41 posts • joined 20 May 2013
Well to be fair, they probably *can* have their job.... Just at less than 10% of their current salary.
That is all....
...are the biggest hurdle to locking down systems securely. What they consider to be adequate security is simply shocking.
Re: Bah humbug
Yay!!! Exactly why I bought a 5s last month! Small form phones rule!!
I enter a search phrase, Google renders some results. How hard can that be to achieve in a browser? Any browser for that matter!
Speak for youself!
I've just bought an iPhone 5S, because from all the reports the 6 is going to be stupidly large.
The only way to get staff in government departments to be accountable is to fire them for gross misconduct. The inter-government money laundering (with thanks to 'Lost all faith') is simply pointless.
Re: My debut single
...or a cover of No Brakes by The Offspring ?
Re: Perfect opportunity
Why? The lack of understanding of Linux by some serious application vendors is shocking.
Both Sky's reporting, and your subsequent cut and paste are inaccurate. Gary Hartstein is not Schumacher's doctor. He WAS the chief medical guy for F1. His views are just that, his views. He's previously stated that he has no direct contact with Schumacher's medical team.
Because you didn't "buy" it from Amazon UK. They just happen to store it in a warehouse and arrange the shipping. Same as Google UK don't "sell you" ad services. They just "advise you", and pass you on to a colleague in Ireland to seal the deal. It's complete bullshit.
All the UK companies that have harvested my email address from a website that I manage for an amateur unincorporated sports club owe me cash? The one's I'm thinking of have never had any dealings with either me personally, or the club, and I have never submitted my details to them? I realise that the worst culprits are the offshore SEO spammers, but there's a significant amount of UK spam as well.
Re: Comedy gold
Makes me chuckle as well. Don't you just love the factual inaccuracies of this rag?
Ever been to Hull?
Re: No.....you do it..
You know they dropped the 'Origin' 3 years ago??
I bet their journey back wasn't as exciting as Sandra Bullock's ??
Any chance of finishing off the 3G rollout first??
The point of creating more TLDs was because there are few useful names left in the current ones, but all that's going to happen is that the companies that have .com and .co.uk addresses will now register a .london variant to point to an existing website. It's about as useful as when they added a 1 to dialling codes...
Re: pip pip pip pip...
9600??? You were lucky... In my day....
Another pointless article
Of course modern life is possible without a smart phone. Have one / don't have one, it really doesn't matter. If you find one useful, or just want to be down with the cool kids then have one, if you don't, don't. I don't have one, and don't care less. If you want to write an interesting article, how about waiting 10 years and asking if it's possible to be without an internet connection - be it to a smart phone, tablet, laptop or what ever else comes along. With Government rolling out more and more services which will only be available on-line, the question is, "How easy will it be to live a disconnected life in a connected world?"
So banks are whinging that cash is expensive? And in what way is this NOT expensive? I don't have a mobile phone of any description, yet it seems more and more that we're heading into a situation where life will be difficult if not impossible without one.
Mobile phones are simply not the answer to everything.
What are those ? Every man for themselves round here!
Politicians don't get in the way half as much as Civil Servants do.
Open Source doesn't equal free. For example, if you're using Red Hat Enterprise Linux, you still need support contracts to entitle you to download patches from Red Hat.
It's probably no more scary than to sit at home waiting for the rest of the crap IT systems in this country to fall apart in a heap.
Re: Fine by me
If the big companies paid their fair share of taxes then either, a) you'd have better public services, b) lower taxes, or c) both a and b. But I guess not having better public services for no cost to yourself is fine by you as well?
Surely all you've got to do is tax all cash taken out of the country above a certain threshold. Say, anything over a million quid per year at 21%. Easy!
Next week you'll no doubt do a contradictory article about how tape isn't dead. Because it isn't, and that's what always happens when the Reg posts an article about tape.
Hardly a giant???
Why, not How?
It's an interesting article on how to convert from VMWare to Microsoft, but nothing on why you would convert? What are the technical benefits of MS over VM?
How is spending £81,000 on "Business Strategy and Analysis for Cloud" actually going to achieve this? They appear to have outsourced the insourcing?
Re: Let's see....
You've purchased the same thing 10 times? Sucker....
Jesus wept! The mainframe isn't clapped out - the staff and management running it are!
Is 450m enough? I genuinely have no idea how much a replacement would / should cost. If a robust replacement should cost 500m, then cutting corners and spending 450m means they are building down to a price, not up to a spec.
All large corporations are run by bean counting bureaucrats. IT is just an expensive irritation to them. All they want to do is spend as little as possible, regardless of impact. I include all of the large IT outsourcing companies in that sweeping generalisation as well.
It ain't broke??
450 million to replace a system that is still at the mercy of incompetent staff managed by stupid managers? Do the clowns in charge not realise that throwing shiney tin at a problem will not make a blind bit of difference? Outsourcing / offshoring, it's all the same. Getting rid of competent staff and replacing them with incompetent replacements.
O/S isn't the issue!
If I had a browser capable phone with a tiny screen, I might want to view a mobile site. I don't though, I have a 7" tablet with Android that I only ever use on a wifi connection. I neither need nor want mobile sites!
At least give us a choice of which site to view?
I wish the banks would stop buying all this crap and just give us a decent banking service - like the good old days where we used to get "interest" on savings. Remember that Mr Banker???
Why is it only ever developers that bleat on about needing more powerful kit? Ah yes... it's to write shoddy ineffiecient applications
Re: Pay attention to SPARC folks..
".....The best place to run Oracle software will be SPARC...." The best for who?
The best for anyone that wants to build a mission critical system that actually does the job it's designed to do. x64 and Linux doesn't do that - it's still a poor excuse for 'Enterprise class'. Nothing in RHEL5 / 6 and their OEL counterparts gives me any reason to think otherwise.
Re: Outsourcing does not equal offshoring
Outsourcing does not always equal offshoring, but it usually does. Companies such as these - both Capita and O2 / Telefonica are run solely on a for profit basis. O2 / Telefonica don't care about providing you with a phone service, and Capita don't care about providing helpdesk / IT services. These are secondary issues to making money for investors. As soon as Capita say they can do the job for 30% less if they offshore, the UK jobs will be gone.
I can almost understand how Google get away with it, but Amazon? I buy physical stuff which is shipped from a warehouse in the UK. At no point does my stuff exist in Luxemborg, indeed a lot of electrical stuff is specific UK spec - power leads etc. I wonder if I could get away with the same if it were a bricks and morter store? Take a credit card swipe that's processed in Luxemborg, but hand over the goods there and then and put 10p on every transaction through the UK as 'warehousing and handling'.
- +Comment Trips to Mars may be OFF: The SUN has changed in a way we've NEVER SEEN
- Vid Google opens Inbox – email for people too stupid to use email
- Back to the ... drawing board: 'Hoverboard' will disappoint Marty McFly wannabes
- Pic Forget the $2499 5K iMac – today we reveal Apple's most expensive computer to date
- Google+ goes TITSUP. But WHO knew? How long? Anyone ... Hello ...