784 posts • joined 20 Jun 2007
Re: Serious question: What's the difference between nudity and pornography?
The signature. If it's drawn/painted/protographed by a famous artist, it's tasteful nudity and classic art. If it's by someone you've not heard of, then it's porn. Many of the most respected artists in history liked to draw nude, erotically-posed, attractive (by their standards) women.
If Botticelli painted it, it's The Birth of Venus and gets hung up in a gallery. If you were to paint the same imaged, it'd be Hot Chick Gets Her Tits Out and be considered obscene.
Re: sensible laws
Already done. The UK has been systematically broadening the definition of child pornography for years, each time citing the need to 'close a loophole.' Ever since the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 prohibited posession of 'pseudo-photographs' - images that looked like child pornography, but were artificial in their production. Photoshop manipulation. Then in the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 this was further extended to include artistic depictions and also redefined child for this purpose to not someone under-18, but someone who *looks* under eighteen - closing the 'loophole' of using young adult actors and dressing them up to play the part of a younger character. It also stated that the children don't even have to be human, they just have to have the characteristics of a human child - meaning someone in government is specifically thinking of either some of those hentai characters or furry porn.
Basically, I could draw a stick-figure couple having sex, declare one character to be underage, and go to jail for production of child pornography.
In fifteen years, we'll be lucky if most of them understand that a file is a series of bytes.
Re: Black hat conferences
Doesn't stop the Bilderberg meetings. You just need enough money.
"You have 18,172 unread posts."
Re: More ports is still the wrong answer
You don't. Internet access is a natural monopoly, even without regulatory barriers: Once someone has laid the cables and owns said cables, it's no longer financially viable for someone new to lay their own cables and compete. The only real solution is to decouple cables from service, as we do here in the UK - but that type of heavy-handed regulation isn't going to fly in the US, where lobbyists are strong and any form of regulation is regarded as a violation of the sacred American principle of the free market.
Re: Er, timing?
Ten years trapped in one building with internet access is a whole lot better than prison, which has no internet access and is full of violent criminals.
I doubt the US would extradite. Too much diplomatic awkwardness, plus it just reenforces the martyrdom issue. No, they'd just lean harder on Sweden to do whatever it takes to get a conviction and a harsh sentence. Serving time as a rapist is a good way to get a reputation tainted.
"Additionally, Google has developed a hashing technology for YouTube that places a unique ID mark on illegal child abuse vids. Once a copy is spotted on the service, all other copies are then apparently removed from the web."
ie, they repurposed their copyright enforcement code.
Re: "perceived threat from foreign companies ripping the government's current regulations to shreds"
There's not much point tapping dark fiber. Dark fiber is fiber laid in excess to requirements for future use. If you're digging up roads to bury two strands, you may as well bury twenty - it won't cost significantly more, and you might need it or be able to rent it to someone else in future.
Re: Its a shame really
You forgot the crying baby.
Re: There are so many problems.
We've plenty of most mineral resources left. The cheap reserves may be running out, but there are pricier ones left - and still a lot cheaper than space mining.
Maybe if you can find an asteroid of largely gold or another precious metal it might be halfway viable. But those are proper asteroids - as in 'belt.' Far, far away in delta-V terms, and very massive. The delta-M would be ridiculous. You're not bringing one of those to earth with conventional rocketry.
Re: There are so many problems.
Depends if you want to aim where it's coming down. It's a lump of rock, not an aerodynamic ship, and even if it does get down right it'll lost of of the mass to atmospheric burnup. Each 'delivery' would need to be hooked up to some equipment to carefully control reentry and fitted into a heat shield.
The alternative is in-space refining, but see the other points for that.
There are so many problems.
1. The asteroids are not near earth. Occasionally one ventures nearish, but at tremendious velocity.
2. The delta-m required to bring even a small asteroid into earth orbit is tremendous.
3. Any large, steerable body in orbit or above is potentially a hyperweapon. That is, the type of thing that makes regular WMDs look like toys. The last time a major body impacted, there were dinosaurs roaming the earth. There aren't any more. Do you want to see that in the hands of private industry?
4. No-one has the faintest idea how to do zero-G refining, with only energy as an input.
5. Most asteroids, and all comets, are crap-grade ore.
6. The only way it might be at all economical would be to keep the minerals in space, and use for space-based manufacturing of more ships - there's no point bringing most of them down, as only a few minerals (Platinum, gold) are expensive enough to justify the reentry cost. So you'd be mining minerals for an industry that doesn't exist.
It's a nice idea, but what we have here is the basic chicken and egg situation. For space industry like this to be practical requires great advances in very specific fields of technology that aren't going to advance without space industry, and a space economy to purchase the goods which can't take form until there is an established industry beyond geostationary orbit. Asteroid mining remains a pipe dream unless either someone makes a breakthrough in technology (perhaps a space elevator) or else many trillions (Yes, with a T) of dollars are thrown away on mega-projects in the hope of maybe setting up favorable economic conditions for someone else to profit from.
Is this actually picking up brain activity (Very hard to do reliably) or just reacting to muscle contractions?
My entire audio rig consists of some headphones I got for £25 at Asda, and I've always found it quite satisfactory.
Those stretchy coiled wires that tether dummy to pram.
That's one conclusion that can be drawn. I wouldn't consider it the only one. Perhaps the encrypted data contains evidence of other, entirely unrelated crimes - maybe he has been running the university piracy network, or has a secret stash of some pornography of dubious legality.
Re: Out of curiosity ...
1. Because no matter how much spying your government is doing, no matter how brutal your police or how corrupt your politicians, you can point to NK and claim 'See, we're not a police state like them!'
2. Everyone likes a villain they can oppose, and NK is practically a caricature of villainy.
3. Because they are constantly threatening war - they've declared war on the US twice this year. One day they might actually follow through, and then we all get an entertaining show.
No great surprise.
Modern crypto is near-unbeatable - but these are statistics for individual cases with warrants. That means in all of these, the investigators have a suspect, which means the crypto can be defeated through conventional policing methods: Get the suspects to hand over the keys for a promise of leniency, search the property for keys written down. If need be call in the forensics guys and do some mid-level-tech stuff like sneaking in and installing a keylogger. Half the time you'll break it because the user did something stupid, like using a weak passphrase.
Cryptography is still good against non-targeted dragnet monitoring though, of the type the NSA uses. It's not practical to actively modify internet traffic on a large scale - such a thing would be quickly noticed.
This seems familiar.
It's like retroshare, but without the decentralisation.
Re: and those who read linux magazines?
A deliberate attempt to damage highly profitable US companies? I think that could be classed as 'economic terrorism.'
If it weren't TOR, you'd be getting the same from idiot script kiddies at home or better cracked using compromised hosts or wifi hotspot. The attackers will go after you with or without TOR.
Huh... I never knew about ll. I've always used ls -l. You just saved me three keystrokes every time I want a detail directory listing.
True bug location.
This isn't a bug in unix. It's a bug in idiot programmers who don't know how to sanitise their inputs. If they were writing for Windows they would be just as dangerous.
Re: Getting desperate?
I've no doubt they could get him for contributory infringement infringement with ease. I suspect the delay comes from a hunt for something a bit stronger to use. If he goes to jail for copyright infringement it may just create a martyr and stir up anti-US sentiment - but with a good search they might find something that would destroy his reputation too. Some real fraud would work - Dotcom has a history of involvement with dodgy businesses, there might be something there.
Re: I can see this backfiring.
Not going to happen. Human like sex. Especially true of emotionally-limited teenagers.
I can see this backfiring.
Always trouble ahead when the crime is based on what the defendant 'believes.' Rather fuzzy and hard to prove.
An easier solution in my view would be societal change. Stop caring! The internet has plenty of boobs, yours are not special.
Re: Bitcoin to the rescue!
It does solve this particular problem. It has new problems. It's certainly an interesting idea with much potential, but of uncertain future.
The great advantage is also the great flaw. It escapes all the overhead, complication, corruption and manipulation that plagues the conventional financial system - but it also escapes the various guards against fraud and crime.
Scientists are arguing over details, but are in broad agreement now. The big debate going on in public awareness is political in nature, not scientific. Facts have very little role in a political debate. This will change nothing.
Re: Kids, parents: don't worry
The curriculum revisions promise to make this at least a little better - if the schools can find teachers who know how to do what they are supposed to be teaching.
Re: 25 and 50?
You can get 8Gb/s Infiniband for less than the cost of 10gig ethernet. It's not quite as fast, but the RDMA makes up for it.
Bitcoin price is up a little.
This is the reason bitcoin was invented. Sure, it's unproven and has many serious fundamental flaws, but right now the financial industry is so hated and people are so desperate for an alternative they'll try anything that promises to escape the dependency.
Re: What about North Korea?
The report lists it as 'country not assessed in 2013.'
Re: Its Newspeak, the language of today...
Do it right! Newspeak grammar places adjective before noun. It's 'thoughtcrime' not 'crimethought.' The word is used several times in the novel, as well as appearing as an example of word construction in the appendix.
They used to sell components, didn't they?
The last time I went in a Maplin store was for an urgently needed fiber cable - just your basic ST-ST. The staff had no idea what one was, and they didn't keep any in stock. Website only, they said.
Re: bad news
Scalia probably still thinks televisions come with a dial to find the channel.
The lending thing makes sense.
The purpose of the EU in most areas is unification of markets. They just want to prevent a situation where a book is published in one EU member state but not legally available in another. A lending exception would help a little here.
Re: Try this then
BBs would just glance off. What you need is streamer. Just some string tied to a rock to give it some mass - it'll tangle in the props.
Re: Mighty Speedy!!
No, we don't.
That's what the RDMA is for. It reduces CPU usage greatly by allowing the network itsself to take over much of the internal shunting of bits around in RAM from application to kernel and back.
Just the prototype
It just needs some miniaturization work to make Llamatron.
I see where this is going.
I picture many lobbyists lined up at the FCC, all explaining how important it is for the government to buy their products to best benefit the children and hinting at cushy private sector jobs. I've no doubt a big chunk of the money will go to buying all those schools iPads to use with their new internet access.
Re: This is actually a good thing.
Or you can get some trained monkeys fresh out of uni to handle the day-to-day operations in your national offices. If something goes wrong that the monkeys can't handle, you just fly one of your very small team of consultants over to fix it.
Re: Er, I don't see anything wrong with it
It's not a problem for what it does directly, but for the consequences of what it does. It allows for increased international competition in the labor market. That's great for employers, and good for their customers too as some of the savings will be passed on to them. It's not good for employees, as it contributes to the 'race to the bottom' regulatory scenario. If country A (Say, the UK, or America) requires things like maternity/paternity leave, minimal annual leave days, sick pay, worker compensation for injury sustained at work, pension contributions and so on then employers will be able to simply not hire in A, and instead hire someone from country B where none of that is an issue and they are free to overwork their employees and toss them aside when finished with. This in turn means that country A has to lower their standards of worker protection to remain competative, because an exploited worker is still more productive than an unemployed non-worker.
There's always been a tension between employers and labor, but increasing globalisation tilts things a lot further towards the employer's favor. There are similar concerns about the secretive TPP treaty allowing businesses to be more internationally mobile, as it would make it much easier for them to shop around for the cheapest, most exploitable labor.
Re: A *very* small step on a very long road.
9/11 did a lot more damage to the national ego than it actually did to the country.
In terms of death toll, the 9/11 attack killed roughly as many people as die in road accidents every month in the US. Think about that: Every month, the US is hit by another 9/11 in the form of avoidable accidents. No-one cares. It's hard to see how terrorists could out-do 9/11 unless they managed to get their hands on a nuclear bomb somehow.
How do you wash them?
The TPP is about something-or-other. Hard to say what exactly that may be, as it's all secret!
The leaks reveal that it's largely about eliminating tarrifs and streamlining customs procedures between members to reduce the cost of international trade. There is also some meddling in domestic politics (It restricts the size of state-owned enterprises, part of the US's long battle against the evil commies). The contriversial parts are the intellectual property reforms. These involve shifting much of the burden of enforcement onto ISPs - requiring they block infringing websites without all that hassle of a court order, or else become liable for the infringement themselves. It appears to also broaden the scope that can be covered by patents (I'm not sure if it actually requires members recognise software patents, most of the concern is about drugs) and prohibits members from passing crisis-exemptions to allow manufacture of cheap generic drugs in the event of a public health crisis.
A lot of it is likely to duplicate the SOPA law that didn't pass in the US. Thus the secrecy. There was enough public outrage against SOPA to defeat it, so this time the backers have learned from the experience and will make sure the content of the treaty doesn't become publicly known until *after* it's been ratified. The public cannot be outraged about that they do not know about.
The Worker's Rights issue, I think - I'm not at all sure about this - relates to TPP making it a lot less risky and a lot cheaper to outsource internationally. It doesn't directly lower standards, but rather could trigger an international 'race to the bottom' to bring wages down. Good for the manufacturers and consumers, but not good for the employees, who will see even more of their jobs disappear and relocate to Vietnam where wages are even cheaper than China, unions are illegal and health-and-safely law is a distant dream. Currently outsourcing is limited by the expense of customs, tarrifs, shipping and regulation. TPP does away with a lot of that, and allows companies to very easily simply shift their operations to wherever the costs are lowest - which means whichever country has the least worker protection is going to attract industry to exploit that, and the only way to retain jobs is do do away with things like unions and workers' rights that make places like Vietnam look so attractive in comparison to employers.
Met != CoLP.
The Met is just your basic police force, for the capital. They are mostly concerned with 'the usual' - burgleries, muggings, car theft, the occasional murder. The expected.
CoLP are a police force for The City, that tiny bit in the middle of London that runs a good chunk of the global economy. They don't do street crime much. Their main focus is on financial and business crime - fraud of various types, insider trading, the crimes that happen when you cram lots of financial businesses together. They are sometimes criticised for having a rather too-close relationship with business (which supplies much of their funding), which goes some way to explain the substantial resources they devote to enforcing copyright law and seizing counterfeit goods. CoLP management considers copyright infringement and the manufacture/import of counterfeit goods to be economic crimes, and thus an area that the CoLP should be focusing on.
You still might see a CoLP officer on the streets if you're in the City, but never outside. You can tell them from the Met by their hats: Met have the famous blue chequer pattern. CoLP have the same pattern, but in red.
I predict suck. DM was a product of the time - a remake just wouldn't be the same. They'll take it too seriously.
Don't forget 'teenage male singing generic love song about unnamed girl.'
Re: Where is Diaspora?
Even if it was working and perfect in every way, it wouldn't work. Social networking operates on positive feedback - people use a network because they have friends there.
- iPad is an iFAD: Now we know why Apple went running to IBM
- Updated HIDDEN packet sniffer spy tech in MILLIONS of iPhones, iPads – expert
- Apple orders huge MOUNTAIN of 80 MILLION 'Air' iPhone 6s
- Black Hat anti-Tor talk smashed by lawyers' wrecking ball
- Climate: 'An excuse for tax hikes', scientists 'don't know what they're talking about'