6 posts • joined 6 Apr 2012
Re: What About the HomeHub 5?
I have got one of these and it is pretty good.
Can't compare it to the others for speed myself, but other reviewers have and say it's near the top.
And BT sell them online to non-BT broadband customers for £129, which makes it one of the cheapest.
Re: Who ate all the pies?
Yes, it's a real computer running a real OS.
Thousands of existing models of laptops.
The only difference being - it is marginally slimmer than the slimmest existing laptops from Lenovo, Apple etc at the expense that you cannot comfortably use it on your lap, or on the tray of an aeroplane or train seat.
For the same price I would prefer an ultrabook or Air with a hinged keyboard.
And it is bigger, heavier an more expensive than tablets, which are not full computers.
So what is so great about it?
Re: I'm not an expert
Er, yes we can.
If the current variation in temperature is within the bounds of historic natural variation, as recorded in the ice core, then of course it can be explained as being just natural variation. In fact this is the best explanation according to the principle of Occams razor.
What is so hard to understand?
They don't teach science good these days.
Re: I'm not an expert
If the current temperature variation is within the range of what has happened naturally in the past, then it is statistically insignificant.
If what is happening now is shown to be in line with what has happened in the past, then there is no reason to the that what is happening now is due to some new "unpleasantness".
Or put another way, if we can explain the current temperature variation we do see as being down to the natural historical tendency for temperatures on Earth to vary over time, why would we need to think up any other reason to explain it? Occam's razor.
The conclusion quoted above seems to be saying:
"The present variation we are seeing is nothing outside of historical norms, and does not indicate a threat to the stability of the ice sheets. But if there were to be more temperature change in the future at a rate that was faster than the current or historical norm, then this could be bad."
Re: a tablet without it is not worth having
"If you never owned a previous model you're not really in a place to make the comparison"
Yeah right. The fact that I have spent hours looking at the screen of previous iPads owned by various people including my girlfriend, is irrelevant. I really can't possible compare without having owned an iPad 2 for a year. Plus the fact that they have the two versions on sale side-by-side in the shops.
No I can't possibly make a comparison, and my opinion is invalid.
" certainly I note not one jot of graininess compared to my PCs/laptops."
Yes, but it's still visibly pixellated, unlike a Kindle, and unlike the new model. Maybe for playing angry birds it makes no difference.
I am glad you are happy with your iPad2. There is no deed to be a dick about it.
Re: Blame your tools. not your ipad
There was an article about it somewhere, I forget, that explains it.
Down to two things:
Hardware limitations - at least in the first iPad, the performance of rendering text was actually slower than for graphics, so people just converted text to graphics.
Secondly, it is easier for designers to guarantee a fixed layout when they just effectively scan each page, rather than to get competent with using HTML5.
- Game Theory The agony and ecstasy of SteamOS: WHERE ARE MY GAMES?
- Intel's Raspberry Pi rival Galileo can now run Windows
- Hello, police, El Reg here. Are we a bunch of terrorists now?
- Microsoft and HTC are M8s again: New One mobe sports WinPhone
- Worstall on Wednesday Wall Street woes: Oh noes, tech titans aren't using bankers