I find most advertisements are for stuff I've just bought, not stuff that I'm looking for.
I have never, ever, bought anything that was presented by a targeted ad.
55 posts • joined 26 Sep 2012
I find most advertisements are for stuff I've just bought, not stuff that I'm looking for.
I have never, ever, bought anything that was presented by a targeted ad.
Why do so many display such ignorance in public?
Microsoft and Google already have authenticator apps that run on smartphones. These apps follow a standard protocol and are compatible i.e. you can use the Microsoft Authenticator app to generate a key that will work when a key from the Google Authenticator app is expected.
You mean we don't need to hack the iCloud for nude selfies anymore, we can just write an app?
No point in copying anything from a Linux GUI. Microsoft only copy things that are successful.
Just look at how Microsoft has beefed up Powershell over the last few years to give the Linux sysadmin types a command line to play with.
Why the hell do these anti MS idiots want to comment on a free session for MS users?
And why the hell do they down vote factual statements?
I suppose their little lives must be so sad, having the rest of the world ignore their so superior solutions, my heart just bleeds for them.
This is a list of your preferences. Don't like it, use a different phone.
People who use other people's IP should pay for it.
Nobody is forcing anybody to buy a WP phone.
Define "Most People".
"Most People" I know have never heard of MySQL, MariaDB, PostgreSQL Sybase, DB2, Oracle or SQL Server. "Most People" only have a vague inkling what a database actually is.
IT People I know on the other hand have heard of SQL Server and Oracle. A few have heard of Sybase, DB2 and MySQL. A tiny, tiny number have heard of MariaDB. A few have heard of Big Data, MapReduce and Hadoop.
Defining "Most People" in terms of those you have regular contact with is one of the most basic analytical and statistical errors people make.
Should do some background checks and see WHO PAID FOR THE REPORT. Hint: Cross reference the published reports with the client list.
It used to be Microsoft that always got into trouble for "sponsoring" independent reports. The Reg has always called them out previously. Looks like you got caught hook, line and sinker on this one.
"No other platform has any apps like these," Cook said.
This statement is patently untrue. All other platforms have productivity apps, video streaming, photos, radio and cloud synchronization. This is just imitation, as is the "flat " UI, and still no NFC. The camera doesn't compete with the top Samsungs & Nokias. Nothing exciting about this release at all. No wonder the markets don't like it.
Apple has been here before. What will be interesting this time is who is last man standing. With reducing market share it doesn't look like it will be Apple and this time there is no Steve Jobs to rescue them from the fall.
Must be a short news day to regurgitate details of an extension module weeks after it was announced to all and sundry...
Hmm, why does "shipments don’t necessarily equal sales" only apply to Windows Phone 8 devices?
And why should it be surprising that Windows Phone 8 is the fastest growing phone OS? Now that Nokia has got a full range of devices to market, including entry level phones like the 520, there was always going to be a jump upwards from the very low base. Seeing the absolute numbers would give another perspective on that. Nokia has always delivered good phones and has a loyal following of people who care more that the phone is a Nokia than what the OS happens to be.
Looks like Blackberry is destined to become a mobile apps and services provider. Compared to its competitors it just doesn't have the cash, especially with Microsoft's billions backing Nokia for the 3rd spot. I wouldn't be surpirsed to see them snapped up soo, especially if the share price declines significantly below $10.
You obviously have no idea what Office 365 provides do you?
This is the most reasoned post I have come across in relation to this article.
Thank you for restoring my faith that there is still intelligent life in these forums.
Haven't read the different Office 365 plans have you?
Especially not the home premium plan that allows the full install of Office 2013 on 5 different machines?
Can't let the truth get in the way of a nice rant now can we?
"The fact that there is no other option for retail purchasers is insane. The fact that their terms are likely illegal where I live is just the Cherry on top."
Facts have nothing to do with these statements. there are lots of other options for retail purchasers and the terms are not in any way illegal, just because there are lots of other options.
Don't read the license, don't complain.
No. Read the license it's all there. You do know how to read right?
I wonder why some people take such determinedly one sided positions that they make themselves incapable of rational argument and unable to be objective about facts.
No-one gives you the right to dictate the terms on which commercial organizations offer their products. You always have the choice not to pay and not to use. Other people choose differently as is their right.
You have no idea what Office 365 offers do you?
You really have no idea what this discussion is about do you?
You obviously have no idea of the full range of Office licenses available do you?
If you want to read documents sent by someone else but don't want to buy Office there is always the free viewer.
The license being discussed is a non-commercial license for a single machine offered through retail outlets, so yes it is comparable to the games you buy for a console.
If you want to do anything other than use it on one single machine then you buy a different license. Why is that so hard to understand? No-one is forcing you to buy this particular license.
If you don't want to buy a license from Microsoft buy a different office suite or download a free one. You can still use the viewer to see what documents should look like.
Its your choice.
As you say you can always choose Apple. But that's like jumping out of the frying pan into the fire isn't it?
So much hatred for so little reason. Primarily from people clearly stating they don't or won't use the offending product anyway!
Microsoft's licenses are no more or less draconian than most other commercial software licenses. If you don't like the license don't buy the product. Nobody is forcing you. If you don't care enough to spend a few minutes learning what you are spending your money on that is your problem, not Microsoft's. Caveat Emptor.
At the end of the day it is their product and they can do what the hell they like with it. If people care enough they'll use an alternative. Most people don't care so Microsoft carries on making big buckets of money and people whinge and whine it ain't fair. Exploiting people's laziness, ignorance and stupidity is hardly a new game. Nothing unique about Microsoft in that.
LOL. Cannot figure out an XBox???? Expert admin wife takes an hour??!!!? Cataracts????
What a joke. But then I suppose anyone who spends time yelling at their TV cannot be taken seriously anyway. I sure as hell hope you don't work in IT.
Playing with Windows Phone in a shop just doesn't impart what the interface does. I glance at my screen and get so much information without ever having to open an app. I can see at a glance if I have emails, messages, missed calls, what my next appointment is, what the weather is like and how my stocks are doing. All without opening an app.
My kids have android phones. 3 (out of 4) of them have the same phone. After a year half the stuff doesn't work properly anymore. After playing with the windows phones (I had a 7.5 before the 8) two want a windows phone and are fighting over the 7.5.
Actually more like XBox. That's where much of the design language originated after all. And yes XBox took several years to overcome firmly established opposition amidst all sorts of cries of there aren't any games, no-one will lead with XBox, etc. etc.
Microsoft has a track record of being late to a particular market and then crunching the opposition over years by spending big bucks. Only time will tell whether they can pull it off again.
Personally I like Windows Phone 8 and Windows 8 and have both. The phone and tablet work better for me than other devices I had previously, but then I make heavy use of Office, especially OneNote and spend lots of time with Windows Server (having touch via RDP to a Windows Server 2012 VM in the cloud is just neat). Integration to work Exchange and SharePoint servers and SkyDrive work very well for me and I haven't found a scenario where I needed an app I couldn't find, but then I use LinkedIn and Twitter and not Tumblr or Instagram.
People in the Linux/android/iOS worlds will continue to spew hatred and vitriol and proclaim doom and gloom and moan how bad Microsoft are whilst not using their products. Maybe one day they will grow up and learn how to debate on facts. Using FUD against Microsoft doesn't work, they are the 800lb gorilla and there are thousands of people making a very good living utilising Microsoft technology to very good effect.
And yes there a number of RT devices from OEMs like ASUS, Acer, Lenovu and Samsung.
Coming from Eadon this is just so rich as to be unreal. Could it be he is afraid of losing the argument?
The exception proves the rule.
If you all want to do is RDP then look at iPad or Win RT. Fine for a short time. Personally I want the power of a real computer with the ease of use and portability of a tablet and need to be able to do real work whilst disconnected.
If you go the pub at lunchtime for any type of session let alone a heavy one then in my not so humble opinion you are not a professional and I would fire you forthwith whether you lost a device or not. Straw Man.
Exactly. These hybrid Win 8 devices compete against the ultras, not the tablets. It's only the ignorant el reg and wired fanboi journos who don't seem to get this.
Rubbish. Office 2007, 2010 and 2013 all use the same file formats (e.g. .docx, xlsx) and can process documents from previous versions (e.g. doc, xls) including being able to save. Another one of those myths the anti-microsoft brigade like to perpetuate.
Google Docs is not Office. It doesn't come close to the feature set or have the same ability to render anything but the most basic documents. For most corporates the Office/SharePoint duo is king whether you like it or not. With Win 8 Pro you get full domain integration and everything that goes with it. In that environment an IPad provides no benefit over the latest generation of phones.
You can't use an iPad for real work. It simply won't run the apps that get used in the business world. Therefore comparing any Windows 8 tablet to iPad is a false comparison. Windows RT competes with iPad. That is where any comparison should stop. At best a mail and calendar client from a business point of view.
I have a Samsung Ativ Smart PC Pro and a Nokia Lumia 920. I have Office 2013 on the tablet and mobile OneNote on both. All my mail, contacts, calendars and files are synced across all my devices. I'm wondering if I even need my desktop anymore as I can hook up the tablet to a usb docking hub and have multiple screens and a full size keyboard if I want.
The biggest problem I've seen is actually trying to get hands on with these new devices. There just aren't any in the channel. I resorted to phoning local retailers on a daily basis to find out when they had stock because it didn't last for more than a day. That's how I managed to get both the tablet and phone. Other people I know are still searching.
Yet more confusion. Why do people equate licenses to PCs? Do they have no understanding of how the sales and oem channels work?
Nobody said 40m PCs were sold. 40m copies of Windows 8 were sold. More than Windows 7 at the same point using the same accounting principles, however convoluted those might be.
Because some people get so wedded to their personal technology choices that anyone making a different choice is insulting them personally. It is especially prevalent with users of minority technologies that the vast majority of people don't adopt in spite of the proponents constantly explaining how much better they are.
Why the big surprise? Its easy to use for lots of people. In my office there is already a Surface RT a Sony Duo and a Samsung Ativ purchased individually by different people in spite of already owning other devices. No-one is having any problems using them.
IBM released OS/2 before MS came out with Windows 3. IBM was the giant and MS the underdog. In the tablet world Apple is the new IBM with the dominant market defining position (everything was an IBM clone back then) and MS the underdog coming late to the party with something that was totally different from the previous ecosystem (DOS character apps) but that worked something like the leader was doing (Presentation Manager then, touch and guestures now) but still allowed previous generation apps to run (DOS box then, desktop now).
The analogy isn't Microsoft being the new IBM, its Apple that is playing at being IBM with a totally closed in, everything built by me ecosystem.
As someone who has a Win 8 tablet and a Nokia Lumia 920 and finds both of them awesome I have to say you have absolutely no f*cking idea what you are talking about.
I do get them. They are easy and intuitive to use. Yes there is a small learning curve when you first switch to a touch screen but it is no harder than switching to any other touch screen interface. You just have to learn the guestures. And the bonus with Win 8 is that I can always access the huge number of legacy apps without being forced to buy them through a store and they just run on the desktop like they always have.
Hmmm. Three menus to shut down. That would be charm bar, power down button, select shutdown option, as opposed to Windows 7 start button, shut down button, select shuitdown option. Isn't total ignorance a blissful state of being?
And right now it is too early to tell which way Microsoft is heading with Windows 8.
Microsoft can afford to spend a lot of money making sure they are successful in the tablet and phone markets over time. Just ask Sony how it feels to be at butt end of a long term Microsoft marketing campaign where the immediate goal is market dominance with a need for profitability only on the distant horizon.
Woz remembers what happened to Apple the first time they tried to fight Microsoft.
And there is the problem in a nutshell. Every different flavour of unix/linux. Fracturing all over the place yet again. Except of course with Android you have to pay for the Apple and Microsoft patent licensing or risk the legal big guns being turned on you. Just ask HTC.
So why don't you go and hack those then? Why do want to install Linux on a Windows tablet? Hardware no good?
Why don't you Linux fanbois go make your own tablet? Then you can hack something that no-one else would want to use so you wouldn't harm anyone.
And there speaks the voice of total ignorance. For your information I'm talking about the Samsung Ativ Smart PC Pro model XE700T1C.
My Samsung tablet is "instant on". I press the power button and the logon screen appears. I enter my password and the UI appears. Sub-second response each time. On my 15 year old daughters Asus laptop the boot time to password is less than 10 seconds, over 50% improvement. From password entry to UI taking input less than 2. Significant improvements from previous Windows 7. Shutdown is almost instaneous, although the disk busy light keeps going for a couple of seconds after the UI has gone.
Any idiot could have predicted these numbers. Seems some journos are letting their bias affect their brains.
Windows 7 followed the unsuccesful Vista so there was lots of interest in upgrading.
Windows 8 follows the successful 7 so there is a lot less interest.
That doesn't make Windows 8 unsuccessful or anything else. What will be more interesting is the business uptake of Windows Server 2012. That will be a much better indicator of business adaption in the short term.
Consumer adoption of Windows 8 and Windows Phone 8 is much more important to Microsoft at this stage to stop the bleeding to Apple and Google. Given Apple's recent missteps and Google getting into anti-trust and entanglements and both having big patent issues Microsoft's window of opportunity lloks better now than in the recent past.
Because although the majority of users make use of very few office features, most of the features are actually used by someone. Power users make a lot of noise when you take away some critical feature they rely on. Besides the whole ecosystem of products around Office and the TOC makes the choice really easy for a corporate.
Anyone can post speculative nonsense. The basic rule of the game has always been and always will be keep your skills relevant to a sizeable chunk of the market. It really doesn't matter which technology as long as you are willing to change and adapt. If you can't change and adapt you're in the wrong business to start with.
Shocking - nice things said about MS. What is the world coming to? Oh yes, I know, it's about to end!!