12 posts • joined 23 Apr 2012
Its a pity.
They had (have) good products but a poor overall strategy. A common shortcoming for a lot of Startups.
Re: Cisco might buy NetApp - why?
Simple rule of M&A (vis a vis Cisco/NtAp): you don't have to buy a company if you can get everything you need from them anyway and there is no one else interested in buying them.
Also EMC buying troubled. 300.000 employee HP just to get a server technology is pretty insane.
HDS takes on EMC, NetApp....
....a bit late?
Really nice graphs. Shows were the storage market is today. Interesting, no Oracle at all on the graph.
Judging by the number of time Nexenta names Pure, they seem to be a bit obsessed with them, at least at a subconscious level. Pure is probably worth checking out then....
Being a silo, will XtremIO be sold by a separate EMC division (like Isilon) or within their "standard" storage offerring.
I'll volunteer for the job....who can I send my CV to? :)
you're asking the right qurstions here. "Big Data" seems to be the buzzword of the moment ("the Cloud" appears to have found its place and form). Lots of Big Data talk, announcements, ideas, shapes, forms and a number of (potential) solutiond - but few real things to show.
How can Germany be the "nearest competitor" with 911 carriages when Italy has 995?
After HP dcoughed up 10B$ for Autonomy, anything is possible....
According to Mr Nowinski, Isilon has "poor performance". Their storage can stream multiple, tv broadcast quality video files, but that's still - slow? I am curious to learn what is"fast" according to the financial community? ;)
- Mounties always get their man: Heartbleed 'hacker', 19, CUFFED
- Batten down the hatches, Ubuntu 14.04 LTS due in TWO DAYS
- Samsung Galaxy S5 fingerprint scanner hacked in just 4 DAYS
- Feast your PUNY eyes on highest resolution phone display EVER
- AMD demos 'Berlin' Opteron, world's first heterogeneous system architecture server chip