73 posts • joined 13 Feb 2013
Re: Barely see the point
OK, let's admit that we both haven't measured Netflix's own HD bandwidth requirement.
Can we agree on the following facts:
1) Bandwidth requirements are dynamic and we need to focus on some sort of average/minimum bandwidth to give us a baseline?
2) How about the recommendations of the EBU (European Broadcasting Union) that for HD the minimum you should need is 10 Mbps ( EBU - Tech 3334 - page 6)
FWITW cable and early satellite HD feeds were using around 15-17 Mbps. So, unless Netflix are magicians or science wizards they couldn't possibly squeeze the same amount of information, that everyone else uses, down to a third of the size without some loss. For if they did, they'd stand to make way more money by marketing the algorithm than all their streaming business combined.
Re: Barely see the point
What you describe is SD quality.
Netflix's own recommendations ( https://help.netflix.com/en/node/306 ) say otherwise. Of course, if you didn't use HD before and don't use HD now; then 5+ Mbps is more than adequate for your needs.
Don't be a luddite
A little smart design goes a long way.
I have been a happy user of UBS's app for ages and never had a problem and very unlikely will have one either because of a few simple steps:
1) Username/Password only allows you to view details and take no action
2) Username/Password AND physical NFC card AND its PIN allow ordinary banking transactions (bill payment, acct transfers, payment to known parties)
3) Any fresh payment to an unknown party or account cannot be enacted by the app but can only be keyed in and in waiting. Final authorisation must come either via e-banking or at an ATM or in person. Hence money transfer to first time accounts is impossible under all scenarios using the app. Needless to say that the authorisation also requires a combo of the card, its PIN, a unique series on digits and access to one's e-banking account on the web
If ALL the above fail, I still only expose my current/regular accounts there that never seem to have too much money anyway. All of the other accounts are not ebanking enabled and only accept deposits, not withdrawals.
No need to forgo convenience for the sake of a little forethought.
Re: Nail in the cloud? @Ken Hagan
Agreed. What I was alluding to is the excuses employed to stop anyone granting proper data protection.
The EU, having repeatedly bent over to accommodate the yanks already is hardly likely to put up a fight.
As for China, I think there's a contradiction in terms if China starts defending data privacy (not a native English speaker but something about foxes and henhouses springs to mind).
Re: Nail in the cloud?
You write: " I wonder how long that will last."
Long. VERY long. Simply because proper such protections will ultimately mean gunships.
Connect the dots: Data protection -> IP Piracy -> Money Laundering -> Drug Trafficking/Terrorism -> Frozen off USD denominated financial markets -> Commerce is severely hampered
So whoever decides on proper data protection will soon find themselves in the pervailing axis of badness of the time.
Swisscom proves that unlimited CAN be supported with quasi reasonable prices. (unlimited all you can use on net, landlines and mobes within and outside the country for around 90 gbp together with their equivalent iPlayer and catch up service).
Why is it so hard for everyone else? Especially given that torrenting is officially and formally A-OK which would normally point to even higher usage.
Re: How I learned to stop worrying and love ceramics...
Sapphire and Ruby can be really versatile and have come a long way in the last few years:
Oskar Moser GmbH for a quick list of potential applications.
Disclaimer: they used to be a supplier of mine but haven't engaged them for over a decade now.
Nice to see them diversfying away from jewel bearings.
Re: Speaking of Canada...
That's a bit of a circular reference problem. If two bits of kit have identical input and output, then they ARE by the very definition producing the same heat (ie emit energy in heat form).
What effect that energy/heat produces in terms of temperature elevation depends on other factors like size, thermal conductivity, materials, surrounding environment etc.
Pointless and confusing
I'm with Cambridge professor McKay on this one. (http://www.withouthotair.com)
He made a very serious attempt at quantifying what it will take to be sustainable.
My best quote: "if everyone does a little, then all we can achieve is a little" (such a no brainer mathematically it makes you wonder why people didn't see through that 'every little helps' slogan).
At the end of the day if we want to really save energy our best bets are insulating our homes and assisting our boilers with solar panels or underground heat exchangers.
Re: Even more confused by the choice of Micro SD slot now
On a small point of pedantry. Most pro photographers I've come across swear by CF on account of the massive storage potential and the superior write speed which helps when snapping continuously at 40+ megapixels.
That may be so UNLESS you talking about Poulsbo.
The most abominable clusterfuck of crock ever to come from Intel's GPU team (admittedly they're an Imagination Technologies chip; but still).
Re: Don't attack AIMessengers, Run with ITs Flows
Just your insistence of stringing together unnecessarily long sentences that render them an unreadable nonsense. One way to demonstrate a deep understanding of any topic is the ability to explain it succinctly and in layman's terms.
However, your tirade had nothing to do with topics or issues that are difficult to grasp, just sentences that are badly put together and strewn with faux-smart leet-speak.
Re: Moving On ...... and Sharing the Spoils
What have both of you been drinking or do you revel in wanton syntax errors as some kind of badge?
Both of you don't make sense but at least the OP was mostly quoting.
Re: Where's the data to support the fact it's needed
I'm with AC on that one.
The system exists and would be perfectly capable of exposing this without any gizmo or fancy modification.
The reason that these slipped through was that the Interpol database isn't directly and easily accessible by airlines (which makes sense given that check in agents would have the keys to thing, otherwise).
Argue about simplifying the access procedure, not about splashing out on unnecessary kit.
Re: charge iPlayer-only viewers the full fee
I sympathise with you.
Back in the day, I was once parallel watching an F1 grand prix from BBC and a Greek TV station. Queue a series of blunders:
- Major events happening during commercial breaks (Murphy's law anyone?)
- The hapless Greek studio commentators didn't realise for a few laps that the front runner was losing ground; at the same time the BBC had their woman in the pits telling us "the gearbox had overheated in the last few laps forcing the engineers to lower the power output somewhat until the thermal profile recovered" (or something like that, anyway).
It's the difference of being given exclusive VIP room access to the event and trying to surmise what might be happening from the background noise that makes it to the pavement where you've been banished.
If the "target" is households, as you put it, then you allow unlimited connections from the household IP address (we're still some way away from multi IP addressed households) and also allow a nominal (no more than 3-5) number of instances that are outside the established household IP.
If it works with enterprise licencing for various types of software (think simultaneous connections/users) I don't see a problem extending it to the iPlayer.
However, it is the rights holders that need convincing, not the population.
For example, BBC had to switch to a satellite transponder with an even narrower footprint than before to continue with unscrambled broadcasts and still claim to only make them available to the UK (otherwise they would need to scramble or pay international distribution rights - about 10 times more expensive).
[rant] so much for the "single market" [/rant]
I'm with zb on this one.
Although my "workaround" is much more prosaic (and actually legal here in Switzerland), I too would love to hand over the cash, to enter the advert free blissdom that is the BBC.
More than any Netflix, iTunes or other service, the iPlayer is the only one I wish I was allowed to pay. Bring it on, I say.
(FWIW I think it would be right to charge only non-TV licence holders for access to iPlayer. After all, I recall from my years in Blighty that the TV licence is meant to support all public service broadcasters, like ITV and C4; so unless the online only licence came with 4OD and whatever the ITV equivalent is, I don't see the point).
You wrote:"My voicemails are texted to me".
How exactly is this a winpho specific feature and exactly how well would it work with non English voice messages?
Lavabit was secure but only by virtue of its owner preferring to shut the whole thing down rather than surrender his keys.
Having said that, shutting down your stervice at every official request isn't exactly a recipe for success.
Kudos to the Lavabit guy nonetheless.
I have the same respect and admiration for Qualcomm as I do for Oracle. And I wish them both well...
(OK, seriously why do we still have no irony icon?)
That's the same Imagination Tech of Poulsbo infamy.
They even managed to tarnish Intel's otherwise OK reputation among the Linux community with their antics.
As far as I'm concerned I-T can disappear and hopefully take Qualcom with them while they're at it.
So they will need all sorts of invasive and unnecessary permissions, escape their sandbox environment and when the proverbial hits the fan we'll be left with Google's (in)famous product support forum.
Count me in; where do I sign?... (not)
A few questions
Guys I could use your expert help.
I finally moved to a place that is well kitted out to make the most of a NAS box (FTTH coupled with 24 LAN sockets scattered across all rooms and a cisco switch just under the electrical panel/cabinet).
While I have various leftovers enough to make a screaming server if I got round to it; sadly I just can't devote the time anymore.
I was drawn to any 4-bay box and the three main usage scenarios are: 1) Torrent client & library, 2) DLNA playback to a smartTV and 3) using their app to access the box directly on my tab/phones when travelling so I don't have to load media beforehand (I travel a LOT and internationally, unfortunately).The playback is only about transporting the data; the TV should be capable of handling the playback of the media. As for the streaming via the app, essentially I only want the box to dumbly stream the data. My tabs/phones are more than capable of playing anything back with no help.
I read you guys talking about the underpowered option of the -j models. But then you get the normal numbers and the "+" versions. Only the + ones come with Atoms and the normals come with Marvells. The -j are hobbled on the CPU and RAM front. Given that a 412+/414+ bare cost as much as a 413j with 4x2TB WD Reds I want your opinion on a possible choice. I'm not sure I need to aim for "+" given the cost.
Apologies for the long post but sometimes (despite much evidence to the contrary) these fora are populated with some very sharp, smart and helpful people so I thought I'd ask.
'powered by Android, secured by [insert_any_name]' ...
Isn't this a contradiction in terms?
Even going by example cited in the article, do you know of many places that offer sufficient speeds for a HD download?
Most terminals (airports, train stations, ports) have dreadful speeds.
The only shiny exception in my experience are Zurich, Dubai and London City airports.
@ Mike Re: "voluntary solutions"?
Actually the "don't make crappy movies" is part of the "don't bet the farm on each film".
Making films so expensive means that producers focus group and market test everything to death. The result is everyone playing safe and ultimately just copying what worked for others. (see stream of fantasy adventure films or vampire themed literature).
Psycho as was pointed out on QI recently was vehemently opposed by Hitchcock's producers which resulted in it being black and white and using a TV crew instead of a film one to keep costs down.
So fewer crappy movies requires less costly films and opportunities for risk taking.
Re: @ Jake
While you can engage in pedantry and endlessly argue about the minutiae the fact of the matter is that coding (yes, even for basic) can teach valuable lessons about problem solving, logic, architecture and mapping.
Languages are just tools. The skills of programmers though are in good efficient problem mapping and solving.
Master that and you have all your life ahead to refine your output further.
So even basic is better than nothing. The shallower the learning curve the better for getting people hooked on coding and *problem solving*!
Re: This article doesn't get the scope of the problem.
My hunch, which could be way off, is that the "idiot contingent" is basically comprised of travelling workers who have low motivation for cost control. Either they're high up enough to not care or they are in the middle where the higher ups demand (and sponsor) their 24/7 connectability.
Add to the mix the corporate comms buyer (IT or purchasing) who rather than choose the most cost effective solution they go to whoever provides the best coverage at the C-suites' homes.
Re: I wonder how long it takes to fully charge? @JeffyPooh
6-8 hrs to charge!?
Well, if it's wrong to assume it's wrong to assume that gadgets would off when charging (fair enough), why do you assume that every single one of them would be drained down to 0 and needing the full monty to re-charge!?
Re: I wonder how long it takes to fully charge?
Not saying that it is the case but it could be the same trick that Asus did on their TF line.
Extra powerful usb charger and modified usb cable. Once the charger realised that it was connected to the TF it would bump the power to 2.5 amps. Failing that, anything else connected would only be served the usual 1 or 0.5 amps.
Smart solution though not very elegant. The charger though usb nominally still was needed for the TF to charge in less than an eternity.
To all those talking about competitors utilising the manual
Sorry to sound like a spoilsport but there is nothing, *nothing* that any known handset manufacturer doesn't already know.
If a maker found any new knowledge in there then they are behind the curve by some years.
And as for the intel value of knowing the competition's products before launch, any half decent marketing department would have worked it out from its market intelligence.
So, to the makers at least, this is a non story.
A couple of legit questions
Guys, just 4 years ago was when the first mainstream quad-cores made it to market. Back then 2.3 ghz meant a hefty cooling fan.
Nowadays they're in a phone (I understand the exaggeration but bear with me).
So have we got successful parallelism that so plagued early x86 code to make the most of the extra cores?
Is parallelism handled differently on ARM and is easier to leverage?
At the end of the day I recall from the x86 camp that twice the cores!=twice the power. How is it on ARM and Android?
(Funnily enough the phone's specs albeit with a little more RAM has been the "good - enough" setup that slowed pc sales down the last 5 years).
Still, for all its flaws it's refreshing to see the headhoncho airing the dirty linen as publicly as she has.
And while it suffers from many flaws I still respect what it has achieved, especially thinking that private enterprises and governments hadn't come close.
Now now, don't get carried away with the sarcasm and the evidence-based commenting or Orlowski will barge in and tell us how media companies are the best thing since sliced bread and all that sharing malarkey is the death; period.
Typing fail. Swear should really read 'sweat'.
See BB, there WAS something you were good at and some of us miss...
It was the CIO's wot dun it.
I have always maintained that it was the fact that CIO's loved it that spelled its doom. What with the granular locking up and lack of capabilities that other phones could do without breaking a swear.
It is funny to see it confirmed.
Where were those CIO's when iThings were flooding the enterprise?
Nokia was listening to the telecoms and BB to the techies. Well, did it ever occur to anyone to listen to the users?
Re: Please explain, not my area of expertise. @asdf
Can't fault you there.
Although things are not as expensive as you make out (not when take home pay is 80+% of your gross) but after 10 years here I've yet to fit in :-)
Re: Please explain, not my area of expertise. @John T.
You write: "Name one single telco that's nice.... Any one will do."
Try Swisscom. Reasonable prices, crazy dense network, 4G at all the main population centres, venues and motorways.
Among the earliest rollouts of VDSL2 and already offering FTTH since a couple of years. Broadband speeds always marginally exceed quoted ones. Couple that with the Swiss supreme Court ruling that mass IP address trawling is illegal (forcing most such collection companies out of the country overnight). IP address monitoring can only be on a case by case basis and only once a case can be made.
The only naff thing they have done is their attempt to charge for IPTV content that is FTA on satellite. But that's a minor annoyance.
Re: This is going to hurt
"A senior manager said to me "you can install far more apps on a smartphone" like that was a good business IT reason for going that way".
Well, old boy, that was half the reason for Blackberry's demise. The multilock, utterly throttled handsets may give IT admins a hard-on but gave nothing but frustration to the users. I still remember bluetooth issues, lack of tethering etc etc.
Couple this with devices that would struggle and crash attempting to display a Web page and then the writing is on the wall in bold 72pt arial.
Re: Can't say I blame him
I stand corrected.
I thought the images and binaries were the object of his ire and eventual departure.
I think I got confused by the link provided in the article.
Re: Can't say I blame him
Completely incidentally, the images in question were indeed released about 2 days after the rant. (http://www.androidpolice.com/2013/08/09/google-changes-course-posts-2013-nexus-7-razor-factory-image-and-binaries/)
Make of it what you will but it doesn't change the principle that open source code will stumble on proprietary gear.
Re: Ubuntu @Jedidiah
Sorry to shatter your convictions but I know plenty of semi newbs who put their rig together and installed it from scratch.
Any and all possible hardware and chips assembled on the motherboard have windows drivers.
Linux? Manual searching required.
And don't get me started on laptops and their fn combo keys for controlling brightness, projector behaviour or wifi state.
I really wish it wasn't the case but Linux of all flavours just fights you every step of the way. And having most of the fancy, blingy peripheral makers exclusively supporting Windows doesn't help. Not to start on iTunes (I know it's filthy but folk use it), netflix or the various iplayers of the various channels.
Re: How does this help? @eulampios
With respect, I will agree with you only when the latest and greatest peripherals have Linux drivers.
That includes: webcams, 7.1 headphones, touch pads and styluses, joysticks with all the customization options, any and all wifi and bluetooth USB dangles, any and all printers with their control programmes for scanning etc.
Then go to the more esoteric peripherals for audio production and then you can triumphantly declare that Linux is better supported.
I wish it was the case, alas it's not.
Re: Here's an idea
Go do a Nokia-is-marvellous piece and stop trolling.
The meters ARE the sensors :)
So no, the meter's own consumption is not calculated in the bill.
As for gas meters, there is one great big unsung innovation. They can work and run (opening and closing the supply valve if necessary) for over 10 years on a couple of D-size batteries. (Of course they are special Thionyl Chloride ones rated @19Ah but still...)
Don't worry, such a function is a long way off.
The reason is that currently the meter does not have the necessary granularity to result in any acceptable rate of false positives.
Until appliances become networked, or at minimum report their own flows to the meter, the picture the meter has isn't sufficient to correctly identify anything before the old-fashioned fuses and safety relays kick in.
Re: It's a pity Google killed their ...
Here's a bit of insider knowledge.
Google et al. didn't kill their efforts. They just froze them. No need to enter the fray now while everything is fluid.
Google, Cisco and IBM have smart grid firmly on their sights but won't enter the space until:
1) Standards and interoperability is ensured (70% of the way there on this one)
2) Taxpayer funded roll-outs are completed and smart meters reach critical mass (not even 20% of the way on that).
Reasoning: How do you justify higher prices/taxpayer-billpayer subsidies to roll out the network if Google et al. are seen to be bathing in a sea of money like Scrooge McD? So they're biding their time, waiting for the traditional players to slug it out and then once one of them (Itron, Landis+Gyr, etc.) prevails snap them up, fold'em in and take over the market.
In fact, ALL metering manufacturers and utilities are way out of their depth when it comes to data management, security or exploitation of the wealth of data provied by these meters.
Re: No Reception
You could; but all that you'd achieve is a switch (read re-installation) with one of the other comms modules.
At the moment meters support:
- GSM (All flavours)
- PowerLine Comms
- M-Bus (IEC 870, EN 1434)
- Optical (IEC 61107)
Sure, be difficult all you like but my suggestion is that your energies would be better expended in lobbying and acting in coordination with consumer groups rather than be the single outlier who Quixotically thinks they can stem the tide.
- Review Is it an iPad? Is it a MacBook Air? No, it's a Surface Pro 3
- Hello, police, El Reg here. Are we a bunch of terrorists now?
- Video of US journalist 'beheading' pulled from social media
- Microsoft refuses to confirm 'Windows 9' unzip lip slip
- The Register to boldly go where no Vulture has gone before: The WEEKEND