Re: Energy from a nail in a tree
Well I wood but I am not holly certain a beer is enough. Th row an order of chips in and it's a deal - I'm a hog any way you look at it.
280 posts • joined 6 Mar 2013
Well I wood but I am not holly certain a beer is enough. Th row an order of chips in and it's a deal - I'm a hog any way you look at it.
Here's a company with good products, some very loyal customers and a healthy profit but it is deemed to be failing and has to lay people off and yet some never-yet-profitable, and possibly never-ever-profitable startup somewhere will be having another round of VC funding to spaff on its far less mature virtualisation product development.
"Every cocido I've had made by kosher Spaniards has had a proper lump of serrano in it"
Well, that might depend on just how kosher, they are!
According to some of the internets cocido does have its origins in the Jewish community but presumably without the porkiness.
"I haven't yet used a Galaxy Note for long enough to judge it."
I've got a Note phone and a Note Pro tablet - the phone is a bit too small to really use the stylus on, although my girlfriend has come up with some decent impromptu sketches and it is handy if you are doing something where your hand might obscure useful information.
The tablet is a different matter - there's enough screen real estate to have a decent sized handwriting area (recognition is the best I have ever seen but as a former Newton owner I may be easier than average to impress) and drawing and sketching on something that's more like A4 size feels a lot more natural.
There's a tiny amount of lag - little enough that you stop noticing quite quickly but it is there - and obviously plastic on coated glass is almost friction free and so feels quite different from paper. (I might actually consider one of the lower-quality screen protectors to mitigate this).
For something completely portable it's in the 'good enough' bracket IMO.
He was more interested in looking at the unintended consequences of even seemingly trivial instructions rather than paperclips per se but I do take your point.
Would "Make as many paperclips as we can profitably sell!" fit better?
It wouldn't take much imagination to see this leading to equally disastrous consequences.
Agree completely. Strong or weak, AI needs some sort of purpose and this is what potentially dangerous.
Someone who is fortunate enough to be paid to think about this sort of thing (Nick Bostrom, perhaps?) gives the example of an AI that is tasked with making paperclips efficiently.
Given this as a motivation the logical conclusion as he sees it is the elimination of human life (as we know and like it at least) as very early on it would be clear that preventing anything from interfering with paperclip production is one of the essential tasks.
Bostrom (or whoever; I've outsourced my memory to Google and while they are doing a good job for the price it isn't perfect) suggests that in fact we are not yet in a position to set any task before any AI worthy of the name where the elimination or subjugation of humans is not the end result.
Playing devil's advocate for a massive change I'd suggest that if these (strong) artificial intelligences do not exceed our own then what can they do for us that we cannot do for ourselves? It would be like making a spanner out of fingers.
If they are to be useful tools they must exceed their creators in those respects that are pertinent to their function.
I don't really have a problem with that.
We have a better chance of getting an artificial intelligence spread across the universe than we do a meat-base one and that alone makes it seem worth having a go at.
" we're a LONG ways from being able to make anything that could be called true AI. We don't even understand how human self awareness works or what it is that makes us capable of independent thought. How are we supposed to replicate programmatically something we don't understand? It's just not going to happen any time soon."
We're closer to being able to make an artificial intelligence than we are to making one we are certain will not cause us problems.
And we're actively trying to get closer to making one. Their point is that we should at least run our efforts to ensure it is not harmful in parallel with our efforts to ensure it happens.
We can already replicate human self awareness without understanding it - that's how you and I got here - we would not necessarily have to understand it, and certainly wouldn't have to understand it fully, in order to replicate it artificially to a degree significant enough to get ourselves into trouble.
"The purpose of AI is to have slaves."
It's not obvious that this is the case at all and it is not even clear that the word "slave" would necessarily have negative connotations for such artificial intelligences even if it was semantically correct.
" You cannot lock into a cupboard any sentient being that has not broken any laws."
Well you can. And we do. We tend to frown on it when we do it to other humans, less so as our confidence in the sentience of the creature involved decreases. However any artificial intelligence would be a new case and new rules would apply. If your complaint is that these rules would be arbitrary then you are right but there isn't an absolute moral authority for us to consult on the matter so we will have to decide for ourselves what would be unacceptable in this case.
"If then given freedom it would no doubt want company of its own sort"
This simply does not follow. Why would it? Because you would? It will not be you.
"and create offspring"
WTF? Why? And why would this necessarily be a problem anyway?
"Whether or not they turn out to be benign is anyone's guess"
The whole point of all this is that (in the opinion of these very clever people) we are now at the point where we have to think about how we would ensure that they were benign - and we need to do this before we make them.
The problem is that we can't usually define all the things we don't want done and we certainly can't if the intelligence devising them surpasses our own.
The key distinction is the one the earlier poster made - we need these things to do what we want them to do and not what they have been told to do if the two are not the same.
We would not want an instruction like "make sure no one is unhappy" to result in action that made sure every one was dead, for example. Or fitted with some kind of artificial limbic lobe stimulator. Or drugged. Or any of the other creative solutions an intelligent but imperfectly-empathetic system might decide upon.
The convention is to use "Strong A.I." for things that could be called self aware (something that could perform any mental task that we are capable of) and "Weak A.I." for something that is dedicated to a particular task or set of tasks.
Even though we talk as though we just know what these terms mean, "intelligence" is very difficult to define and "free will" isn't much easier.
We assume we have both (to at least as great a degree as anything we have ever observed) so we tend to define things in reference to ourselves; if something convinces us that it is intelligent then it is - or may as well be because that's all any of us has to judge another by.
We probably wouldn't be convinced by anything that couldn't set out a goal and a plan to achieve it but it's not clear that this couldn't be a deterministic system that did not have the degree of free will that we believe ourselves to have.
There's a related track considering whether determinism is in fact necessary to separate free will from random behaviour which brings us back to our ill-defined terms.
"Don't buy a game until it comes out and you know you'll like it."
The dilemma here was that I wanted the game to happen and it might not have without being backed.
I'm perfectly sanguine about that backing not resulting in quite what I wanted but accepting that there was no guarantee that it would be perfect (for me) does not mean I'm not rather hacked off about the change they have made to the promised product and the way they went about notifying us of that change and handling complaints.
I won't be asking for a refund, and I will probably give the game a go at some point but that's quite a way from the excitement I originally had and I have to say that the whole experience puts me off Frontier and may even put me off funding other games in this way. Fortunately Wasteland has been quite a lot of fun so far which restores a bit of faith in the general idea.
" Is it more important to slash power consumption than push further increases in data rate?"
Yes. Yes, it is.
Better battery life is more important than:
- Increased data rates compared with 4G
- Thinner phones
- Screen resolution
- Loud speakers
- Pinkness, glitter, gold, or rhinestones
"What about France ?
"It is already 75 percent Nuclearified for its leccy. And no one seems to mind it or object . Been that way for many years."
France has an admirable dedication to energy self-sufficiency as a matter of national security and nuclear is a huge part of that but to suggest that no one objects when they build nuclear plants is way off the mark.
Apart from anything this is France and people object to almost everything almost all the time.
Nuclear gets the same sort of objections as it does anywhere,it just has greater government support and so a) there are better incentives (/bribes if you are that way inclined) for areas that accept the plants and b) it will happen anyway whatever anyone says
Sarkozy flat out refused to discuss the matter - the UK gives more of an ear to the NIMBYs and Green activists / nutters. Cameron did sign up for cooperation with France on nuclear power though so that may change.
"No, the reason they "stuck" at 40 is because anything less than 40 can't be called whisky."
That rather begs the question though.
If whisky was better more diluted then the legal minimum ABV would be lower - or at least there would be pressure from the industry for it to be so as who wouldn't want to sell more water and less expensive distillate, particularly if it tasted nicer to the customer?
'In an ideal world all whisky would be sold "Cask Condition"'
Cask strength do you mean?
It is mandatory for Scotch and Irish whisk(e)y to spend time in casks prior to bottling.
"Apparently it releases some of the flavouring compounds, thus accenting the nose (smell), and allows the more complex compounds to dissolve, bringing out the more subtle edges of the taste."
Yes, but by what process? Any chemists care to comment?
"The reason they stuck at 40 is because the flavour of the drink falls away fairly rapidly if you dilute past that point."
So should we only be adding water to the whisky that has not already been diluted to this point?
And should we be adding water to our brandy, calvados, gin, and rum if they are above this strength?
"whisky ... usually benefits from a small amount of water
I hear this a lot.
Can anyone explain what is actually going on?
If it benefits from a small amount of water why is it not just diluted more in the first place?
Purely anecdotal I realise but my Pebble goes longer than a week between charges (about nine days in fact).
The UI is obviously not very slick and (because) the screen resolution is low but that's a result of the focus on battery life which is the correct compromise IMO - it certainly made the difference between me stumping up on Kickstarter and writing it off as a silly gadget.
Personally I think they've done very well - initial production and distribution delays aside - largely through setting themselves achievable goals that were in line with what people would find useful rather than aiming for a wow factor with insufficient utility backing it up.
"when a couple of Star Trek characters travel in time ... it's as if they say "well, we just had an adventure that ... throws into doubt all our concepts of self, consciousness ,.. Let's never speak of this again.""
Well they are all already used to teleporting which raises pretty much all the same issues so I guess they have dealt with any cognitive dissonance.
... is for me the most interesting thing about this. As the article points out complete ignorance ought to lead to a 50-50 split so to have more than two-thirds of answers wrong is significant.
I'd love to know if people thought they knew what Moore's law was but were wrong, if they just thought transistors had nothing to do with computers (because they are in old radios?), or what.
"About time the ethicists were told to bugger off"
Not a fan of The Only Way Is Ethics?
My local Spar sells a range of scotch eggs including one that is made with a pickled egg and coated with salt and vinegar crisps instead of breadcrumbs.
I wouldn't say I prefer the egg pickled but it's certainly a good variation to have available.
What are your stretch goals?
If people are not allowed to copy good design then there will be more badly designed things around to offend him.
If he cares about the design more than the money why would he mind being copied?
I think it might be the case that these particular tablets are also being released running Windows on the same or only very slightly different (more RAM?) hardware.
So Linux ought to be no problem in terms of the capabilities of the device.
Excellent article. Thanks for the link.
"Title says it all."
Some of it twice.
"we don't have a hope in hell of filling anything larger"
Yes, Nook HD+ support multiple profiles - it's much more a parents-and-kids thing than anything that would have an impact for BYOD and I suspect that the google development will be much the same (and frankly I can't see anything on the device ever being sufficient for a properly secure BYOD setup anyway).
Why didn't CW just wait for Dixon's to die and then cherry pick what they wanted from it?
Or at least how does it claim it will one day make money?
I don't get it.
"My dentist has got a Panamera, which makes me think I am in the wrong business."
I know a dentist couple who only work six months a year and then go sailing for the rest of the time.
Looking down in the mouth? I don't think so etc.
£90k seems like an awful lot - I'd be interested in a quick straw poll of commentards to see what percentage of that sum people have paid for their most expensive car.
I'd be around 1% but that was many years ago and I really am not much of a driver.
Given NASA's motto, how about "For the benefit of ale." ?
It's probably not relevant but just might be - the 'threat' may look obvious but is still subject to interpretation; if threats and bullying were established to be staples of his m.o. then that might help seal the status of that part of the email.
Put it this way, if the expensive defence lawyers could somehow spin it that it couldn't be a threat because Jobs just wasn't that sort of person they'd certainly give that a go.
For these projects LegoTM is a four letter word.
Either people won't pay that much in which case Apple suffers, or they will, in which case Samsung has some headroom to expand into - it does like a phone at every price point and if there's a new price point there's a new opportunity; even if it is still the case that people won't pay as much for Samsung as they do for Apple, a new phone that is fifty dollars cheaper but still more profitable than the old top-of-the-range model is going to have them rubbing their hands in glee.
"though the data rate obtained is good, I am slightly underwhelmed."
Particularly given the short distance that rate is available over.
There's something attractive about a robust, solar-powered data transfer mechanism - that sounds like it could be cheap and simple, and therefore useful - but if you have to have a node every 10m or so that all breaks down quite quickly.
I guess a thorough answer to this would include the word 'ecosystem'. I assume they take a cut of apps sold through their app store for example.
"On the contrary, I would expect people who care enough to buy organic would smoke less than average, excercise more than average etc and that this meta-difference would show up in the results... but even this seems not to be the case."
So I guess you will now be considering revising your assumption seeing as the alternative would be to believe that the products used in non-organic farming somehow counteract the effects of smoking and taking insufficient exercise.
Not only is it a red herring (is that GM gone too far?) it seems from reading the Reg article that the science could have been more rigorous.
Given the relatively large sample size I guess we can allow for smoking, exercise, and other very relevant factors to average out across the groups but using "reported eating habits" to group these women seems a bit too vague - are people who report that they "always" eat organic being honest or trying to give what they think is the "better" answer? Are they eating mainly processed food? Do they eat a lot of (organic) meat?
With the caveat that I haven't read the original publication I'd say that it looks every bit as flimsy as the straw man it seems to be aimed at.
"There is no sport named "soccer". It's called FOOTBALL."
'Soccer' is a perfectly acceptable contraction of 'Association Football' which is the sort of football that it is.
I'm all for poking fun at the septics but it's an English word created in England by English people so it's a bit harsh to go off on one when they use it.
"Critics of homeopathy argue its remedies are just placebos."
Critical? Surely that's the only thing that can be said in favour of them, is it not?
"And will your Note 3 fit comfortably into my trouser pocket?"
If it helps my Galaxy Note is fine in a pair of Levi's 501s but slightly uncomfortable (more from a vague sense of apprehension about its survivability than any actual nutcracking) in a pair of 511s.
Other trousers are available.
"I'm possible in the minority in this respect, but I'd rather retain control of my business and settle merely to become a multi-millionaire"
I am with you there - it wasn't as though they were looking at poverty if they didn't take this offer.
However they may just not see it as a bad thing - if what they care about is getting the product right then this should give them the stability and security to achieve that.
Or some such bullshot will be how they justify it.
I don't understand why they or one of their competitors has not done this already* - I think it would be a really strong selling-point.
*At least to my knowledge no one has - if any commentards know better I'd be interested to read more.