Re: Microsoft play well with others?
Company that plays well:
142 posts • joined 13 Feb 2013
Company that plays well:
What's the point in awarding first place to a device that's hard to come by?
There still people who use these???
About 5 years too late.
I still remember everyone's cries for a decent keyboard (and NO, the HTC ChaCha is not a decent keyboard) on an Android device and how if BB could pull it we'd all migrate to their handsets.
Still, we'll see if better late than never still holds.
OK, where do I start? Cores (4 to 8), PCI lanes (16 to 40) or Cache (8 to 20)?
Just on the PCI 3.0 Lanes, if you want to do SLi/Crossfire or simply slap on a PCI SSD, you're out of luck.
Same with future expansion options.
1151 are definitive false economies.
The 2011v3 replaced one of the early i7's from late 2008 so having a 5-6 year stint on each CPU, while in meantime allowing for whatever new gizmo comes along from SSD's to the (then-new) USB3 is good economics. The 2001v3 has another 5-6 years (if not more) of good gaming life ahead of it barring some unforeseen revolution that would make us all upgrade.
Can we once and for all put to bed the notion that anything LGA 1151 can be associated with serious gaming of any kind?
Unless and until we have a replacement for the LGA 2011v3 beasts, nothing can persuade me to upgrade.
All the 1151's are like also-rans in a losing race.
Fully agree. Besides, naming anything LGA 1151 as gaming or enthusiast is a travesty.
LGA 2011 - X99 still reign supreme. Octacore @3.5 GHz with 20MB cache? Thank you very much :)
Am I the only one that finds his voice really attractive in a kind of feature film promo trailer kind of way?
Sneer all you like; ASUS gear is usually both top notch and pretty good value for money.
Feel free to downvote but I still maintain that LGA 1151 is a halfway house for moderate setups.
True enthusiast boards are LGA 2011 exclusively.
PCI lanes on offer: 1151 - 16, 2011 - 40!
SATA 3 (6 Gbps): 1151 - 6, 2011 - 10!
Cores: 1151 - Max 4, 2011 - Max 8
L3 Cache: 1151 - Max 8MB, 2011 Max 20MB
So, unless I misread something, the LGA 1151 is what I'd call sporty city car and not exactly grand tourer. In other words, the 6700K is hardly a flagship, more of a capable middling.
Yo, Mr. Lock-It-All-Down, don't be so smug. Look around and you'll find that all your lock down twattery has resulted no so much in shadow IT but in a shadow working environment.
I'm willing to bet you that your poor users have resorted to way more ingenious and far fetched to override your control-freakery than you are complacent to realize.
Speaking as a proud member of the shadow IT brigade, I see this as a never-ending saga.
The same article could have been written 10 years ago and most probably would apply 10 years from now.
The reason at the end of the day is that authorised, properly secured apps tend to be cumbersome whereas unauthorised ones trade in the security for ease of use.
One tiny example: file sharing with external partners. Our corporate app works on a rather difficult to type URL, requires registration by the outsiders, only accepts *.zip files that contain the company name in the filename otherwise summarily deletes them and has a 50 MB limit.
Compare with box/drive/onedrive/whatever and you get a shareable URL, 15 GB size limit, 2FA for added safety and you can re-designate a file as no longer being shared after the external has taken it.
I may accept and respect our policies but my external party doesn't have time to faff on with mindless registrations just to get their hands on a single file, not to mention the amount of times externals have sent me their drawings in a zip folder only to be spaffed by the system.
I disagree with part of your premise.
If Google went down the road you describe then Android couldn't/wouldn't be able to boast Andy Rubin (in)famous tweet about what being open meant: https://twitter.com/Arubin/status/27808662429
Then, as you know, there are two flavours of Android. The Google vetted and approved Android with the various forks that exist. Why should Google be responsible for patching the forks?
Thanks for the proposals 9/5 but I'm afraid we are after different things.
With the exception of Satellite Reign the others had horrible graphics that make my early police quest and camelot games look positively recent.
Those graphics are painful to look at. It's like playing the original wolfenstein all over again.
How about something more aesthetically pleasing? I mean with graphics like that, no wonder Indie games get only the very dedicated to play them.
Thank you both. I intend to check 2-3 fro, that list. Looks interesting.
Pray tell which are those games of which you speak?
The great unwashed would like to know.
Good luck in the upcoming Pong! championships....
I'm no MS apologist but, strictly speaking, if you are present at your PC at upgrade time you get a popup that you can select the delay between 10 minute and 4 hours. There's also nothing to stop you postponing for endless number of 4-hour intervals.
It's when you go AFK that the timer starts and then goes on with the restart.
A 2009 OCZ Z-Drive v1 is still in active duty :)
[Disclaimer: one of its cousins was RMA'd before the current one got delivered]
Yes. They are seen and detected by the BIOS/UEFI just fine.
That was also the case with the very early OCZ Z-Drives all the way back in late 2008. No reason for any of the more modern varieties to go back on that.
Thank you ElReg for finally considering an article on the subject. I've been asking for something on the topic since late 2008 and the first iteration of the (then) OCZ Z-Drive.
I can't believe that it took 7 years to make such an article a viable topic.
Well, it all has to do with the likelihood of being faithful and the amount of rozzering you're likely to encounter. Huge gorillas have testes way smaller than our on account that they stay faithful whereas smaller chimps have massive bollocks on account that they'd pleasure anything that walks past them.
The clincher of the story: Nature intended it for human males to be modestly unfaithful on account of their gonad size. (Not sure it'll stand up in court lads, but don't say I didn't try)
You're asking the wrong question. MS knew what you knew. Their misplaced gamble was that they could force it down users' throats on account of their ubiquity. Sadly for them, gladly for us, this is not the 1990's.
Which is why people like me use the CamSam app to precisely report when a camera is no longer there or falsely reported.
Here in Switzerland the coppers have clued up on this and occasionally spam fake reports. Thanks to the crowds though they never last long.
And when they set up a camera, it takes on average 5 minutes till it's reported and shared. I, for one, have reported a fair few while they were still being set up.
One honest question: How do you square your recommendations with the need (more like dictat but let's stay with need) for a meter to last in excess of 10-15 years?
Wait a minute.
I'm all for the accusations you make but but but, what FB is doing is actually giving away the connection for free. I don't recall AOL giving away internet access packages for free.
So yes, it's abusive and walled garden and all those evil things. But it does give people who would otherwise can't afford internet access somewhat of a window to that world.
If customers become more discerning (as inevitably they will), they'll ditch Zuckernet for the joys of a proper access plan.
Yep, count me in on the punch up. I hadn't seen the guy before but upon setting eyes on him the first thing that came to my mind was "tosser".
That gives the Reg's mobile site the green light.
A huge thumbs up from a grateful reader too.
Help me out here. I think that just describing something on some sci-fi novel or making a movie prop to resemble something performing some (at the time) imaginary things are not sufficient grounds neither to award a patent nor to invalidate another.
Actually building a model and demonstrating its use according to the patent would.
Excuse the pedantry please but just saying, TAG Heuer has nothing to do with the TAG group for the last 15 or so years. Now it's just one more brand/marque in the growing arsenal of luxury giant LVMH.
I agree with the sentiment; disagree with the premise.
I fully subscribe to your frustration with regulators, regulatory capture and how modern manifestations of capitalism have little to do with its classical definition.
Most large enterprises seek to establish their turf not by virtue of their product/service but by subverting regulators to erect notional and real barriers to entry.
What we experience from Big Corp these days is protectionist's arms race.
But with Uber; I'm afraid you've mixed up the roles. If you think that Uber is this svelte witty underdog fighting the good fight with the behemoths of the taxi profession; think again.
After all, going by the age old joke, that's Germany so anything that's not expressly allowed is forbidden.
(France: Even what is forbidden it's still allowed; Switzerland: anything that's not expressly forbidden is obligatory and Greece: everything is allowed provided you know the right people; and the latest newcomer, Russia: everything is forbidden, even that which is expressly allowed).
What you described there, was quite a powerhouse for the time.
Quadro Nvidias, SAS interfaces, 8 GB RAMs and the first Core2Quads and all that circa 2006!
Agreed on the ECC point.
I have yet to see ECC RAM fitted to any desktop from the humble Dell Minis all the way to powerful CAD workstations, enthusiast LAN party gaming rigs and everything in between.
In fact, outside of Xeon CPU's there's almost nothing for the desktop. (There's a few for lappies and embedded but not for desktop).
Haswell and Broadwell have only just started offering ECC support.
I stand corrected.
Assuming then 18k SOLID gold throughout; 18k is 75% gold, 15% silver, and 10% copper then we're looking at maybe around an ounce; all-told.
Don't take my (mistaken) word for it: http://leancrew.com/all-this/2015/03/apple-gold/
You'd be surprised!
From the main sources we have: 1.65" X 1.5" for the thicker of the two. So let's assume a surface of 2 square inches to plate (being generous as we have non-flat components to plate).
Also, let's be extremely generous and assume a tough wearing 10 micron thickness of plating (anything beyond 7 micron is suitable for hard wearing, oft-used jewellery that should last decades).
Finally, looking up the latest price let's generously assume $1200 per troy ounce.
Considering each micron costs around a dollar, the 10 micron thickness costs around a tenner.
Now, the proper jewellery type steels used (316L, 904L) can be had at up to $5k per tonne.
From the above you can assume that the thing is priced highly but costs nowhere near that.
And to close the pedantry full circle; at $10k that would be just over 8oz (250gr) in gold so unless the Apple thingy weighs more than that; then it's worth/sold at more than it's weight in gold.
I hatez as much as the next person but where exactly did you spot the desperation when the company is breaking one record after the other in earnings, turnover and profits?
Maybe it's the moment they run out of ideas, but desperation?
"Some customers are concerned about the risk of having their NAS remotely hacked through the internet, ... this is an unlikely scenario."
Did this gem really come out of the mouths of an entity even remotely involved in IT?
With all due respect, razor thin margins and excess demand are kind of incompatible in most economic scenarios.
Zucker-jerkery aside, asking where you'd be happy working for the person you're interviewing makes good sense unless you're hiring drone for uteerly no-brain jobs.
You had me sold till the: "Usenet remains king for sensible discussion" bit.
The sooner it gets decoupled from other services and stays optional, G+ may be fine.
There are people who would still like to use it and appreciate the flexibility of circles etc.
So long as membership to it, isn't tied to nearly everything in the G universe, G+ may do just fine for those that want it. Ramming it down peoples' throats just isn't going to cut it (just ask Sinofski).
The way I see it, ever since Twitter went public it has been under pressure to clamp down on "undesirables" and become more "mainstream" and "marketable".
This, fundamentally is at odds with Twitter's earlier self-proclamations of being the free speech wing of the free speech brigade. And yes, however regrettable, free speech can be upsetting, offensive to some, occasionally OTT.
We are who we are and while it's a sad indictment of the human race, I don't see Twitter's (or any other's) job to police people's expressions insofar as they are not in breach of laws (and even then; it's debatable as all the Arab Spring tweets shirly contravened some local laws but were allowed/encouraged nonetheless).
Twitter the ragtag restless agitator of old may have had some street cred; Twitter, the betied, upstanding corporate citizen, not so much.
If they have found the robot to change bedsheets, puff up the pillows and lay down a fresh set, I want one.
I guess he/she does it for fear of losing power abruptly but unless the battery has come loose, I can't see a scenario where that happens.
Who are this Juku team of which you speak in your disclaimer!?
Have an upvote on the icon simile.
So I guess I'm the only one here to have my tab slow down to a crawl.
From tapping settings -> WiFi to actually seeing anything takes anything from 1 to 3 minutes!
Settings in general seems to crawl for some reason or another.
Pity, as the little fella was pretty fast before.
Actually, count me in on that too.
Nexus 7 2013 here and the update very nearly killed mine.
Loads of apps misbehave now, going into the Wi-Fi settings takes a good minute or two (to the point that I thought it would never open the Wi-Fi settings ever again).
There's definitely something wrong there. Under 4.4 everything went buttery smooth with no bugs at all so whatever is doing this to the tab is the software.
http://www.edri.org/files/Czech_BBA09_EN.pdf Bottom of page 3:
"Persons are identified by their IP addresses, from which an unauthorized copyrighted material
sharing is taking place. This gives responsibility to the connection owner and not necessarily the real wrongdoer. Under the law innocent victims, with insufficiently secured networks can
be punished, such as public WiFi hotspot owners."