Re: LCD everywhere
I had a TT and discovered i could get a bit closer to the car in front by moving my seat forward...
349 posts • joined 29 May 2012
I had a TT and discovered i could get a bit closer to the car in front by moving my seat forward...
"what do you use an SD card for??? i expect you want a dvd drive and a 9600 baud modem too?"
Yes. And I want to be able to swap the tray-loading dvd drive for a floppy drive (better still, a ZIP drive) or an extra battery.
You're right to be angry when your last laptop only lasted you 9 years and now is probably only worth a couple of hundred $£$£$£
Maybe, maybe not. But you'll be able to say to Dominos 'That's was never an 18" pizza you delivered - it was 12", tops!"
Is entrusting credit card verification to banks as irresponsible as giving a child matches?
The Bank of England have been slammed that their new banknotes allow rampant fraud, banking experts are claiming.
The problem is that whilst the notes themselves contain various security measures and are hard to copy, banks are being lazy and not checking the notes presented to them carefully enough and consequently are allowing people to deposit Monopoly money.
I never mentioned a pedestal. If you want to put people on pedestals because you feel threatened by their skills or experience, then that's up to you. But don't do it just to insult them.
I was born in '67 :-) Been doing MVS/OS390/zOS assembler since '87 and never heard the phrase in connection with it before. Just shows that there's nothing new...
"It doesn't mean that. You need to get down off that pedestal and go and learn about some other programming languages"
Enlighten me then if I've misunderstood. What does it mean?
By the way - do you think real programmers don't use 'goto'?
"assembler on an IBM mainframe.."
You get an upvote for that alone. I thought it was just me.
When I realised that all this "Pass by reference or pass by value" bollocks was just a new way of saying "does the register contain the value or the address of the value?" I mentally slapped my forehead.
So, umm, let's follow your logic here: Apple are building a car, so they can steal patents, and then sue people for infringing those patents.
Sorry - I missed something. Why do they need to build the car?
You know, it really isn't that easy to create lots of patents and then sue people for using them.
At the bare minimum, you have to invest a new best way to do something. If it isn't the best way, then other people will just do it differently and not infringe your patent.
Just have the operator follow the drone in a microlite aircraft.
Can I sue Sony because I can't play Xbox One games on my PS4? It's mine so I should be able to do what I like with it.
"I mean when you buy something, it's your right to use it in any way you want.". The trouble is, you don't buy software - you licence it. And the licence says what you can and can't do with it. If you don't like the term of the licence, you return it and if you don't return it, your agreement to the terms is implicit.
Also - sue over what? Go ahead and do whatever you like with your iDevice - if you want to wipe it and install Linux on it, go ahead. It might be difficult but you can't sue for that. It'd be difficult to fly to the Moon on it too, but that's another thing you can't sue them over because you think they should have provided that option
You're getting confused over between Apple making it hard to modify the software on their iPhone (which is the reality and which they are entitled to do) and your fantasy of Apple having to provide an easy option for users to do/install whatever they like.
I'm not defending Apple here - I'm just clarifying your thoughts :-). Try it with an Samsung device - you bought it, so it's yours to do what you like with. And if you can't reverse engineer & customise their proprietary additions to Android and install them on your Nokia or sell them on the Google Play store then is that something you can sue them for too?
You can't sue someone because something you bought won't do something it wasn't advertised to do.
...a random member of the public:
""It didn’t have any markings on the sides of it or anything. I couldn’t figure out what it was,” Concord resident Melissa Lewis told her local TV station."
What would we do without her?
Big deal. If a closed financial system (the Earth) is facing collapse, who cares how many little bits of green paper move around to secure a solution?
"But it looks like toilet humour is dead. More's the pity."
You should try watching 'South Park'.
"the device is secure, both from hackers, and the NSA"
"You're naive. Dangerously so. No matter how ethical the company is, if they have any American legal attack surface whatsoever then they will be forced to give the keys to the kingdom over the NSA."
It was a rhetorical question and therefore correct. A device to access the entire Internet by voice that was totally secure and remembered everything you needed it to would be good. If someone said "Wouldn't it be great to have free, driverless cars that you could call when you needed one and could never crash?", then you can't reply "No - someone would charge for them and they would crash", because the proposal is that they are free and can't crash.
You can argue that these things can't be achieved, but that's all.
I know - very pedantic.
"Sony Pictures Entertainment could not be reached for comment".
Even after their home addresses had been leaked? Why didn't you just write to them?
I saw it - there is no way a solid-gold watch (Apple or otherwise) will be worth £30 in a few years. Working or not. Unless the watch weighs less than 2g or someone finally cracks the secret of alchemy...
(Cue Percy and Blackadder...)
"I wonder which will still be working three years later and may have actually increased in value while the other is worth just scrap or £20 for spares on Ebay."
You can buy broken, solid-gold watches for £20 off eBay? That's amazing.
You know, you haven't chosen wisely by bringing future value into a debate concerning something made of gold. Unless you were actually dismissing the Omega.
I doubt if anyone will be "bitten" by this I.e. Pay £2000 for it with the intention of using it as an external 5K monitor in target display mode ot to get gone and find out it doesn't support it.
"Doctor! I'm just going over here... Oh, I've been captured."
<Doctor rescues assistant.>
"Thanks Doctor!. Now I'm going..oh, I've been captured..."
<Doctor rescues assistant>
"Thanks!. Now I'm just ... Well what do you know,.I've been captured..."
Portrait? Useful for 15" monitors maybe, for viewing portrait documents, but I can't see a use for it on a 27".
"This has been an option for years... unlikely a disgruntled employee could do it"
So it hasn't been an option?
...some of the people here trying to define 'cool' probably think that telling a girl that they were up until 3am, recompiling a Linux kernel, is going to impress her. Which it won't Even when wearing your best tank-top.
You really should stop feeling so smug and superior. Some people genuinely prefer the Apple ecosystem and buy an iPhone after an informed choice. Why else would peopl buy them if, as you say, it's just a status symbol yet everyone else despises them thus robbing them of any status?
If switching to Android from iOS was so easy for you, then I'm assuming you have no investment in the iOS/Apple ecosystem (iPhone/iPad/MAx datasharing etc) nor any iOS apps, iTunes films etc.
Which begs the question - why have an iPhone? Someone at work asked me if he should get an iPhone or Android so I asked what apps he wanted. "Apps?" he replied. turns out he just wants email, web-browsing, phone calls, messaging etc so I told him it didn't really matter what he bought.
Is this just a random list of distracting things? Just, using an Apple Watch would be distracting but I didn't see the IAM issuing advice that the new Nerf guns would be distracting if small children were using them for a pitched battle in the back seat. Same for porcupines - a porcupine on the passenger seat is also distracting. Again, no warning. And that girl who I usually see walking up the hill near home - very distracting. Especially in summer.
"Bought it on Kindle, read it already. It's excellent. Couldn't put it down."
Well, no you can't - it's digital. You could put the Kindle down though...
Remind me again what these better phones were?
Well, the easiest thing for any of these type of questions if to use your wife or girlfriend's place_of_birth/mothers_maiden_name/pet/car/colour etc.
but I guess that's not going to work either, is it?
Indeed - it's great that primary-school kids are Internet-savvy.
I remember a discussion on a forum once on the CLI vs. GUI. One CLI fan commented that he could knock up a quick CLI command string to convert a folder of 100 JPEGS to BMP (or whatever) much, much faster than someone doing it in a GUI graphics program.
Mind you, he couldn't see the irony of using an image-processing problem to demonstrate the advantages of the CLI over a GUI.
This is the old 'Programming the video recorder' argument.
A colleague of mine, Andy, who was a contractor with his ownsLtd company, was asked by his nephew if he could do hid 'IT industry experience' with Andy. As the nephew had a raft of ICT certificates, Andy asked him which programming languages he knew. "Programming languages?" came the reply.
He was competent with Word and Excel though.
But compared to the phone i had (running Win Mob, IIRC), I wasn't too sassauge-fingered to find anything wrong with the buttons, my headphones fitted, the camera was better, could have done with C&P, quick-dial: meh (Just dial a favourite or contact), far better browser and more useable with the massive increase in data over my 500Kb allowance, MMS - never sentine in my life and why would I when I could send an email? Notes - as good as Outlook and perfectly adequate, it did triangulate cell towers which my phone didn't (and see data allowance above).
Plus the OS was smooth and intuitive.
What on Earth are you wittering on about? Claiming money plus interest for the time you had a product before you decided to return it? What colour is the sky on your planet?
"Sooner or later, people will wake up, and Apple will be in trouble.". Too right. OK, so we were a bit off with the 'iPhone will flop" comment before it launched, but this will surely come true.
OK, we thought it'd happen in 2008, then 2009, then 2010, then 2011 and err ummm,, but no fear - one day people will realise The Truth and that us nerdy techies knew best all along and that they don't want some that they can just use without having to re-compile the kernal every few weeks.
I can't see it catching on...
I wasn't aware that Google were the sort of company who paid people who didn't 'get things done' enough money buy a yacht...
Why is the death of a 10-a-penny code-monkey a 'travesty' (you need to look that word up - you probably meant tragedy), but the death of someone who got things done, not?
"They made MAJOR changes to a very functional OS ( XP , W7) rather than taking small steps = fail.
The expect that users will forget 10-15 years of habits and instantly move over to a new paradigm = fail.
All they had to do was move in small steps, test the water and either implement or remove.."
Who do you think they are? Apple?
Yeah - I had one of those. I carried it around in my jacket pocket and pulled it out on the train and effortlessly held in one hand to read e-books and swipe through emails and web-pages.
Hang on - no I didn't.
"I may have even written one or two myself." One or two what?. Mainframe viruses? No - you haven't.
(vexabibulus ... means the feeling that one experiences when one discovers that the toilet roll has been mounted incorrectly)
....or that the perforations don't line up... (Yes - I know how to fix that).
It should go in the dictionary with reciprivesexclusional (a number defined as having any value other than that of itself e.g. the number of guests at a restaurant - will be any number other than the number on the booking) an luposlipoculinophobia - the fear of being chased around a kitchen table by timber-wolves whilst wearing socks and a newly-waxed floor.
"It is a big opportunity and we are all over it. We will have something by the middle of next year."
Personally, I prefer Apple's approach - which, for the most part, would be HP saying "Here's our new 3D printer and it's available now." (Ok - maybe a couple of weeks). Not "Just wait until the middle of next year woo-hoo!"
Everyone moans about hugely early announcements that are inevitably late. Or so vague ("We'll have something") that you could announce anything 'on-time' and be months or years away from a product release.
Who remembers Google's "We'll have an iPad killer by Christmas"? Didn't happen - it was months late.
All of you - announce the damm thing when it's ready to ship! None o this "Just wait a few months and don't buy anything else - we'll be brilliant - honest!"
"Ah Logic Lite. The equivalent of Ejay Dance 6"
Not really - Garageband is Garageband; it's not the 'lite' version of anything in as much as there's no menu options that, when you try to use them, you get a pop-up saying Sorry - that feature is only available in Garageband Pro. would you like to upgrade for the special one-time fee of $29.99?"
And the same for all the other iLife apps - they are their own apps with support forums etc and you know that other Mac users have the same software, unlike all the other bloatware, feature-crippled, unheard of, unsupported, written-by-1st-year-Java-students cr@p that other machines get loaded with.
So when my Dell-owning friends ask for advice about their free photo editing software "Glorius Korean Software Kompiny (sic) Foto Editor Pro Lite V32.5!" and why it's asking for $30 to crop a photo "Please be upgrading to wonderful Korean Software Kompiny (sic) Foto Manipulator Expert V 24.8 for advance features" I have to say "Dunno mate. My last pc was an Acer it it came with "Most Brilliant Picture Changer V5" but needed upgrading to "Hoo-soon Picture Magic 9 " to save changes."
"It's definitely been tried. I attended a talk by a guy who did an experiment like that on himself (essentially inserting tiny wires directly into the nerve - an incredibly painful process apparently).
If I remember correctly he was receiving the stimuli from someone else, having it sent over wifi then into his own hand."
aaaannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnddddd... we're back at comment 1.