Re: IoT crazy
Ok, I'll bite :-D
Anything by The Skids or maybe Stand by your pan?
124 posts • joined 3 May 2013
Ok, I'll bite :-D
Anything by The Skids or maybe Stand by your pan?
I agree - pretty much any smartphone now can generate pretty impressive images - certainly good enough not to always take along my DSLR.
My problem is though (and Apple while it's not just you, I'm looking at you more than most) the obsession with a slim form factor makes them a pig to handle even for casual photos that aren't Selfies or shots of ones dinner for Facebook....
In a gentle, ease myself into Monday kind of way. :-)
Though as has been said, seeing these built in production would be much more interesting.
... a Flash of flaws?
or less opaquely
An Abobe of flaws?
> So the solution is for none of the major corporations to look for bugs (even in their own code)?
> Isn't there too much of that already?
No, the answer is for Google et al to act responsibly - by all means hunt each other's bugs but don't then use them to indirectly threaten end users.
We've seen the rumblings about Win10 and the fears of loss of test time and patch management, but that's exactly what Google were trying to force. I see few sys admins running Windiws estates who relish on the fly quick patching to timescales like the ones Google arbitrarily set and now seemingly can't deliver to in their own code bases. :-/
Or more likely, traffic shape the hell out of windows update...
In present times I t's a brave handset maker than tells The Big G to shove it.
I still have the magazine, and the final AF and all the issues of AmigAction that was born from the corpse of CU.
Sadly my '030 16mb A1200 with PCMCIA CD-ROM went to landfill. What on earth was I thinking! I can still remember seeing it land in the skip. :-(
Depending on who it is pressing against you groin, £20 may be excellent value!
So, so, funny - have an upvote Sir!
In terms of image quality there's probably not much point in going beyond today's resolutions.
Is it just me or is the big downer on camera phones the handling. My iPhone 6 plus takes perfectly acceptable pictures, but for photography handling the slim oversize body makes using the camera a chore. I imagine I'd find the same with other premium handsets too.
Whatever Apple might trumpet around pros using iPhones or iPads to do stellar work, I have a hunch the only ones who do are those commissioned by Apple to shoot video for them.
These prices are simply in line with the superb connection quality, customer service, depth of coverage and data speeds Vodafone provide.
Remove the only differentiation? Expand boldly is to a commodity market with little real profit in it?
How on earth can anyone at BB think consuming capital on non-profit hardware is preferable to gracefully leaving the market is beyond me?
And this isn't a dig at Android, it's just acknowledging that if you're not Samsung or Apple there's just *no significant profit* to be made in hardware.
When will BB finally smell the coffee and start to make some really strategic bold decisions like killing the sacred cow of Hardware? Give it up guys!
ISTR an outage at Apple that caused loads of IOS devices to fail to authenticate on to wifi because devices couldn't talk to a broken page somewhere within apple.com
Spurious outward comms always concern me.
I'm not sure about Android but the limitations to non-native apps on IOS will be way too big to make Cortana anything but an also ran so why on earth take the time to produce something so pointless.
A "digital assistant" will always need to have a level of OS bind in to make it (arguably) even half useful. Surely the time would be better spent throwing all engineering effort at making Cortana compelling on Windows mobile and desktop?
Sir John Harvey Jones once made the point that the problem with big companies wasn't getting people to do things, it was about getting people to stop doing the wrong things and line up behind a well thought out agreed strategy - That seems very relevant here.
At some point peak Apple will be right, so will Apple's demise. Nothing is more certain. Not even death.
The problem is I can be just as right.i don't want to hear how Apple will fail, nor MS nor Google., Sony or anyone else. In the end each of them *will* fail. I guarantee it!
I want to read some insight not the bleedin' obvious all the time!
Commentards can rant either way, that's what commentards do and damned right because we're not paid, just passionate. But paid journalists?
I wonder just what the Venn diagram of Glass users versus Apple Watch users would look like - I can't decide if the circles would be almost concentric or almost apart!
Me? I'll skip both I think.
From the looks of it these guys have simply discovered BT Openzone! ;-)
I... ensure order and security
You... rule with an iron fist.
He... Commits inhuman atrocities.
(With apologies to Bernard Wooley)
> That'd be a good concept - produce a module that established watch makers can incorporate into their designs.
Agreed - if the case became a standard that the module could be transplanted in to or out of.
Being able to Upgrade the hardware module while retaining the "luxury" case would be a lovely way to combat obsolesce.
"How can they not make a phone that works with out needing to download a ton of spam filled apps?"
Because that delicious spam filling pays for the underlying "free" OS (free to the manufacturer mind, not to us!). No such thing as a free lunch. You're as bad burned as scalded or any other down home expression you can think of...
Capitalism is a double edged sword.
Is it just me that's amused that only half the aide memoir was used in the event name? :-)
"Considering that there are more app developers for Android than iOS, isn't going by a percentage (saying so many percent of iOS developers make so much money or more vs so many Android developers) make it seem like there are more iOS developers making the threshold when in fact more Android developers could be making it?"
True enough, but by the same logic doesn't that mean more Android Devs are failing the threshold too?
I don't quite see why you see percentages as invalid? They seem representative to me and far better for analysis. Working on absolute numbers would be like asserting that 10p Bic Biros must be inherently easier to lose than Parker Duofolds simply because Bic sell more units.
> What part of "unless you set up a policy to bin them" is causing you trouble?
That's a fair point, but It's broadly similar to concerns around the UK's Porn filter.
There'll be a (slightly paranoid) suspicion that one day some over zealous prosecutor tries to brand changing the default setting as "actively destroying emails" and therefore clear evidence of wrong doing - "You were given the ability to store all email forever at no extra cost and you actively chose not to and switched it off? Are those the actions of an innocent man? Etc, etc..."
Should something like that ever to go to court, regardless of local retention laws, it's anyone's guess how the chips would fall. I imagine a lot would hinge on the state of M'Lord's Haemorrhoids on the day.
"Apple has something to bring to the computer business - it has nothing to offer the car business."
Isn't that what conventional wisdom said about the phone market? I seem to recall Steve Balmer certainly took that view...
Not saying you're wrong but are the likes of GM,Ford, VAG et al fundamentally much different to Nokia - long established, entrenched, complacent - fat and happy?
90 Days is time to do "something" but given the amount of regression testing that must be required it's probably only time to cobble something together in an unstructured and untested way.
I'm sure MS could be more fleet of foot than they are, but I'm equally sure continuing to drive this agenda is the wrong way to improve things.
This is little more than a pi**ing competition.
"if the date of a patch disclosure deadline falls on a weekend or a public holiday, Google now says it will hold off on its disclosure until the next working day"
That's big of them...
in the UK we're all expected to park on the Motorway...
Thank you - my bad! :-)
Agreed! And actually The Guardian's stance probably sums things up nicely.
Murdoch (and I can't stress enough my dislike of the Murdoch press) set up a paywall. The message is clear - if you value his journalism you pay a fee to enjoy it.
The Guardian on the other hand, snipes away at that same paywall, spouting puff after sanctimonious puff about content being free and rejecting a pay model:
To quote - "We're very sorry you awoke to find you could no longer read your newspaper online without a credit card and we feel your pain". Indeed...
Is the implication of that quote (That you can read The Grauniad without giving them your credit card details) still true? Yes, but isn't it also now also just a little disingenuous?
In the end we're either going to have to come to accept being the product or accepting we have to pay for things. :-/
As you say, time to uninstall...
we're furiously agreeing here. :-)
Tizen would be a bold move, but it's the only one that makes sense strategically as a phone only play. The other Strategic options are to get out of the phone business or as you say tie their Android handsets to the internet of things via a closed app/API.
> Or put their money where their mouth is and fork Android, or use Tizen.
Well said. Use the profits to differentiate. Change or die...
I doubt Apple care, they seem to make phones a lot of people do like.
In the end, the measure of any business isn't marketing spend, cost base, market share or any metric beyond return on investment.In this world, rightly or wrongly profits and therefore ROI count. And actually in the long term Apple don't matter to Samsung,
Sansung are dependent on Google, which is strategic suicide, just as any x86 system builder is dependent on Microsoft. The only possible outcome where manufacturers can't differentiate is a race to the bottom.
The bottom line is IOS can do a few things Android can't, just as Android can do a few things IOS can't, but Samsung currently can do nothing HTC, Hauwei or any other Android licensee can't do - usually more cheaply.
Samsung have done well to defy gravity for so long, but the pressure will always there in the market they're in.It's reaching the point where even Blackberry look like having a better proposition, not better than Android, but better than any single licensee.
Good point - i may be mistaken, but IIRC the original report said this wasn't fixable in software/firmware.
So I wonder if that was correct or FUD. I'm not sure 10.10.2 makes things any clearer one way or the other.
I have a slightly different take.
I *love* a well made watch just as some *love* vinyl and just as I write with a good quality fountain pen - because i like the feel and experience. I used to wear a watch every day.
But, even though I have 5 pretty high end expensive time pieces on my bedroom dresser, I now *never* put one on (save interviews, weddings etc.). I've thought about why this is and the best i can do is simply that a wrist watch doesn't have enough added value (features?) for me to spend the time pulling it on - which might sound odd, but is the truth - so I rely on my phone.
So far nothing i've seen in the wearable stakes has made me consider one, not even the iWatch which is probably the most functionally rich offering but still leaves me cold.
The cellphone, it seems to me is the new pocket watch - but unlike the pocket watch it has sufficient added value not to be replaced by the convenience of a wrist watch.
The secret to adoption (if there will ever be one) will be a killer app of some description but I can't see where it's coming from.
That's a fair point but taken in the round it's worse news for Samsung than Apple.
Whatever the relative merits of iOS and Android, if anyone wants iOS they can only but it from Apple. The closest Samsung has is Touch-Wiz, which doesn't have the same draw as it's tied to Android and increasingly Google services.
Samsung are going to get eaten by the rise of the Chinese more than Apple because their point of distinction is so less defined or embedded. I expect Apple will continue a steady decline and settle at 8-10%, but I can't see where Samsung will settle.
It's a more or less perfect copy of the PC world with Apple using (often purely emotional) pulls and selling standard kit at margins Wintel vendors can only dream of - Nice work if you can get it.
Strategically, if they wanted to be a major long term player in the phone market, Samsung should have stuck with Tizen and gritted it out.
Any decent factory car kit these days includes voice dial? Unlike Siri that'll be optimised for the car mic, etc. too.
Let's hope it's not in the same way MS Office revolutionised computing education...
> Why would I want to pay through the nose to be effectively locked into the Amazon ecosystem?
That's a really good point, but Apple seem to have been able to achieve it and if anyone should be able to, it should be Jeff?
Maybe the iPod>>iPhone migration path is just more compelling than the Kindle>>Fire Phone. Certainly the kindle seems less like a natural feed to a phone than the iPod classic does, but not massively so.
The thing that puts me off is Firefly - very clever for sure, but the idea of paying Bezos top money to allow me to buy more from him more easly just grates.
Given Redmond's hold on the corporate desktop it genuinely surprises me that WinPhone isn't seen as gunning as number one. Apple are a mess in the enterprise and even if they make a real effort to catch up MS have all the experience in-house.
Managing corporate deployments of IOS seems to be a nightmare, so why does so much mindset still sit there? - I'm genuinely curious.
"It's the whole aesthetic rather than the sound quality ...."
"Not it isn't. It's about pantomime, and the pretence of sound quality."
I agree there's probably some confirmation bias in using Vinyl, but is that such a bad thing? If anyone derives pleasure from the process, regardless of it being aesthetic or pantomime, what's the harm?
Personally, my Vinyl went the way of all plastic years ago and it won't be making a return. But Enjoyment of music in whatever form factor can't ever be described as objective. Fidelity is only part of the equation - one of my favourite tracks is the original pressing of "Try a little Tenderness" - mastered on to CD full of hiss, distortion and obvious loss of fidelity at the recording stage - but it adds to the atmosphere of the track immensely even on "clinical" CD.
... if anything they look like lumias to me.
"What would Mr. Jobs have said?!"
I have to disagree - swapping SIMs on an iPhone is a royal pain - can I ever find that s*dding SIM unlocking tool?
I've reached the point of having ordered 100 of them so i can keep a stock to lose as I'm not about to start using bent paperclips on delicate electronics.
Any system that's "fingers only required" seems far better to me.
And that's just what they do? :-)
Because not everybody is happy being told what they can and can't do with the device that they have purchased.
Fair enough and it's a very valid point, but that doesn't answer the question posed of why anyone would *need* to. Prefer to, maybe, but regardless of any distinction between IOS or Android, the basic point is play with fire for whatever reason and you have to accept you may just get brunt.
Not every woman, my wife keeps her phone in her bra... :-/
So still profit then, just expected rather than current?
Apple were late to the mp3 player market and it didn't seem to hold them back.
Not that I'm not sceptical, I reached the point years back where my phone had replaced my watch.
I'm sure there's a business case for a big campus site, but not for one that's as much form as function.
History records many examples of hubristic companies who massaged their own egos out of existance. BSkyB took on the undeniably chic Marco Polo House as their (expensive) head office, while Sky took on a functional "shed" somewhere near Romford. Both were suited to the companies needs but one was built to a reasonable budget while the other was more or less pure excess.
Activities like these don't condemn a company but they do signpost the management mindset.
If I were Cook, I'd be spending less on head office and more on testing/R&D or other activity that benefits end customers and therefore Apple's competitive position...