If there was one thing Apple could claim it was quality over everything (including price competitiveness). I guess a 100% markup on each device wasn't enough and they've decided that surely the consumer won't notice a few compromises here and there.
368 posts • joined 2 Apr 2012
I'm assuming they were intentionally scalped? Perhaps a little too aggressive though, heck one of them lost his eyeballs.
Depends if they use any original Pentium chips.
Shouldn't microsoft focus on utilising some traditional intelligence before going on some hopeless quest to develop the artifical variety?
Correct me if I'm wrong (not that I need to say it) but aren't the buttons a way of saying "Feel free to approach me to chat" without the wearer needing to verbally accost randoms in a fruitless search for stimulating conversation?
IE feel free to read the paper, futz with your phone or stare blankly at the back of the head of the person in front of you if you like, this campaign won't affect you.
Re: The problem is a lack of imagination...
The issue is that they're not looking at the bigger picture. Boil a kettle, and it's one tiny inconvenience for one person. Boil 50 million kettles at once, and you bring the nation's powergrid to its knees, and not just for three minutes.
Do consumers have any rights left in America other than the right to consume?
It should just headquarter itself in the USA.
Sure, it might pay a few actual dollars in tax, but at least these behaviours are praised as virtues there, being a shining example of capitalism and how "the market" sorts out everything if it's just left to regulate itself.
I guess it's worth a shot
Making every potential target financially non-viable to engage with can't be any worse than trying to educate people not to respond to spam. There's a constant flood of new idiots jumping online just waiting to be approached by a saviour proffering gigantic genitalia and a Google paycheck of $9,000 per week.
one of his clients had already seen dodgy activity on their credit card which had been attributed to the attack
"Look honey, that transaction from hotandhornypodiatrists.com must be because my Yahoo account got hacked. There can be no other explanation."
Re: Meanwhile, over at the Inq
Element hider addin can be useful for adblocking the panels they cover content with, if you really want to see it.
Usually it's an easy decision to make. I can't see the content without disabling adblocker? Guess I don't need to see the content. Bye.
I'm 40 and every time I see someone browsing the net without an adblocker I almost have an allergic reaction. How can anyone live with that visual pollution?
Isn't trying to lock people in via SA just as likely to give them the push they needed to jump ship?
If I'm weighing up options, adding some ridiculous contract term to one of them makes me far more likely to lean the other way.
Re: Focus your hatred on Cruze, not on Republicans. He's 1 lone loudmouth.
I have to wonder, does he believe his own propaganda? Is he truly deluded, or just a liar?
I have serious doubts about Google honouring any incognito or privacy settings at this stage.
Re: The fun never ends
Seems a lot of effort to go through when 10 seconds unattended can see you plug in a USB keylogger between PC and keyboard. Which works on any OS as far as I'm aware.
Re: AI will be fantastic
To be honest, I suspect any AI that can accurately be called that will be on the side of whatever corporation created (bred? imprisoned?) it and it will not be to anyone's benefit except their own.
Imagine a Google AI on your phone. Can you picture what little benefit you'd get out of that compared to what Google gets? To have it quietly singing ad jingles on your nightstand during your REM-sleep? To have it nag you into filling up at BP instead of Mobil with a hundred different very logical reasons despite the fact that the last time you stopped at a BP they treated you like crap and you just don't want to go there?
Now picture it instead being an AI controlled by your government. That strikes me as even more horrifying.
No, I think I'll wait for other people to test-run this stuff before I volunteer to give up any semblance of privacy or individuality.
Most iFanBois have already been bled dry by yearly thousand-dollar phone upgrades.
Hands up anyone who's surprised. Nobody? Gee I wonder why that is.
Ask a politician to craft a law to fix an accounting loophole and I'd be surprised if you get anything more effective than a "please don't do that".
Surely any business that gets caught storing passwords in plain text deserves to be shut down no questions asked. How can this still be happening?
Re: Whilst they might be wary of doing it too directly next time
"To make us look bad to potential customers and get investigated up the wazoo by you guys." maybe?
I am a great believer in hearing both sides of the story before deciding whose side I'm on but without seeing events firsthand I think it's going to be hard to get an accurate picture.
Obviously guilty of "driving while non-white".
Re: He clearly doesn't understand the First Amendment
Republicans only pay lip service to their supposed "small govt" goals. They'll legislate the shit out of anything if it stops (1) abortions, (2) black people voting, and (3) guns being regulated in any way.
Much like the most outspoken homophobes in their party are the ones busted at 3am in public toilets soliciting for gay sex... I mean "doing research on the dirty hommo secksuals."
Re: ...expose customer data
Cable companies are just hoping there won't be anyone technical enough to see through the techno-blather. They just want them to see "Privacy implications" and go "Whoa okay sorry we asked, as you were.".
If another nation's citizen gets hacked by the FBI, surely that becomes an international matter? The US can't simply say "Oh that's legal by the way." and expect the other country to back off.
If twitter were to delete anything that could be considered as an attempt to influence someone's opinion it may as well shut up shop entirely.
Not that there's any point. I doubt anyone's ever changed their point of view based on a twitter post.
I get the feeling that the likes of Apple would rather destroy something than give it away.
(not that you can "destroy" an IP address, but they'll never let someone else use something even if they don't have a use for it.)
A secret court has ruled that a different secret court's ruling about a third secret court's validity stands. You cannot question the secret court. So says the secret court.
Feel safe now? No? Good. That's the point. You're supposed to feel scared. Scared people are easier to manipulate.
Okay, own up. Who's asking for these features? Surely they don't think this kinda crap up in a vacuum. There must be some market research company surveying people and getting enough responses that say "Sure, I'd just love Microsoft to spy on my fridge contents to tell me when the milk is past its best-before date. When can I buy one?".
Re: cant see much
Wait until professionals analyse everything and issue an official report? Where's the fun in that. It was obviously an ISIS sniper trained in rocketry by North Korea and smuggled near the facility by the molepeople firing a prototype rifle provided by aliens!
And *this* is why you properly salt your hashed passwords. I'm talking to you, LinkedIn, MySpace, etc etc.
Pffft, don't be silly. "Silverland1".
Re: Easy mistake to make?
"We don't negotiate with terrorists...we simply pay whatever price they set for their oil."
Thankfully the US will soon have a president who'll hold Wall St to account for these kinds of shenanigans. Oh wait...
It's starting to look less like citizens and protectors and more like animals and zookeepers. Does a chimp get to complain? No, if they act out they get segregated.
"Citizens of Peach Trees. This is the law. Disperse immediately or we will use lethal force to clear the area."
SPeaking of which, did you get one of Kanye's new shirts?
Can't you just email firstname.lastname@example.org and get them to send you a .zip file of all your public and private posts off Facebook?
I have to wonder if they're making themselves a laughing stock internationally on purpose, to undermine their very serious image as a ruthless totalitarian dictatorship that starves its citizens and brutally represses any attempt at improving their lives.
So does that cover only accounts promoting violent Islamic extremism, or also your garden-variety 2nd amendment pro-violence racists and cishet-hating militant pro-castration feminists?
Re: The real problem is why it's only 36%
Ditto. I went to install my bank's app at one stage and reviewed the permissions list. There really was no point in listing it, it should have just said "Everything.". I queried them on it and received the following response.
Thank you for your message regarding the *deleted* Android mobile app.
I have provided details regarding the permissions that the app requires for your reference below.
• Coarse and fine (GPS) location data
This is used for the map functionality and the find nearest ATM function.
• Identify phone call status
This is used as the app has the function that allows customer to directly phone the Bank from the app.
• Read contact data of all my personal contacts
This permission in required to allow customer to select a mobile number and email address for people in their contact list to make a Pay to Mobile/Email function available in the mobile app.
If there's one company I should trust in any way you'd think it would be my day-to-day bank but no. I've literally never been in a situation where I've been away from home and thought "Hey I really should schedule this payment *right now*, it can't possibly wait until I get home.".
My next phone will be selected on the ability to control app permissions granularly. Maybe then will I reconsider installing more apps. If they fail from not having GPS or camera access then I don't need them and they'll get uninstalled.
Got busted by the hubby tryin'a get yo dick wet in his girl? Lawsuit time!
Optimised for something that doesn't exist yet. You can tell that the marketing drones have been busy.
Well thankfully there's no way some unscrupulous manufacturer of nasty knockoffs will take this logo and apply it to their kit. None at all.
Re: They have to be joking
So they're saying "We'll do the hard part, designing a horrible UI, now some manufacturer just needs to do the easy part, creating cost-effective transparent monitors. Voila!"?
Can we please not -gate it. Please? Maybe call it DieselDeception? DieselDishonour? DieselDisgrace? VolksWangle?