Porridge. There fixed that for you.
200 posts • joined 21 Jun 2007
Porridge. There fixed that for you.
Although he's a graphic designer (who now has thousands of twitter followers). Could this be photoshopped?
At least he's not living in Slough.
So, basically what RightScale does... but with a lot more work.
How quaint. :-P
The vcloud-tools suite, developed by GDS and available on github is excellent.
"Emmm, errrr. waffle waffle waffle, enterprise bla bla. Oh I don't know"
Not that Docker has got anything to do with this, so it was a bit of a silly question
I agree. I mean what the fuck are these people smoking? Have they actually been on a train before, or just seen them from a distance? Wave at big screen. Jeez.
No fats or carbs? so, proteins then?
Or water, minerals & vitamins?
Or did you have something else in mind?
"we just eat too damned much now for our life style, end of."
Oh, but if only it where that simple. Carbs, and particularly sugary drinks leave you feeling more hungry. So, people tend to eat more. And it only takes a little bit over to start piling on the weight.
Of course we need to move around more as well generally, but it's not as simple as "just eat less".
Since about 15,000 years ago we've been farming. For about 2 million years before that we where eating a Paleo diet. Whatever that was, it's hard to say exactly but it certainly didn't include any bread and pasta, or rice, and probably very little tubers.
I really don't get why you've got so many upvotes for this post. You have totally missed the point. And yes, eating "too much" of anything is bad for you, by definition. Duh. But you should probably eat plenty of red meat, that advice is outdated.
The whole point is that traditional diets have been recommending low fat / high carb for decades now and this was the "eat sensibly" thing for many, many people. Still is for a lot of people too.
I guess by the amount of upvotes, everyone else is missing the point here too.
Read "The Diet Delusion"
@Steve Davies 3, you seem to have wandered away from The Daily Mail (or Cambridge News?) comments section, and stumbled onto The Register. Away with yer.
I'd suggest switching the tyres on your MTB for road tyres, if you can find some that will fit. That will make the most difference IMHO, for very little cost.
Absolutely. I've heard this so many times about Perl, and it drives me mad. Yes, you CAN write obfuscated Perl but it doesn't mean you should. You can also write beautiful Perl. I wish the obfuscated perl competition had never happened, I think it's pretty much killed off a good language.
Having said that, I'm starting to think Ruby or Python are tidier by default.
Bit shit then really.
Nice idea, but until they sort that one out I certainly won't be buying one.
I won't anyway, as I don't have a spare £1,500 to spaff. But if I did, it would be make some great footage following me down the slopes. Could be handy for insurance purposes at well... this is exactly how I broke my leg. ;-)
I always thought Daniel Craig. I'm sure if I ever bump into the real Dabbsy, one of us will be disappointed. Well, at least one of us.
"Yes, yes. We MUST own the road from the Manor into the village. "
It simply doesn't make sense to OWN the infrastructure, unless you are a truly massive organisation. Like Google or Amazon or Microsoft.
Your comparison with property ownership don't stack up. A House will probably be worth 4 times what was paid for it initially, by the time the mortgage has been paid. How much are your servers worth from 25 years ago, or even 5 years ago? A car would be a better comparison. Even better, the road infrastructure!
You also seem to think that we'll de-skill by moving to the cloud, but it's definitely the other way round. We'll need heavy automation and scripting, for provisioning and deployments. Yes, we'll be managing MANY more hosts per sysadmin... but also doing lots more stuff, so we'll need more people not fewer.
Hybrid cloud does make sense though, or at the very least being able to switch between providers if you don't want to host your own.
Oh, and if you can't afford the cloud bills you are screwed anyway. You would not be able to afford the electricity or the people to run the service, and the cost of the actual hardware is just a tiny part of the cost of running a whole service.
"...Yourself out of a job"
Wrong wrong wrong. With that attitude you are destined to become less and less valuable and skilled as time goes on. You can stick with your manual boring repetitive processes ... but eventually you'll be replaced by a script.
Surely you want to be the one writing that script? It makes your job more interesting and productive and allows you to get more stuff done.
That's the way the wind is blowing, and if you can't smell that then you are already dead (I can't mix in any more metaphors).
If you aren't already doing DevOps, you are already dead (or mortally wounded) and you just don't know it yet. This is the same principal.
"In theory railways ought to an ideal candidate for automation..." but the unions have decided that's not such a good idea.
I think the thing you are missing here is the number of people killed on our roads each year, but more importantly the cost of insurance. Many young people simply can't afford to run a car, and so taking one of these when needed would be pretty compelling.
I think it'll happen sooner than YOU think, but perhaps not as soon as Google would like.
And yes, London traffic is going to be a pretty tough nut to crack, but there's a hell of a lot more of the country where the roads are less congested. Perhaps not like being a zombie driving around in California.
I predict that in ten years from today these things will be pretty common* across the UK. In twenty years there will be more autonomous vehicles than ones with drivers. Anyone want to bet a pint against that? (if you can afford a pint in 2024)
* about as common as seeing, say, a Volvo on the roads today. They aren't anywhere near the majority, but still nothing out of the ordinary.
hardly soaring. a couple of months ago up to 38 and now down to 27 bucks. Yesterday was a tiny blip, unless you are a day trader.
Did you actually read any of the original question at all? It's not very long, go back and read it and when you're done come back, I'll still be here.
Back so soon? OK, Cygwin is great for doing bashy things in Windows and I use it a lot. But if I want to shut down a bunch of VM's or take snapshots or interact with Active Directory I wouldn't dream of doing it in bash. I might do it in Perl if I fancied a challenge.
All of these problems with the PowerShell DOS box I've experienced myself, and a decent GUI would go a long way. Now, if you could get the Powershell DOS box to behave like the Cygwin DOS box (that's all it is really?) then that would be useful.
> why not just use bash ?
How about because you can't pass objects in bash, just a bunch of text. You can do a lot more in Powershell, but bash still has it's place too.
Are they saying they have already DONE the automation, and they are now able to cope with fewer staff because of the great work they have already done? A bit mercenary perhaps, but sounds like good business.
On the other hand, are they going to be tackling all this automation with the staff they have left after the cuts have been made?
Be interesting to see how that one works out.
I predict a spread eagle.
With the tube strike and all.
Once we do discover an exoplanet rich in oxygen and methane, I feel pretty sure it will pique the curiosity of some organization or country enough that they will devote the budget to make a massive array of space telescopes. Once we focus our attention on that area, we might also be able to spot other signs of life, by developing new techniques.
Call me a techno optimist, but it seems inevitable to me.
And it will change many things on this planet, when we do make that discovery.
I'm sure you'll say it's about raising awareness, and all that. Which is a good thing. Perhaps. As long as it changes someone's behaviour somewhere, and they aren't just more aware and then do nothing about it.
But for just one week, you can probably live off your own stored body fat (none meant, and I'm sure none taken) - as long as you have water to drink. So, you can happily live off nothing per day and just drink from your spring. But you'll probably have a stinker of a caffeine headache.
What about homeless people who probably don't have access to free drinking water (as they don't have a spring on their land)? And that's just in a rich Western European country.
What about people who don't even have any access to clean drinking water?
I think most Reg readers have figured this one out already.
I think this is a first for a mainstream moby, to have noise cancelling headphones built in. It would have been nice to have a little more detail on how well they actually perform as I'd have thought this would be a major selling point.
Used to love that show.
@Lars - fine, then switch it off. Personally I choose convenience over a (slight) risk in security. That's my choice and you can have yours. What's the problem?
What I really don't like is the site - even somewhere like the Open University - forcing me to type the bloody password every time, when I would rather not bother.
I like you even more.
Had always thought you where American for some reason (because it used to say from San Fransisco?) or Polish American.
Dobra robota and indeed Na zdrowie. ;-)
So, is this a chroot'ed environment, or something else?
I also learned to program on a VIC-20 in BASIC (at age 11) and it's served me well ever since. (not BASIC, but the skills and interest I picked up).
Problem is with Twitter, Facebook, Minecraft, youtube, Snapchat, and hundreds of TV channels to distract (not to mention xbox) our kids don't really get the benefit of being BORED. For me it was boredom that led to my inquisitiveness, but I'm not sure that if I was born 30 years later I might be the same as kids growing up today.
Too much shiny shiny.
even by your standards.
Yeah, I know it doesn't actually say that, but that's how it's meant to read.
I think the main problem is an old person has tried to devise something that younguns will find cool. Thing is you look a complete tit, so no one will boy one. And it's bloody expensive.
Now, if they invent a skateboard like the one in Snow Crash by Neal Stephenson, that might be another story.
I'm really surprised at all the anti snowboarding feeling here in The Reg. Firstly, it's just as dangerous and if anything it's usually the skiers that I see being carried down the mountain in the bloodwagon or the 'copter. Personally I like both, but I thought there would be more developer types on here and they are anecdotally more into snowboarding. Is this what's called Heuristically driven bias? Actually pretty much ALL the devs I know are into snowboarding.
costs too much for me and family and I mostly listen to it on shuffle anyway.
Yes, make it free or a token amount.
They would still make a huge amount of money from Office.
Isn't this completely blindingly obvious?
Wrong! If you sit all day, it has a major detriment to your health ... even if you regularly exercise as well.
I admit I have not read the study that's mentioned, just the BBC article.
... apart from when I don't.
I've been swinging between decaf for a few months and a couple of full caffeine flat whites for a few months... for the last few years. I actually feel much more awake, and can stay awake longer when I DON'T drink caffeine. This is presumably because I don't sleep as well (when i do drink caffeine)
I do love caffeine though, and I love that buzz. Stinking headache when I give it up, and boy do I feel mega tired and grumpy for a couple of days.
Overall, I think I'm better off without it. I sleep when I need to. I think if you don't sleep well, it can really fuck your health up long term. I'm in a very small minority though in the IT industry.
Seems there's loads disappearing up there, to the West of the A1(M).
You can also see how Thetford Forest has loads disappearing and loads being re-planted.
We will be hopping into a car that will drive us to the cinema where we will tell it ‘park yourself and come back and get me at 10.15pm.’
Surely you'll be telling it to pick you up "when the film finishes" and it will work out what time to arrive. And if the film runs late, it would take that into account. And of course "it" isn't going to sit there parked for 2 hours waiting for your film to finish, but will scoot around the city moving other people around. You could get any of 100 cars that happen to be close at the time.
But saying that, 12 mph? And using dedicated lanes? Well, it's a start I suppose.
I wonder how long it will take for young (chavs / hoodlums / plebs / oiks) to discover the game of "block the car" by standing in its way for a couple of minutes.
I agree with pretty much most of what you've been saying, apart from the cost part. An rPi is bloody cheap. You don't *need* a case or an HDMI display, at least not to start with. The kid can probably hook it up to the 2nd TV if needed. Of course you'll need to grab an SD card. A keyboard and mouse can probably be picked up for cheap, or you can borrow the ones from the main PC and put them back again when finished without too much worry,
Even if a family already have a crappy PC just for Facebook, if that's their only PC they aren't likely to let little Jonny install Linux onto it and start messing around "doing programming" on it. With the Pi, they can break it and re-install as they like.
In reality you are probably right, and I've been struggling with the same things myself. Do I start with Scratch or Python? How do you explain modulus to an 8 year old? (which you hit pretty quick if you follow the Codeacademy tutorials).
It's not like the old days where you could just switch on the Vic-20, and within seconds you'd be at a BASIC prompt. No need for any parents help, just play around with it. Sigh.
Does wood count as a fossil fuel?
... except when they are in the fast* lane of the autoroute, they NEVER use them. When they do use them, it's not to indicate their intention, it's just to indicate they are in the fast lane.
So, in their case a button or a switch will suffice perfectly well. They don't use it very often, but when they do it usually stays on for 10 minutes anyway.
So, really it's a UI problem for different locales. N'est pas?
* Yes, yes. I know it's not the fast lane. They are all fucking fast over there. 130 speed limit and all that.
"usable home automation"
... give it 10 or 20 years, and we might have robots walking around who can take your washing out of the basket, put into the washing machine, hang out on the line, bring back in, iron it... useful stuff like that. Oh, and it'll cost £40,000 a shot. So, unless you are a footballer then forget it for another 10 years.
Right now, you can turn on a light or if you are really adventurous... open the curtains. Or you could just get up and turn on the light, or open the curtains.
Currently it's a solution looking for a problem that doesn't exist, and until these things are general purpose enough to be useful they will remain in the domain of the enthusiast / hacker.
Surely, if you had, for example, really poor eyesight anything over a few hundred years ago, then your chances of surviving long enough to bring up children would have been greatly reduced. In modern times, you stand pretty much the same chance as everyone else which allows you to pass on these new defects.
Over time these would reverse evolution, but by the time it's had a chance for making any significant impact (many generations) we'll almost certainly have technological fixes for these things. Be it genetic manipulation, or nano technology or something completely different.
My point is, it's not stopped, it's reversed. I thought this was obvious to most people (who read the Reg).
A similar study carried out in the 30s in Germany may have concluded that most people weren't Right Wing enough (compared to the average of the political parties at the time).