Re: Been there. Done that.
EDIT was probably faster to load and a lot more stable than Word, especially in the 9x era.
1643 publicly visible posts • joined 20 Jun 2007
In international clout, Spain has a lot less influence. If Spain says "No more showing your matches on TV!" then... well, not much - it's not that huge a market, and the government of Spain has limited ability to enforce it as they have independent media. If the government of China says the same, they *can* enforce it, and the company loses access to a much larger, more lucrative market - plus China can make life harder for the company in other ways, including outright banning their games.
My own home server array used SMR drives. I've been replacing them with proper drives as they fail. Which they do. Frequently, and expensively.
I don't know if it's just the 'Seagate 8TB Archive' drives or SMRs in general, or because they are running in a very non-temperature-controlled environment, but they don't seem to last. And their performance is awful. I had to stick an SSD in configured as cache to get it halfway usable.
Some companies do a similar thing - HR strips off the name and any indicators of gender from the CV before it gets passed to the person who actually makes the decision. As well as potentially improving the accuracy of the recruitment process, it's also the ultimate CYA against a discrimination suit.
They can still discriminate at the final interview.
The main reason for these AI- or algorithm-based recruitment processes is to remove the human-element, because humans *suck*. They have a really difficult time setting aside subconscious biases they will influence their decisions, even if they are not aware this is happening.
You describe how to manipulate a human recruiter yourself: By asking questions yourself you become more memorable, and thus more likely to be considered. Does asking questions make you any more suited to the job? Probably not, but by making yourself more distinctive you give yourself an advantage over the dull-as-dishwater candidates who are just as qualified.
Everyone who has sought a job knows the basics of manipulation. The smart suit, the fresh shower and haircut - those little aspects of appearance that bear absolutely no relation to the job, but still bias the recruiter into judging you to be more professional.
That may have worked once, when schools had a slightly higher tolerance for violence. These days, it's easier to punish he who threw the first punch than to prove verbal bullying - and you can be sure the parents of the bully will not rest until they see 'justice' done. Many bullies are even aware of this, and deliberately goat their target into starting a fight so they can then run to the teachers.
The BBC has long been trying to stay relevant as consumer choice broadens and tastes change. Sure, they are among the best around when it comes to making top-notch documentary programs - but good documentaries are among the most expensive programs to produce, and generally get very poor viewing figures. It's really hard for them to compete with the much higher-budget non-fiction produced in the US. As much as people love to complain about the excessively high pay, the BBC budget is dwarfed by most of the American television producers. Four billion pounds a year an annual budget? News Corporation alone pulls almost twice that in annual revenue.
You'd have a very difficult time writing such a law, even before the lobbyists gut it. For one, it's going to screw with trade secret law. The single most essential item when repairing any complex electronic device is a detailed schematic, and many companies consider their designs secret - not least because if it were published, another company would rapidly make an equivalent but cheaper clone. So your repairability law would instantly undermine trade secret law, and that has seriously international implications. Plus there are some factors that render devices non-repairable for solid design reasons. Batteries glued to cases are not just to anger repair people, they are also to shave another milimeter off the device thickness. Then you have devices which, for reasons of their function, have to be intentionally tamperproofed. Payment card terminals, security locks, games consoles, cable TV boxes. As much as we might wish it were easy to just pull out the optical drive from an XBox One and stick in a new one when it broke, that would open the device up to the trivial hack of building a circuit that emulates the optical drive so you can play copied games - which is exactly why the XBOne uses a cryptographic authentication system to detect if the drive is replaced and disables itsself if such tampering is found. The only place you'll be able to clearly mandate repair-friendly design is in white goods, and I'm pretty sure even that industry would fight it.
I wonder if this might be doing the right thing for the wrong reasons. There are certainly reasons to be concerned about the undue influence held by large technology companies, and about the sometimes underhanded and questionably-legal methods used at times to suppress competition. Care must be taken to ensure that the economy of scale does not turn into a monopoly situation. But I have to wonder... is that the real reason behind this concern? Or are we looking a something much more political: A reaction to a belief now popular among Republican politicians, that Big Tech's claims to be moderating their networks of racist and homophobic content are disproportionately silencing conservative speakers, and this threat to conservative ideology must be opposed?
You need significantly more delta-V to reach any of those than you do LEO though. 9.4Km/s minimum (ignoring engineering issues like drag) to reach LEO, add another 4-ish on top if you want any of the earth-moon Lagrange points. If you're going to be shuttling crew up and down for years while you build the thing, that's a big issue. It's why the ISS is in such a low orbit: The cost savings in crew change and resupply runs easily make up for needing to occasionally give it a nudge to compensate for atmospheric drag.
If you're looking for a viable global language, Chinese or English are good options just because they have such vast number of speakers already. Chinese is ahead, but not by much. Third place is Hindustani, which is *way* behind. I'd go for English - not primarily because i speak it myself, but because the only alternative with comparable numbers of existing speakers is Chinese, a language which is infamously difficult to learn as a second language. English is no cakewalk easier, but it's a lot easier than Chinese.
I'm not sure if everyone speaking the same language would mean fewer wars, or more.
In the case of the child abuse filter, it's not actually a law to repeal. It's more a soft pressure. The government *could* pass a law, but would rather not - so as long as all major ISPs maintain a 'voluntary' filter in compliance with the government requests, no law is needed. If one of them refused to do as they were politely asked, then the law would sail through parliament easily.
Sort of an 'offer you can't refuse' deal.
Easy enough. Several already exist. Simply hosting video is only part of the problem though. Youtube's real power is in getting people to watch them - subscriptions and recommendations, that useful list down the side, a good search system, and ranking to separate the very few good videos from the mountains of rubbish. If you put a really good video on youtube, you will get thousands of views - it might even go viral, with a good thumbnail and a whole lot of luck. You put the same video anywhere else and you'll be lucky to make it into triple digits.
The day ReactOS becomes relevant is the day Microsoft sues them out of existence. It wouldn't even need to be a strong case - MS could drag in out for years, sue in multiple countries, and generally cause tens of millions of dollars in legal costs. The only reason MS allow ReactOS to exist is that it's too small to justify the bad press that could come of destroying it.
Because about two days later someone would bring out Windows 10-2: Just like Windows ten, except all the telemetry is gone, it doesn't auto-install onedrive, doesn't nag you to set up a Microsoft account every time you install it, and has a start menu that actually opens first time, every time without trying to load up half the internet in smart tiles and an unwanted search of the Microsoft store.
They could gain traction by trying to compete on price, or offering a better service. It'd be pretty hard to beat Steam on service though, as they have had years to refine their software and support process. That leaves price. If players can buy a game on Steam, or buy it on Epic for even 5% less, that would lure over a few customers.
Epic achieved a few serious service screw-ups already though, by trying to establish a store before the technology was completed. Understandably - they made it into the big leagues with one super-hit game, but Fortnite mania will not last forever - they need to turn it into a long-term business before the chance is lost.
It's not that the arms 'never' grip. They will grip hard enough - either at random, or once ever N attempts. On many models there's a switch hidden in the coin box that lets the operator adjust the frequency with which it grips tight enough to grab a prize (assuming the player also won the skill-based part of the game).
The arcade needs people to win sometimes. Not often, but enough to maintain the hope.
Religion does tend to get a free pass. It can get away with things that would be considered completely unacceptable to any other social organization. Who else is entitled to surgically alter babies to give them a life-long brand as a member of the club?
The story still seems plausible. If the machine was out in 1980, it wouldn't be surprising if it was on display a few months prior to release at a trade show to build up a bit of hype before they are scheduled to go retail. The machine on show would then be either one of the very first off the production line, or one of the development prototypes.
Pretty much your standard political comedian: He just points across the political divide, makes a lot of very vulgar comments about how stupid the people there are, and then tries to pass it off as insightful commentary. His arguments mostly consist of misrepresenting his opponents, explaining how this misrepresentation is evil and wants to take over the world, throw you in prison, and so on. Tends to say a lot of horrible things, then when called out on it claims he was only joking.
They are already facing criticism in the US over widespread claims that they are 'silencing conservative voices.' Not just from the angry mob, either - politicians are getting in on the game, and starting to agitate for regulation to 'protect free speech.' If they take down Crowder's videos, even if they have perfectly valid reasons to do so, it'll just feed into the growing conspiracy theory. Political types will claim this proves that the lefties in charge at Google are trying to force all right-wing views off the internet, and Google gets to deal with the backlash.
They are trying to remain politically neutral, which just means that high-profile channels all get a free pass.