore it if you like", so we end up wasting money whilst they just get on with business as usual.
"little would be better than nothing"
Except that's often not the case because that's the argument used by politicians et al for the "Precautionary Principle", ie "well we don't *know* that this will do any good, but let's introduce this measure *anyway* just to be on the safe side".
The fact that said measure will probably infringe on the liberties and rights of many others never seems to concern them so much :-(
The point is that the "opt in" should be "please censor me".
The mods might object, but seek and ye shall find... :-)
" draw you a pair of boobs on the Moon"
Nah, someone decided to see if the Lunar Rover could do doughnuts...
But, but... don't you know that copying like this is THEFT! So something *must* be missing...!!!
(Sorry, I seem to have been chanelling the MAFIAA there for a moment)
So how does this ultimately differ from all those sofa shops and double glazing salesmen who offer you phony "discounts" (translation: just cutting their profit margins a bit) if you're wavering and they want to nail the sale??
... said to the other DNA strand:
"Stop copying me!"
... erm, on the other hand, no, forget that!!