Re: AI or MInd?
Probably one of those that have a deficiency in gravitas.
120 posts • joined 19 May 2012
Probably one of those that have a deficiency in gravitas.
It could be worse, they might be nice to us.
Maybe the shoe event horizon won't be so bad?
> Oh my, a $1.2 million settlement!
Please read the article again.
$1.2m in /legal fess/. The settlement amount is not disclosed.
> most spiteful trolls
You really don't get out much do you.
> abc.wtf was registered by Microsoft themselves
While the IP points to an MS server (try visiting http://abc.wtf), the registrant is a registrant protection service (ie. proxy to avoid putting you personal details into the whois database).
The reverse DNS just reflects the resolution of the domain.
Its nameservers are also not MS (primary on Rackspace).
against typography this should be immediately ignored.
That horror in the diagram.
Given i7-9xx (1st gen i7's) had a TDP of 130W, and current generation AMD CPUs also go well over 100W how to dissipate that much heat is nothing new.
(Looking at Sky-Lakes to replacement of my ageing i7-920: but will wait on the mainstream variants, however is does look like 2x16GB for memory is viable price wise.)
> Nope the explosion creates Lithium
No, the explosion spreads the lithium, Lithium is a normal product of late life star fusion.
As a stars hydrogen is consumed it is not enough to sustain the star, gravitational collapse leads to high core pressure and temperature allowing higher order fusion to take place. If the star is massive enough this can go as far as creating iron. (The latter stages of this happen in the final minutes before the star explodes as only stars massive enough to end as supernovae take fusion that far.)
Fusion into heavier elements is endothermic so cannot sustain the star, these elements are only created in a supernova explosion itself.
> I know no modern OS that still have this huge stupidity set by default: auto-executing of removable storage. Apart from Windows.
Windows does not either. Unless you are running XP, *and* have not done the simple configuration change. XP always supported that configuration setting so its existence is old (more than a decade) news.
I suspect other commenters here are right: the diagnostics tool is just a thumb drive and relies on the OS to execute it, rather than having a secure mechanism,
But then its not like the safe and lock industry have a history of security by obscurity is it.
> they have more control over the updates, and can pick and choose.
More than "complete and total"? WSUS gives central control for all (supported) versions of Windows: server or not.
If you want control run Pro edition and use the tools provided. If you want an easy life leave it on automatic. I would rather have all those potential botnet nodes, sorry, home users, up to date thank you.
> but wanted his company to do an audit.
The bosses had asked him to check things: makes a big difference having permissions even if the local branch staff do not know.
The teams operate all around the world: uploading data from those events rather than snail mailing a memory stick?
I'm assuming this is all part of the process of preparation for LOHAN.
Isn't a proper mission control part of any (near) space mission?
> It has a 5x5 LED display. That's an ideal form of output. Anything more sophisticated and they'll play Minecraft on it instead of doing their ICT homework.
Minecraft could easily /be/ their ICT homework: http://services.minecraftedu.com/wiki/ComputerCraftEdu
> Ground-up restos are spendy, true, but it's still far cheaper than purchasing a new car.
Does that include accounting for your own time at a decent rate?
I doubt it.
> Strustrupp didn't want C++ to C backward compatibility.
He certainly didn't say that in "Design & Evolution of C++" which goes through the early stages of C++'s evolution from C via "C with Classes".
> Why are people still writing ordinary C
Because they are targeting platforms without C++, or in case where it is (at least perceived that) C++ is unsuitable (too much dynamic memory, polymorphism, ...: too hard to predict exactly what happens). Eg. consider code for a low power embedded system running on a PIC controller with memory measured in hundreds of bytes (or less). And then there is inertia.
> Yes the survey is inaccurate
Of course it is. As every such survey (whether COBOL marketing from MicroFocus or a survey of job advertisements to name two that regularly generate headlines) it is massively biased because of its selection of data sources.
> Chrome seems to grab one or two[fixed] 50MB process per tab.
"Seems" is the right term. There is a lot of shared working set across those processes (and others).
Here, one Chrome worker process has a working set of some 55MB, but of that almost 22MB is shared.
Just adding up the working set of processes will always end up double counting memory usage in Windows.
TL;DR: Memory in virtual memory systems is complicated. Almost every measure is not what you think it is.
> "We are learning that chaos may be a common trait of binary systems,"
Someone needs to go back to school. The Three Body Problem has been known as long as gravity: Newton covered it in Principia…
> How the hell are we going to get the consumer market[…]
That is far too complicated. (And by "far" I mean: distance to the edge of the observable universe far, not round the corner to the chemist.)
Any solution needs to be easy enough that no user interaction is needed, and cheap enough that it becomes the default.
> Can I be famous now please?
If you were original then maybe. But you are not: https://xkcd.com/538/ hence no.
> mythbusters [...] fast machine gun to cut something solid in half
Cut down a tree is the usual aim.
Been done in other programmes as well.
Not cost efficient or time efficient. But does show why one does not want to be in front of such weapons.
> why are these sites not using[…]
Content separated from structure (eg. CMS) could well mean no one person controls all the markup.
(And there is always content relative links, eg. //code.jquery.com/jquery-1.11.2.min.js, for content from other domains.)
> Business knowledge is lost in email. It must be properly filed on a network location, and email only serving links to the latest version.
And now your sales team wants to send a quotation to that potentially very lucrative customer.
Not everyone is connected to the local network ...
And note even IE6 (XP SP3/2003 SP2 and above) supports SNI. (Not in the original versions of those OSs, but it was added later.)
If you have clients from before those relics then it is quite possible even assuming HTTP 1.1 will be a problem, so you have to have a unique address even when unsecure.
Certificate providers are appearing with ever cheaper (some promising free) certificates.
(This is covered in the linked discussion thread.)
While they won't be EV certificates, as the underlying drafts do consider levels of security, that aspect is covered.
So your "About Me" site gets a free certificate, but as you are not selling anything you are only looking at providing end to end integrity rather than significant identify validation.
At the other end of the scale a medical site or retailer does need to spend some money on their identity. But if they are not willing, how secure is anything they do?
> It's also about a thousand times smarter and more interesting.
Talk about damning with faint praise…
There is already a standard for it: RFC 3251 "Electricity over IP", but your a couple of weeks out for that.
Or perhaps, hoist by their own petard.
> Each year flash costs between 162X and 53X more to make per TB than disk
The graph clearly says cap-ex. But the cost of manufacture is op-ex (eg. staffing), materials and a /proportion/ of cap-ex.
It will be more expensive, but nothing close to the cap-ex multiplier because the other costs will not be anything like as proportionately as big (otherwise flash would already be far more expensive than it is reative to spinning rust).
> High-end storage: […] Frankly, unless you already have a pile of Fibre Channel disk shelves then go for SATA.
I think someone meant "SAS" there, otherwise the next sentence – backward compatible with SATA – does not make sense (and who does high end storage on SATA?).
And hope the sign does not sink...
Go stick your head in a pig.
> First off, several encryption methods been written and tested so there is no longer any reason to invent a new method.
Wrong. New attack techniques are developed, faster computers can brute force longer keys and thus new, more resistant, algorithms are needed and longer key lengths are needed.
For instance DES has never been broken (albeit it was weakened my new attacks), but it can be brute-forced in hours today. Equally SHA1 has been weakened by new attack techniques.
Thus neither DES or SHA1 are suitable for their original purposes despite huge evaluation and analysis through their standardisation processes.
>f ISO 25999?
Or are you mixing (now withdrawn) BS 25999 and (its replacement) ISO 22313?
> They probably tasted like chicken.
Can't have done. Chicken (or any birds for that matter) had yet to evolve.
This time it is Opportunity.
> looks to me like they are trying to turn every hard disc into a NAS box
[without all the benefits]
Indeed. Instead of open set of code managing redundancy (with a support contract), you end up with every application doing it. Mostly poorly (inevitably).
Twitter displays the date/time of other's tweet's in your locale. Unless they are recent, then it displays something like "+20 min".
Thus Vulture South would need to translate the offset into a local time, and then perform the timezone conversion, Neither difficult, but it was a Sunday :-).
> Seriously, Alt+F to open the menu, [...]
Press ALT: see ribbons overlaid with the available short cuts. As you enter them more specific ones appear.
Once you know where the command is on the ribbon (they are easier to find as the organisation is far more consistent, but you're used to the inconsistency of the menus).
So to sort a table: Alt-JO and the Table Tools Layout tab is opened, SO and the sort dialog is open.
And this works even if the ribbon is collapsed (Control-F1 to toggle).
The ribbon is different, but it is not hard.
(Wrong rover, but applies even more so.)
You'll continue getting support.
Because it does not end in January, only "mainstream support" (ie. new features being added) ends in January, Bug fixing and security patching go on until "extended support" ends in 2020.
But then I expect you know that. Troll.
While Fasthosts may have no such legacy applications, their customers may well have legacy applications.
(And I agree, I read it initially as "that's a very specific number of servers" :-))
> Give us a small and cheap but very fast PCI card to boot and run our O/Ses from!
Have you looked at M.2 flash cards (on motherboards with the appropriate support)?
Of course they have capacities that mean you can skip a SATA flash disk and just back it up with the large spinning rust for bulk storage if required.
> Why is this different from using a telephoto lens on a camera?
Well the camera is remote, potentially significantly remote, from the operator (photographer).
And unlike, conventional, helicopter based news filming, a UAV is far less noticeable while being able to get much closer.
Then you get into the difference between private only use and commercial use (eg. requirements for release forms).
So it is somewhat different. But I suspect it'll take a court case or few to really determine the rules.
Arboreal areas contain ursine turds.
Just received a nice dead tree edition... and wondering what's happened to the time :-)
There have been some updates compared to the online versions (plus some extras), so worth it even if you do read http://what-if.xkcd.com/
> ... Why is MS still releasing patches for IE6?
Server 2003 is still in support (until April 2014 IIRC), and shipped with IE6. Hence it gets patching because Microsoft's policy is currently to support all IE versions that work on a supported OS version.
However, as of Jan 2016, that will change (as announced recently), with only the latest compatible IE supported on each OS.
Good point. After all they only need to return status 418 (even if not short and stout).
This article is about Tea; HTCPCP is about coffee.
> VinceH I think we got hit by the same inspiration particle!
Clearly some form of particle cloning going on, because it seems to be bouncing around here as well!
However, in proper abbreviation creation mode I reverse the last two words:
Arboreal Recognition System for Evasion.
The difference between "update to [get to] V31" and "update [applied] to V31": the ambiguities are strong in this one.
I would assume the malware (incorrectly) injects quite a few lines of its own code knowing it is a file that is executed for each request.