HTTPS isn't all that
Lots of people happily posting while at work thinking it is secure thanks to HTTPS. Despite the fact almost every modern workplace firewall has a man-in-the-middle cert deployed to inspect traffic.
567 publicly visible posts • joined 3 Mar 2012
Started off years ago as reasonable doubt about safety. Years later I think it is reasonably safe to say it isn't dangerous or we'd know about it. Now the airlines just see it as a way to potentially generate revenue.
Having said that, normal rules of public manners (no yakking loudly on phone in public) still apply.
Album on Amazon UK £6.99
http://www.amazon.co.uk/The-Devil-Put-Dinosaurs-Here/dp/B00CWM7VJM/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1375346221&sr=8-2&keywords=the+devil+dinosaurs
Same album in Amazon USA $5.99
http://www.amazon.com/The-Devil-Put-Dinosaurs-Here/dp/B00CWM3F4C/ref=sr_1_1_bnp_1_mus?ie=UTF8&qid=1375346314&sr=8-1&keywords=the+devil+put
So £6.99 vs £3.96 (according to online currency convertor)
So the record companies don't think I notice I'm getting financially shafted? Except I'm not - I'm just not buying, I'll just use Spotify or not listen..
In short, clearly the device has a lot of potential but at the moment it is very limited. I reckon if a few of the NAS box type people produce apps for it, or somebody does a Windows / Linux sender, it becomes a way of getting the HTPC out of the living room. Personally I'm going to wait and see if the ecosystem grows a bit before jumping in - I already have a perfectly good mini-itx box behind the TV
'Exactly. Why not just run on a hosted platform? What's the point of owning iron at all? In most cases it just seems to be resistance to change and people protecting their jobs.'
Owning your own kit can be cost effective and better as long as you don't let a bunch of must-have-the-best nutters make the decisions. Common practice seems to be to not measure how many IOPS you data really chews through, how little bandwidth your servers actually use etc etc. Most people overspec by a factor of 10 or more. I remember using Platespin 3 years back in the P2V era - meant I made a case for saving our company many many many times my salary not shoving in stupidly overspecced 10Gb Cisco switching / HBAs etc etc That plus backing off from having THE flashiest SAN on the market vs something more mainstream.
Much cheaper than hosted once you cost in WAN links, and less latency. But horses for courses.
I quite often ignore their warnings. Why? Some of the warnings are crap. Not all, but some. What Google don't acknowledge is there are the collateral damage blocks from as using the www equivalent of spamhaus blocklists. So if people get away with it 'I understand the risks durpy durp durp durp' once....
Do Google publish their false positive statistics?
Have worked in and out of the SMB field for a long time. The thing that often ticked me off royally was a complete lack of budget for (say) backup software renewal, or a copy of Sage for finance that isn't 25 years out of date. Yet the money was always magically there when the boss was speccing up his own laptop. Same crap, smaller scale.
Recovery is what matters. Only after having done several offsite restores was this driven home to me. The old ways of doing stuff (file based / tape / only 'important' databases, the rest can be done manually / manually reconfiguring networking n event of DR / anything involving Backup Exec / ignoring fast recovery of client infrastructure). All crap.
are rare. So much of the IT navel-gazing fraternity are obsessed with perfecting encryption that they forget that the MD's secretary will hand over her password to somebody who will just fill out the following online form from from the National Audit Office (http)
Just in case the insult gets missed by the assburger syndrome sufferers. Security professionals are snake-oil charlatans who get paid too much to make everything run slowly.
Build good products at sensible prices and customers will come. As it is you're slowly killing yourself on a high margin consultant pay-cheque funded arrogance strategy. The only other company left from the 90s actively doing the T-Rex strategy is console-cable-Cisco.
You not actually read the papers at all and see the massive splurges of reserved-for-social-housing bits in the new estates popping up all over the country?
Not that they're any good for contractors anyway. They go almost invariably to tenancy-for-life people who get onto the system during their apprenticeship then still reaping the benefit 20 years later.
I'm a private landlord so have a bit of experience. The whole buy tho let thing caused a lot of bad lazy (cough, yuppie) landlords who get fleeced by estate agencies who get high percentages for providing a rubbish service. Neighbour landlords who use agents have been a pain - the agents phone us direct and try to force commission works in communal areas and so on. Their markup of 'respectable' high street agents is utterly cowboy ridiculous. These charges of course go on the rent, which I where I going direct avoid viewing fees and have lower rents, plus get to vet the tenants myself on my gut feeling about them rather than references. Of course it can be hard work - being called up at 3 am because a stereotypically ditzy female tenant doesn't know how to change a flourescent tube can be ... irksome.
'Often working for a powerful bastard is much more pleasant than grafting for a good guy who is coming last.'
Once worked for a 'nice guy' who was the kickstool for every other manager in the building. Ergo he never said no to all the other managers' doomed-to-fail crappy projects. Bought hook,line and sinker into a 'positive thinking', customer service 'guru' mantra that was meant to motivate junior customer service people - everyone else was meant to pay lip-service.
I left.
The biggest issue, outside the'security' half-truth that us IT types say in a knee-jerk fashion is:
'who controls the device?'
If manager hands his laptop over to spotty teenager to surf porn and torrent sites, fills hard drive with trojan filled games, IE toolbars, fills the taskbar iwth addon utility 'apps'. The computer is going to run like a pile of brown stuff. IT department gets the flack for slow PC but will get an argument every time they want to take the crap off the machine. Whose decision is it if Steam launcher is slowing the PC down? Yahoo toolbar? iTunes?
And if you bring in Citrix (probably least bad option), what happens when user works from home but insists on using nastiest overcontended consumer ISP availalble yet won't take blame for slow connection?
This stuff needs a clear line of responsiblity, and BYOD muddies it.
.
One of the clearest examples upfront of what 'The Cloud' is all about to the big boys. Ransomware. Pay up or you can't access your own stuff.
Hopefully we'll see a resurgence of PC gaming over the next few years. Steam may be a annoying and sucky, but it was never so brazenly controlling as this.
They kept blocking all my old company's SMTP traffic as they regularly reimplemented dodgy third party IP blocklists, which included our IP address.. Cue 3 weeks of fighting Indian read-from-a-script,-don't-understand-SMTP morons trying to force me to sign 'I'm a commercial spammer who agrees only to spam 50 000 BTInternet customers a day ' documents. Clearly they'd rather approve commercial spam than understand we'd been wrongly blocked in the first place due to their own rubbish systems. And that we'd been over this 3 months before. And 3 months before that. Rinse, repeat..
Yes, we had reverse DNS and SPF set up, and nobody else blocked us.
Trouble is most of our customers were old and IT-illiterate so used BT / Yahoo.
.
who the heck does brute force attacks on SSL? Nobody. Why stuff like this is news makes me depressed about the state of IT. People and sloppy webapps are the weak points, not SSL. Doubtless security experts will earns millions in the coming months enforcing best practice analysis toolkit results.
People are beginning to realise most of the high end (read Cisco IOS console-cable) 'skills' are smoke and mirrors. .A bit of basic networking knowledge and picking a product that isn't overpriced, buggy, semi-proprietary and needlessly obscure will solve most companies' needs. Let the downvotes commence.