That's Google News in trouble for providing links to the Financial Times and the Wall Street Journal that bypass their paywalls, then.
352 posts • joined 15 May 2013
Re: C'mon, ElReg. Je suis Charlie!
We're not making a big fuss over it as there's no need to.
Re: Really, El Reg...
Define an "assault rifle". In your own time...
Meanwhile I've turned the pic off, as it's a stock image that doesn't add a great deal here.
Re: I bet it was...
I appreciate you were being ironic, but consider this an official "thou shalt not do that again".
See that great big "send tips and corrections" link at the bottom of the article? Use that instead of scribbling all over the comments section and then getting butthurt because you've been caught gobbing off.
Let me put this in simple terms.
If you don't like it, don't read it.
If you think we're somehow biased for reporting what's going on in the world, feel free to set up your own news website and tell the world how wonderful everything is.
Re: I am outraged by you all
I come into work and this is the first thing I read in 2015. Here's hoping the rest of the year stays equally insane.
Re: Happy New Year
That comment was lucid and understandable. Who are you and what have you done with amanfrommars?!
Re: @ gazthejourno (was: Re: @AC "9 hrs" (was: Gawd/ess.))
I blame the Christmas spirits. Hic!
Re: @AC "9 hrs" (was: Re: Gawd/ess.)
Because hoping someone's family is caught in a bomb blast isn't very nice.
Hugs and kisses
Re: Re: "... face future action over any losses Sony incurs"
Try looking at the icon before biting.
Shut up! They promised us all free Mariah Carey cassettes if we just shilled for them like the corporate MSM! Don't spoil this!
Re: The clueless will pay for their ignorance
Is this the first time you've decided not to call him "Snow job"? I only ask because I got so bored of reading it I just hit reject on your comments as soon as I saw it.
mod hat on
Mind your language. Those who know who I mean, know who I mean.
Re: Re: AC Re: AC AC "...under the terms of the Geneva Convention it can't be used...."
I'm rejecting the rest of your rants, Matt Bryant, because we don't work on Sunday nights and that's why eleventy bazillion of your increasingly bizarre posts are clogging up my pre-mod queue.
Re: Talk about cr*p journalism
Actually that was me misreading someone's rant about this one sent to the corrections email address. I thought we'd misquoted the Git folks when that wasn't the case. Originally it was right, then it wasn't (which you spotted), now I've put it back to how it was.
Wot Peter2 said. I'm obviously so terrified of guns that I'd never dream of building my own... oh, wait.
What a clueless blowhard.
Oh, agreed - the real work was done by the gunsmith, who fabricated a thin bushing to get the barrel to time correctly, and headspacing it with a big tray of bolt heads and a set of go/no go gauges.
Mind you, given the space available there wasn't time to write about setting up the sights (ever tried to do that when the rearsight isn't true? Damn that axis pin - might have been bent as well as peened), the weeks of patient work it took to bed the thing properly, and my Heath Robinson solution to correcting the offset zero.
3MOA - worth bearing in mind factory reject standard for the No.4 was 4MOA. In addition, the bedding on this one could be a lot better and the barrel's an all-but-shot-out 1955 Mk.2 unit. With some proper attention I know I could easily add a minute to the accuracy, but for now it's fun and it's mine.
I don't have the money for an as-new original stock No.4 barrel (~£600+) and I certainly don't have the money to order a custom barrel, bearing in mind the condition of the receiver it's going onto. I'll keep that money for my target rifle!
Re: You did vary your certificate...
Read the bootnotes.
Re: Do only horny young boys write article titles for The Register?
Actually no, you're not getting the oxygen of publicity. Bye bye!
a) "Feuer frei" is not a Nazi slogan. It's the German command for "fire at will" and is still used to this day by the Bundeswehr.
b) Rammstein are not Nazis. See the lyrics of "Links 2 3 4" (which, before you start babbling on, is the German equivalent of "left right left", as you might hear the Garrison Sergeant Major of London District bellowing during the Trooping of the Colour)
c) If you really want to listen to Nazi-inspired metal, look up Hansyl und Gretl.
d) Stop taking whatever it is that prompts you to write such complete and utter bilge. After ceasing, investigate the function of the enter key with regard to paragraphs.
Have a nice day.
Re: @John Brown advertising are getting increasingly peeved
It's worth feeding that back via Reg Forums. It's no guarantee we'll stop running those sorts of ads (hey, money's money and without it I'd have to get a proper job) but we take all feedback into account.
Re: advertising are getting increasingly peeved
Showing the ad, as far as I know, rather than clickthroughs - but then again I'm not on the commercial side of the house (ignorance is strength!) so I could be completely wrong there.
Quite a lot of our ads aren't Flash-dependent. Now I'm not saying disabling Flash doesn't mean we at Vulture Central eat fewer beans in the evenings, but...
Re: Re: advertising are getting increasingly peeved
If you like what you read here, we politely ask that you whitelist us from your ad-blocker. We're mostly supported by ads - if people don't see the ads, that's a hit we're taking.
By all means turn the adblockers up to max on all the other tech news sites, though.
We had to refer it to the BBC PR and Compliance Department for their permission. I'm terribly sorry, but you must understand how these things work in the real media world.
Thanks to the 94,000,000 of you who wrote in to point out the origins of Only Connect, we think Yugguy's probably got the point now.
Re: Re: Garland of Flowers
There's a certain irony in having a pop at someone for an ad hominem argument by calling them a fuckwit.
Please cease and desist from this, amusing as it is for the rest of us.
Just because a handful of people want to change the meaning of basic English words doesn't make them right.
Hugs and kisses
Vulture Central Language Soviet
Re: Wikipedia RULES
Please, I implore you, post that somewhere publicly.
Re: Rebecca Brooks
I am duty bound to point out here that Rebekah Brooks was charged, tried and found not guilty by a jury of her peers. The CPS has declined to appeal that not guilty verdict.
Re: Please wake and grow up.
A dinner, hosted by popular cheap taxi company Uber.
Thank you for your input. Please feel free to use the crayons in your nearest toilet stall next time you feel the urge to sound off without comprehending.
Re: Re: Who wears a watch these days?
Not sure what happened there. It's live now, anyway.
Re: Re: Rand
I once read something which described Atlas Shrugged as Ayn Rand's overlong personal sexual fantasy about powerful businessmen. Sounded about right.
Re: Re: VMware versus Hyper V.
I'll let this one through the "new commentard" net, along with a polite reminder that if you want to advertise your commercial conferences on the Register, you can pay for the opportunity to do so through our commercial team: firstname.lastname@example.org.
You ever been to one of these central London protests? It's the same old procession of Socialist Worker placards, Palestine flags and weed-smoking trustafarians at all of them. Often the organisers are outnumbered by the rentamob eejits who love an excuse for a day out to "stick it to the man". The only ones which come to mind as being different are the static protests opposite Downing Street - but then those don't feature an option to cause traffic disruption, get on the news and spread litter around.
Bleat about bias all you like - I'll write it as I see it.
El Reg's Facebook page
If you're a regular Reg reader and use Facebook (yes, I know half of you lot treat the two as mutually exclusive but there's supposedly 8,000 of you on there as well as here), please come and tell us what (else) you want to see on there aside from the news feed. We're all about giving the people what they want here at Vulture Central.
Re: stop their Radar app from processing your tweets
Your correspondent does have some sympathy with the view that non-protected tweets are essentially public
Try reading the article before gobbing off, genius.
Re: This thread is being pre-modded.
It's more of a pre-emptive thing. I don't think very many comments at all have been pre-modded out of this thread at all, which rather restores my faith in humanity.
Re: Re: huh?
If you see factual cockups like this, please use the "send corrections link" at the bottom left of the article page. We'd rather edit it and have correct information up than duff info with everyone complaining about it underneath.
Re: Spot the difference
In fact neither of those was posted, looking through your comment history. One of them is sat in the pre-moderation queue, while the other simply seems not to exist.
Outrage level 1/10, show again spittle-flecked mouth.
Re: Random Spot Checks
Did you read the headline and skip straight into the comments again? READ THE ARTICLE. Here, I'll even make it as easy for you to do that as I physically can: Page 2 of article with all the answers you want to hear.
Something tells me you're determined not to believe that the random spot check campaign is a random spot check campaign unless Chief Constable Marsh himself turns up on your doorstep and says those exact words to you in person. If that is the case, please just say so and stop asking questions that have already been conclusively answered.
With clays you're constantly on the move, whereas with rifle and pistol you're trying to stay as still as possible. I've seen the same thing happen to my own scores ... practice makes perfect I guess!
Re: Legal Guns
This didn't actually happen, did it Pinocchio? You're clearly a windup merchant. If this did happen somewhere other than your imagination you'd have called the police straightaway to report this "unlicensed" "high powered rifle".
Re: Biting the hand that feeds what?
It's in the Weekend Edition, El Reg's off-piste offering for the regular readership. Do you also post the same thing on the car reviews and the Dr Who punditry?
*sigh* why do I even bother engaging with this sort of thing...
I have a theory about how this can be turned into a legally defensible method of carrying out truly random spot-checks. It's to do with constant monitoring of FAC/SGC holders, unaudited local "intelligence" databases full of gossip and innuendo ("can't be too careful with gun owners, you know, especially after Cumbria") and no requirement to state the actual piece of intelligence which led to the visit when on the doorstep.
Put it another way. If this gives the police no extra powers at all, then why bother going to the effort of having FELWG put it through top-level stakeholder consultation and getting the minister to sign it off? Qui bono?
My reading of this is that uniformed coppers could rock up on your doorstep unannounced. To stay within the letter of the guidance Plod just needs to say "We have received intelligence that gives us cause for concern about your suitability to hold an FAC. Please will you allow us in now for a chat," while his mate double-checks his list of lawful powers with which to force entry. You know exactly what will happen if you say no in that scenario. What other choice do you have than to let them in? Having let them in voluntarily, many of your legal safeguards are not engaged as they would be if a statutory power or search warrant was used, meaning the two officers have carte blanche to poke around your home on a fishing expedition.
All Plod needs to say, when he stands up in court later, is that an anonymous caller to the new Crimestoppers hotline said they heard raised voices from your home and saw you stomping around the living room with your shotgun. The police are duty bound to act on intelligence received; to preserve the integrity of Crimestoppers the caller's identity and motive cannot be speculated upon.
If enough adverse rumour, gossip or hearsay could be collected on every FAC/SGC holder in the land, that would give the police defensible grounds to carry out spot checks on all of those unfortunates. Hence the new Crimestoppers number.
I want to think I'm wrong, but the more I see of detailed police procedure in this country the more I'm convinced the worst-case scenario is usually the truth.
Re: Non story
Everyone knows that the police have the power to turn up unannounced if there's an actual problem. As the shooting orgs say, this latest change doesn't appear, on the face of it, to give them any new powers. If they've got genuine suspicions, they have the power to revoke FACs and/or get an arrest warrant from a judge.
Yet it does seem the way this has been communicated to police forces by ACPO, away from the public eye, is "You now have the go-ahead for unannounced spot checks".
I am absolutely not cool with the police having official blessing to turn up on my doorstep and "persuade" me to open the door on pain of "consequences".
Re: Is Old English The Only Real English?
Today I have learned something that I did not know before.
Signed, Vulture Central backroom gremlin.
Re: Re: Penetration Testing the System .... Out of this World Style
amanfrommars' posts are perfectly logical and reasonable.
If the platform's gone titsup, how do you think we're going to post it on there? *facepalm*
It got caught in the manual moderation filter. Something evidently tripped it off, possibly the length. Either way it should have appeared by now.