Some people find gorillas highly admirable.
576 posts • joined 6 Jul 2007
Some people find gorillas highly admirable.
'Someone will always imply something that was never there in the first place.'
I think you mean 'infer something'.
When you imply something, you suggest an idea without stating it directly. If you infer something, you imagine that an idea has been suggested but not directly stated. That's why when you 'infer' something you bring your own idea into what you heard or read. (Latin inferre - 'bring in')
' Was most disappointed with the novel. The characters are ill-defined and one-dimensional. The plot had no unusual turns and was easily predictable.'
This being the review for a technical non-fiction book on the Roman army. The problem being that any fool can write a review, and many fools do.
Not necessarily. Armistice Day is not Armistice's Day, and Christmas Day is not Christmas' Day. So if we have a day celebrating the nation's pedants National Pedants Day is perfectly grammatical.
(Hurls chalk back.)
If I go to a notary and establish rights to the Durán brain,can I sell it?
After all, I'm taking vacant possession.
'Child slaves with bucket and spade (sorry, shovel, farmers use spades.)'
You use a spade to dig and a shovel to move stuff around. (Think of the verb 'to shovel'.) If you can grasp economics, Mr Worstall, making this distinction should not be too hard.
You make a good case, Sir. But if that's why and how it's done it seems to me that a judge would have no problems writing out a warrant for cops to access the data - as has happened for decades.
What is more of an issue is that police and government now want massive and warrantless access to everyone's data, and the only reason they can offer is that it will keep us safe from the dreaded paedoterrorist alliance.
That does sound unreasonable.
A few years back I wanted to change the monitor of a well-respected academic for a more modern one. (He was using a CRT ffs.) After meeting with stubborn resistance, we finally got to the reason. He 'liked the screensavers installed on this monitor'.
So yeah, I believe that people still happily install .scr viruses. Not least because 'if there's something wrong with it, I'll just call IT to sort it out.'
I find myself cheering for Microsoft? My, how the world has changed!
Mention must also be made of the Kudu armored personnel carrier built on a Landrover base by the Rhodesian security forces. A model of this weird-looking beast can be seen here ...
I used to take a Dak regularly between Grand Reef and what was then Salisbury in Rhodesia. The old Gooney bird had to fly very low for part of the journey to avoid rockets, which meant getting bucked around a lot by thermals.
So, on a trip with newbies, some of the infantry guys would fill one of those green NATO airsickness bags with fruit salad, and once the plane started the full roller-coaster bit and the newbs were looking a bit green, he'd pretend to barf into the bag.
Then he'd pass it to the person next to him, who'd take out some of the fruit salad and start to eat it. We had to stop doing that eventually because too many newbs didn't get to their own barf bags in time.
Two years ago a builder was working on part of our house. When he left for the night there was a thousand or so quids worth of power tools on the lawn. Since this was visible from the street I asked him if the tools would be okay. He gave me a worried look and asked 'It's not going to rain, is it?'
Pick the right bit of the backwoods, and security consists of making sure the doors have doorknobs and not handles. Bears figured out doors long ago, but you need opposable thumbs to open a doorknob.
B'ND's listening station in Bad Aibling...'
Bad, Aibling! Bad!
... go together like monkeys and nuclear physics.
There are two issues here. Firstly, politicos - and today's specimen is a fairly typical exhibit - are mostly from a generation that thinks using email puts them on the cutting edge of the digital revolution. So people who can't tell a browser from an operating system are making legislation about the internet. Unsurprisingly, since they don't understand the Net, and have trouble controlling it, politicians fear it, and their legislation reflects this.
Secondly, legislation is a slow, cumbersome business designed in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, when there was little urgency, and plenty of time for checks and balances to swing ponderously into place. Meanwhile the internet moves on and evolves. So we get laws made today that address issues relevant in 2005.
So we get stories like this one. Politicians who do not understand the present proposing legislation about the future based on an irrelevant and misinterpreted model from the past.
One of the reasons the rich are getting richer is that the 1% really work at it.
I remember the Economist did an article on this about two years back. If you are a kid in the 1% life consists of being rammed into a 'top' nursery school, then rounds of private tutors and extra classes until you can get into the kind of university that gets you a valuable degree and contacts among the 'best people'. Then its on to a high-pressure life in management, lawyering or finance.
The rest of us tend to have a slightly more laid-back attitude, allow kids to more or less develop at their own pace, take gap years and so on. In short, the rich work harder at getting and staying rich than the rest of us. Given that they have more practice, the right funding and contacts, they succeed more often too.
If the Chinese or Russian government wanted access to emails on servers based in the USA in violation of US privacy laws, would there be any doubt of the response?
How do you spell 'hypocrisy' in American English?
Not only did most people know the earth was not flat, they knew it a long time ago.
The ancient Egyptians opted for egg-shaped, but the ancient Greeks figured out the shape from the shadow of the earth on the moon.
In 200 BC Eratosthenes even worked out that the earth had a circumference of 24 700 miles. Which shows how primitive and unsophisticated people were in those days. In fact the circumference is 24 900 miles
FOTW or Troll?
I'll go with E
"Reader, suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself." –Mark Twain
Congressman John Carter shows that some things never change ...
Okay, I googled it, and got this
http://www.lanarkshiremums.co.uk/pregnancy.html 'Pregnancy classes in Lanarkshire'.
Coatbridge girls have to attend classes on how to get pregnant?
Perhaps he merely missed the spacebar, something Idoalot. The reference could have been to Nob End, a scenic bit of landscape on the canal somewhere north of Manchester. In which case this is indeed a terrible thing to say to a Yorkshireman.
Remember the outrage when Steve jobs said that iOS would not use Flash? If only more companies had followed his lead ....
'... various mouth-breathers glue themselves to shop windows and thus frighten the horses.'
Okay, can someone explain to me why a mouth-breather glued to a shop window might frighten the horses? Since the average horse doesn't spend that much time around shop windows, the horse might assume mouth-breathers to be a perfectly normal attachment.
Or assuming that we are not to take the statement literally, this must be a contender for mixed metaphor of the year.
re AC on Jefferson.
According to what I've been able to check, Sally Hemings was 16 or 17 (opinions differ) when Jefferson slept with her. This was usual at a time when some girls married at age 14.
At the time the pair got it together they were in France, where slavery had been abolished. She had all the usual rights of a female of the time, and only relinquished them when she agreed to return with Jefferson to Virginia.
Jefferson was a widower at the time, and there was no blood relationship between him and SH, so there was no incest.
SH was freed by Jefferson's daughter.
So your argument against Jefferson consists of a) errors and b) generalizations.
I do believe that slavery is wrong and the American elite of the time were appalling hypocrites, but given the quality of your research rather disqualifies you from having a credible opinion
Oh, and BTW, the usual spelling is 'Hemings' not 'Hemmings'
In a thoughtful post you ask:
'As long as "no-one gets hurt" are we likely to progress from pretend-sex to trying it out in the real world?'
Well, we've had the internet as a 'pretend-sex' playground for the past two decades. As far as I know a wave of 'real-world' moral debauchery has failed to sweep across the west. Apart from the extreme conservative (small 'c') viewpoint, most people would say that sexual politics and gender relations are in a better place now than they were a generation ago.
We can debate whether the internet has helped this (I think it has) but it's very hard to prove that it has been a hindrance. Certainly as a satanic instrument of moral perversion in the real world, sex on the internet has been a total failure.
The case, reported Feb. 17 in The Wall Street Journal, involved one Dr. Craig Bittner of Beverly hills (where else?)
And to think a few years back people were building websites based entirely on Flash.
'I would argue that anyone who does not have at least one degree that required differential equations and linear algebra is not educated.'
Go on then - I'd like to see you make that argument. Meanwhile lump me in with uneducated peasants such as Winston Churchill, G.K. Chesterton or Mary Beard.
'that's trawl not troll.'
'Time for America to get back to work and you looser hippies are not stopping us this time.'
Time for the tighter hippies to step up ...
So the digital centre will 'unlock major challenges in the data value chain', with 'meaningful engagement' and 'collaboration solutions'. Looks as if this was written with a buzzword generator.
This team-oriented explicit implementation is actually a user-facing projection of multi-channelled tertiary budgetary management typical of an objective-based innovation infrastructure. A paradigm of an assimilated executive system engine in fact.
See? Anyone can play. Now where to I apply for my £3bn?
'If a respected scientist over the age of forty explains at length why something is impossible, there is a good chance of it happening within twenty years. If a substantial number of scientists under the age of forty are working on that same thing, it's practically certain.'
Arthur C.Clarke 'Profiles of the Future' 1957 (paraphrased)
'Assailant = dirty rotten b******d who had the gaul to attack...'
Please tell me that the Gaul was Obelix
'As it stands now, the way the US is controlling the net doesn't seem so bad.'
Indeed. I really can't understand why people don't trust the US to run things fairly and impartially. Whatever was that Snowden fellow going on about, anyway?
If they made a version with a screen on right and left eyes, could they tweak it to get full 3-D?
'To put it very simply: an atheist denies the existence of any gods, a monotheist says there is only one, a polytheist goes for one or more'.
You left out henotheists ...
'... helps [the] user to know how to use and download iTunes”
Actually, if done properly, this would not be a bad app.
Maybe iTunes has improved its interface since I scrubbed it from my computer a few years back. But I remember the iTunes interface on the PC as a counter-intuitive POS which made it as hard as possible to do even the simplest functions, presumably in the hope you'd end up buying something out of sheer frustration.
'In Sydney just the other month the victim was arrested and taken for questioning, as well as having all his electronic devices taken and searched. That is UTTERLY unwarranted (yes).'
Um .. did you read the article? According to the report, the hoax message was apparently sent through the victim's computer which he claimed was hacked.
So if someone owns the computer from which a swatting attempt is successfully made, and then claims in defence that the computer was hacked, then I'd suggest that the police were acting reasonably and responsibly in checking the computer and questioning the owner.
Here's the link again - http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/teenager-arrested-over-hostage-drama-says-he-is-a-victim-of-swatting-hoax-20140604-39hyo.html
If amazon ever gets its wish that 35% goes to the author, this will indeed be a revolution. Many publishers offer royalties of between 4% and 12% of sales. And sales to things like book clubs can net the author less than 10p per book sold.
The author can get some of this eased by having an agent fighting on his behalf, but then the agent takes anything from 10-15% of the author's profits as well. Writing is like acting - the few who make it big do very well, but at present most writers would make a better living flipping burgers.
'Just ask the Chinese how to block properly!'
Or the Australians. They're trying hard to catch up, as other stories on the site show.
This isn't just a problem at self-service. On occasion I've tried to buy a bottle of alcohol with a head-scarfed till attendant at the supermarket. This is followed by an annoying wait until the store can find an Unbeliever who will actually handle the bottle.
Goes back to Alistair's comment about dealing with non-native customer service ...
"I've met tons of people with degree's, they all think they are smart"
Oh, my word. Where to start?
'Yet the five warmest years on record have taken place in the last fifteen years.'
If so how does this square with average temperatures not increasing in the same period? That's what it says in the story. To keep the average, doesn't this mean that the other years must have been significantly colder?
'The crux here is drawing conclusions from data, and the scientists are probably better at this than a creative writer or history student.'
Why a history student rather than a historian? Drawing conclusions from data is exactly what a historian does.
Or did you think it was just about memorizing dates?
Who was it that said 'The US and the UK are two countries divided by a common language'?
Having frequently visited the US, it's my experience that most Brits get into trouble at the border by thinking that Americans are Britons with a funny accent.
Brits rather like a bit of non-conformity, Americans hate it. At the border, the trick is to put yourself in a readily-recognizeable category and conform to it. So for example, if you're going to Nevada, don't bring skin-diving gear, even if you have a good reason.
Don't joke. It's not that the border officials don't have a sense of humour, they don't have a British sense of humour. In their minds, they are under-paid and under-valued. If you seem to be making fun of them, it will not end well.
Finally, don't judge all border officials by those at big-city entry points. If you saw some of the crap that they have to put up with, you'd also lose your sense of humour fast.
'There is actually an extensive, ongoing, developed monitoring of a specific known threat.'
There may be. The problem is that if I'm going to give up my liberties in exchange for protection against a threat that for 'security reasons' no-one can tell me about, then I need to have a great deal of trust in the people I'm giving up those liberties to.
The British governmental system falls laughably below that standard, so if it's all right with you, I'll opt for open government and take my chances.
We elected him. And the reason we as a nation go along with the government stripping away our liberties one by one is, to put it tactfully, because we're a generation of lily-livered cowards.
There was a time when we accepted that the IRA would exploit the benefits of living in a free society to perpetrate acts of terror. We didn't think that the answer was to stop living in a free society. Today ...
Ah well, at least they haven't banned coffee yet.
Space is not big. Space is a place for things to be big in.
Lack of coffee excuses much - but 'virii'? That's going a bit too far.
The word is 'viruses'. For the same reason that you call Mr and Mrs Jones 'the Joneses' and not 'the Joneii' (which actually sounds rather cool, but still).
It's not a Latin plural, because 'virus' in Latin is an uncountable noun and does not have a plural. So it's merely a perversion of the language that makes you sound precious and affected rather than geeky. Please, I beg you, give it up.
So Apple objects to inscribing words describing female genitals on an iPhone, yet has an entire ad campaign based around a song that originally described male genitals?
(So what did you think 'Gigantic' described? - the next line 'a big, big love' is another clue)