2622 posts • joined 1 Jun 2012
Re: 0% finance over the contract term
"True, but only if the bargain happens to be available when your contract is up for renewal."
That's only an issue where the buyer can't wait. The natural victims (or cash rich) probably can't wait, but I've always found my phones continue to function beyond the end of the contract, and sometimes it has been necessary to wait a couple of months for the right deal to come up (or indeed pay to exit the contract a month or two early - I've done both). Obviously the roll-on contract usually includes the "handset" charge, so you don't have that long to make your choice before the maths works against you, but over two or three months, chances are something's available on a blindingly good deal, and in practice it is usually an outgoing premium model rather than a pretender. So there's fewer deals on (say) an LG G3 than on a Sammy S4.
But even that assumes that these deals are only sporadically available. I've found that if you're relaxed about what you get and from whom then there's usually something on offer. In the sales culture that pervades mobile phone retailing, somebody is always keen to offer deals to secure market share (eg run up to Christmas), or desperate to clear excess stock in the post Christmas slack period. Same applies for the invariable Spring sales offensives, or the slack water over the Summer holiday period. As with cars the market is also distorted by sales bonuses and campaign targets. At the moment the market is pretty quiet, but I can still find offers for an S4 on contract for an implied cost fifty quid cheaper than the best sim-free deal I can find.
"Every other businessman on the planet would kill to be able to do the same."
Well then, they need to concentrate on creating a reason to pay extra in the first place, and then lock people in through non-portable content or similar barrier to market exit. When the earlier iPhones were being sold, they were generally distinguishably better than competing products, and there was a logic to paying the iPremium. After a couple or four years use, a modest number of purchased apps, and potentially a shed-load of music which is (for most users) difficult or impossible to port to Android, there's a huge cost or convenience barrier to moving away from iShiny, no matter what the Android offer is (within reason). With contender phones (eg S5) pitched at similar prices to Apple devices, buyers won't notice the pain of an iUpgrade that includes another iMargin (have I overdone the i-words yet?), and the whole cycle continues, with more music and app purchases locking buyers in.
There's all the marketing, design, construction quality, distribution model that Apple offer, and these offer owners a rational justification for paying the iTax, but those aren't particularly good reasons to buy yet another of their phones. £400 of otherwise lost music is however a very big reason not to leap on the Android bus.
Re: 0% finance over the contract term
"But this is why I have a nice little Samsung S3 Mini and not an i-whatever as the i-whatevers were all 40 or more pounds a month."
A disadvantage of the purchase model is that the sneeky buyer is much less likely to be able to benefit from over-commitment fire sales by the mobile retailers, or other unintended subsidy variations. So my full fat S3 costs me £17 a month all in (Carphone Warehouse/O2 offer), and I reckon the air-time and data allowances are worth about seven quid, meaning that by buying a phone on run-out was cheaper than buying a less capable handset outright.
This isn't a "my phone's cheaper than your's" jibe, simple an observation that the construct of the subsidised market (including minimum commitments by networks and retailers) often creates opportunities that a more transparent hardware purchase market is less likely to offer. At any point in time there will be something good that somebody really needs to shift, and if you're flexible then there's bargains to be had.
Re: How do these thing save money?
"If you want to save money, don't use electricity/gas, right?"
This isn't about saving money, it about saving the planet, in the minds of the EU, and you are lucky to be allowed to pay for it. You have to bear in mind that smartmeters are mandated to be offered to all consumers by 2020 under EU directive, now written into UK statute by the bunglers of DECC and the criminals of Westminster.
The authors of this policy have committed to it on the basis that (a) they have re-engineered government to a war-footing to fight "climate change", and (b) they earnestly believe that the paltry savings will add up. But you have also to be aware that smart meters enable half-hourly metering, which means potentially different charges based on when you use electricity. Anybody can see that this will be confusing and customer-unfriendly, but half hourly metering is already in the process of being foisted on small businesses. In the short term half hourly metering says nothing about the tariff structure, in practice the tariff follows, and it is the regulator's expectation that the two will be linked (search on Ofgem, P272, filetype:pdf). There's an important underlying hypothesis here that shifting demand around during the day will have a big impact on emissions, and that's wholly unproven.
OFGEM are forever whining that the electricity market "doesn't work" (and it's true it often doesn't but usually because of them), but they are hoping to see energy suppliers experiment with time of use tariffs before smartmeters are universal, and then it will be open season on consumers. As usual the poor will be hardest hit, but I was rather amused to read in a DECC commissioned report that a mitigation strategy for consumers facing higher peak electricity charges that they could cook their evening meals later (like 10pm) to avoid higher peak charges in winter.
Unfortunately, all of this policy ignores the problem that the EU/DECC renewable strategy means that in future years we will have unpredictable generation, so that the prevailing logic of peak demand driving prices will fall apart, and prices will be driven by the random interaction between the vast build out of wind and solar power (again, your expense) and demand.
EU and UK energy policy (including smartmeters) is a despicable, tree-hugger inspired mess. Industry projections are that energy policy will cause electricity prices to double by 2022, and all of the three main political parties have the same position - blame suppliers for the cost of electricity, whilst throwing more and more of your money at subsidies and bad ideas like smart-metering.
Re: While a few men may think this is a good idea
"the spider has hacked the tracked dyson M1A1"
Not sure about the spider, but if we are to believe our government's security services the Iranians and Norks might. I'm fairly relaxed about the Iranians getting my Nerf-armed vacuum cleaner tank to hunt
Re: While a few men may think this is a good idea
In which case they'd better automate the Slipper of Death. Android powered, internet-of-things compatible, totally fear-proof?
Maybe combine it with the Dyson tracked vacuum cleaner, so that the spider scuttles across the living room carpet, and slowly, relentlessly the Dyson M1A1 grinds after it, sleepless, indefatigable. Eventually the spider will be cornered, and the machine can vacuum it up, or simply crush it under the tracks, before sending a Facebook update announcing success and showing video confirmation. Or team up with Nerf to give the Dyson proper spider-attack capability. The Middle East model could despatch the spider by....no, lets not go there.
All these possibilities from technology, and the best the makers can give us is a fucking bendy telly and a watch with a battery that lasts a whole day. Knobs!
Re: Re. nuclear base
And I didn't even mention which country it was for...
Could have been the bad guys. But these days it's not really clear who are the bad guys, and maybe our side are the bad guys. Perhaps they weren't in the days I referred to, who now knows.
"That's not a typo. 10,000GB on spinning platters in helium"
Ten terabytes? I can remember when you could run a tactical nuclear air base on 80 Mb.
Re: BBC produces quality TV that the market can't...
Somebody better let me know. Horizon used to be excellent, but has long since degenerated into repetitive mush.
Re: Use a proxy to get outside of the Virgin Network?
"Like a pirate on a VPN? I don't want my name added to a government watch list!"
Maybe not, but don't you think that the likes of GCHQ and NSA (and others) have identified and profiled regular, prolific, popular or controversial commentators on leading social, political and tech web sites? And you, on a web site like this.....weeelllllll........ you've probably had your inside leg measured without you so much as knowing.
Re: Not all collisions are high speed
"I once calculated what might happen if whatever it was which made Tycho crater hit somewhere in the North Sea. It wasn't pretty."
This could explain Scunthorpe, Clacton, Hull, South Shields, Filey. I hope your work was published.
Re: kinda cool...@FrankAlphaXII
"Had this occurred in the middle of nowhere in Nicaragua (what I'd refer to as "Bum Fuck Egypt", or BFE for short), nobody would ever know but some farmers who are to a decent degree ex-Sandinistas and Contras that both know big explosions tend to mean trouble, and maybe some drug mules here and there."
That big swoosh above the atmosphere was evidently no comet or meteor, it was simply the roar of red-neck generalisations hurtling out of the pages of Huckleberry Finn and menacing a whole selection of developing countries. Fortunately with the exception of one particularly rancid comment that fell to earth and caused a hedgehog to explode in Nicuragua, the toxic ball of hill-billy wisdom has rushed off round the Sun, and may return to cause offence in a few hundred years hence unless space defences can ward it off.
And whilst it's on-topic, remind me again who armed and funded the Contras as part of an illegal destabilisation plot?
Re: Even free isn't cheap enough@ JDX
"99% of arrogant nerds are total idiots that don't understand people.
If you're goose-stepping out as a grammar nazi, shouldn't you have avoided a two word sentence that starts and ends with brackets, and looks barren of capitalisation and a full stop?
Re: BBC Worldwide
"Organizations like the BBC already do geolocation on IP addresses to filter non-UK traffic. It surely can't be beyond the ability of their IT staff to get the ranges of IP addresses used by the major "VPN to bypass copyright" providers, and just blacklist them as well?"
As somebody who has to pay the telly tax to support the Beeb, I'd suggest that instead of canvassing overseas regulators with bad ideas to try and support a token revenue stream, the idle, useless bastards actually focus some attention on producing something worth watching for domestic audiences?
I'm surprised anybody would want to pirate anything the BBC has produced in the past five years.
Fatuous arguments defending the status quo, as usual
"If covering an area which is economically marginal means that the network which has gone to the expense then has to give that coverage to rivals, no one will go to the expense"
Who said anything about giving capacity away? A straightforward charging mechanism could be put in place, and by suitable design could actually incentivise provision of coverage in areas that currently have no service by directing all tower-specific revenues to the operator.
An interesting alternative is to have an independent operator of towers of last resort which all MNOs are mandated to roam onto. If there's some level of economic demand, OFCOM offers the MNO's a "last chance" offer to provide coverage on their terms, before the independent is offered a local mast monopoly with all the MNO customers in range roaming onto this (ie, if they don't take the opportunity they can't then try and undermine the independent at a later date). Wouldn't undermine the ability of the MNO's to do things their way, but if the incumbents can't or won't extend and improve the networks then it can still be done. As I conceive the idea it wouldn't be a universal coverage obligation, simply a means of providing capacity in locations where there's commercial levels of demand, but where individual operators elect not to provide connection. It also create a clearer playing field if (for example) local government wanted to make a contribution to extend mobile coverage.
Re: big $15.8m payout to lawyers
I'm surprised that the legal bill is so small. IPOs and M&A are lodes of 100% pure moolah for law firms, and for a Chinese company with no history in the US to launch a $20bn listing on the basis of legal advice costing less than $16m it looks like very good value indeed. The investment bank leeches have reputedly shared 1% of the IPO value as fees, so that's $200m in fees which makes the legal fees look like small beer.
At average values for big US law firms the $16m equates to perhaps 22,000 hours of billable time, or 16 lawyer-years. Over a four month period your 40 figure is about right, but that then implies no big fat success fee, and none of the traditional padding of the figures.
Why doesn't it make logistical (or logical) sense? Chances are that they'll only be serving the heavily populated metropolitan areas. And potentially Oz is a nice learning market before moving into other developed non-US markets, given that there's little similarity between North American markets and many other Anglophone or even European markets.
Re: That's the trouble u c?
"If I were a civil servant wanting to do central planning, I'd be rolling out a national grid of fat comms pipes "
You mean spending tax payers money on things they aren't prepared to pay for themselves, on the basis that you know better than they do what is good for them? You should apply now, you'd make an excellent civil servant.
"Can't imagine Apple getting planning permission to build a shiny new GCHQ-style doughnut HQ in the middle of Hoxton.."
Well the tax dodgers at Google got the nod for a £650m HQ just up the road in Kings Cross. Sounds like they've since cooled on the idea, perhaps because they've now visited the area, but if you've got the money then London welcomes you.
"maybe we should set up a federally sponsored publishers' shelter? "
We have. It's called the EU. And in this case they'll decide that it somehow "isn't fair" that Google's search engine points to Google's other services. But for us in the EU, regardless what the gravy-trainers of Brussels decide we can simply use google.com
"If anyone asks you if you intend to vote Conservative in the next General election, tell them Yes. And then vote to get a different set of bastards in. Maybe then we can get some of these legal work-arounds blocked."
Given our effectively two party system, you mean to vote for the party that actually wrote and passed RIPA into law last time it was in government, the same party committed to making you have an identity card to prove that you're entitled to breath?
Have you been drinking again?
"Microsoft buying nokia was a bit like a dog chasing a car. Now it's caught it, it doesn't know what to do with it."
To be fair, that's how most M&A works. And for that matter, it's now how wars are undertaken.
Re: Like the 630 review before it..
"The same issue plagued the Nokia 630 phone, where reviewers said it was less than £100, but in actual fact the price was £140."
But Microsoftia having whispered in the reviewer's ear that it was £100, that's what all the reviews said, making for positive headlines. Moreover, when writing their conclusions these same people would have contrasted against cheaper phones, and thus were more likely to give the newcomer a positive review.
Whilst customers will notice the price differential, if they've already gone in with the belief that a reviewer has declared the relevant phone to be the bee's knees, there's a fair chance they'll find the extra few tenners.
This is called "marketing" these days.
Re: Does it really matter who shot it down?
"The transcript which puts the blame on the rebels even has them talking of shooting down an enemy plane and I can well believe that's exactly what they thought they'd done and intended to do. "
It could be true, but I think its a bit odd that military personnel capable of operating advanced defence electronics would be speaking in the open on insecure telephone lines, don't you? The veracity of that transcription has yet to be proven.
"A simple repeat of bringing down a Ukrainian transporter as they'd already done earlier."
Very different. The transport was at lower level, and believed to be brought down by a man-portable device incapable of reaching the altitudes at which civilian airlines were operating. A MANPAD involves far less skill (and thus implies less knowledge and awareness of the user), and has far more limited range, so couldn't shoot down MH17.
Re: @Alan Brown
"The USA stepped up right from the outset and said "oops". The people involved were disciplined and payouts were made."
Err, they had to be dragged to the international courts to pay up.
And not only did the US award the crew combat ribbons for their performance in the gulf, the Vincennes air warfare coordinator received the USN Navy Commendation Medal, and later the commander of the Vincennes was awarded the Legion of Merit medal for his command of the ship.
Re: Does it really matter who shot it down?
"It was obviously a mistake, whoever did it. "
What makes you say that? The alleged attack weapon was an advanced weapon capable of reaching high altitude that required multiple crew members, and two or three different ground vehicles. Whoever fired it and was able to hit a target flying six miles up at nearly 500 miles an hour miles up knew exactly what they were doing with complex anti-aircraft weaponry, and by definition would have known that civilian air traffic was operating in the area at that altitude, would have been able to deduce that this was civilian (from speed, altitude and course) and therefore knew this wasn't either a Russian air force intrusion, nor a Kiev military transport landing supplies.
Putin was on a plane through this airspace 200 miles (ie 24 minutes) behind MH17, and if you accept my suggestion that whoever launched the missile knew exactly what they were unleashing, then there are only a couple of obvious conclusions, both of which are fairly unpleasant:
1) This was an attempt to assassinate the leader of the world no.2 nuke weapon power (with more important questions than who launched the missile, like who originated the scheme, and who authorised it).
2) The Putin proximity was irrelevant, and the intention was to deliberately bring down any passing commercial transport, intending to implicate the other side (a false flag attack). I'd not be so bold as to suggest this proves anything, but the immediate enthusiasm of Western power to blame Russia first and separatists second is notable.
There is perhaps a third option, the "Vincennes excuse", in which those who launched the missile intended to bring the plane down, but in the red mist they'd ignored the obvious signs that this was a non-combatant, but that's like claiming that murdering the wrong man is only manslaughter, and doesn't wash for me.
Provisional report's due out in a day or two, IIRC. Hopefully the report will be technical and of high quality (as most air accident investigations are), but the public voice of Western powers will be much as before - airliner shot down by advanced SAM, don't really know who fired it, it crashed in separatist held territory, so it MUST be the separatists. In the same way that because Pan Am 103 crashed in Scotland, it had to be the fault of the SNP.
" Could they put an automatic weighing machine under the passengers queuing for that security check?"
Good idea. And then combine the baggage and passenger weight allowance to make everything fair.
"The glass was sealed (I assume cling film)."
Don't take a job as an aircraft designer, please. Or in anything involving pressure vessels, pipelines and such like. You might be OK with balloons, though.
Business as usual
"Ranadivé says it is business as usual for the company and customers won't notice any change."
Certainly is BAU in the ERP sector. The model is:
1. Build basic ERP, recruit customers
2. Acquire other firms to extend basic capabilities
3. Go private, so PE managers can pillage the company and "improve" the financials
4. Sell out to Oracle or SAP (or Infor, who one day want to sell out to Oracle or SAP).
Customers certainly won't notice any difference, in that their bills will continue to rise, supplier flexibility decline, and employees will (as ever) fear the thin whoosh of the scythe.
Re: Wake me when they actually do something
"@ I ain't Spartacus....Your thought process & justifications scare me, I can see why the world is the way it is."
I wouldn't worry. Our non-Spartican friend seems to give credit to the idea of a cyber attack that disables all of our critical infrastructure. Given the motivations and morality of many of the baddies of this world, if it were feasible it would have been done. Sure you can DDOS a bank. Big deal. You can hack many companies, big deal. You can demonstrate vulnerabilities in some SCADA kit, big deal.
But the idea that the whole modern world is simply waiting to be hacked and crashed is bollocks. I've worked in infrastructure for most of my career, with an initial spell in high security defence computing, so I like to think I have a good feeling for the extent of the risk, and I say the prophets of imminent cyber doom are talking out of their arses.
Re: Sanctions against@ IAS
"Did the US annex Iraq? Nope. Did US forces leave at the government's request? Yup. Are US forces leaving Afghanistan at the government's request? Yup. Did the US annex part of Afghanistan? Nope. Notice a difference?"
You're quire right, I do notice a couple of differences: Some people, in fact quite a lot of people in eastern Ukraine welcomed the very limited Russian involvement. As far as I can see NOBODY in Afghanisatan or Iraq welcomed the unjustified invasion of their countries, the dismantling of all institutions, destruction of infrastructure. And in Iraq and 'Stan there's been collectively hundreds of thousands of mostly civilian casualties.
Re: Yup. had that in apartheid South Africa
"Apparently Russia's corporate finance needs are nearly $200bn this year, just to refinance maturing debt. And according to the German government exports to Russia in July were down 60% on last year."
Well the Russian government can fix the debt rollover problem just the way the US, UK and ECB fixed their debt problems. You run the printing press.
But that line about Germany, that's the nub. The effect of sanctions against Russia will hurt Germany above all (and London, but primarily in lost profits). Reduced exports to Russia are not a big deal, but if the Russians retaliate and interrupt winter gas flows then the effects will be, shall we say, interesting. Germany has a lot of gas storage, so there will be two options for Russia - token interruptions to make a point, knowing that storage will supply end users, or prolonged interruptions towards the end of winter to disrupt end users and inflict economic harm. And with the West having sucked up to Ukraine, what will Germany do if Ukrainian gas supplies are cut, and Kiev citizens are freezing to death? Will Germany sacrifice its gas reserves to keep Ukraine warm?
I don't know the answers, but the whole mess in Ukraine is largely a Western caused mess with a Western policy response that must be the finniest thing Putin's ever seen.
Re: Sanctions @ I ain't Spartacus
<i"Arguably, the Iranian sanctions roll-back is happening because the US has reached the end of the line with them."</i>
And because the Americans now find themselves in a bizarre, unannounced and undesired alliance with Assad and Iran to fight IS, because the US backed a thuggish crook to run Iraq, who then destabilised the place on ethnic lines, creating fertile territory for Sunni extremists. And to add further black humour to this situation, many of IS's more competent fighters were CIA trained and armed in Jordan, and are now using all that military kit the Yanks poured into Iraq, but couldn't be bothered to bring home. Separately the US is all cozy with the GCC states who have allowed funds and arms to flow to IS, and indeed spending serious money to "protect" these states against the alleged threat from Iran's antiquated military and thus pouring yet more advanced weapons into the volatile pot that is the Middle East.
When I look at the foreign policies of the various major world countries, I can see what motivates most of them. Except the US, where they seem intent on repeating mistakes of very recent years, creating new enemies where none existed, and destabilising regions they want to see stable. The only logic of US foreign policy is that it persistently maintains high oil prices, and whilst the man on the Western street might feel he suffers from high oil prices, everybody else (including Western governments, financiers, traders, and oil companies with expensive to produce US oil resources) love high oil prices.
Re: Morals, ethics, principles...
"After all, why should business suffer just because their customers are evil war-mongers who shoot down airliners. "
Well, that's a good question. The moment MH17 was down but still smoking, Western politicians were blaming Putin and the Ukrainian rebels. When Pan Am 103 came down it took weeks indeed months of intensive work to establish who really did it (and still the evidence is not wholly convincing).
Since those early accusations over MH17, you'll have seen that no proof has been offered, that the makers of the accusations have quietly backed off and distanced themselves from the more vociferous complaints. The photos allegedly of "rebel held" AA missiles have been debunked, showing locations in far distant Kiev-controlled territories, and the US (despite having the technology to resolve the hairs on a Talibani's backside in Iraq from earth orbit) have failed to produce all the loudly and gladly anticipated evidence of a missile launch in rebel held territory.
Ukraine is a backward, ill-governed, corrupt and undemocratic part of the world, with strong ethnic and national tensions. US-sponsored interference in Ukraine's primitive politics resulted in the Maidan uprising, which surprisingly then replaced an elected pro-Russian president (a dodgy crook, I'd accept) with a not-properly elected pro-US president who's also a dodgy crook, dependent upon extremist right wing militias and continued Western cash injections, triggering the not-so-latent tensions now playing out.
So, who's the bad guy's here? And interestingly if we have a cold winter in Europe, who's on the hook for the Russian retaliation for ill-conceived sanctions? Germans. Initially their government tried to take a softly-softly line, but I daresay the population will be pleased at their government now bending over to US pressure.
The US establishment have intervened all round the world over the past decade and more, and I can't think of one instance where the outcome has been good (particularly for the Americans themselves). Forced out of Somalia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and leaving those countries more wretched than they were before whilst creating and arming new enemies. Now the fools are again dabbling with starting a hobby war in somebody else's back garden, with no legitimacy nor any public support at home.
If there's a need for sanctions, it's sanctions on Washington (and perhaps London/NATO) to stop the madmen from their current spiral towards a new cold war.
Re: sounds neato
"My neato vx-21 ( yes the name is off-putting ) ...."
Well Dyson have messed up calling a vacuum cleaner a "360 eye". If it's got tracks then they should have called it the Dyson Kursk, and given the design a suitable khaki theme. And they could have offered an expensive version with metal tracks, deliberately devoid of lubricant in order to move with a menacing squeaking and clanking (and an extra cost option of a built in speaker playing a quiet soundtrack of a 26 litre diesel). I'd have one of those.
Of course, the marketing dweebs who specified it have no imagination and probably no knowledge of history, so none of that was ever on the cards, but they could at least have called it the Dyson Panther, which has pleasant overtones of grace, speed and strength amongst those who don't have a Commando war comic moment when the term "Panther" gets mentioned.
Re: Still missing critical feature
"Non of these robot vacuums empty their bins out requiring daily human interaction. I have given up on such robot until this has been implemented."
A software fix should enable it to identify the cat flap, reverse up to the flap and engage reverse thrust? Admittedly it'll make a mess outside until the wind blows, but I can tolerate that.
Re: Please note
"A really big solar flare could take out power stations worldwide, and in many countries (including the UK) that would also cut off water supplies."
We've had a number of big solar flares over the recent half century, and they've generally failed to cause the havoc that the doom-mongers predict. The power plants are well protected, and it is the grid that would get hit, and even that has plenty of interruptors and circuit breakers than have to deal with locally more powerful phenomena (eg lightning, short circuits) on a far more frequent basis.
Some water facilities would be affected by loss of power, but as a rule UK water engineers have designed both water supply and sewerage systems to use gravity, with a combination of distributed storage and local power back ups keeping water supply going for long enough to overcome most credible interruptions.
Collect your tin foil hat over there ------->
How the board laughed....
When they worked out they were being fined a whole 0.006% of 2013 turnover.
Re: "and they run old or outdated operating systems"
"That would be Windows Embedded for Point of Service - i.e. XP?"
Probably. But ignoring the OS, what about the EPOS system? A few large European retailers use EPOS systems written entirely in Java which is bad enough. When you then learn that the individuals who designed and coded it have only recently been released from Her Majesty's hospitality for fraud then you might conclude that the retailers have not bought wisely.
Then again, with the slightly whiffy nature of many EPOS suppliers, often involving accounting standards that are a flexible friend, and sales/purchasing practices amongst both software vendors and the retailers that would make an Afghan drug dealer blush, things can only get worse.
Re: Here's an idea....
"Y'now, those useless money eating things like, youth clubs, sports clubs, rehab clinics, homeless shelters, debt advice agency's, sure start centres, intervention teams, social services, adult education services, apprenticeship schemes."
Nulab tried that for ten years without too much obvious success, and as a result of the Cowalition's failure to make any worthwhile cuts the national debt is still rising by £100 billion quid each and every year (over £11m per hour).
How much more money do you want to spend on schemes trying to distract the feckless and where will it come from?
Re: IE involved, again...
"Perhaps the bigger news was the compromising of the engineering software companies web site in the first place. But they fail to say *who* that was, which might help other folk know if they might be exposed or not."
How does it help the intended victims? OK they avoid software company X (possibly to the extent of that company going out of business), but the real issue is that the target companies themselves are operating vulnerable software that they need to address. The bag guys can easily move on to another industry specific watering hole, so avoiding the original launch site achieves nothing. Indeed, if the attackers are taking a strategic approach they're sitting on a catalogue of vulnerabilities to use when the current crop are patched, they'd have future watering hole sites already identified, and duplicate C&C servers in reserve against a takedown.
What troubles me is that the auto and aerospace sectors are dominated by big, technologically advanced companies, with plenty of IP to protect. They have small armies of people like the target demographic of the Reg to look after IT security. Which means that either the crooks will find the drawbridge is already up and castle defended, OR these IT security professionals (us) continue to run hideously vulnerable crudware in the first place (like Java, Flash, Acrobat Reader), and the installations are presumably unpatched as well.
I'm inclined to the latter view, but I'd welcome the view of people more directly involved.
" It's unlikely to be a deterrent for the big boys who cover their tracks and operate globally with impunity"
Largely because the non-malware spamming business operates hand in glove with the global payment processors, and that's where the regulators should focus. You want to stop Vi@gra spam? Simply stop them taking payment with any major credit or debit card. So few people would know how to pay in bitcoins that the revenues from spamming would collapse.
If the regulators really wanted to stop it, they could make it illegal for payment processors to take funds from organisations undertaking criminal or unlicensed activities, on the basis of the jurisdiction of the buyer. The spamming vendors themselves wouldn't be traceable, but the regulators do know where Mastercard live, and have the necessary sticks to force them to come clean. If you could stick Mastercard for twice the entire value of all such transactions they'd soon start being careful about who they do business with - as things stand their (and resellers) merchant services divisions probably have f***ing account managers to support the spammers.
Re: @Kristian Walsh
"Market share is a measure of how many new models of each type are being sold per month or quarter. Thieves are, however, stealing from the installed base."
That is 100% correct, but I'm not sure that your subsequent assertions about Apple products having a longer service life are correct - Apple buyers are inherently of the magpie persuasion, and the traded in phones are often exported or even scrapped (no point in diluting the premium market). On the other hand a second hand Android, particularly mid to low end is worth far less when exported.
The time series data that I've seen suggested that broadly speaking the market shared had held up for the past two or three years, so I'll acknowledge your challenge when you can find better data on the installed base of devices - a quick google suggests that the installed base is dominated by Android in all major markets for which data is available, so I think my argument stands until further notice?
Re: Stating the obvious
The reported iphone theft levels are somewhat above the prevailing market share of the device in each market. So the iPhone market share in the UK is circa 30%, in Germany circa 20%, but theft levels are in both cases around 10% higher.
What that might suggest is that iPhone users are more likely to hang out in locations where the crims conduct their trade, or are simply more careless in both making their phone ownership obvious to others ("Hallo! HALLO! I'm on the train! I SAID I'M ON THE TRAIN WITH MY NEW SHINEY IPHONE 5S), and more careless in looking out to avoid having their phone stolen.
You can argue from this that iPhone users have better social lives, but are a bit gormless. Or you could just argue that it reflects the market share in the demographic that hangs around nightclubs, and that anybody with a phone in a nightclub should expect to have it stolen.
Assuming devices are replaced like for like, the higher theft levels are a nice contributor to Apple's extravagant profits.
Re: EU law proportionality test
"So expect the CJEU to urinate noisily all over the German law in question."
I doubt it. As Germany is the only solvent economy in the EU I very much doubt that the EU are going to try throwing their weight around. As it is the Eurocrats have to persuade the Germans to either pay off the debts of Southern Europe and France, or to accept a tsunami of inflation to water down those states debt. Far from seeing the netizens rise up with their pitchforks, the only people who are perhaps willing to die in a ditch over some poorly regulated hire car app are the unlucky users who get in a car driven by an inept clown.
And judging by my experience of German taxis, the cars are usually new, high end cars, well driven. I'd prefer to pay taxi prices for that, than sit in some potentially uninsured rustbucket driven by somebody with no regulation whatsoever.
Back here in the UK things are admittedly different, because the regulated taxis are (in my home town) crummy, low end rustbuckets driven by the clueless. So taking pot luck with Uber can only be worse if the Uber driver turns out to be a homicidal psychopath.
Re: Payment Processor
"So the point isn't that nobody accepts Amex. It's that nobody (yet) accepts Apple!"
Other sources have reported that Apple are also signed up with Visa and Mastercard, so the lack of popularity for Amex is moot. I doubt that the payment processors want to tie themselves to any particular hardware or software, so chances are that there's similar deals in the offing for other phone makers.
The thing working in Apple's favour here is the single port of call (not only the software.hardware tie up, but that Apple can and will tell the MNO's to sling their hook). In the world of Android they've got to deal with a host of hardware makers, the vampire data squid that is Google, and the network operators. And each of them is daft enough to think they stand a credible chance of coming up with some proprietary NFC solution that will get them a big slice of the payment before they've gone anywhere near the payment processors.
Personally I might use Visa or Mastercard for NFC, but I wouldn't trust Google, hardware makers, and in particular MNOs. In relative terms Apple fall somewhere in the middle of my distrust spectrum (which only runs from "not much" to "not at all, in this universe and all others"), which is a pity given that I wouldn't touch their over-priced and under-specced hardware. And even Visa & MC can sling their NFC hook until they take liability for fraudulent use of NFC credentials.
Re: Bring it on@ Voland's Right Hand
"So while a great idea in principle, you will have to re-regulate the railways first (as in most places where they have working rail on the continent)"
Our railways are already regulated, so I presume you mean adding more regulation.
But that won't work. I work in a different industry that is currently very heavily regulated, and despite (or more likely because of that) we as an industry are under investigation by the competition authorities and the regulator who believe that the market is "not working". I can assure you that you cannot "regulate" a desired outcome through adding more and more rules, each of which has unintended consequences that require more rules to deal with.
By definition, the commercial rail operators in the UK do what they do to maximise their profits. If they are now doing things that you don't want, or not doing things that you want, then you want regulation to force them to take a course of action that will reduce their returns, and thus their willingness and ability to invest. This principle is why we are increasingly at risk of blackouts, as regulation and intervention to "improve" the energy sector has simultaneously reduced returns, raised costs to consumers, and made investment highly risky and unpredictable. The only answer to "improve" UK railways then is tax-funded subsidy, significant fare increases, or renationalisation. I remember the waste and incompetence of British Railways, I'm in no hurry to go back there, but even if that were an outcome it can only hide but not alter the fact that non-profit oriented spending diverts investment from better investment opportunities. In a state still spending around £100 billion a year more than it raises in tax, and with a £1.3 trillion pile of public debt, where will you get the money from to fritter on "improving" our railways in ways that rail users currently aren't prepared to pay for themselves? Taking the money from HS2 isn't the answer, because that's simply substituting one form of mis-allocated capital for another.
Re: Odd List
A more pressing concern than the odd list is that the w@nkers at VM actually have the time, desire and resources to censor user data that even their own employees shouldn't be able to see.
With several recent performance f*ck ups, and continuous upward price creep over recent years I'd rather they sacked the disciple of Mary Whitehouse who instigated this policy and put their effort into keeping prices down and services working.
"That was why I have Co-pilot."
Bwahahahahahaha! Another UK victim of Copilot's predatory UK pricing. £5.49 for all of the USA, or £24 just for the Western bits of Europe. I'd quite like Copilot, due to the limitations of the free Navfree app, and the neutered Google Maps service, but if they think they're fleecing me then they can FOAD, I'll manage with the two free apps mentioned.
- +Comment Anti-Facebook Ello: Here's why we're still in beta. SPAMGASM!
- Vid+Pics Microsoft WINDOWS 10: Seven ATE Nine. Or Eight did really
- Analysis Windows 10: One for the suits, right Microsoft? Or so one THOUGHT
- Xbox hackers snared US ARMY APACHE GUNSHIP ware - Feds
- George Clooney, WikiLeaks' lawyer wife hand out burner phones to wedding guests