But don't worry, boys and girls...
... you can trust the Government with all your data...
6844 posts • joined 19 Jan 2007
... you can trust the Government with all your data...
I recall the first time I played the sit-in version and I was utterly blown away by the immersive experience of not just standing in front of a cabinet, but actually having the whole machine move around me in response to my controls!
There were others that followed, but I still hold a treasured memory of retfA renruB (as I used to refer to it since the title would spin round and reverse on screen ;-) )
> Even gaming properly is too much like hard work!!!
Game smarter, not harder!
> Your problem is not with these poor cold and wet guys on the street, it is with the advertisers.
FYI, in the past (long before the advent of MW) I have delivered leaflets, so I do know what is involved.
But you're right that my problem is with the advertisers because if they paid more than the minimum wage, the guys on the street would not be working below it if people put "no flyers" signs on their doors. Of course the advertisers won't pay more, because they'll argue that "if we pay more than the minimum wage, it will mean we have to charge more for our services and that would mean we couldn't employ so many people, so it would be *your* fault they're out of a job" (which actually means "I wouldn't be able to pay myself so much...")
However the point is that it's *my* front door and just because I have a letter box and a doorbell does *not* mean that everyone is free to shove their rubbish through it or disturb me when I'm working (I work from home), meaning I have to drop everything and find out it's some idiot wanting to sell me something I don't want and wouldn't buy at the front door even if I did or push their religious BS onto me.
This is no different from my browsing a website and someone's advert being stuck over what I'm trying to read or jumping up and down and flashing in my peripheral vision or unexpectedly blasting out sound from my speakers and if you do that to me, I *WILL* be a grumpy, miserable git!
> I have a plastic engraved plaque on my letter box flap with the same message and also 'no cold callers'
For brevity I didn't include the full version which is printed in big letters on an A4 sheet and says:
YES, THIS DOES MEAN YOU!
There are still those stupid enough or arrogant enough to ignore it :-(
> If it is your ad that has annoyed them, then you will lose goodwill with that person and probably a potential customer too, because your company / product is associated with irritation and annoyance.
A parallel example: I have a big sign on my front door that says "NO Flyers, Menus, Junk Mail", yet still some idiots shove their rubbish through my letter box.
I take great delight in phoning up the companies involved and informing them that, because of this, there is no way I will ever use their services since their employees have so little respect for my wishes.
... it's different for *us*...!!!
Signed - Your MPs
Apropos of this: here's an article published just today "Now the Tories are allowing big business to design their own tax loopholes"
I am not a tax expert, so don't expect me to cite specific rules and I doubt you're an expert either, so even if I did, would you be able to validate my claims?
That is, however, of course, the point. Neither of us can afford the "buy in" which is the cost of the expensive accountants and tax experts who know the loopholes and avoidance methods that exist in the incredibly complicated tax rules we would need to negotiate to play the game on their level.
> Hate the game not the player!
It helps when the playing field is level and the rules are not rigged in favour of the big players and against the little people...
A lot better, because these cars are actually paying attention all around *all* the time, leaving the passenger free to make phone calls, play with their laptops or even doze off without endangering anyone else which is a big change from the current situation.
> Ram the driverless Volvo!
Are you aware that the driverless cars are fitted with cameras and lasers to scan the area around to them to enable them to *be* driverless? I think they'd be recording that data...
> What if a driverless Volvo and driverless Tesla hit each other?
Then one or both must have had a major systems failure (or been shunted into the other by another vehicle)
> I found the factory configuration menu of the neighbour's car.
Now that one *is* a serious concern, hopefully there's no hard-coded passwords or other such nonsense caused by Sales taking precedence over Security!
Pah! Abraham Lincoln fought Vampires... ;-)
These ballons will, of course, drift on the wind and others will have to be sent up to replace them.
All of these will, eventually, come down somewhere which may not be easily accessible, leaving a mess for someone to clean up...
All you need is a dodgy old microwave oven like one of my neighbours used to have which would block my video sender every time they turned it on!
Because Terrorists and Paedopiles and Drug Dealers Oh My, of course!
You have whatever Rights we *say* you're allowed to have and you are perfectly free to talk about whatever you like, provided we agree with it!
In return you agree to allow us to snoop on everything you write and everyone you contact and everything you look at...
- Signed: Your Government.
She does *NOT*, however, have the right to *NOT* be offended by something!
... (dot)LGBTQIA then? (FYI the last three are Queer, Intersex and Asexual)
Well, probably they would, actually, if they thought they could charge money for it like every other one of the myriad of ridiculous TLDs they've already allowed...
> you don't step down as group CEO because a couple of software engineers in the US subsidiary of your company fucked up
And anyway, you have a nice golden lifeboat with a lucrative retirement plan set up...
> You sound like a Repubican blaming 7 years of Congress failure on the President.
... when you've done everything in your power to block, damage or subvert everything that that President has tried to achieve.
... but not *too* secure - Signed GCHQ
The point is the equipment on the Atom is the bare minimum of what is needed. Self-cancelling indicators are not needed, they're a luxury, so they go.
FYI my motorbike doesn't have self-cancelling indicators either, but it's hardly a chore to press the button with your thumb to cancel them after you've turned a corner and provided you check your instruments as part of your Information phase (you do scan the road ahead, mirrors and instruments regularly, don't you?) you'll notice if you've left them on.
The Atom isn't a practical car, but if I could afford one, I certainly would buy one *and* drive it back from Nice (admittedly ensuring I had a decent set of Textiles to wear...)
At least it's not just the wrong shade of pink...
Maybe it's Threads.
Call the Weyr to rouse the Dragons...
> Google and co need your consent
I don't call "If you use our services, you agree to let us do what the hell we like with your data" to be proper consent!
Mark, I know El Reg allows people to use pseudonyms, but, come on...
> the ability to put certain commentards on ignore could be worthwhile
Or certain Authors Or Leader-writers Perhaps?...
My webcam has a plastic shutter which goes over the lens when the cam is not in use.
"...it was a couple of scapegoats who put these in."
(Coat because it looks like it's being hung out to dry)
... typical Android "all or nothing" permissions.
Watch this episode of Mythbusters where they show how it only *looks* like the shadows are going in different directions: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2m7k1z
PS to the two downvoters: Did I *really* need to put the Joke icon instead of the (ironic) Black Helicopter icon on my post about the NASA soundstage in Arizona above?
I've got one here that was on a NASA sound stage in Arizona...
Mr Neil Herron is also a joint owner of Creative Telematic Holdings Ltd
Although, unlike some people elsewhere have suggested, I don't think that he somehow fiddled the figures to get himself off, because not only would that mean that the Insurance Companies wouldn't trust their products, but he'd be open to a charge of Perverting the Course of Justice.
And (again) one of my favourite quotes:
'The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not “Eureka” but “That's funny...” ' - Isaac Asimov
> It's hard to "prove" a hypothesis
Actually "prove" means "test" in this context, hence "degrees proof" of spirits etc.
You're cherry picking a few isolated incidents out of a whole mass of data.
"On any given day, more than 87,000 flights are in the skies in the United States. Only one-third are commercial carriers, like American, United or Southwest. On an average day, air traffic controllers handle 28,537 commercial flights (major and regional airlines), 27,178 general aviation flights (private planes), 24,548 air taxi flights (planes for hire), 5,260 military flights and 2,148 air cargo flights (Federal Express, UPS, etc.). At any given moment, roughly 5,000 planes are in the skies above the United States. In one year, controllers handle an average of 64 million takeoffs and landings."
Given how few accidents there are, I think that counts as pretty damn safe (and a lot less risky than being on the roads!)
Let's they get thepiratebay.(whatever) banned in any form.
How long before the-pirate-bay.(whatever) or bayofpirates.(whatever) or piratesbay.(whatever) get registered?
It was proven to be a failure, good for headlines in the right-wing press, useless for actually preventing crime or reoffending.
"Mr Whitelaw introduced the short, sharp, shock - a military-style training and punishment programme - at four centres. Four years later, when it was found the policy affected neither the rate of crime nor re-conviction - and magistrates preferred sentences involving supervision coupled with treatment - it was consigned to the penal policy dustbin.
"'It was a catastrophic failure,' Stephen Shaw, director of the Prison Reform Trust, said. 'It produced fitter criminals who could outrun the police.' The policy went the same way as borstals and detention centres,"
> £3000 for a bike has a different 'value' dependent on the owner's need.
You're clearly not a biker...
> If some girl wants to point her tits at me instead of her gun, I'm all for it!
Might I remind you of certain women in the Austin Powers films...
And don't forget this statement from the designer of the Death Star...
Yes, but then in the report to Vader the Commander says "An escape pod was jettisoned during the fighting but no life forms were aboard", so where was this "other" one?
Fine, so maybe, as I suggested, the didn't have a phone. Or perhaps they're out of battery. Whatever. The point is that a phone should always be able to make emergency calls, no matter who holds it, but that's not what the OP wants.
> it has been imposed by 'someone thinking of the children'
ORLY? So, let's try a hypothetical scenario:
* * * * *
You are in an accident, someone happens along but they don't have a mobile phone or they have one on a network that has no coverage in the area you're in.
Wait a minute! You've got a phone, but the keypad is locked and you're unconscious, so your erstwhile rescuer has no way of calling the emergency services.
What a shame nobody thought of allowing emergency calls *even when* the phone is locked...
* * * * *
Now maybe there should be more safeguards on the emergency dialler, but I don't know how other phones work. On mine (Motorola Moto-G) you've got to swipe up to get the unlock screen, hit Emergency Call, then dial the number and press Call, which seems pretty secure against accidental dialling to me.
... it's different when *they* are the ones doing it...
> It was a joke for fuck's sake.
No, jokes are funny. That just sounded like someone who's already bitched in previous posts having another bitch...
You're both right and wrong about that...
... meanwhile it's trebles all round for the Lawyers...