501 posts • joined 6 Jul 2007
Ah yes, I vaguely remember shaving. Something that happened between puberty and leaving school. Then I grew a beard and have kept it ever since.
I'm often bewildered by why men shave. Is it to attract women by looking more like them? It can't be because they enjoy spending time and money removing facial hair. And why do some men religiously remove the hair from their faces, but panic when it goes from the top of their heads?
Being bald with a neat(ish) grey beard, in the morning I run a wet flannel over the top of my head, and a brush through the beard, and I'm groomed for the day. Simples.
Re: This is rather sad
'If you know a bit of astronomy you'll also know that most of the major stars have Arabic names. All catalogued by Muslim scholars when most of Europe was throwing rocks at Romans.'
I'll give you Aledbaran. On the other hand, Alpha Centauri, Arcturus, Bootes, Betelgeuse, Antares, Canis Major, Sirius, Ursa Major and Minor, Rigel, Upsilon Andromedae, and Zeta Orionis are Greek or Latin. And Polaris too.
'A lot of minor stars' have Arabic names perhaps. But the major ones were cataloged by the classical Greeks and Romans.I may not know much astronomy, but I can catch the whiff of hyperbole.
Any EU data network that includes Britain will automatically be plugged into the US spy system via the 5 Eyes agreement.
To be cynical, I'd paraphrase Angela as saying 'How dare the US spy on our citizens? We can do that for ourselves!'
Over the last decade the cold, dead hand of government has been slowly closing over the internet. This is just another brick in the wall.
The basic assumption here is that this block is to protect the kids.
Well, 'the kids' have had pretty much unrestricted access to porn for almost 20 years now. Can anyone point to a definitive study that shows harm being done? Given that a wave of debauchery has failed to sweep the nation, I think we can safely assume this is not about protecting the kids, but about the government taking control of what we see and hear.
Oh, and BTW
If your password can't be cracked in less than a million tries it SHOULD be secure.
If a site allows more than one login attempt every five seconds per account or a total of more than ten failed login attempts on that account, then the person who set up that website should be fired with extreme prejudice.
Pointy-haired Boss: My password box just shows asterisks
Dogbert: So make your password six asterisks
Pointy-Haired Boss: I hope I can remember that ...
There's the problem in a nutshell
Re: I thought the usual method was
I'll take that bet.
Neither the Romans, nor the Sassanians et al had cameras.
More to the point, Roman males happily screwed around outside marriage without public opprobrium. It was just married ladies who were meant to be good. So any Roman caught in flagrante delicto might just order a commemorative bas-relief or two with no shame at all.
Re: Slightly obvious flaw in the plan
er .... this is where the 'scammer' bit comes in. To get that first date the mugu has to pay for his/her would-be beloved's air fare from [wherever] because the scammer has a 'temporary financial problem'.
For example, there's a small industry that extracts cash from lonely American women who fondly believe they are sending it to some Tom Cruise lookalike squaddie in Afghanistan with whom they will one day be united.
If I were the lawyer, I'd focus on the fact that Match.com seems to allow profiles for women living in the USA to be set up from ips in Nigeria and Russia. This might be construed as wilful negligence. INAL but there is such a thing as a 'duty of care' to customers.
I knew a guy with a job like that - he worked in a records office and walked about eight miles a day. He loved it. His plan was to 'walk around the world'. He'd calculate his progress on a map, and would get books about the places he was 'walking through' and once even went on a holiday to south-eastern France because visiting it in his head had been so pleasant.
When I knew him he'd 'done' Europe and Turkey and was planning his trip through the Middle East to India.
There is no heaven or hell, but people make it so ...
"Section 215 allows authorities to collect business records if they are related to an investigation of terrorist activity."
This is what you get when you legislate in a hurry. With an intelligence agency, the reaction is 'Oh wow! Let's collect everyone's business records and investigate them for terrorist activity.'
When you get complaints that this totally subverts the original legislation, assume your investigations had a chilling effect on terrorist plans and blithely announce that your investigations 'prevented X* terrorist attacks'.
(*Where X is a random number multiplied by the number of zeros in your budget.)
Current snowfall so far today in the mountains of British Columbia: 15cm and rising. I'm keeping all my facial fur right where it is.
And that pint's a Fernie Caboose!
'I don't think the rest of us should have to Google words ...'
I don't think that people using 'Google' as a verb have any right to complain about neologisms. And there's definitely something ironical about 'English that is only used in the UK'?
Try telling a German that you saw a vixen in the mist.
He will not immediately think of a rural morning.
Because they don't want to admit they opened that dodgy email of Miley twerking, because they spilled coffee all over the keyboard when you warned them that would happen, because they *know* they shouldn't have deleted that file and now claim that the computer 'just did it', because they were meant to file that report yesterday and 'the system lost it'.
The average user (yes, they use the system so they're users. Like people who drive cars are drivers. Get over it) the average user with a problem does not think 'how can I supply the sysadmin with enough information to fix this problem?' S/he thinks 'how can I get this issue fixed so that I don't look bad or stupid?'
Nevertheless it's a good idea to be polite to the average user, because if you have arranged the system to that it's possible for one of them to actually screw up something other than their own data, you darn well should be apologizing.
'If they are willing to splash that amount of cash to destroy something animate, rare, violent, sociopathic and unique then they may as well kill each other.'
Except something unique is one of a kind. So killing 'each other' is hard to arrange without parallel universes or something.
I've always loved that simple cartoon that shows just a few feathers lying on the grass. The caption is 'The Early Cat'.
A really, really pedantic correction
'In the ancient world, such a tactic was known as a Parthian Shot, after the ancient Persian army's tactic of feigning retreat and then launching a volley of arrows. '
No it wasn't. A Parthian shot was one fired over the tail of the horse while the horseman was retreating. Furthermore, the army in question was Parthian (the name is a hint). The ancient Persians - Achaemenids before the Parthians, and Sassanian afterwards - didn't 'feign retreat and then launch a volley of arrows'. When fighting Romans, their light horse tended to keep out of range of the heavy infantry while firing arrows all the time.
PS Maybe you were thinking of Ovid? 'cui rugis uterum Lucina notauit, ut celer auersis utere Parthus equis. (If childbirth's seamed your belly with wrinkles, then offer a rear engagement, Parthian style.)
Ovid Ars Amatoria 3.786
Still think Britain is a democracy?
Re: He was lucky :-(
"Politicians are not born. They are excreted."
Not disagreeing with the sentiment, but I doubt Cicero said it. You'll find the quote all over the net - but never with a reference, and seldom in Latin (and with Aristotle and Zeno as alternative sources).
In Cicero's day there was no word for 'politician' - a man of a certain status did politics, but he also did jurisprudence and military command. The 'professional politician' is a product of modern toilets.
I'm surprised that the BL even has wi-fi. Won't be long before someone accuses them of rotting children's brains with their evil microwaves and gets it banned altogether.
The UK is progressively 'protecting' itself into a straitjacket.
" he should be returned to the United States as soon as possible where he will be accorded full due process and protections," press secretary Jay Carney said."
In other news Private Bradley Manning's prison sentence has been reduced to 90 years.
Is Carney stupid, or does he think the rest of the world is?
Re: Isn't there an IP issue here?
'Technically yes, but unless they are making money or she can prove a loss in court there is not much that can be done.'
DMCA takedown notice doesn't just get the pic removed. If you get all legal on the hosting service, then depending on where the server is located you might get the entire site offline.
Depends how vindictive you are feeling.
Re: Welcome to the real world, kid.
Agreed, females get a lot of crap from FPS gamers. I play a lot and I've seen it.
OTOH whenever I play a new game I always start with a cute female char and a gender-neutral name. Because as a male char, if I screw up through inexperience I get a torrent of abuse as a 'fuckin noob'. My female char gets some kindly guy talking me through where I went wrong, or even mentoring me through the next level.
Once I'm up to speed on how the game works, I retire cutie and go back to the bald git I usually play. Gender in FPS works both ways.
Re: Comedic, as it is..
My dictionary says that when 'either' is used as a conjunction it is used before the first of two - or sometimes three or more - specified alternatives introduced by 'or'.
That's the Longman 2003 Standard English dictionary.
Can you give the source for your claim that 'either' is exclusively used with only two alternatives? Either you have a source, or you were making an unwarranted assumption, or this is plain grammar Nazi nastiness. Do let us know which.
'Children are getting far more access to pornography than they used to, and it's not doing them any good at all. '
Really? Kids have been accessing a largely unfiltered internet for the past two decades, and I've yet to see a wave of debauchery sweeping the country.
So we have an unfalsifiable statement - i.e. hot air. I can claim with equal justification that 'Children are getting far more access to pornography than they used to, and it's doing them plenty good. ' They now know where the bits go, don't ask mum any embarrassing questions, and young teenagers can work off their frustrations on the .jpg tribe.
As for 'an impossible model of perfection' either a) you've not watched that much porn or b) you also want to ban all advertising.
Thing is ...
The story has become about Snowden, not the leaks. All the fuss about the messenger has detracted from the message.
In the USA at present, part of the system operates via secret legislation overseen by secret courts. Anyone telling what the secret legislation has authorized faces extreme penalties, even if that legislation is constitutionally dubious.
This is 'government by the people'? THAT'S what we should be worrying about. To some extent terrorists have already succeeded in overthrowing democracy.
this isn't about protecting kids
It's about getting control of the net.
Of course the current idea won't work. But now we've accepted that our web usage should be 'filtered' (read 'censored'), the govt can 'tweak' the system till it has Chinese-style control.
Legislation has been steadily working in that direction for years.
Why just Google?
Take a look ar Scribd.com - the world's largest repository of copyright violating texts. Users put other people's material online and Scribd get a cut of every stolen text sold. I've seen hundred dollar textbooks copied and sold for $5.
You can either have unmonitored uploads, or you can profit from the material. Doing both encourages unethical behavior.
Re: I just listened to BBC R4 The MeeJah Show
Don't get carried away by the 'once in a decade D-notice' - many magazines and newspapers routinely inquire whether something they are considering publishing will attract a D-notice, and if advised it would, they don't publish.
Real life != computer games.
For example, xBox war simulations are about killing the enemy. Real-life warfare is about finding comfortable boots.
Since the designs for this wonder machine remain theoretical, the concrete computer is abstract?
Re: Sporking hell
Um ... there's a reason you shouldn't call a spade a shovel. A spade is for digging stuff, a shovel is for moving it.
Care to re-think your analogy?
Re: A few points of order
'America did not exist'. Um yes it did, it was - and is - that big rocky thing you sail into on the way to the Orient. The United States of America did not exist, but that's not the same thing.
the same two questions ..
Every time this is debated, I ask the same two plaintive questions.
How much has global temperature risen in the last two decades?
How does this compare with the thermal radiation of the moon and Mars?
If the moon and Mars are reflecting more heat, then global warming is due to solar activity. If they are not and temperatures on Earth are indeed rising, then it's probably us. Yet AGW debates always seem to start without this basic information.
If this meteorite is just visiting, I'd be very interested in its plans for the return journey. Otherwise, it's an immigrant.
I for one, welcome our green scummy Mercurians, however veiny they may be,
Re: "Col. Ahmed Mohammed Ali said on his Facebook page"
Um , I think the false premise here is that the world was ever sane.
Re: Does spam actually have a purpose?
Buggered if I know.
We run a forum where people can post queries. With spammers in mind, the board is set to block anything that looks like a URL within the message.
So we get posts that read something like this
Penis pills I to agree with your postabilityness penis pills
... which posts are deleted before anyone but our moderator sees them. Apart from being a pita, WTF is the point?
A force for good?
The thing about mobile phones that no-one expected was subvelliance.
Cops found that it was not so easy to break the law with members of the public photographing them, which was why they hurried to make photographing policemen on duty illegal.
With these glasses, every policeman who roughs up a member of the public, every councilman who fishes for a bribe, every sanctimonious politician who leaves a brothel will never know when their misdeeds will go on the record.
THEY have devices in place that make Bentham's panopticon look childish. We need something to watch them right back. However, like the camera phones, the authorities probably won't stand for it - they'll take the tech for themselves. If google glasses do become illegal you can bet an exemption will be given to 'responsible government agencies.'
He might be broke but ...
He can still pay in other ways. Five years in the Big House sounds about right.
How about ...?
Do you ..
1.) Drive a German car
2.) Wash down Indian curry with Belgian lager
3.) Go home and sit on a Swedish sofa to watch American shows on a Japanese TV?
4.) Despise foreigners
If you answered 'yes' to all the above, congratulations(?) you're a Brit!
Re: History and culture
Mike 2r wrote
"It [Trafalgar] marks the last time the Royal Navy was challenged in an all-out fleet action. Literally from that point until the carrier age, Britain was the uncontested naval power of the world. Nations that fought Britain might try to go after her trade ships, or act where the navy was weak. But no one tried to assemble a battle fleet and fight head on."
Battle of Jutland: 31 May - 1 June 1916. German Battle Fleet v. Royal Navy
World's first aircraft carrier: HMS Argus 1918
Carrier age 1935 -
Which country did you say you were from, Mike?
Re: Uh, JaitcH (was: Americans use such self-explanetory language ... once you learn the vocabulary)
' ... shots, fired inside the home so no chance of them exiting through the walls'. Making culture-based assumptions here, Condiment.
You are probably thinking of a solid brick-built British home (where bullets bouncing around inside might be an issue if the plaster isn't thick). Many North American homes have walls consisting of two layers of chipboard with insulation between them, and plastic siding on the outside.
A .38 will go right through. Heck, you can do it with a nail-gun if you are not careful.
Classic G.K. Chesterton
Feast on wine or fast on water
And your honour shall stand sure,
God Almighty’s son and daughter
He the valiant, she the pure
If an angel out of heaven
Brings you other things to drink,
Thank him for his kind attentions,
And pour them down the sink.
When red wine had brought red ruin
And the death-dance of our times,
Heaven sent us Soda Water
As a torment for our crimes.
Re: Moron Poison
Good one, Sir.
'Forae' are indeed no place to be right, and 'forae' is about as wrong as a forosum post (hey, I can play too) can be.
The usual English plural is 'forums'. If you must affect knowledge of Latin, the Latin nominative plural is 'fora'. In fact in all the forms of 'forum' including genitive, ablative and dative, 'forae' does not exist.
Nevertheless 'quidquid Latine dictum sit altum videtur', eh?
Re: @Dr. 81 Splutter!
'Real doctors' wrote a thesis and were awarded a doctorate. (From the Latin participle 'doctus' meaning 'learned'.)
But ... games might help
How does our asshat senator not know that violent video games don't help the potentially violent?
It's not unusual to fantasize about violently letting rip though, being sane, most people don't actually do it. I had a very stressful workplace a decade ago which I reconstructed as a set in Doom. After a bad day at the office I'd sit down at the computer, frag the place and its monstrous occupants with a rocket launcher, then emerge from the study a much more relaxed individual.
So perhaps violent video games might allow the violent or distressed to harmlessly blow off steam. But I can't see any empirical evidence that they encourage them to take their activities into the real world. As a matter of interest the word 'amok' comes from people running that way in pre-xbox Malayan culture.
I'm still waiting for the first post that consists entirely of little rectangular boxes ...
This has nothing to do with paedophiles or terrorism and everything to do with the government wanting to control its citizens.
If this is the first brain-controlled helicopter, how have helicopters been controlled up to now?
Another thought - '16 000 could be at risk'. This does not mean that 16 000 cases of abuse happen.
If 50% of those who 'could be' at risk actually are, and one in four of those at risk do suffer abuse then the reported statistic of 2,000 cases is actually in line with the scarier higher figure.