8 posts • joined Thursday 7th March 2013 16:18 GMT
Re: Unlawfully testing ....hmmm
The law defines quite clearly how a patent is filed, granted and enforced. An NDA is not one of them.
I read on another source that Pure might be trying to accuse EMC of a breach of the licensing agreement. If so, what would be the sanction in that case?
It appears EMC bought the array through a middleman, hence its unclear how EMC would be liable for that.
As a I wrote above, I would be curious to learn details what Pure is holding EMC accountable for.
It might be just an attempt at filing a countersuit in order to settle the dispute out of court.
I'd be curious to learn which law prohibits testing of competitors equipment.
Reverse engineering too (if there is no patent or copyright infringment).
If Pure has any patents, pull them out.
I am curious to learn what "unlawfully testing a machine" consists of??
The acquisition would make sense. If I were NetApp, only 2 aspect of the deal would raise concern:
1) do I want to get into the tape business?
2) what to do with the 2000 employees of Quantum (and at what cost).?
IMHO, a benchmark without a $/GB parameter in it is superfluous for a real-life situation (unless we are talking about a customer with an unlimited purchasing budgets and decisions are based only on performance).
But when they bring their cash...
Interestingly enough, I never hear the companies or their boards complaining about Shareholders when they invest large chunks of money into their company. They then call them "forward thinking", "early adopters", "industry experts", "visionaries", etc....
Judging from past events and interviews, my guess is that Dell (if its still Michael running the show) will find 2B$ to be too pricey (like Data Domain or 3PAR) and will end up buying a less valued competitor of Violin's like Nimbus Data, Whiptail or similar - believing that they made "a deal". (like Compellent).
Someone like HP, NetApp, HDS or even EMC will eventually pickup Violin Mem.
The italian term "dematerializzazione" in in this particular case means "to do without a traditional, physical document support (i.e. paper) in favour of a digital document form". Hence, the term "digitisation" is more appropriate.
- World's OLDEST human DNA found in leg bone – but that's not the only boning going on...
- Lightning strikes USB bosses: Next-gen jacks will be REVERSIBLE
- Pics Brit inventors' GRAVITY POWERED LIGHT ships out after just 1 year
- Microsoft teams up with Feds, Europol in ZeroAccess botnet zombie hunt
- Storagebod Oh no, RBS has gone titsup again... but is it JUST BAD LUCK?