230 posts • joined 30 Mar 2012
To be honest I'm not sure what nefarious use my medical records could be put to anyway.
What's the risk?
How many comments have you blocked to give the impression that your readership agrees with the faux outrage?
Is this intended to wind Fry up so he says something publicly in a sad bid to garner publicity?
>I don't use Adblock on The Reg...
I didn't used to, but they went through a phase of flash and/or heavily animated ads that meant I just killed them. I can't have stuff flashing and bouncing around the screen at work.
The world needs 1 in 10 to be so then we are rich, if the world needs 1 in 10,000 to be so, then we are poor.
The fraction doesn't really tell you much.
Re: The Americans must love asymmetric warfare
For the Americans, every war is asymmetric.
Isn't this a crime against humanity?
Doesn't it have to work as a sentence to count?
Lack of empathy.
At least there's a reason I don't give a shit.
The alien spacecraft drops into a low solar orbit refueling its weapon systems before the assault...
> (...) is inflation proof.
You misunderstand inflation. It isn't entirely driven by government printing money and it isn't entirely bad. For instance, the big fear in the Eurozone is of deflation.
Equally, your gold example is flawed, you are taking gold as an absolute value. You could take the dollar as an absolute value and say that gold fluctuates wildly against that too.
The problem is rapid fluctuations of the currency, and any currency that is valued by virtue of a market half the world is trying to stop will fluctuate wildly. It does not matter how many bitcoins there are when they can drop in value (vs cocaine for instance) by a third overnight.
What matters is the perceived worth of what backs the currency, in the case of the dollar this is the US itself. In the case of bitcoin, it's the market in illegal "stuff".
Re: Cost analysis ...
It's not that by using bitcoin you are guilty (although you are of course attaching value to the currency) it's that the substantial use of bitcoin is for criminal transactions.
If Tesco agreed to accept uncut diamonds for groceries, they'd be pilloried for it too.
..all you need is four candles and a pair of flower pots.
Possibly good news for PC gamers as these machines are both basically PC's inside, so porting to hgh-end kit should be a doddle.
Re: Lets see
>It has value as a mathematical exercise.
You misunderstand currency. Currency is a medium of exchange, it's "value" is about what it can be exchanged with.
Your analogies are as dumb as suggesting the value of ten pound notes lies in the printing of them.
So I say again, what are bitcoins exchanged for? Beer? How many bitcoin transfers are about beer do we think?
No, it's drugs, guns and kiddie porn or they'd just use Visa.
>> And beer according to Alex Brett @16:28
"All of our pubs accept cash; all except the Coalheavers Arms accept Visa and Mastercard."
But not only bitcoin, the point is why do you need bitcoins? Because you're a pervert junkie.
(or you're after a novelty selling point. :D )
3 down votes but no-one has attempted to explain why bitcoin might have a value outside junkies and perverts.
Consider why a currency is worth having. It is because you can buy things with it.
What can you buy that requires you to pay in bitcoin?
- Drugs, Guns and CP.
Re: If they are actually registered in China...
Ancient Chinese proverb say; Man with £2.5 million no longer live in China.
The whole thing seems to operate on the back of the blackmarket anyway, what else attaches worth to a bitcoin?
Chances are it's mostly drug money.
> The US was sending white men to space while a few hundred miles away, it was lynching black men at the same time.
Yes, the '60s space race was about nuclear supremacy and resulted in victory in the cold war by bankrupting the soviet union - a deeply unpleasant regime. Was the US right to focus on the soviet union whilst being deeply racist? No, they should have ditched the racist tripe then got on with it.
> The Russians were sending men to space while the expended rocket stages probably landed on a few Siberian Gulag corpses.
Yeah, properly sick regime.
> The UK went about 'fighting for freedom' in WW2 while it starved a few million Indians in Bengal in the process, and simultaneous beat up Hitler for killing a few million more.
The UK didn't "fight for freedom" in WW2, it fought for survival, and it was bloody close. As for the famine, do the Japanese not deserve some credit for creating the problem in the first place?
>The second is the straw-man argument that a country can only do one thing, or another.
Firstly the straw man is the suggestion that anyone is saying they can't do both, but they have failed to deliver on sanitation and even just shelter for a signifcant proportion of their population.
Secondly most here are Brits, from a country that actually deliberately gave up space exploration because of the cost (sadly, but some things are more important).
>Realistically, there are poor people everywhere...
Not quite on the same scale. It's frightening to see it up close.
>Should America sort out its poor before sending technology space-wards?
Water and sewage yes, and except for people being deliberately remote they have done.
>What about Russia? China?
Yes, they're basically totalitarian regimes that treat their people like slaves though.
>Should the UK have sorted out all it's poor before extending outwards?
No, because there was a clear financial return from doing so, which is what drove it.
>Should the Victorians have sorted out the poor before investing in the industrial revolution?
That actually did "sort out" the poor to some extent.
You seem to have confused things with clear technological, commercial or scientific value with what is in truth a vanity project designed to intimidate Pakistan and warn off China.
It's a potheadfourcandle heater gone wild...
No dihedral? On a glider?
Hope you're going to balance this one properly...
Reading, Bracknell, Camberley, Slough....
Why do IT companies set up in the most depressing towns in Britain?
Such utterly soulless dumps, when they're not geographically tied to anywhere.
Re: four words... WE NEED NUCLEAR POWER
Three words: It's Too Late.
10-15 years, maybe 20 and British planning officers can turn any project into something that makes the Panama canal look like a DIY project. They've spent 15 years pondering a runway being built at an airport.
We've fucked up big-style.
A to G
What's wrong with the kwh or joules used during a standardised test?
What does the alphabet bring?
I had a nose round tor recently to see what all the fuss is about, never mind staining my computer my mind is now indelibly stained, my retinas are permanently etched with the obscenity of it.
Why not go half and half?
Use helium to achieve minimal buoyancy and chuckable hydrogen for the lift?
Not got much to do up there have they...
Perhaps there's a need for a back-up balloon in the main event?
I vaguely recall a while back some chap called Lewis Page insisting that compressors were much too heavy.
Re: it will probably be an expensive boutique operation.
Traveling time would go up by a factor of 5, I guess. But space would not be an issue. You'd be able to walk around or sleep. England to Europe would be fine.
Not sure it would be so onerous, London to New York would be around 35 hours if they could get it going at around 100mph (The Zeppelin's could do 80 I think).
I'd happily take a sleeper in preference to cattle class on a plane.
Re: Compulsory casts.
What compiler doesn't know the types of arguments?
The compiler should really kick up a fuss for implicit casts from signed to unsigned. If there is an explicit cast then the programmer is due a spanking.
Re: A human body with "long fingers"
My god they're making pianists out there!
Re: OK I am now officially old
It's kind of like tcpip for paedos.
If you have enough relays tor isn't really secure, you could even map hidden services by recording relay to relay traffic and thereby mapping hot spots which would be most likely services.
I suspect the entire network is actually law enforcement. The cost of 4000 relays would be peanuts for that kind of intelligence.
Those laws would have, and will do, nothing at all to stop another Dunblane.
However no-one has done it since.
Besides, I'm sure people said what you're saying, after the various restrictions on rifles after Michael Ryan decided to turn Hungerford into a war zone. August 1987. I'm old enough to remember it, are you?
Yes I am. You perhaps forget the more recent loony in Whitehaven who thankfully only had a shotgun rather than a semi-automatic assault rifle.
Where the law doesn't prevent it, it does at least reduce the damage.
Handguns were restricted beyond all reasonable belief and made incredibly hard to use legally because of a psychopathic fuckwit who shot up a school.
...and no-one has done it since.
> How in hell do you go about banning phones on grounds of *size*?
Simple, you take each phone sold in Britain and see how if it can be inserted into the Home Secretary's arse.
The one's that will go in are banned.
Will we get a transcript? This audio/video bollocks is all very cool, but not very inclusive.
Really a phone part?
There's plenty of space for chips in PC SSD's, phones on the other hand have limited real estate so a stacked part is valuable.
There's also the interesting possibility of stacking flash, a CPU and memory in the same chip creating a true PC on a chip.
Re: Lots of IT jobs in London...
>I've 12 year C# and know quite a few devs with similar years.
You were using it live before the first spec was out? Not sure that's something to be proud of....
Re: Lots of IT jobs in London...
He probably doesn't have a clue if he's "registered" or not as most of you lot just grab CV's from the job sites.
It'd be easier the other way around. What is your company called so we can avoid it?
That is my job, add in the need to pay the mortgage.
Re: The answer is obvious...
Whilst it's very good, and very G. It doesn't have the scale required, typically plants are in the tens of MW range rather than the GW required.
There's also fracking involved which appears to be non-G.
Re: SSD are too damned expensive for capacity, and RAID 0 SSD is suicidal!
>FreeNAS PC box with six 3TB WD Red spinning disks
Yes, it's cheaper but it's also slower than the equivalent flash which is often the point. Flash disks can entirely flood a SATA channel now - which is the point in PCIe drives.
We need fast storage rather than lots of it, so flash works for us.
Climbing aboard the bandwagon.
Patents. Perhaps it's not as easy as it sounds?
Write Once Read Never
Pretty much Facebook's entire business isn't it?
- Vid Hubble 'scope snaps 200,000-ton chunky crumble conundrum
- Bugger the jetpack, where's my 21st-century Psion?
- Windows 8.1 Update 1 spewed online a MONTH early – by Microsoft
- Something for the Weekend, Sir? Why can’t I walk past Maplin without buying stuff I don’t need?
- Review 'Mommy got me an UltraVibe Pleasure 2000 for Xmas!' South Park: Stick of Truth