"no software to download"
Quite untrue. You had to download a Windows-only browser plugin, which had this terribly annoying habit of making sure that I always had a URL shortcut to lively.com on my desktop (which it would recreate every day).
123 publicly visible posts • joined 23 Dec 2006
The MacBook Pro has faster 3D graphics, and it has slightly more connectivity (FireWire and ExpressCard 34, both missing from the MacBook).
I think for me personally, the smaller size and much lower price tag (and otherwise identical specs) win out, even though it means I'll have to buy yet another new audio interface. Even the low-end graphics are quite capable for what little computer-based gaming I do.
Many enterprise installations only support ActiveSync and require the high level of control that Windows Mobile gives them with device lockdown and the like. iPhone and Palm's respective ActiveSync implementations are pretty piss-poor and Android's simply doesn't exist yet, and likely never will, since even if someone writes an ActiveSync conduit between Google Apps and Exchange, no IT administrator in their right mind would even consider supporting anything which puts potentially-confidential information under Google's control.
Android is definitely a compelling platform for end-users who aren't tied to an enterprise system, but currently the only smartphone platforms which are compelling for the enterprise are WM and Blackberry, and to a MUCH lesser extent, iPhone (which at least allows for remote wipe).
What I really hate is when it gets the idea that I've made a typo even when I'm just writing a word which isn't in the dictionary (due to being specialized jargon or a name or whatever), and sometimes it gets quite insistent on "correcting" something even if I've given it a very strong hint about wanting to use a word that's very similar to the one I'm typing, when the one I'm typing has explicit punctuation in it (usually an apostrophe) which then gets wiped out when the phone decides that the apostrophe must have been a typo (which is odd since it's basically impossible to insert one by mistake).
Also, when I'm typing in a hurry, often I'll make subtle typos which people would still be able to understand - BUT the iPhone corrects those typos into entirely different words and what comes out is a big pile of nonsense.
I don't know what the contract and data situation is in the UK, but in the US, T-Mobile is VASTLY cheaper than AT&T for the same service. When I was on T-Mobile I had 300 anytime, unlimited weekends and M2M, with unlimited data (meaning unlimited bandwidth, although limited to web and email, but tethering was actually allowed!) and 100 SMS, for about US$40 (after taxes). This was the lowest service level with unlimited data, and was more than sufficient for my needs.
Eventually I got the odd notion that I "needed" an iPhone and so I switched to that. Now my bill is nearly doubled (about $70 after fees and taxes), and while the actual numbers for the service I get have gone up (450 anytime + rollover, unlimited nights + weekends), and the data service is now theoretically not restricted to what ports I can use (although for all practical purposes it is unless I jailbreak my phone), I was hardly coming even close to my previous plan limits, and while my iPhone certainly is a better web browsing and music-listening device, if I had just unlocked it I could have done all this for half the monthly price.
One thing to note, by the way, is that in the US, T-Mobile doesn't provide any sort of PAYG data (except on the Sidekick), unlike AT&T which has a wide variety of overpriced PAYG data products (and in order to use the only economical ones you have to have a monthly minute plan which is for all intents and purposes even MORE expensive than their contract fees).
Basically, cellphone service pricing in the US is completely out of whack.
mp3's algorithm is excellent at things which can be encoded as a combination of sine waves (MASSIVELY oversimplifying, of course); where mp3 falls down is things like square waves and white noise, which frankly don't come up that much in classical/symphonic works.
It sounds like it's being plucked by a mechanical plucker, and every note ends up sounding identical. The end result doesn't sound any better or more realistic than what you get from the Sculpture modeling synth that's in Logic.
So like everyone else has said, it might have worked out better if they just built one.
"I would have preferred a 16 gig Nano to the touch, however as I refuse to use an HD equipped iPod it was the only option available (I'm definately not gullable enough to buy an iPhone)"
Not sure what you're trying to say here, but all the Nanos are flash-based. Only the Classic is HD-based.
Free-as-in-GPL, no advertising dollars, no stupid crap, just a solid scanning engine which gives you complete control of when and what it scans.
Also it's ridiculous for AVG to scan HTML pages but not images - consider how many exploits there have been based on bad image decompression and render bugs!
Both CrossOver and TransGaming Cider are based on Wine, and thanks to them, many more games are playable on Mac and Linux now. While it would be nice if game developers would actually learn to write cross-platform code to begin with (which would require reversing a LOT of inertia), this is a reasonable short-term concession while the games companies come to realize that there are lots of users who aren't on Windows.
First Adam: Funny, most people consider Linux to be the OS you want running in a cupboard.
Second Adam: This service is running an app on one system and displaying it remotely on the other. I fail to see how that's the other way around from running an app on one system and displaying it remotely on the other.
There are actually a few devices which use raw 802.11b/g for low-level communications and discovery and so on. There's nothing about the MAC-level protocol which requires that it be used for TCP/IP. For example, look at how well Nintendo DSes work with each other (in local game mode) and with the Nintendo Wii (in DS Download Play mode). While it does lead to more spectrum contention (if the devices don't find the least-utilized channel, anyway) it's not like it adds a traffic burden to your routers etc., assuming they just sit on their own private SSID (as is the case of the aforementioned Nintendo DS use cases).
Also, ideally more things would use zeroconf (aka Bonjour) to discover each other, so even if they ARE on a TCP/IP-based network there's still not much fiddling around to get things to talk to each other.
Plus, 802.11 has WAY more useful transfer rate available. Considering how badly even something as simple as A2DP stresses Bluetooth at a whole whopping 128Kbps (which sounds terrible), I'd love to see wireless headphones which can actually transmit lossless audio (such as how Apple's AirTunes works).
Blu-Ray (and HD-DVD) actually do provide a somewhat better picture even for SD televisions. A 1920x1080 JPEG stored at 95% quality downsampled to (effectively) 852x480 is going to look a lot better than a 720x480 JPEG stored at 40% quality stretched out to 852x480, which is pretty much the rough comparison between the two (assuming a square-pixel 480p 16:9 display). Not to mention the lack of interlace motion artifacts.
Here is a page with side-by-side comparisons of the DVD and HD-DVD versions of Lord of the Rings at 480p resolution: http://www.cornbread.org/FOTRCompare/
"Freetard" is Fake Steve Jobs' invective against the free/opensource movement. There is absolutely nothing free/opensource about this web-based app. Plus, as others have said, you certainly are running the word into the ground, seeing as how freetard it is freetard about the every freetard third word you freetard use.
You might want to read up on statistics, notably the Poisson distribution. The chances of any random event occurring during a limited time frame is greater than zero, and the more time frames you observe, the chances of observing the event go up to 1. So the more street lamps you walk under, the more likely it is to observe a street lamp popping.
You only remember the time the lamp pops, not the 99.999% of lamps you walk under without popping.
That just seems so wrong, somehow. I had no idea a search engine and advertising company was equivalent to 3 world's-largest-eCommerce-company-which-has-actual-productses.
Anyway. The hope for the SDK was why I bought an iPod Touch, and I'm glad my technology-related hopes have come to fruition for once.
Anyone who's actually written patents knows that patents are incremental, and any sort of new work needs to be patented if it's going to be afforded the protection of the patent system. An integrated display and a low-footprint vertical dock are both new, and the integrated display itself makes it a much more different beast than current and former docking solutions. Also, remember that many patents cover things which are obvious-in-retrospect, but can anyone complaining about the patentability of this innovation honestly say they came up with this idea first?
Also, the DuoDock did more than just improve the video and audio; it also had slots for its own RAM and FPU, to actually vastly improve the capabilities of laptops (back when RAM densities were so low and FPUs were so large that they actually made a noticeable impact on the size of the notebook).
I've had a W580i since it first came out (and it's certainly the best phone I've ever had - and I've gone through quite a few), and they sound like very comparable devices. The W910i looks a bit slimmer, and it has an additional camera, and HSDPA instead of EDGE, but otherwise they seem pretty much identical.
The only downside to the W580i is the same one mentioned regarding the W910i - the charge/headphone connector going on the side. I ended up getting some Bluetooth headphones to mitigate the nuisance of the headphone adaptor, and now I have only one device in my pocket where I used to have three (phone, iPod, and PDA); of course, my phone+PDA combination has been taken care of nicely by Sony Ericsson phones for quite some time.
Also, the shake-to-shuffle doesn't seem to actually do anything, but I'm actually a bit glad for that since I like listening to music with album-based playlists (generated by SyncTunes for OSX) and I'd hate for my music to get disrupted every time I have to run to cross the street or whatever.
You have exactly summed up why single-return code isn't necessarily a good thing. In fact, ALL religious coding practices are problematic. Having general guidelines (such as "don't use break or continue in loops") is okay, but having specific mandates (such as "NEVER use break or continue in loops") leads people to slavish devotions to practices which end up making some pieces of code look WORSE than the problems that the guidelines are trying to avoid.
I really wish that more people would understand that rules of thumb are guidelines, and that it's okay to not have total devotion to them.
This isn't HD on a standard video DVD, this is HD video in AVCHD format stored on DVD-ROM, which is rather different. You won't be able to play these DVDs on a regular DVD player, just on a DVD-data device which supports AVCHD (such as a PC or PlayStation 3 or whatever).
I recall from a previous article that Google's fingerprinting technology does a motion-based analysis. This makes it resistant to reencoding and probably limits the false-positive rate, though it probably doesn't quite make it resistant to things like cropping, stretching, or mirroring the video, and it'd probably also be pretty easy to fool by simply changing the pulldown characteristics (like randomly shuffling frames around a bit, or making the left half of the video one frame ahead of the right half, or something).