... give a phuck!
5194 posts • joined 19 Jan 2007
... give a phuck!
....at the University of Woolloomooloo, Bruce?
Sure, no problem. There's just a bit of a waiting list.
30 years the last I heard.
Of course there is another way, see icon, but it's a bit tricky to collect it aftewards...
I wouldn't have downvoted you if it wasn't for the fact that companies from other countries get similarly "boned" by America's thinly veiled protectionist nationalism.
Matt, do you really think such childishness adds anything to the (lack of) validity of your arguments?
Still, feel free to down vote me and call me some more names if it makes you feel better. I'll even let you get the last word in since once again you've shown there's no point in trying to have a reasonable argument with you....
Oh dear, Matt, resorting to ad hominem attacks again.
There are parts of London (and other cities) where it is virtually impossible to avoid being within range of CCTV cameras yet, astonishingly, crimes *still* happen in those areas!
You may be happy to have the State monitor and observe and record your every movement and journey and phone call and e-mail and web access, but, please, don't assume that because you "have nothing to hide", you have the right to decide that we should be happy with it too.
And from 2010: "Number of crimes caught on CCTV falls by 70 per cent, Metropolitan Police admits"
"Prosecutions linked to CCTV have fallen in parts of Britain, raising questions about the true impact of the security cameras."
"Scotland Yard sources suggested the fall was because officers deciding only to mark down an involvement of a CCTV camera if it had formed part of the investigation. Previously officers had recorded if a camera was in the vicinity of the crime scene.
"Campaigners suggested that this change meant that the effectiveness of CCTV as a crime fighting tool might have been exaggerated by the previous figures. "
" Last summer an internal Met Police report concluded that for every 1,000 cameras in London, less than one crime is solved per year"."
Still, let's keep on having Big Brother watch us and snoop on our every move and journey and e-mail and phone call. After all, giving up essential liberties for a little temporary security has always been a good thing, hasn't it?
... is the False Positive Rate? How many people were arrested and then found *not* to be criminals?
Or don't we get told that because it makes their scheme look less good in the media?
"... improve their bottom line and boost their bosses' bonuses"
Fixed that for your.
... so there's going to be even more Londonization, concentrating people and jobs in the capital whilst the rest of the country is treated as somehow second class or second rate.
... Double-plus good, Proles!
... like the online version of Security Theatre?
"Will this make us safer?"
"Well, no, but it will make you *feel* safer, so don't worry your pretty little head about it.!"
... is Treasonous, Citizen!
- Your friend, The Computer
Great, but who are you going to tell...?!
I bet their roaming charges are out of this world...
... of axe grinding...?
Have you *looked* at the people who are being elected to office in the US or the UK or several other countries too?!
They're not just deluded, some of them are bat-shit crazy!
And you don't get a choice of candidate, you just get whoever the other nutcases tell you you're getting because they think the same way...
Now try the following experiment: Print a load of pages with OEM black ink. Then print a load with compatible ink. Spot the difference (hint: check your wallet).
(PS Oh, and yes, now you can get cheap B&W laser printers, but I have an inkjet that's about 6 years old and still works fine, so I have no need to change it)
... won't make a crap programme any better!
"the nature of the connections was not described in the document."
Hmm: "Are you, or have you ever been connected to Al Qaeda, Hezbollah, Hamas, or have you ever watched a documentary about them on TV...?"
... really? Did I miss something? Exactly when was the following achieved?:
* involve mobile phone operators installing adult content filters on phones which will be switched on as the default unless the customer proves he or she is at least 18 years of age; and
* involve major internet service providers providing home network filters for all new home broadband services, which will be switched on as the default unless the customer specifies otherwise.
Unless by "achieved" they actually mean "comprehensively demonstrated to be utterly impossible to introduce or enforce"...
... is National "Overspend on Government IT Projects" day!
"one can't help but HOPE that Duncan Smith will be the latest and most high-profile victim of the Universal Credit catastrophe."
Reading books *while* crossing the road?! ;-)
Just as long as it's not an Illudium Pu-38 Explosive Space Modulator.
We don't need any Earth-shattering Kabooms!
... I thought that was Europa?
What Ofcom seem to be missing is that if you're streaming your content from one your Broadband Provider's "approved suppliers" (ie themselves or one they get a kick-back from) then your traffic is prioritised over someone who is streaming from a non-approved supplier.
This is the equivalent of having a "Ford Cars Only" lane on the motorway because Ford have struck a deal with the DfT to charge their customers a fee to use that lane and pay the DfT a percentage. Other cars aren't allowed to use that lane because their manufacturers aren't paying the Government for the privilege.
If they're so clever to "split the opposition" they should have included Kiddie Fiddlers and Terrorists because we "soft liberals" are so dumb that we can't see this tactic for what it is.
"if they are monitoring a know person surely this helps them to identify links to their criminal associates so they can be investigated too"
And if that person happens to call your number by mistake and you get identified as a "criminal associate" because of a False Positive, how are you going to prove your innocence (because you sure as hell won't be presumed innocent any more)?
Lots of things can be used for "a huge amount of good" like National DNA databases, ID Cards, country-wide ANPR systems, the fact that they also pi$$ all over fundamental liberties is just an unfortunate side-effect...
I wonder what would happen if somone's engaged in a bit of "one handed browsing"?!
Hmm, that operation has legs...
"It's Communism, so in any practical implementation you've got a self-perpetuating State which acts soley in the best interest of whoever they feel like, normally themselves."
Isn't it great that we, in the West, live in a free society so we don't have the same problems with a small elite running the country to suit themselves and the vested interests of their mates and financial backers...
So lots of money for ICANN for the application process, now they can look forward to even more money as businesses have to defensively register their domains with another load of suffixes!
Trebles all round!
Now we don't have to be corrupted by the eeeevilll porn and we can just enjoy the intelligent dialogue, magnificent acting and wonderful music without all the disgusting sex spoiling the fun!
(Icon because Cameron's ideas are a complete joke)
... I picked up a copy of The Space Merchants in a charity shop and, whilst reading it, I had to flick back to the front to check what date it was actually written because it seemed so appropriate for today!
A sad loss :-(
Miniature In-flight Navigator Gadget Eliminator
@YAC - I was just thinking that that building would make a great Secret Lair from where I could RULE THE WORLD!!!!!
(Mines the white canvas one with the long sleeves and extra straps...)
Aha! No, it wasn't Heinlein's Waldo, but you just jogged a memory because the story does refer to the device as a "waldo".
It was "More than the Sum of His Parts" by Joe Haldeman from his short-story collection "Dealing in Futures".
Thanks for your help!
I was going to cite a sci-fi story as Prior Art, but I can't remember the name of it (or even who wrote it, but it might have been Philip K Dick or Roger Zelazny) and I've not found it by searching :-(
IIRC it concerns someone who has lost an arm and had a cybernetic replacement, however suffers what would later be described in the Cyberpunk RPG as "Humanity Loss". He tries to get the surgeons to replace the rest of his body but they refuse, so he locks himself in a room with a computerised surgical device intending to carry out the procedure on himself.
The scientists stop him by hooking a lab tech up to a device which remotely controls the arm to punch himself on the chin (decapitating him!) and the arm is then connected to a Doctor who ends by saying something like "What miracles I shall perform..."
So can anyone remind me what the story is and who wrote it?
Boffin is certainly not demeaning, it's a term of respect and endearment for those clever "Back-room Boys" who come up with wonderful inventions like Radar, the Bouncing Bomb and other such things which are of use to those who actually need them.
People like Barnes Wallis or even Q from the Bond Films are archetypal Boffins and they would be honoured to be described as such!
... a huge abandoned city of cubes and cones, though?
You mean the mail service that, by using, you automatically give Google permission to read all your mails?!
... the first adopters of this will be those ladies who charge you several pounds a minute for a video chat.
... erm, at least that's what I've heard...
The reason there are those gangs "making a fortune out of smuggling cigarettes and alcohol" is because successive British governments have been stupidly greedy and keep putting up the tax on these products (IIRC something like 75% of the price of a pack of cigarettes is tax) to avoid having to put up other taxes.
You forgot to say the magic word...
I blame the Sirens...
.... it's not Howard Wolowitz with his "Hey, baby. How would you like to drive a car on Mars?" line...?
"In my experience that message is more likely to be in the Child ->Adult direction, in a suitably exasperated 8-year-old voice."
That reminds me of the picture I saw of a small child on the telephone (with one hand doing a face-palm) and the caption "No, grandma, double-click on the Internet Explorer icon..."