Re: 'kin typical
" albeit subjected to an apartheid policy"
To be fair, they are not subject to an apartheid policy.
They are free to choose it for themselves and free to pack it in whenever they want.
3192 posts • joined 26 Jun 2007
" albeit subjected to an apartheid policy"
To be fair, they are not subject to an apartheid policy.
They are free to choose it for themselves and free to pack it in whenever they want.
Mr Dan Paul
There is one thing that does unite the world and allow us to see past our differences:
Our dislike of USAian attitude to the rest of the world.
Thank you for giving us that. It is the biggest USAian contibution to peace and goodwill between men.
"guy deserves neither girlfriend nor cat"
He clearly handed in his man card years ago. Wouldn't know what to do with a girlfriend.
And some even clever and infinitely more powerful politicians well motivated to thwart them.
According to wonkapedia it only takes 3kWh/m^3 for desalination.
At 200litres per person (a generous amount), that's 600Wh per person per day. Bugger all really.
Reverse osmosis of waste water produces even better efficiency.
You can guarantee though that the politicians want to keep this drought alive. Fear keeps the populace in their place.
"In a petrol car, production of the car is 20% of the pollution, driving is 80% of the pollution."
Based on what lifetime and usage? That "20%" is fixed whether you use the car for 50,000 km or 500,000 km. Many of the numbers are based on some usage model like 100,000 km or 100,000 miles.
My 20 year old diesel HiAce has over 400,000 km on the clock. It has had nothing replaced except one clutch (replaced at 90,000 km due to previous owner being a knob-head - it would still be on the first clutch if I had owned it from new) and normal wear and tear items (cam belts, tyres and brake pads). By my reckoning it has used about 33,000 litres of diesel. And I treat it like complete shit.
What is certain though is that replacing a clunker with a shiny new hybrid - or any car for that matter - does not necessarily reduce pollution.
Right, so just like I said there's not $2BN of investor value in this.
There are far better ways than that to support open source.
There are perhaps 1000 or so really useful open source projects that could do with some sponsorship. Direct injection into those projects would be far more valuable than the very indirect method of sponsoring storage.
What open source projects need it developer time, not a few bucks for storage.
"Thus they see that as a means of raising revenue."
I'm aware of that. I'm a paying customer. But it takes a hell of a lot of paying customers to be worth $2bn.
I can't believe the punters are that stupid that they think they own all the code in github.
Since most of the accesses to github are via git - and very few via web browsers - there's very little exposure for advertising revenue.
Since it is so easy to replicate a git repository, there is no real "stickiness" to git either. In 5 minutes I can move my repo elsewhere.
Yes, a small service business makes sense, but $2bn no!
The reason the moonshot had a lasting spinoff was that it engaged thousands of kids who got hooked on a fantastic dream about the capabilities of technology.
The late 1960s saw model lunar modules hanging from the ceiling in every second kid's bedroom. Tens of thousands of kids walked around on Halloween dressed up in tin foil space suits.
What are the exabyte generation going to hang from their ceilings and do for Halloween costumes?
Until you can engage a population like that, you won't get a long term benefits.
"But in order to break the rotational symmetry (and get this `spin drift'), we also need something else"
Yes, that is indeed so.
Think for a moment of the air forces on the sides of the bullet as it flies along. If they are not the same then the side with the higher pressure is more viscous and the side with the lower pressure is less viscous. That means a spinning bullet gets more "traction" against the higher density air and less against the lower density air. This puts a sideways thrust on the bullet.
This is most notable with side winds. If the bullet is spinning clockwise and the wind is from the right, then the air on the right hand side of the bullet is more viscous than on the left. The bullet gains more traction on the air on the right and is thus deflected upwards (as well as obviously being pushed leftwards by the wind).
Similarly for the same rifle, a wind from the left deflects the bullet downwards and right.
Then there are a bunch of other effects some of which are only meaningful on large projectiles (eg. ships' guns).
They will try Credit Card verification.
Within a month, various politicians will be wondering where that extra 800 quid of spending came from/
A week later they will have an emergency session repealing it.
It all depends on the shot you're using...
If this guy just picked up his home defence shotgun loaded with slugs or OO buckshot (9 balls) he would be lucky to hit a drone, but the projectiles travel a reasonable range.
If he had lighter bird shot in there, the pellets don't fly as far. 7 or 8 (typically used for skeet) does not make it past about 300m or so but have lost their ability to cause any damage long before then.
The ideal anti-drone shotgun load would probably be some sort of "chain shot" using nylon and rubber balls. Absolutely zero danger to people when they come down, but would cause a lovely tangle on the props.
In the 1980s I worked on a computer that had a whistling power supply. The ferrites would squeak at different amplitude/frequency depending on the load. You could run a for(...) loop and count the iterations by listening to the warbling of the power supply.
... and light proof too... since you can get info out via the screen.
... and heat proof too... since you can get info in/out via temperature sensors and CPU load causing increased temperature.
... and operate from a battery... since you could also get data in/out by modulating power draw or monitoring voltage on the power cables.
... and no doubt tens of other mechanisms.
What a bullshit article.
Any computer that has been physically accessed and has had either nefarious hardware or software installed is no longer air-gapped.
Why does Obama have a mission to get these people online?
If they don't see any value in it, then why push them?
We don't have TV in the house and I know exactly which two words I'd say to any .gov person telling me I must get TV.
"It's better to be ruled by stationary bandits rather than nomadic ones, to be sure, for they will at least farm you rather than just steal everything."
Wrong, the nomadic ones are better.
The stationary bandits do farm you, but they manage to convince the populace that it is for their own good, so people welcome them and accept their lives of tax servitude.
The mobile rape and pillage sort are obviously bandits and the people see them for what they are, so people defend themselves and get rid of them.
The set of people who are Austen fans likely has a very small intersection with the set of people who are security savvy.
A botted Austen fan is probably more useful than a botted gamer because they're less likely to detect that their machine has been compromised.
What you're talking about is NVRAM.
The article talks of read time and writing algorithms, so this does not sound like NVRAM. It is still flash-like.
It is also not clear if the devices would support random access (like NOR flash) or page access (like NAND flash). I suspect it will be page access like NAND flash.
NAND flash takes a while to read because the read command has to wait until the read logic settles. This can take a reasonably long time with the long NAND chains. After that there is still the overhead of doing the actual data transfer.
Having been deeply embroiled with flash for the last 20+ years, it is interesting to see some competitors emerging.
I've heard it said before that you can tell how bad things are in a product by seeing how many people are working overtime.
I bet tonight there's a long queue of pizza delivery trucks outside One Microsoft Way.
Due to all the extra PV, the daytime usage is down, but the night time usage is not. People still want to cook and watch telly while the the sun isn't shining.
So they really want you to increase your daytime use and not your night time use. That flattens out the demand curve too, which allows big generation plants to operate more efficiently.
When are you going to want to charge your car? At night surely, while you're at home.
The only way to get daytime charging up to any significant level is by fitting charging stations in office car parks, malls, etc etc etc. That's a hell of an infrastructure that would make the whole smart meter fiasco look tiny. Lots of gravy for the industry.
Microsoft have dicked the developers, particularly phone developers, for ages.
The WinCE APIs kept changing.
Then please stop using C++ and rewrite everything in Mobile .NET.
Then please use Mobile Silverlight... except now we want to kill that.
So finally developers are finding a reasonably stable Windows Mobile API they can use: Android. Cool. And when MS decides thay're tired with Windows Phones again you have your exit strategy all worked out.
Nope. Intel has a parallel tack of acquisition and divestment that is almost as bad as Microsoft's
They bought StongARM from DEC, developed that into the fantastic XScale range of processors, then sold it to Marvell.
They developed then dumped a wide range of embedded CPUs.
The same for flash - both NAND and NOR.
The same for USB chipsets.
Now they wonder why the embedded industry is shy about designing anything with Intel in it. As soon as you start shipping, they'll make the parts you depend on obsolete.
The main point I'm trying to make is that these gender biasses are just natural and we'll break things if we try to force then to obey some idealogical ratio.
Back in the 1960s, medical doctors were almost exclusively male. Until then there had certainly been a socailly driven gender role bias that made medical doctoring a male profession. By the 1980s there was a large % of females in medicine. When I was at university in mid 1980s my gf was a medic. Around a third of her class were female. Now over half the medical graduates are female.
From that you can see the effect of Western women's lib which opposed gender bias in the late 1950s/ early 1960s. There was a lag for the changes to be felt, and the early 1980s was when the change came through.
So why did the same happen in engineering? It would be absurd to say that medicine was given the nod, but the patriarchy held on to engineering as a male domain.
Nope, the restrictions were removed. Engineering etc just has less appeal for women as a group.
Construction, roadworks, rubbish bin operators, truck drivers. mechanics carpenters... no maths required there, yet not many females in those occupations either.
Let's just face facts. Different jobs appeal to different people and for some reason or other the set of people who are drawn to STEM is typically male.
This is not necessarily a problem and doubtlessly any PC government program to intervene will just end up causing more problems than it solves.
It does not distinguish between production (which strengthens an economy) or consumption (which weakens it).
Nor does it even see subsistence economies like parts of Africa where a large % of people feed themselves, build their own houses, without any money changing hands. and economically live on thin air.
Nothing every happens in a vacuum and it is an over-simplification to blame Hitler's rise on deflation.
The punitive reparations of WW1 made German antagonism inevitable. These were exacerbated by France annexing part of the Rhinelands when Germany could not pay its reparation fines. Of course this would lead to German aggression.
Looting invaded lands to feed Germany was partially justified by this being restitution for the reparations and annexation. Germans felt France in particular had taken more than it should.
As the saying goes: "Cometh the hour, cometh the man.". If Hitler had never been born, someone else would have done the same.
Many years ago I worked in a place that tried to have dress codes and the manager was a huge fan. He claimed people wrote better code when they were "professionally" dressed.
Over a week end I wrote the code for two modules at home. One was written wearing a suite and tie. The other, completely naked
I then passed the files around the office for people to compare for "professionalism". It came back 50/50.
Not that NASA would allow them to pack a 1400 year supply of anti-wrinkle cream.
With carry on baggage for a 1400 year flight there won't be much room to buy stuff at duty-free either.
Just like you crave fresh air after a 12 hour plane flight, you'd want lots of gravity after 1400 years of weightless space travel.
We don't need new propulsion. We need new physics.
Even travelling at light speed it would be 2800 years before you get any info back: 1400 for the trip out and 1400 for the signals home.
Good luck getting funding for a project like that!
You're getting down votes because suggesting people might consider Google Apps threatens the BOFHs.
BOFHs think every small company should have their own IT department because that will keep them in gravy.
For anyone that thinks having your own BOFH will lead to better security of your company just remember this:
Snowden was a BOFH and that didn't work out so well for his employer's data security.
Well at least it should not take any effort from Microsoft.
The rumour is that their spider/crawler/bot is just a bloke in a room typing urls into spider.txt.
All they need to do is not type your name in. Job done.
Pretty sad if you worry about showing up on Bing.
With hackable, networked cars you'll be able to xmessage that twat in front of you that the lights have changed. Heck, you can probably take control of the whole car and park him out of the way.
"I pray he never wins"
Praying doesn't help either.
Geostaionary is over 35,000 km up making a round trip of over 200 milliseconds.
Thus for the advertised low-latency, Musk must be shooting for LEO sats or such.
If he's going for LEO then they're nowhere near the Inmarsat's geostationary satellites.
ARM goes into hundreds of different devices from those costing less than 30 cents to those costing hundreds of dollars. For each of those, ARM gets royalties.
Clearly they're not getting much for a Coretex M0 in a 30 cent device. I would be surprised if they get one cent.
They'll be getting a lot more per unit for the top-end devices: mullti-core parts with GPUs etc. Those have historically mainly gone into phones.
Now, however, the top end devices are going into a wider range of devices, so phone numbers alone are not enough.
The only way to fix this is to ban Twitter.
"In case you didn't know, Pakistan has more than a few nukes."
And unlike the west, they've shown enough restraint to not light one off yet.
The America dubious justification for nuking Hiroshima was that it cut the war short and saved tens of thousands of lives.
If Pakistan was to follow that same logic they'd have fired up their nukes long ago.
Hat's off to Qualcomm they've done some amazing stuff over the years.
But let's face it, the Chinese companies have figured things out and know how to make some great parts at very good prices. They're leaving the US parts makers behind.
Allwinner in particular is going well. In less than 5 years they've changed from a company with a funny name to one of the major chipmakers in the world (by volume). A year ago they were making the A33 quad core/GPU/codec tablet processor part for $4. Astounding. And they've been busy doing more since then.
Ignoring, or denying, the fact we're wired this way is not constructive.
I am not trying to denigrate men. I am one. I am not trying to condone acting on this wiring either. We learn to moderate the urges so we can have a civilised society.
One of the few times we really let the lizard brain loose is playing FPS games. We can unleash the killer - even if just in fantasy. Unsurprisingly, the other lizard brain elements emerge too. Boys will eat more during/after FPS, energy dense foods in particular. So any surprises then that fuck part emerges too?
In our lizard brain wiring we classify things into the three distinct piles: threat (kill it), food (eat it), women (be nice to them for breeding). If they're in the threat pile they don't get treated nicely.
Men in the threat pile are still threats, but not as bad because they fit with our understanding of the world. Men are supposed to be virile champions. Even when they are the enemy, we still see them as being great.
What we don't like is our classification system being messed with. These threat-women that confuse our lizard brain classification system get lashed out at. It's the same for blokes wearing dresses.
Choose one. That is how the male lizard brain works.
Therefore it it has the potential to frag you then you'll be more interested in killing it than sweet-talking it.
Biologically too, you want something that would nurture you and your offspring, not shank you and the sprogs in bed one night.
Nobody's fired her yet and she still gets to take home a pile. She's managed to keep this gig going for 3 years now... Pretty impressive.
In a place like YaWho? you'd expect the knives to be out and CEOs changing like presidents in a 1970s South American dictatorship.
Still, YHOO is pretty much at the same value as 10 years ago, and almost 2.5x what it was since she arrived, so the stock holders will be happy. It's a head-scratch how a company can bleed red ink for years and keep going up...
The climate models I've looked at (yes, I even looked at the code!) didn't even have latent heat modelled.
That's broken, but entirely understandable since most of the things that we need to look at are not understood well enough to model.
"Even if it costs us nothing for fossil fuels, they are just wrong."
Except that cheap energy has lead to a step change in our ability to support people. It is what allows us to feed 9 bn people well, when just 60 years ago we had only 3 bn people - many of them starving. In that same time, the air has also become cleaner.
"I would like to cycle to work with out breathing exhaust from infernal combustion engines." But on the flip side, being able to eat and keep warm in winter are not too bad.
The Nokia write off was just a Ballmer turd bobbing to the surface.
And Ballmer can be completely blamed on Bill Gates who basically installed his BFF and refused to have him removed.
Nad is just the bloke in the hot seat when this happened. That it was going to happen was obvious.
Maybe Nad is just there to cop the flack. Once the worst events have played out, and Nad has copped the flack, they'll rinse him and replace with another Gates/Ballmer stablemate.
Ban guns and only the bad guys will have them. Law abiding people will have nothing to protect themselves and their property from scum.
Banning crypto is not going to stop the bad guys from using it. Only the law abiding citizens will be compromised.
Johnny terrorist is not going to hand over his guns or his crypto.
What we will end up though is a paranoid bunch of citizens: "OMG!!!! He's got a PGP key!!!!"