38 posts • joined Monday 27th February 2012 14:58 GMT
Re: selfies are frickin OLD.
I think you're a little confused there matie. Taking pictures of yourself is old, sure, but *calling* them a "selfie" has only been around for the last decade. Until then they were self-portraits.
Oxford Dictionary's desperation for mainstream acceptance into pop culture
Wow that's a bit mean. OED has been accepting "pop culture" words for centuries - how else did a "lavatory" and "bathroom" become places to defecate. Just because this is the first you've heard of it doesn't give you the right to label them as "desperate".
Re: Van Diemen’s Land writ large
It's an abbreviation. A tinnie doesn't mean a small tin.
Actually, yes it does. Not smaller in the literal sense, but metaphorically, as in downplaying its importance or impact.
You seem to have missed a couple of important points here
"Ah so click - wait - click again. Just like Apple or Windows or most other GUI based systems has been doing to let us edit the name of a file in the GUI for, what, 25+ years? Because if you double-click you launch it, so you need that pause. Yeah, it's horrible, but it's hardly new."
...except Alistair carefully pointed out that there was a time limit between clicks in the software he's talking about. In Windows you can leave it any time from when clicking again would not be a double-click (configurable, but usually around a half-second) to several years (if you can keep a Windows machine running for several years without rebooting it, unlikely) - the second click will put the item into "edit" mode.
And just BTW, it doesn't work quite the same in Mac OS, but that has been discussed at length above too.
"As for the GS, if that's your main example of "poor design", then I'm afraid you don't understand design at all."
No, it wasn't an example of poor design, it was an example of unconventional design. Although, looked at from the perspective of 35+ years' hindsight, I think it *is* piss-poor design.
"Back when I was learning to drive every car was different"
Me too, me too! methinks you are referring to the 70s or thereabouts?
"the wipers and the indicators seeming to swap randomly"
There is a reason for that. It took me a long time to work it out, but it's based on the country of origin of the car. A right-hand drive vehicle has the gear stick on the left, so the indicator control is on the right. The wipers (presumably used less often than the indicators) are on the same side as the gears. Everything is mirror-imaged in a car designed for a left-hand drive market, which when it's sold in Britain only has the driver's cockpit transplanted to the other side of the car, not transposed.
Similarly the fuel tank filler point is on the side of the car that in its original market would be opposite the driver's side. Maybe in some places you still have petrol pumps at the side of the road...? The mind boggles at the thought.
"sometimes the horn was at the center of the wheel, sometimes on the end of the indicator stick"
Thank God that is one quirk that seems to have disappeared. I think the little knobby at the end of the indicator stalk was a British thing - specifically, BMC / Leyland - I remember a couple of Minis and Austins with that very-hard-to-find-in-an-emergency horn button. And let's face it, the horn *is* supposed to be an emergency control!
Re: 1 out of 10
C'est logique Francaise, oui!
Re: 1 out of 10
Nope, there is no difference nowadays. (Well, OK, there is - you don't have to take out the back seat to change the headlights, because it's basically f(&*^cking impossible to change the headlights no matter where you start.)
I wish I had had your dad's advice before buying a Xsara Picasso. Marvellously spacious car (with redefined "groundbreaking" dashboard, natch, that you can't read in daylight) but oh BOY do they screw you on the price of spares. Examples that I have to make alternative plans for: rear parcel shelf (just a solid moulding, not a fancy retractible like in the BMW X5 or Audi Q series) - either £ 270 or £ 340, I don't remember the details, it was in 2008; wiper/headlight/ECU switch/control stalk assembly - a bargain at £ 270 (this year).
Plus of course the legendary awkwardness of getting any basic maintenance work done on the thing. I think the first step for changing the spark plugs is to remove the engine.
Re: ASSANGE: 'I'm fond of the truth but only when it's the truth I approve of."
No. If Gov had no secrets it would be impossible to protect its citizens in any kind of meaningful way.
Abuse of privacy in government is obviously bad, but embarassing diplomats for having opinions is just petty vandalism and doesn't achieve anything "positive" (Assange's choice of terminology).
Getting too old? No.
Ballmer said at a 2011 conference that "at his age it was just getting too tiring" [to do the monkey boy rants].
Correction, Mr B: it's getting too tiring because you're totally out of condition. He's pear-shaped and after the "Wooooooooohoooo I love this company" performance he was panting harder than someone who's just completed a marathon. Maybe once he retires he can find some time to go to the gym.
Re: One Smart Thing
"I hate to think how my productivity would've suffered if I'd been stuck spending most of my working day re-installing and re-re-installing software and drivers because they didn't work right the first time, dealing with security holes, scraping out fistfuls of malware and crapware, and otherwise wasting time banging my head on Windows."
Oh yes, because that's *exactly* what we Windows weenies do *all day*, right.
If you have used Mac exclusively for 17 years how the hell can you know how much maintenance is involved in keeping a Windows box running? Listening to your friends and family whingeing, I suppose - like that is a representative sample.
Re: F*ck you attitude.
@Fihart: you clearly haven't looked at how Apple does business, have you.
Re: SSD are not reliable enough yet!
Quote: "I’ve not had a regular HDD fail at under 4 years or so for a long time now."
...I have. Many. Far *too* many to call a hard drive reliable. And I'm only responsible for something under 80 computers.
In some cases the failure has been covered by warranty (drives with 2-, 3-, and 5-year guarantees) but the "free" replacement drive (a) often ends up costing almost as much as a new one, if you have to mail the damn thing to an overseas destination as I do in from South Africa, and (b) in any event is w-a-a-a-y less than the cost of your time to recover / rebuild and reinstall the machine.
Re: Actually, Hard Disks are reliably unreliable!
A well written and well thought out response, Rob, and you make some very good points. I have thrown away more hard disc drives than I care to try and remember, and have another two on my trash pile right now - subjectively, it certainly feels like the failure rate has been accelerating in recent years.
Of course, manufacturers are under increasing pressure - from a number of directions - to make their kit ever cheaper, so naturally reliability is the first expected casualty. You would think that they'd try what mfrs in other ore related industries have done: add value to make their products more attractive. And any of the features you describe could provide that "edge" - but I suppose only time will tell which direction they choose to go.
"The Fruity Firm"
Will always appear in any Reg report about Apple. The only variable is how many words come before it in the article.
"It looks like he will get the blame though, because other parties who should share the responsibility, such as the politicians who were responsible for the odd route, the train designers who made carriages that came apart too easily and the rail company who didn't ensure there was automatic protection will all make sure he does."
Now who's convicting based on tabloid reports?
Re: Guilty by accusation
Of course I meant NOT ALLOWED
Re: Guilty by accusation
@ Nigel 11 - One MAJOR flaw in the plot of "12 Angry Men" is that a jury is allowed to re-enact a crime to "check the facts". That would be another, so far unexplored in this conversation, abuse of their powers - the jury does *not* consist of expert witnesses, so their re-creation could be flawed and therefore come to the wrong conclusion.
I once had to watch porn for my work!
Not so long ago either... Installing a hotel video system, the video on demand included "Adult" films... we had established the normal "blockbuster" movies were working, but there was a problem with the HD and so I had to call reception, get them to release the room no I was in, and attempt to watch a pr0n. Hey - it worked - but just to be *absolutely* sure, I watched one full scene - must have been about 20 minutes - before I chickened out and switched it off. One of the better days at work.
But to get sort of back on topic, I just checked the pirate bay, and the movie in question is listed as "video" in most of the torrents, not as "porn". A quick check of the uploader's comments in one example yielded this:
"This movie is, in essence, softcore chinese kung fu (kinda) porn.
"While sustaining a budget far beyond most asian porn flicks, this movie (lacking penetration or any weiners or anything) keeps up with the "man! asians are f&*%^ing weird!" film category.
"Worth a watch, if you really like asian boobies, which are copious in this film, as well as very neatly trimmed bits o' pubage."
Re: food calories
[quote]The Calorie is an obsolete Victorian energy unit, and it's 'Nutrition' food energy basis has been completely discredited by current Scientific knowledge of animal and Human food digestion and metabolism; the Joule is used for proper Scientific energy measurements. Anyone who uses the obsolete Calorie unit should be mercilessly mocked and humiliated[/quote] and blah blah blah
Perhaps you should be mercilessly mocked and humiliated for not knowing that there is no difference between calories and joules? Not in the above context, when numbers are not being quoted. What you are saying is the equivalent of "The Mile is an obsolete Victorian energy unit, and its 'distance' basis has been completely discredited by current Scientific knowledge of geography and navigation; the kilometre is used for proper Scientific energy measurements. Anyone who uses the obsolete Mile unit should be mercilessly mocked and humiliated"
1 calorie is approximately 4.2 Joules. In food terms, probably due to laziness, "Calorie" is used to mean "kilocalorie" so 1 Food Calorie is actually 4.2 kJ, but you can't "discredit" the calorie any more than you can the gallon or pound (avoirdupois, not Sterling)
Re: you're an idiot....
[quote]So for some folk [with certain hormone issues - eg thyroxine] they can eat dramatically less than you or I AND PUT ON WEIGHT...[endquote]
Yeah, and pardon me but there were no fat people in Auschwitz. "Thyroid" or "hormone" "conditions" have been used as an excuse for decades and it's ALL BULLSHIT. If you eat more food than your body needs, you will store it as fat. So some people's metabolism is more efficient at extracting calories from food: those people just have to eat less.
"Dramatically less" in your example is clearly still not little enough. I knew someone who was a Big Bess all her life, went on a hundred fad diets and had several courses of radical treatments - nothing worked until at the age of 45 she just cut _out_ the carbs, cut _down_ on everything else, and STARTED EXERCISING. A couple of marathons later she was svelte and sexy and feeling better than she had in decades.
Sorry, you're the idiot.
[quote]You want to check your heart rate? It's quite simple, here is your wrist, here are some fingers. Now count.[/endquote]
Yeah evidently you are another of the "I don't need it therefore no-one needs it" school of thought. You can hardly do that all day long, or even more than a few times a day.
For purposes of tracking fitness or weight loss goals, continuous heart rate monitoring is one of the most useful tools available. Next time you are in your local sports shop (ha ha) go take a look at how many heart rate monitors there are out there. There's a demand, "dude".
No offence mate, but YOU'RE an idiot.
Not for liking big jugs, but for being a tool. Accept that some people have different tastes, and just because you can't understand why someone doesn't like the same stuff you do that doesn't make him an idiot.
glass phone, yeh...
...especally since it wasn't more than a month ago that Apple specifically said Retina is better than Amoled, brighter, less blah blah, more yada yada whatever, they would never use Amoled... <chortle>
Re: Mmm... wobbly...
Indeed. One of the more (to me) obvious things that you'd think mobe manufacturers would take into account. If I'm sitting at a desk and a text comes in, or an email, and I need to reply why should I have to pick the damn phone up to be able to type on it? Or use the other hand to hold it steady, which amounts to the same thing. Stoopid, stoopid, stoopid.
Re: Dear Apple - say what?
Have you tried doing the same things on an Android device?
I speak only from experience of the Galaxy SII, but I had one for 14 months and talking of headbutting walls - well that would be like saying I was mildly irritated. My blood pressure was so high at times I scared people, an cam so close to throwing the thing in the ocean that I scared myself. Now that I have moved to an iPhone I am so *SO* much happier, and calmer, and more rational...
Seriously, guy, if you find the iPhone hard to type text on there must either be something wrong with the device or with you.
Re: a few people will get killed - They lost?
That's an interesting interpretation of history that I haven't read before. The more commonly accepted version is that no-one lost, and certainly no-one "won".
Dashed this off while in church
...and didn't bother with some rudimentary proofreading before publishing. Three glaring errors by the time I passed the graphic and I stopped bothering to read any more.
two points come to mind
1. probably the emptiest article I've ever read on El Reg. Basically one line from Sergei repeated several times with a few minor changes.
2. probably the most responses to a pointless article I've ever seen. Says something about the social impact of the content!
Re: re. "...just look at the amount of money men now spend on hair gel."
Aye well of course we had it rough. We had to work 15 hours a day, down at t' mill, for tuppence a week, and our dad would thrash us to sleep with razor, then dance on our graves singing glory halleluya.
Re: Can't pull it off
A dress shirt looks stoopid or at best incomplete without a tie, like someone snatched your clip-on on the tube. If you are going to go open-neck then wear a shirt that was made to be worn open-neck.
Re: What's a little lawsuit between friends?
Why not, it's been going on for decades. Apple is currently suing partner Samsung.
That's it, go charging off on rumour - don't bother to check your facts first. That way there's no fun in MS-bashing.
The "locking down" is ONLY for machines that are sold specifically as Windows computers. All OEMs have always had non-Windows alternatives available, which are cheaper anyway. Why would you pay extra for a machine with WIndows pre-installed and then install Linux?
And locking down would never apply to machines assembled from components - have you seen how many different manufacturers of motherboards there are? And how many models each one sells?
You DON'T know what you are talking about
It's frankly quite boring hearing people (usually Linux and Apple fanbois) parroting that BSoD line. I run Windows every day, on several computers, running several apps on multiple monitors, and I honestly can't remember when last I saw a BSoD - certainly many years ago.
I also support hundreds of user machines from companies with many PCs (and Apples) down through SoHo and single-user installations - including grannies in old age homes - and haven't seen a BSoD on any of those in years, either, that wasn't caused by a hardware fault.
So please, until you are talking about something you actually have some knowledge or experience of, shut it. It's people like you who talk unfounded nonsense that actually perpetuate myths and bias, based purely on your own prejudice. Not doing anyone any favours.
"Getting into" the hardware game?
MS has been making hardware since 1982 - before Acer was even called Acer, and long before they made PC hardware. And their hardware is nicer than Acer's.
Microsoft's multi-touch user interface was released before Apple's, and their track record on hardware in general is pretty good - on consumer devices, stellar. Whereas Acer has never released *anything* revolutionary, or sexy, or even interesting, for that matter. Reliable, OK; cool, naah. Leaders, they ain't.
Sounds like sour grapes, Mr Kan.
Re: Go MS!
Oh - that's right, there aren't any OEMS already offering Linux on their PC's. Yeah I forgot.
"Windows is dead."
You said it yourself - "I'm a retired scientist" - the vast majority (from my experience in IT, I'd say way in excess of 90%) of Windows users are incapable of using Linux. Any flavour, any shape, any desktop. Blame that on Windows if you like, but it's fact. You are an anomaly, not the rule; I deal with computer users all day, every day, and even those who are diehard (blowhard, if the truth be told) Apple converts or Linux afficionados have at least one Windows machine somewhere that they are ashamed of and don't always admit to... but it's there. :-)
- World's OLDEST human DNA found in leg bone – but that's not the only boning going on...
- Lightning strikes USB bosses: Next-gen jacks will be REVERSIBLE
- Pics Brit inventors' GRAVITY POWERED LIGHT ships out after just 1 year
- Storagebod Oh no, RBS has gone titsup again... but is it JUST BAD LUCK?
- Microsoft teams up with Feds, Interpol in ZeroAccess botnet zombie hunt