Re: Hasn't hibernatation always sucked?
My only gripe with hibernation (on my Vaio Z11 with W7 and 6Gb of RAM)) is that it takes significantly longer to come out of hibernation than to boot from cold. That said it has not failed in over 6 years.
125 posts • joined 13 Feb 2012
My only gripe with hibernation (on my Vaio Z11 with W7 and 6Gb of RAM)) is that it takes significantly longer to come out of hibernation than to boot from cold. That said it has not failed in over 6 years.
"This will replace the driver for the Telemtry System with something different than has been installed by windows updates. I've had no sleep errors at all since I did this."
How long ago was that?
Sorry, not doubting your probity.
"Ahhh, that's interesting. I've completely avoided the SP4 due to Windows 10.
I could do Win 8.1, as the CAD software I use works with that. But Win 10 isn't an option."
Downgrading my mate's SP4 to W8.1 was not completely seamless. IIRC the volume buttons weren't mapped properly, the cameras wouldn't work and the power button didn't function properly (relatively minor issues for my friend).
There is more info at the following
You will need to turn off signed drivers and find a licence key.
It is rumoured that battery life under 8.1 is better but I didn't have time to confirm that.
"Surface Pro's come with UEFI enabled making it impossible to install another OS on them."
Installed W8.1 on a friend's SP4 (his employers do not support W10).
"If you buy a Surface Pro, you are stuck with Windows."
Incorrect. Others have installed Linux on their Surface Pros
"I would wager that a Nokia/WebOS combination would have blunted Android growth, and gave iOS run for it's money."
Nokia's Symbian was the market leading smartphone OS (by market share) until the middle of 2010, at which point Android usurped them. iOS has never been the market leader.
"Apple know how their phone backup system works, and clearly the FBI do not."
Then why can't Apple explain how a phone that had been within range of a "trusted" Wifi network on numerous occasions had not backed up for ages? It seems likely that iCloud back ups had been turned off by Farook ages ago. Are Apple able to override user preferences and force back ups? Sounds like a backdoor. Perhaps that is why the Chinese insisted that Apple move their customer accounts on to Chinese state owned servers...
"The remote wipe is a command sent from an Apple server, and is thus quite easy for Apple to block."
Are you suggesting that the FBI can phone Apple moments after an incident and ask Apple to block access to an AppleID/iCloud without needing a court order? If that is the case then yes the FBI messed up but it would imply that Apple aren't as concerned about customer privacy as they would have us believe.
"The case really looks like it's either the FBI trying to cover up their incompetence and then ending up in really hot constituiinal water by mistake, or a deliberate attempt to subvert the rule of law."
I find it hard to believe that the FBI's lawyers would have worked on the assumption that Apple's lawyers would have forgotten to highlight any possible operational errors.
If smartphones represent little more than shortcuts to finding forensic data than what is the big deal about encryption in the first place?
Mind you I think that you may well be the first person I have seen that has suggested that the FBI's requests be declined as part of a weight loss program.
Someone running iOS 9.3 beta 3 was trying to fix a bug that stops the time being displayed in the status bar at the top of the phone.
It seems that he tried various dates and eventually scrolled back to 1/1/1970.
Benson's list of leads is here
Having purchased a Lumia 950XL, which has "fast charging" rather than "quick charging", I have been looking for suitable chargers. I guess I am gonna have to stump up £20 for a USB-C charger. I would have preferred a 3 AMP charger with both USB-A and USB-C ports but thus far they look a tad iffy.
(BTW you cant "fast charge" using USB-A to USB-C)
And what is it about your 5 year old Mac that is so magical?
(sent from my 2010 Sony Vaio Z11- with a removable battery)
"I think most posters here need to read up on "Tax Incidence" and do a little less public showing of greed and envy."
And when MegaGlobal Incs are able to pay for the right to avoid so much in taxes it impacts upon smaller firms that are less able to comptete.
These smaller firms are more likely to be more labour intensive and accordingly employ more people
"These deals are not being done in a back alley with companies handing a suitcase full of cash to the head of a country's tax department with a handshake agreement "we'll look the other way when you pay less taxes" like some third world company with rampant bribery."
Suitcase full of cash? All of the iTunes purchases made in the EU carried Irish VAT (23%). At the same time MS and Google customers paid the VAT applicable in their own country.
S'funny how a firm is allowed to have a number of subsidiaries that pay absolutely no taxes and the authority that allows the set up gets billions in VAT that they would not have ordinarily received...
Company X may well have looked at the research papers, thought "oh that's clever, how we we do the same thing in a slightly different way?".
IF company X believes that it has acted legally then it would have no incentive to cover its tracks
"Don't you know that nazi was an abbreviation for National Capitalist"
Erm, you mean the political party that rejected both free market capitalism and Marxist socialism?
They could have called themselves the National My Little Pony Party, it doesn't follow that they had an equine fetish or that they wanted to elevate the position of those with pink manes
No need to reply, it is pretty clear from your tired post where your political allegiances lie (which is your prerogative). For the record, I am a "none of the above" kinda guy (rightly or wrongly).
And how will the old bill know what firmware you are using?
Will the TSA prevent tourists with European phones from entering the USA lest they use channel 12 or 13 when using their phone as a Wifi HotSpot?
IF Apple are concerned about security then it is correct that they explain the potential dangers to users. If they have grounds to believe that the public will fail to understand those risks then, sure, pull all domestic apps that install root certificates.
IF Apple respect privacy, then give developers tools that not only allow them to block adverts in Safari (already done) but that also allow them to block adverts in apps (including iAds).
"When the iPhone had no modern competition (meaning its competition was Symbian and BlackBerry)"
You are Charles Arthur and I claim my £10.
Seriously though... Lets all play "Windows Mobile or Palm didn't exist".
My Feb 2007 HTC Athena was vastly superior to the first few generations of the iPhone. I too had tabbed browsing but unlike the iPhone I could use 3G rather than Edge. I could play Flash video, I had GPS, rear and front facing camera, camera flash, copy'n'paste, video calling, MMS, a much bigger screen (5"), higher screen resolution and pixel density, more RAM , a faster processor, SD support, grown up bluetooth, stereo speakers, multitasking, gyroscope, S/W and a detachable H/W keyboard. Oh and it was made out of aluminium.
Kinda like an iPad pro but you could use it as a phone.
I will hold off for the Intel based Surface Phone
Many of the HTCs had 5 row sliding keyboards. The last was the HTC 7 Pro.
That still doesn't explain why the refund cost in the UK is lower than the price that Apple sell the product for.
AFAIK, in the USA the refund is higher than the RRP.
IMO a receipt should only be necessary if the customer is asking for a refund in excess of the RRP. Some people do pay more than RRP.
In the absence of a receipt Apple should be willing to pay the cash equivalent to the price that they sell it for.
Apple's press release say that the speakers were first sold in Nov 2013. So why are they only recalling the units sold after Jan 2014. Were the earlier ones different? And if so then why a (semi) full recall and not a batch recall?
He might well be telling the truth, apparently the code also crashes several apps such as twitter and whatsapp.
The Apple "fix" only seems to help resolve issues with iMessage and not the apps.
The Vaio Pro 13 had similar (and better) specs and cost the same as the MBA but weighed significantly less.
It did have a shorter battery life , unless you added the sheet battery which resulted in it weighing as much as the Air, added a few mm, cost a bit more but did result in a longer battery life than the Air.
Oh and it had a full HD touchscreen.
"No USB...So no danger of rootkits and the like via those ports"
Did you read the article (you know, like the bit where they bemoan the fact that it only has one USB port)? Or did you just jump into iDefence mode?
"Data wasn't bundled with device contracts, and was expensive."
I purchased the 6" T-Mobile Ameo in Feb?March? 2007 (A phone with specs that pissed all over the first few iPhone generations)
My contract was the 3.5G T-Mobile Web and Walk Pro. Unlimited data with the option of tethering. From memory it was about £35pm.
Perhaps this might have something to do with it
Never let it be said that Apple don't reward those that tirelessly fawn over them.
As an update.
I was able to communicate with people on different carriers today but still unable to send texts to my GF's O2.
if I reboot I can send/receive texts BUT if I try to resend one of the earlier failed messages it puts the kibosh on everything again and I need to reboot.
Thanks EE, I wasted 2.5 hours travelling from Hammersmith to Ealing to meet a client in the pub early yesterday evening. I noticed that my SMSes to them weren't getting delivery reports so i assumed that their phone was turned off and eventually left the pub. Eventually at about 9.30pm my phone was flooded with text messages that had been sent to me earlier in the day. Will have to spend today apologising to customers, including those that had tried to call me but couldn't get through.
Rather oddly, the delivery report for the messages that i had sent have time stamps that are earlier than when i actually sent them?
4G internet access had been fine all day, I hadn't made any calls and accordingly assumed that the network was fine.
"do you think that Apple can somehow keep the current iPhone pricing, but sell cut down iPhones to the low end market without cannibilizing the high end market or eroding the market perception of Apple as a premium brand? "
Erm.. they did just that earlier in 2014 when they resurrected the iPhone 4 in emerging markets such as India.
"3 fast hosts support is pretty poor."
3. fasthosts' support is fucking awful.
Fixed it for you.
Truly the worst hosting company that I have ever had the misfortune of dealing with.
(IMO) the only thing fast about them is the zeal with which they ride roughshod over UK consumer rights.
There were at least two high profile malicious apps in the app store. Both were placed there by researchers as proof of concept. The first being Charlie Millers. It is possible that other malware has gone undetected.
"The official line from Apple was parroted online from a Genius drone employed by the company, when quizzed by The Register on Friday."
Meh.. you should have just contacted the Guardian, Charles Arthur was busy repeating their PR bumpf verbatim
"Apple may have come late to NFC, but it has had the balls to put it into its flagship product, which bodes well."
Sorry, but what does that mean?
The last and only non flagship phone released by Apple was the rehashed 5C, even that though, was generally considered (by some) to be a premium product
"The fact is that no-one wants their ridiculously insecure bloatware any more."
There isn't any bloatware on Windows Phone and the bulk of the bloatware on the average PC was dumped there by the OEM.
"Those who can afford to do so are moving away from PCs to Apple."
My laptop cost more than any of Apple's laptops, but hey, it had a vastly superior specification.
And for the record, although I owned a Lumia I have nothing against Android, nor am I a fan of MS (or any other company)
Windows Mobile on small screens was far from ideal but many of my handsets were usable without a stylus. I day that Apple proclaimed to have released a massive screened phone, I had a 5" HTC. I only ever used the stylus to calibrate the screen or for resets. TBH I actually miss the pixel perfect accuracy of resistive screens. Trying to sketch on phones these days is like playing a piano with boxing gloves.
II don't recall any WM phones with 256x160 respolutions, my first one (HTC BlueAngel- 2004) had 320 x 240, the first iphone was only 320×480, the phone I had at the time was 640 x 480
Regarding MS mocking the iphone- IIRC Balmer suggested that it was to expensive- shortly after, Apple dropped the price 2 or three times. That said, they clearly under estimated the forthcoming public desire for touch screen smartphones.
"Apple's early iPhone deals with AT&T worked ...because the iPhone was so far ahead of its early competitors"
Only true if you ignore the other devices that could do so much more than the iphone.
"While Steve Jobs was alive, it was fair to call Apple a cult built around him."
Perhaps it is still fair to call it a cult. Post Jobs, the general consensus seems to be that Cook lacks the charisma to be Son of Steve. So what do the iFans and Apple loving press do (I'm looking at you Charles Arthur)? they look lower down the ranks and pluck Ives out. The irony being that he seems to be even less charismatic than Cook but I guess his slower-than-is-humanly-possible speech makes him appear enigmatic.
Personally I feel sorry for Cook, he is clearly good at what he does but he has inherited a firm that has a fan base that craves the cult of personality and Ives seems to be the kind of fellow that would rather get on with his work and has little or no desire to open garden fetes.
You mean like Festo's 2009 robotic swimming and flying penguins?
How can you not see that owners are confused?
Apple go out of their way to suggest that manufacturing defects must be discovered and reported almost immediately. This is a blatant example of distorting the meaning of the consumer protection laws. Sure the devotees will state that, according to the law, after 6 months the owner may need to prove that the fault is the result of manufacturing. In 99.9% of cases it is obvious that a solid state device that has not been subjected to abuse should not fail, and if it has then it must be the result of a poorly manufactured component.
Apple also go to great lengths to scare the customer into thinking that customers of other brands have to go back to the store rather than dealing with the manufacturer. I had to get my phone reflashed last week. I walked into a Nokia service agent. I wasn't asked for proof of purchase or told to go back to EE. To date
I can understand why someone might love Apple products but it is staggering that any rational person could defend their stance with regard to consumer rights.
Google the 2007 HTC Advantage, a 5" Windows Mobile with a magnetically attached keyboard come cover.
My HTC Advantage (released before the iphone) looks exactly like the ipad/keyboard. It connected magnetically, holding the phone part at a comfortable angle, keystrokes were transmitted via contacts on the two. When not in use it acted as magnetically attached screen protector. The only difference is that the cover had a Perspex window that showed on screen notifications (the phone knew when the cover was in use)
I can't see how HTCs superior device is not prior art.
Back in early 2007 people took the piss out of the size of my 5" HTC Athena. Most people thought it odd to want to be able to check emails or surf on a phone. Tastes change.
If apple do release a phablet then 2014 will be the year that Apple fanbois tech editors, such as Charles Arthur at the guardian, tell us that phablets are clearly superior to tiny 4-5" phones.
Having used Bing and Google Maps prior to Here maps, I do not understand why any one else in London would use anything other than Here. The internal Tube station floor plain layouts have saved my bladder/dignity on more than one drunken homeward bound journey
"Sort of reminds me of the playground games, My Father earns more than your father. No he does not, mine earns more.
It does not matter who earns more or who's device is best. Whatever makes the family member/device owner the happiest then that is the best. All subjective naturally."
Agreed. with regard to functionality IOS/WP/Android are pretty much on par. That said it is the case that certain fans (read:journalists), such as the likes of Charles Arthur at the Guardian (previously of this church?) feel it necessary to find new metrics to prove that apple are the "best", rah rah rah. By way of an example only last week he told us that market share is meaningless (without concrete of the installed base- fair enough- good point), prior to that he posted a link that suggested that WP8 must be crap because you can't play Candy Crush on it Retina? God's gift to mankind, someone betters it and it becomes a gimmick....
TBF he is not the only sycophant/apologist/iFan but (IMO) he demonstrates my point pretty succinctly. So much so that long standing regulars at the guardian eff'd off and set up their own playground (some had little choice as their accounts had been deleted, eg me, for being snarky and not towing the company line).
In principle, there is nothing wrong with playgrounds............ so long as they are level.........
Why are Apple fans in a perpetual cycle of looking for new metrics to "prove" that their iWhatever is the best?
Android usurps iOS's market share and the fanbois point out that that iOS has a greater share of browsing or that users click on more adverts.
Some one points out that Apple make abnormal profits from their customers and they retort that they have higher resale values or that "poor" people really want an Apple device but can't afford it.
As someone that has had touchscreen smartphones since 2004 I have never cared how many people around me have the same handset, nor have I cared about the amount of profit that vendor makes (provided that they make enough to remain in business). And at no point would I feel proud to think that I was being charged a premium for a device that is on par with other items.
"You can hardly compare Applecare to the statutory warranty. Applecare is in addition to your statutory rights (of course) and means they provide more support (for example including their software) and gives enhanced support - i.e. instant swap out and none of this return to manufacturer and it's away for 3+ weeks."
"Enhanced support"? And where in the T&Cs does it state that AppleCare customers are entitled to device swap out?
More support? Most OEMs offer a two year warranty throughout the EU, they too provide limited software support.
AppleCare Plus- just an insurance policy (priced at £79). Personally I expect to see Apple charging people the excess for items that should otherwise be covered by the Sales of goods Act. Dodgy home button- that'll be £50 to repair please.
AppleCare+ only entitles owners to a replacement (read: reconditioned unit) in the event that AIG decide that a repair is uneconomical- which is pretty much consistent with most insurance policies. In many cases owners might be better off with 3rd party policies which also cover theft/loss.
It never ceases to amaze me that that Apple owners bang on about the exceptional build quality of Apple devices yet never question why a premium priced product has the worst warranty duration.
What like 3G, GPS, video recording?
Multitouch is the only major "gift" that I can think of.
Or by innovations do you mean that they once had the ability to make grown journalists wet their seats at keynote speeches?
Why does everyone assume that Apple will add retina to the Ipad Mini? The MB Air still has a shit screen.
You can start by flooding the sender of the offending text with clean texts, this will push the naughty text off the screen. I guess that you will have problems if you try to go through the text history though.
You could try asking apple but they (still) haven't publically acknowledged the bug, and thus accordingly aren't offering public advice.
Thanks for the reply, and apologies for the tardy reply.
Apropos " the interest of responsible disclosure" and "At worst it would be an annoyance."- My choice of terms was perhaps ill advised. it was an attempt to circumnavigate the "responsible disclosure" counter argument. By that, I mean that I agree that publicising a flaw that would result in owners' bank accounts or personal data being compromised might be seen as irresponsible. In this case there is no known security risk.
BTW I see that you have now posted the article. Kudos. It certainly seems to be the most in depth that I have seen thus far.
Tnx, and apologies for being impatient.