Re: Shouldn't there be...
They extend from between the fingers, not from the fingers themselves.
58 posts • joined 9 Oct 2012
They extend from between the fingers, not from the fingers themselves.
What do you mean "Miss"?!?
"While hes out on lunch ..."
So any time really, because this fella is, quite clearly, permanently out to lunch. :-)
Enjoy my overdraft. :-D
... What have the Martians ever done for us?
It's in Bootnotes.
Or have IQ levels taken a dip today [possibly in the commentards section]?
"It's a NICE suit, but not a SPACE suit!
It does NOT contain an intricate system of tubing for the collection of bodily waste!" :-D
From memory, so probably not accurate. :-D
"A planet with its core on the outside?"
Wouldn't that be an exo-core planet?
I assumed exo-planet refers to a planet being outside something, in this case our solar system.
"Exo" = outer.
"Planet" = well...planet.
Definitely clutching at straws, man.
Or a Turtlenator! :-D
Icon appropriate to discussion.
"and on the TV there is the 9 PM watershed."
After which ANYONE with a television set can access the material broadcast. There is no filter in place. So it is the responsibility of the parents to prevent their precious kiddywinks from seeing the smut.
Just as it should be the responsibility of the parents to prevent those same kiddywinks from seeing the smut on the internet by supervising them when they are online.
It's very simple: Don't allow your children to have a computer in their bedroom, just as my parents didn't allow me to have a television in my bedroom when I was a child. If you only allow your child properly supervised access to the medium by which such things can be viewed you control their access and you know they are not seeing anything they shouldn't.
As for cinemas and WH Smith: There is no catch all filter in place. There are, however, adults providing proper supervision of the children in order that they do not come into contact with the grumble mags and flicks. (Are you spotting a connection yet?)
Really, if you can't handle the responsibility of bringing up a child properly, don't have kids.
Cease these terrible jokes!!
I found myself in one of their elevators in a hotel in Portugal many years ago.
Made me giggle. :-)
...in the picture above the counter, but is the size of a small coin when placed in your hand. ;-)
"all of those are mythical, you can only reanimate what once existed."
I'd imagine that's why he said "design" rather than "reanimate." ;-)
Folk who say "Snezz" are surely pronouncing the acronym SNES (Super Nintendo Entertainment System.)
Would it be OK to say "Sness"?
Will someone please explain to Eadon that Enemy Of The State wasn't a documentary?
Not a chance!
I'm not falling for that again. :-/
So not very grating at all, then.
More like.....polishing. ;)
Well, here it is: The pink panzer.
The rinky-dink panzer.
And it's as plain as your nose..........
That it's the one and only, truly original, panzer-pink-panzer from turret to track!!
Hmm, I think I lost it a little toward the end there. :-/
Still, I guess that's my earworm sorted for the day! :-D
Rather that than the pig farm in Snatch. :-/
A sad tale, indeed.
I can't help thinking, though, that the media's insistance on spreading the misinformation that illegal immigrants get free housing, healthcare and benefits in the UK serves to encourage this sort of desperate attempt to enter the country.
I LOVE LAMP!!
It isn't dragging, it's panning.
You move the mouse in the direction in which you want the "camera" to pan, hence the arrow that appears.
If you were dragging it you'd get the grabbing hand cursor, I'd have thought.
Big Brother because I've not yet found anyone doing anything untoward in any of the windows......... But I'm going to keep looking. :-D
I envisage a full size version of the Race 'N' Chase I never got as a kid.
Can't wait for the tipping bridge/jump section. :-D
Ah, the old robot tooth-drier.
*inhale through teeth* "That's gonna cost, guv'nor!" :-D
Revelation 13:18 - "Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six."
The wording differs slightly in different versions of the Bible (King James, New International, etc), but it's there.
Or have I missed some very subtle trolling here? ;-)
0.0.2.154 - the dotted decimal of the beast.
That'll sort it. :D
"Maybe someone who thought that computer should actually work rather than overheating every three minutes..."
A bit Red Arrows, was it? :-)
And what's that floating on the top? :/
"Wouldn't that cause time and space to explode or something like that?"
Um, no. I meet my father on a fairly regular basis and have done for over 40yrs now and, to my knowledge, time and space have not yet exploded.
"This film will be a revolution. It will be released in iMMersion - the patented novel all-sensory media format whereby iPhotons are propelled at extraordinary velocity until they dramatically collide with a screen coated in purest iSilver resulting in a pan-spectral iPicture that quite literally reflects into your puny mortal eyeballs."
Perhaps you'd be so kind as to explain your point.
In small words for us hard of thinking types.
As for your patience, I couldn't give a toss, mate. :-)
And why has no-one brought any bloody popcorn to this bruhaha?
So, you've been stalking me eh? Naughty boy! :D
You'll also notice that all my posts (gramatically correct and otherwise) are posted under my username. Not one of them is posted as an AC.... Which leads me back to my original point, which was that it is my opinion that you were out of order in criticising the author of the article (especially considering the name calling at the end of your post) without using your username. The fact that you chose to pick me up on my grammar/punctuation/whatever-else-you-can-think-of rather than adequately defend yourself simply indicates to me that you lack the courage of most people and prefer to hide behind anonymity.
As for speel chekker, IE7 deosn't hvae it, konbhaed. :-D
BTW, "Transparent attribution"?!? What does that even mean? :-)
Oh gosh! I'm being pilloried by someone who isn't even brave enough to identify himself!
In the common parlance of today's yoof: Whatever.
If you're going to criticise someone in such a vehement fashion, surely it is only good manners to do it under your regular username rather than as an AC.
Unless you lack the courage of your convictions and don't feel able to stand by your post?
Poor show, IMO.
....Don't listen to AC/DC.
Satan avatar because it's the nearest I could find to the maloik. \,,/ >.< \,,/
Where did the ground crew get that oversized lightsaber?
Seriously though, what IS that? Is it a light source (if so, why not use some sort of arc lamp?), is it a heat source (if so, why not use something more efficient... and in a tent or similar?) or is it one of Al Harrington's Wacky Waving Inflatable Arm-Flailing Tubemen? Without the arms.
No, that's trolls.
Orcs drive BMWs. ;-)
*Bond.... Before someone else pick me up on it.
I try not to cock up more than once in a day..... but often fail. :-D
In Casino Royale, bond wins a DB5 from a swarthy fellow in a card game when he's in the Caribbean and uses it to pull the guy's wife. She inadvertantly betrays her hubbie and is subsequently murdered.
The "DBS" they rolled was a modified DB9, according to IMDB:
D'oh!! Hoist by my own petard. :-D
"Decimation in modern parlance no longer means 1 tenth, is often used to refer to an extreme reduction."
That's as maybe, but it's still wrong. Like people who type "lightening" when they mean "lightning".......
Oh, so you just saw a "make less heavy" strike, did you?
The pedant in me (becoming more evident as I age) finds it nigh on impossible to ignore such stupidity and forces me to correct them. This often illicits the reply "But my spellchecker didn't pick it up!", the results of which I'll not go into but, suffice it to say, they are not pleasant. :-D