* Posts by rocwurst

29 publicly visible posts • joined 11 Jul 2013

NASA will award contract for second lunar lander to a biz that's not SpaceX

rocwurst

Why doesn't the Press point out that if Congress deems it so important to dual-source the HLS Lunar Lander for redundancy, then why don't they also demand competitors for the SLS rocket, the Orion capsule and the Lunar Gateway in case of, you know, cost overruns and delays? *rolls eyes*

I know a certain company that could field a very good alternative to SLS that is incidentally already putting in place most of the parts needed to replace SLS with their current HLS solution for 100x less expense than SLS...

*sigh*

Apple's zippy silicon leaves Android rivals choking on dust

rocwurst

iOS has a far better Multi-tasking architecture than Android

>" iOS is a ancient platform that under the covers has very basic capabilities, no background services, very limited multitasking essentially a toy OS"

Completely inaccurate of course. Apple implements a far more intelligent multi-tasking architecture than Android.

On Android any app could for example continuously poll a data source every few seconds or minutes in case a value changes thus using up battery, CPU clock cycles and network bandwidth.

What Apple did instead was to implement a comprehensive Push/notifications architecture that developers can use that only pushes the updated data to the app when that value changes, thus eliminating all of the wasteful behaviour that is otherwise required. This is just one example of how much more intelligent Apple’s multi-tasking architecture is than the simple multi-tasking implementation of Android.

iOS intelligently allows a huge range of app processes to multi-task in the background including tracking GPS locations, downloading files, playing music, checking for new content, refreshing data, receiving push notifications, continuously tracking accelerometer, barometer and digital compass motion data with the Motion chip, voice calls and VOIP, SMS and messaging, communication with external and Bluetooth accessories etc all in the background while other apps are in the foreground.

Much better than the wildwest of rogue programs and widgets draining batteries and sapping CPU cycles on Android.

Apple says banks can't touch iPhone NFC without harming security

rocwurst

Who do you trust - the Big Banks or Apple?

>"I wonder what would happen..."

Why the same thing that is happening now - the one Aussie Bank (ANZ) supporting Apple Pay will continue to steal the customers away from the Banks that don't. ANZ's new customer sign-ups have surged by 20% since they launched support for Apple Pay. My new ANZ credit card should be arriving in a couple of days.

Do you really think those 1 Billion Apple customers around the world would trust the Banks instead of Apple in this matter?

rocwurst

You think Apple would be able to spot all possible vulnerabilities in thousands of proprietary Banking apps that might surface later?

rocwurst

Re: banks can't touch iphone nfc without harming Apple's profits.

>"there are plenty of celebrities out there with pictures of their snatches on the internet thanks to iCloud"

You mean thanks to social engineering tricks grabbing their passwords. There was no hack of iCloud.

rocwurst

Re: Comparison Off

@DougS,

Apple has already captured 75% of all contactless payments (that's contactless credit cards and mobile phones/watches etc) in the USA are now made with Apple Pay - that's actually pretty massive.

Apple has already negotiated a much lower surcharge with UK Banks than the 0.15% rate in the USA so Aussie banks should also be able to get a better deal.

rocwurst

Re: Comparison Off

@imaginary

You are aware of the 2 people who were electrocuted by their cheap Chinese Lightning cables on their iPhones? That's enough evidence for me.

rocwurst

Re: I'm torn

@Jonathon Desmond

Indeed. The ANZ Bank has already broken ranks in Australia and partnered with Apple and been rewarded by a 20% surge in new customers.  No wonder the other big Aussie banks are shaking in their boots - they're losing all their customers to the ANZ.

rocwurst

Re: Nice of Apple to look after their customer's secruity so well

Apple Pay is far more secure than a contactless card which can be stolen and used to pay for items all day without any authentication. In contrast, a stolen Apple Watch or iPhone is useless thanks to Apple's biometric authentication architecture. Heck, you can even remotely locate your lost iPhone using Find My iPhone - try that with a lost credit card.

Apple Pay also has far better privacy only sending a one-off token during a transaction and keeping your user identification private from the retailer

Cock fight? Not half. Microsoft beats down Apple in Q1

rocwurst

Re: Not counting all the iPads.

>"My point was that there are other windows tablets not made by Microsoft available."

Yes, and I've demonstrated that they don't change the fact of Apple's dominance in tablets against Microsoft.

>"My second point was that the article was talking exclusively about the PRO line of products."

And my point is that the difference between Microsoft's PRO tablets and their cheaper line is a completely different OS which can run desktop Windows apps. In contrast, Apple's iPad Pro and the iPad Air and Mini all run the same OS, can run the same apps and can all use external keyboards. The only real difference is the stylus.

As such, Apple's whole iPad line are just as "PRO" as the iPad Pro and show up silly comparisons where people try to exclude the bulk of Apple's tablet line to try and get a win for Microsoft somehow, as a complete farce.

As ridiculous as saying the Zune was doing well because it maybe sold as many units as one small segment of the iPod range.

rocwurst

Re: A partial quarter does not a whole quarter make. And...

So, selling more iPad Pro's worldwide than al Microsoft tablet models put together is "lukewarm sales"?

Ok....

rocwurst

And yet Apple dominates Business mobile

Citrix reports iOS has 64% Business market share worldwide.

Good Technology reports that Apple captured 72% of global Mobile Enterprise device activations in Q1 2015 with Android on 26%.

Egnyte reported that Apple's worldwide iOS mobile business market share increased from 69% to 78% in 2013 while Android declined from 30% the previous year to only 22%.

Intermedia's Mobile Trends Report shows that Apple’s share of Small to Medium Business has increased from 65% in 2011 to 68% in 2014. Android languishes on 26%.

So much for Apple being a "fashion product".

rocwurst

Re: Not counting all the iPads.

Counting all Windows tablets still leaves Apple with by far the most sales.

IDC reports: "Released in November, the iPad Pro sold more than 2 million units in the fourth quarter, while Microsoft sold about 1.6 million Surface devices, most of them the high-end Surface Pro and not the entry-level Surface 3 device, said Jean Philippe Bouchard, IDC’s research director for tablets, in a news release this morning. The research firm said the iPad Pro was the top-selling tablet in the category known as detachable."

In contrast, Apple sold 16.1 million iPads that quarter leaving the rest of the Windows tablet segment for dead.

rocwurst

Re: Re my point is that is a pointless comparison

Considering Apple sold more iPad Pros worldwide than MS sold of every model of Surface tablet according to IDC (50% more in fact), I'm not sure why you would think it was a "pointless product"?

rocwurst

Re: Not counting all the iPads.

What makes you think I care a whit about the stock market? I wouldn't touch it with a barge pole - too much like gambling for my liking.

rocwurst

Re: Not counting all the iPads.

And my point is that is a pointless comparison when Business also buys far more iPads than just iPad Pros.

It reminds me of back when Microsoft tried to say the Zune was the number one 30GB HDD based media player in the world and conveniently ignored the vast numbers of other models of iPods that Apple sold which together completely overwhelmed total Zune sales.

How history repeats itself.

rocwurst

Not counting all the iPads.

Worldwide Apple sold 50% more iPad Pros (just one model of Apple's iPad range) than Microsoft sold of every model of Surface put together according to IDC.

When you count all iPads, Apple sold literally 10x as many iPads as Microsoft sold Surface tablets last quarter.

For some reason this article seems to think that Apple's other iPad models aren't used in Business which is of course completely false.

Citrix reports iOS has 64% Business market share worldwide.

No, the fact of the matter is that Apple has decimated Microsoft in the tablet and mobile worlds in business as well as in the consumer market.

Tim Cook signs SAP for iOS – SANA app pact

rocwurst

Apple's dominance in Business continues

In the joint press release SAP reports that "76% of business transactions touching a SAP system are from Apple devices" and Apple has reported that their Enterprise revenue hit $25 Billion last year, up 40% YoY.

This agrees with all the other data out there:

Citrix reports iOS has 64% Business market share worldwide. Also, Good Technology reports that Apple captured 72% of global Mobile Enterprise device activations in Q1 2015 with Android on 26%. Likewise, Egnyte reported that Apple's worldwide iOS mobile business market share increased from 69% to 78% in 2013 while Android declined from 30% the previous year to only 22%.

Intermedia's Mobile Trends Report shows that Apple’s share of Small to Medium Business has increased from 65% in 2011 to 68% in 2014. Android languishes on 26%.

Looks like SAP and IBM are very sensible to target iOS since Apple's platform already dominates Business and Enterprise mobile.

Tim Cook: I'll give just a THIRD of what Gates gave to charity last year

rocwurst

Re: Utter fail

The "suicide cluster" at Foxconn was actually 17 suicides out of 1.2 million workers over 5 years, 10-20x lower than China's average suicide rate, 15x lower than the USA rate and 25x lower than the rate amongst MIT undergrads.

In fact, the suicide rate has "slowed to a dribble" since Foxconn STOPPED giving large payouts above and beyond that required by law to relatives of suicide victims.

Xiaomi: It really ISN'T a biz-miracle idiot tax like Apple

rocwurst

Hardly

Apple makes 60% of their revenue in the rest of the world.

Apple not only has 40% market share in the USA (the World's second biggest smartphone market after China), they also have around that market share in the UK, Japan and Australia.

Every year Apple sells more iPhones, not less - they are on track to sell over a quarter of a billion iOS devices in 2014, up from 234 million in 2013 and Apple has over 885 million active iTunes/App Store users worldwide compared to Google who is only a little bit further ahead on 1 Billion active Android users.

Apple doesn't need to compete in the sub-$200 category of smartphones where 60% of Android phones come from, the iOS installed base is more than are enough to continue bringing in the lion’s share of the profits, app revenues, advertising ROI and e-commerce revenue around the world.

rocwurst

Indeed Tim, the "Apple of China" label is wearing pretty thin considering Xiaomi only made $56 million profit last quarter (compared to Apple's $8.5 Billion profit) and Xiaomi has been kicked out of India its second largest market. Apple's profit share of the entire Mobile industry hit 86% in Q3 2014 up from 72% the year before according to Canaccord Genuity.

Apple continues to sell more and more iPhones every year at that amazing 60% margin and has now sold 1 Billion iOS devices worldwide and is on track to sell a quarter of a Billion iOS devices just in 2014 alone. Apple has indeed cracked the secret of rocking horse poo(!).

However, there are also other very important characteristics that define Apple, one of the most important being making the "whole widget", i.e. Apple doesn't just make high-end hardware, they also make the OS, the software, services and sell media and content such as movies, TV shows, iBooks and have their own physical retail stores.

Not only does Apple compete in all of these other areas, they DOMINATE most of them as well - the App Store is number 1 in the world making 60% more revenue than Google Play, Apple Pay is now the number one mobile payments system in the world, iTunes is the number one music retailer in the world, Apple is by far the largest company in the world on the share market - Apple may soon be the World's first Trillion-dollar company - and the Apple Retail Stores make vastly more revenue per square foot than any other retailer in the world,

Xiaomi may be the most blatant copier of Apple's looks on a superficial level, but they are definitely not Apple-like in the vast array of other ways that define Apple as a worldwide phenomenon.

So, Apple won't sell cheap kit? Prepare the iOS garden wall WRECKING BALL

rocwurst

Re: It's the Apps Stupid!

App Annie reports that Apple's App Store generated 85% more revenue globally than Google Play last quarter and Nanigans reports that iOS users generate 1,790% greater advertising ROI so Android app net income is a long way from getting near parity with iOS at this stage.

As such, iOS's "Premium Unleaded high octane" fuel is not only available at just as many gas stations as Android's "Unleaded" fuel (iOS app download numbers are similar to Android), it is bringing in vastly more revenue for the Oil companies (developers).

iOS runs on all the same roads (The Internet) so that's not a problem but with a built-in GPS (iOS Security architecture and App Store curation), drivers are kept away from minefields, dodgy fuel stations and broken bridges (malware) which Android users far too often stray onto.

As such, developers would be foolish not to continue developing apps for iOS first unless this revenue and profit disparity reverses.

rocwurst

Re: Oh no

Actually, they do make petrol specifically for Aston Martins - it' called High Octane Premium Unleaded and Fuel companies (developers) are more than happy to supply this additional fuel choice for the smaller number of high performance vehicles around the world (iOS devices) as it brings in much higher revenue from a much more lucrative user demographic (iOS users).

Of course, both the Aston Martin and your average Hyundai share the same roads (the Internet).

However, iOS device numbers and active iTunes/App Store users are both approaching 1 Billion (with a quarter of a Billion more iOS devices sold each year and growing) compared to Google's 1 billion active Android users.

Thus, in the car analogy, Apple is actually equivalent to Aston Martin, Lamborghini, Audi, Mercedes, Porsche, Volkswagon, Honda, BMW, Lexus and Ferrari all put together in terms of installed base but bringing in vastly higher profit margins.

Apple will FAIL in corporate land 'because IT managers hate iPads'

rocwurst

Malicious Exploits, not vulnerabilities is the critical issue

Vulnerabilities that rapidly get patched are nothing compared to malicious exploits that actually do vast damage and thanks to a user base that installs the latest updates astonishingly fast, iOS is an incredibly secure platform in the *real* world.

As you say, Android is worse - in fact, it is FAR worse.

32.8 million Android devices were infected with 65,227 different malware variants in 2012 (and another 20-30 million so far this year) according to NQ Mobile vs close to zero iOS devices.

An example of the viciousness of many Android malware exploits is the Eurograbber malware that swiped $47 million from the bank accounts of 30,000 hapless users last year.

Then there is the Bmaster command and control botnet malware which has been siphoning between half to 3.5 million dollars off hapless Android users per year.

And then there is the Google Messaging Service security hole being used by hackers to steal Android users’ data and forcing them to send premium SMS messages with direct financial implications to Android users. In fact

One big worry is the enormous Master Key security hole affecting 99% of all Android devices sold since 2008 that can give malware full access to all system and user data and control phone and SMS functions and turn the Android device into an always-on, always-moving, hard to detect botnet zombie.

This Master Key vulnerability can unfortunately only be patched by manufacturers releasing new firmware for their devices which is regrettable considering the dismal record manufacturers and Carriers have of releasing updates for Android devices.

rocwurst

Re: Actually Apple dominates business tablets and mobile

That's a bit of wishful thinking. The iPhone surged to 31% marketshare in the UK last quarter- up from 23.3% YoY and this was even before the new iPhone 5s and 5c were released.

Most of Nokia's Windows Phone gains are in the cheap bottom end of the market - not where Business plays.

rocwurst

Actually Apple dominates business tablets and mobile

HP would say that. In reality, Apple completely dominates the Business tablet and smartphone markets with over 90% marketshare in Business tablets and 78% in mobile in general:

- Apple's iOS mobile business market share increased from 69% to 78% in Q1 2013 while Android declined from 30% last year to only 22% (Egnyte)

- iPad captured 93.2% of Business tablet market in Q4 2012 (Good Technology)

- iPhone accounted for 73% of all non-BB business smartphones (Good Technology)

- iOS devices in total represented 77% of mobile device activations in the enterprise market in Q4 2012 (Good Technology)

Citrix reports that iOS as a whole represents 58% of all smartphone and tablet enterprise mobility management deployments (62% in the USA) with Android on 35% and Windows on 7%.

Citrix mentions the iPad represents 53% of the iOS total, but don't indicate how this compares to competing tablets. However, considering the iPhone-iPad ratio is far lower in the overall market, it follows that the iPad's Citrix tablet marketshare would be close to what Good and Egnyte report as well

Samsung takes mobile net traffic crown from Apple

rocwurst
IT Angle

Indeed. The problem with this comparison is that neither the iPad nor the iPad mini are included in Statcounter's graph. if you instead look at Statcounter's Operating system comparison instead which counts all devices, you find that iOS has a share 3x greater with 4.16% versus Android on 1.39%.

After all, if you are going to compare operating systems, then you need to compare all devices that make up those operating systems. This is particularly true in mobile devices where so many Android devices are large screen phablets or mini-tablets themselves. How can Statcounter count 5" and 6" Android Phablets, but not the 7" iPad mini?

Very biased stats.

rocwurst
Alert

Re: Comparable stats

Trouble is, Statcounter has a significant bias in the opposite direction:

With 7 of the top 10 Statcounter countries by device numbers being developing nations, the stats are severely skewed towards the huge number of cheap Android devices in those countries:

From Statcounter's FAQ:

"In June 2013, our global sample for mobile devices consisted of over 2.6 billion page views. The ten countries with the largest individual sample sizes are listed below:

672 million - India

560 million - United States

125 million - Turkey

120 million - Indonesia

102 million - United Kingdom

62 million - Canada

54 million - Thailand

53 million - South Korea

46 million - Brazil

45 million - Malaysia"