"Do not take life too seriously. You will never get out of it alive." - Elbert Hubbard
5796 posts • joined 19 Jan 2007
"Do not take life too seriously. You will never get out of it alive." - Elbert Hubbard
Alas the on/off switch on my FX-81 died a long while ago, but I still have an FX-350 by my side here and an FX-570 in the other room which are kept working by dint of leaving the power switch "on" and just using the AC button to switch it on and letting the auto time-out to switch it off.
@bigwhite1975 just when they thought it was safe to go back in the water lol! #feedingfrenzy!
After it's been backed up, scanned, analyzed and linked into our records of everything else you've done...
You have now!
It seems the NSA has access to everyone's back end, so just bend over and brace yourself...
Great Maker, Vir, the Vorlons have improved their Planet Killer!
(Yes, the purple one, please and a glass of fine Brivari...)
... that children will not be blocked from researching Alan Turing because web pages that mention him will no longer contain "objectionable content"?
"You might waver in the middle and prefer both"
Or some people might make a firm decision that they prefer both...
... a nicely satirical viewpoint...
These filters will never be used improperly, will they...?
"mobile operator O2 has blocked a huge range of sites through its “Parental Controls” settings. If their parents have chosen this option, children using O2 phones will be unable to access almost all of the internet: police websites, the NHS, ChildLine, the NSPCC, the Samaritans, many schools and even the main government website, GOV.UK.[...] And sites like ChildLine and the Samaritans are there precisely to provide support to children in crisis who may have nowhere else to turn. [...] Children can have burgers marketed to them but they can’t get help if they’re being neglected or abused."
... the Institute of Contemporary Arts have to do with this...?
... you damn pesky kids...!
Sites like this one which give excellent advice to parents on how to teach children about the importance of consent and respect for others will also be blocked:
Bravo, Dave, sites that don't teach girls how not to be raped, but aim to teach boys *not* to rape will no doubt be censored by the Great Firewall of Britain because we're "thinking of the chidren"...!
... we have *always* been at war with Eastasia!
"abused by a socialist/dictator president"?
Because no right-wing capitalist dictator president would dream of abusing such a kill switch?
... that a site like the following (which gives excellent advice to parents and children about the importance of consent) will get blocked...?
This isn't just "don't get raped", it's "don't rape", full stop. Learn that "no" means "NO" and respect the rights of others. But it's about (gasp!) sex and we can't have impressionable minds seeing that sort of thing!!
Well *that's* obviously a really stupid thing to do...
... gods forbid that those "impressionable minds" get the idea that condoms are a good thing to use to avoid unwanted pregnancies and STDs...
Dah, dah-dah dah dah-dah dahhhhh....
They had one of the upright machines in the Portsmouth Polytechnic Students Union back when I was a student and one afternoon, for the hell of it, I completed it by *every* route and held all the places on the high score table :-)
Get your children to join your local Junior Anti-Sex League, proles!
> Can anyone point to a definitive study that shows harm being done?
No, because there isn't one. There's lots of anecdotal claims, but they're generally based on the idea that "they saw porn therefore they did XYZ" and ignoring any other influences that may have been around.
On the flip-side, however, is the work of, for example, Professor Milton Diamond PhD of the University of Hawai'i who studied the effects of the increased availability of porn in Japan and America and concluded:
" It is certainly clear from the data reviewed, and the new data and analysis presented, that a massive increase in available pornography in Japan, the United States and elsewhere has been correlated with a dramatic decrease in sexual crime"
Unfortunately that didn't stop the last government introducing their Thought Crime "Extreme Pornography" legislation, nor, I have little doubt, regrettably, will it stop David Cameron from introducing a law making possession of videos of "consenting non-consensual" porn (ie acted out scenes of "rape" by consenting adults) a criminal offence as well.
You can (for whatever good it will do) sign a petition to object to this here: http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/58255
Great, provided that the only text alert allowed is a silent-mode vibration.
I once had the misfortune to be in the Quiet Coach of a train with some idiot who, fine, wasn't *talking* on his phone, but his text alert was the Tarzan yell. After him getting about a dozen texts in five minutes I asked him politely to turn the bloody sound off to which he replied "Oh, sorry, I didn't know it was bothering anyone..."
> "the more common cowapult couldnt be used in many areas due to the local religious beliefs"
So there's no local equivalent of "Fetchez la vache"?
I was so confused by the headline that I clicked on this item just to find out what the hell was actually going on...!
> "Surely we all own the copyright to our faces...?"
Nope, anyone can take your photograph in a public place and even re-use it there's nothing you can do about it. The only thing that they can't (or shouldn't) do is to post something defamatory in relation to the picture because that's libel, but even then you'd have to sue them to get redress.
Does that include the Smog?
> "Hotel rooms usually include a safe, keeping the laptop (if it will fit) or the hard drive in there is better than carrying it around with you. For that matter, the hotel itself usually has a very secure safe"
Both of which are entirely vulnerable to corrupt staff since the room safe has a built in "back door" security code to unlock it and the hotel safe can be opened by whoever is duty manager at the time .
As such, all they give is a false sense of security.
Obvously they will need to build in an additction to pictures of Kitties!
... run their website (that is responsible for ensuring people who take credit cards over the internet are PCIDSS complaint) using that well known secure piece of software, Flash...
... if this was QI, klaxons would be going off and lights would be flashing, since the coldest place on Earth is actually in laboratories where scientists have reached temperatures only just above absolute zero (or possibly even below if you believe some claims!)
@AC If you're gullible enough to believe that bottled mineral water is "better" than tap water, I've got a great deal for you on Nelson's Column...
Just because you dress it up in big words doesn't meant that you're not (either intentionally or through ignorance) agreeing with the Daily Mail's default "Hang them and flog them" position of demanding harsh sentences because "that's the only way they'll learn their lesson and not do it again"
And they would, of course, also agree with you that "it is not the place of a business or organisation that has been on the wrong end of this kind of offensive behaviour to plea", but at the same time, they would no doubt consider that "victim impact statements" should be taken into consideration by the courts when determining the severity of the sentence.
"clemency will only encourage further offending"
The Daily Mail comments page is over there ->
... and kettles come to mind?
"We're only snooping on everything to make you safer..."
"We're only snooping on everything you do to target ads at you..."
(In chorus) "It's for your own good!"
... go to the new Dark Skies Park in Northumberland... http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-tyne-25260186
... spotted any Black Monoliths in the vicinity?
Only terrorism? Dear me, haven't the Chinese Government and media discovered the scare-value of child porn yet...?
... fail to
buy bribe offer campaign finance to the right people...?
So five downvotes to my post pointing out that a cyclist or motorcyclist doesn't have to put a foot down, but nobody has come up with anything to contradict that, apart from Steve Knox who asserts that "balancing a bicycle without rolling forward or backward is practically impossible" leading me to the conclusion that he doesn't ride a bicycle or motorcycle like myself and has never seen someone do (or done) exactly this.
To quote a document from the Insitute of Advanced Motorists:
"26. Misconception: At STOP lines the rider must place at least one foot onto
the road surface.
"There is no specific requirement for the rider to do so. The essential requirement is that a rider’s machine must come to a complete STOP."
I recommend that the downvoters take some Advanced Training (or they can just downvote me again to be petty...)
> Yup. STOP means STOP - worldwide As a cyclist that means "put your foot on the ground" - if you play that stupid game of wobbling and not quite stopping you can be ticketed
Really? I'd like to know where he got that idea from because the only requirement in the Road Traffic Act is that the vehicle comes to a complete stop before proceeding (ie the wheels stop rotating). There is nothing that says a cyclist or motorcyclist has to put a foot down.
... IDS is revealed to have lied to Parliament.
Naturally he will now resign his post in disgrace...
... and next week Satan will be ice-skating to work...
"...are not hit with shock bills through no fault of their own."
Err, excuse me, but exactly *what* relevance does how hard you work (or whether you're working or not) have to this?
Is she saying that if you're not (according to her) "hard working" that you have less entitlement to protection perchance???
... they ban searching for the websites...
... then they ban searching for workarounds...
... then they ban any search engines which won't comply with the ban...
... then all search terms have to be approved by a government flunky (your search results will be available in the next three days...)
Of course you could go for the ultimate in style and have a gold one like Tycho Brahe.
... pick your own...
... For the Heart of the Sun...
"could the arguement not be made that sexually graphic depicitions of minors in such media risks normallising the treatment of children as sexual objects?"
Sure, you can make that argument. Just like you can argue that GTA normalises beating people up and stealing their cars for fun...
Why do I keep reading that as "content free ad network"?
... exactly the sort of thing deserving of patent protection...
.... another of Google's great ideas goes pear shaped because they completely failed to take *people* into account.
Whoever would have expected it...?