Re: Post NSA
Government maybe but residents no. Most residents only have one thought about TPP and that's "Hell no"
1145 posts • joined 10 Apr 2012
Government maybe but residents no. Most residents only have one thought about TPP and that's "Hell no"
"Do you think people always have choice about when they need the loo?"
So who is making you use GMail? There is 1001 "free" services out there or you can make your own mail server.
There is no such thing as free and preventing companies from monetizing the service just results in the service being close because it's unfinancial.
Actually I think they stopped because the English was so bad, the robots were getting confused......
"Yep they are. Google do not operate in a vacuum occupied by Google and their customer's alone. When they scan emails they can also build a profile for users emailing gmail users and also those who have never even sent email to a gmail user but whose emails have got captured in a conversation thread that has been. When Google read a users address book, they get the email addresses and contact details of users who don't use gmail. Their data-store analysis activity and the data they store itself have implications far beyond Gmail users. It has made Google one of the most powerful intelligence agencies on the planet. You have not been granted mandate to decide this is ok for all of us, because you think critics are "are dumb" and that Google should be allowed to continue un-examined and without criticism"
The problem with most people is that they don't know the difference between privacy and anonymity
The internet is like a public toilet with camera installed in each cubical. The cameras are already there and we can choose not to use the public toilet if we don't like them. We are told that the cameras allow the computer to scan the cubical so the company knows when to refill the paper and clean the toilet. The company makes it money selling the waste to fertilizer companies.
You don't want to pay for the toilet. You don't want the company to sell your shit. You don't want the cameras and you complain if the cubical runs out of bog paper or someone left a floater. Not only that you'll also complain if the company closes the toilet cause it's unfinancial because it's your god given right to have free toilets.
Sure the company could use the camera to look at your willy but there are thousands using the toilets every day and your willy isn't that special. If you have an issue, cover your willy or choose a toilet that is dirty because it has no camera or use your own toilet.
You're anonymous but not private. Learn the difference.
Is it just me or are some people dumb.
There is no such thing as a free lunch. Google's "free" mail service is paid for by ads. They can target ads and show things relevant to the user or they can show random stuff.
I'd rather have targeted ads. I don't need penis enlargement pills or feminine hygiene products but I can understand some of the commentards on here do......
"Too many people are under served by the current transport system. They are blind, or too young to drive, or too old, or intoxicated as well as stoned and/or retarded."
Did it in my twenties. It really isn't that hard. Buying the first property is the hardest but once the bank owns your soul, they will happily lend to you again and again.
I'm a software developer and I'm a millionaire. Mind you I didn't get rich from my day job other than being a geek with no social life left me money to invest.....
Mind you, millionaire really isn't a very high bar these days.
"What, a complete nutjob?"
No. A rich nutjob.....
(Most have got the nutjob part down pat already)
Saw it and thought exactly the same thing.
Just right for Australia.....
"Run out and find me a five year old child!"
Michael Jackson said that too and he got into trouble for it....
I don't know what's more disturbing, the fact that roboroo has a blinking anus, you for spotting his anus or me for watching the video again to confirm his blinking anus.......
Welcome our new robo skippy overlords.......
So are baseball cards but last time I checked, they're not a currency either.
I think people are confused because bitcoins have the word coin in the name. The law states that it's property and until they law says that bitcoins are money, you can't get charges with money laundering (at least until you exchange them for money)
I could argue the same for expensive paintings and wines. It's property that can be exchanged for money.
According to the law, it's property and never money.
"Not sure what you mean by "anonymous", but they are traceable. That's the whole point of the chain. The equivalent of laundering would be the pooling shops that mix the content of wallets, making the coins hard to trace -but not impossible."
No it's impossible to trace without the police having everybody's wallet. The wallets are anonymous and short of getting caught with the wallet, the police cannot identify the owner, let alone what the coins were spent on.
Think of it like anonymous credit cards. You can see the flow of money but without linking the cards to people, you can't see who's buying or selling.
"The bitcoin does not have to be a currency to achieve this. The money laundering process begins when the bitcoin was bought (or money changed hands for the goods that were then traded for bitcoin)."
That's true except Rob didn't change the format. He was paid in property (bitcoins) and left it as property (bitcoins). It's not until Rob changes it to actual cash that they can claim it. Considered the police seized bitcoins instead of cash, their argument falls flat.
Just image Rob was paid for with an expensive painting and hung the painting on his wall. You can claim laundering if he sold said painting for cash but you can't for him keeping it instead.
You can only do it if you declare paintings as a form of currency (and not property) or make a property laundering law.....
"and use that money to buy Ferraris, beach houses and hookers, which are all a drug lord really wants in the end"
Isn't that what we all just want?
"The government may need to prove a larger operation for the money laundering, but since the bitcoin are exchanged for cash, it's still a money laundering operation. Just because he only had the subcontract for exchanging property doesn't invalidate the operational basis."
Ah but your argument falls flat as the bitcoins hadn't been exchanged to cash. They were still bitcoins.
Rob was paid in bitcoins (which are property) and he left them as bitcoins (still property). You can't argue it was money laundering because at no stage while in Robs possession was it turned from or to an actual currency.
You can argue proceeds of crime but you can't argue money laundering without money. The government needs to declare bitcoins a legal currency or they need to drop the money laundering charges.
At the end of the day, the law is an ass.....
Yes but there is no property laundering laws and as such the money laundering charges have to be dropped.
As for the proceeds of crime, running a website isn't a crime just because said users used it for crime otherwise Google would be in trouble.
The law isn't about right or wrong, justice or injustice. It's always about the letter of the law. There are going to be some serious precedents set no matter who wins this.
As much as this is a joke, the future will be 3d printed buildings.
Google and the NSA win.
I'd of thought the skills writing a crypto currency would make him very employable.
We Aussies beat you to get an operational drone delivery service.....
Not if he spends on coke off the Silkroad.....
Lets solve the pollution problem by using more chemicals......
If you have to buy equipment to comply on the government's spying demands, then they should pay for it.
The only thing the government has a right to complain about is not getting a discount for spying in bulk...
Then stop bugging everyone.....
May TPP die a quick death and never be seen again
There is nothing more democratic than secret treaties that sell us out to multinational companies.
Quick, buy up Vasoline before parallel imports are banned and drives the price up.
Executive action one : Find free workers
Executive action two: Find free engineers
Executive action three: Find free lawyers.
These changes are the most you can do without actually doing something.
That 25 Mbit is fast enough for anyone with their fibre to the node NBN.
"ahhh the naivety...
First its for your own safety, however Its a long slippery slope..I can just imagine the Police loving this. Caught not wearing a seat-belt by your SIM card. And how long before GPS data is added etc.
(Substitute speeding, parking in a no parking zone, etc take your choice)"
No naivety here. I've known the police would install black boxes for years. A total record of when and where and fines will be automatically deducted from your bank account.
These black boxes will be legislated that all your data belongs to the government.
The only thing that has a hope of crushing the black box dream is self drive cars. If the car is driving and can't break the law, then there is no money to be made and the government loses interest.
Who owns the sim card? They're the ones paying for the data thus should own it. Phone companies don't transmit for free.
I hope his complaint about hand lotion was because his cellmate wasn't using lube.....
With a name like Fluffy Bunny, you'd think you'd be less serious. My comment was an insulting dig at Windows 8, not actually a comment about the role of prisons.
If I was actually commenting on Brevik, I'd say just surgically remove his eyes, ears and tongue and let him spend the rest of his miserable life, dark and alone, dependant on the charity of others, not whining that his playstation doesn't have the cool new games.....
"they'd give him a Windows 8 machine instead."
Prison is about rehabilitation, not punishment. You can't give him something that will make him want to go out and kill someone.......
When they forced a touch interface onto desktops without a touch interface.
If the idiots had left the start bar alone and allowed desktops to default to the desktop mode, they would have never had this problem.
If MS bothered to ask consumers this would have never happened.
Are these Americans or is he going to have to file in Durk Durkastan?
No just the whole movie (which was god awful). The plot was more rancid than week old road kill and less substantial than a budget porno.
Worst movie ever.
"Make sure you have your memory switched off then."
I've tried to for some movies and for some I've tried to wipe the memory. Damn you Halley Berry in Cat Woman....
Beer icon cause I'm still trying to wipe it.
"fraud & kidnapping and attempted rape"
Which charge was the real one and which one was to get the press?
"Well I don't believe in the Big Bang I'll tell you that. How did this become such a believed theory? It has glaring "plot holes". I think just settling on the BB is lazy science."
Don't tell me you go for the "God made it in six days" theory?
Probably mining bitcoins while it waited.....
Or was that Windows ME 3.0?
She slipped over onto some bullets.....
"Abadie also beat the speeding ticket he gave her for driving at 85 miles per hour in her Prius because of lack of evidence."
A prius capable of doing 85mph? Clearly the cop lied.....