Obligatory link to the only* article on El Reg written by Mr. Shapps: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/04/06/tory_tech_savvy/
362 posts • joined 6 Feb 2012
Obligatory link to the only* article on El Reg written by Mr. Shapps: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/04/06/tory_tech_savvy/
"So it will have to be possible to drive the car manually with all the remote stuff switched off. In the case of systems/network failure, as well as when you are in a remote region."
No, I would expect the robot cars will be required to operate autonomously if there's a loss of communications - they just won't be able to co-operate with other vehicles or traffic management systems (which is less of an issue in the areas with poor connectivity).
Does KDE still have the little yellow turd (I know, I know, but that was the first impression and it stuck) in the upper right corner of the desktop that can't be removed?
I'd assume Amazon (being careful not to actually say so) is planning on potential drones neglecting to consider that point.
Amazon is happy - delivery gets made for cheap.
Customer is happy - delivery gets made for cheap.
Insurance company is happy - when the drone's car hugs a lamppost, no payout!
Drone is unhappy - no worries, plenty more where that came from.
That's a thoroughly depressing thought - would there be any way for Lastpass to prove otherwise?
So Hola might be getting its act together.
Never did I imagine that the "This man is your friend, he fights for FREEDOM!" pictures of Fredrick "Hotwheels" Brennan (and all the associated exaggerations) would start to become reality.
The internet hero of the moment being a crippled dwarf operating from the Philippines is fitting somehow; Neal Stephenson could be imagined writing something like it.
"would the lower gravity and negligible atmosphere cause the water underneath to sublime and blast the drilling probe into space?"
Probably not. The hole would have to be several km deep, and there would be an unfeasibly long piece of drilling equipment in the way.
Don't drill the ice, melt it. Google "melt probe".
"what would happen if it was struck by a large asteroid and the ice shell melted/was destroyed over a large area"
"would you end up with a floating ball of water (like the earth)?"
Yes, if the impact was severe enough.
"would it just freeze again immediately?"
"would it go shooting off into space like a deflating balloon resulting in an ice shell with a bit of rock rattling around inside?"
"At which point it matters whether you're borrowing in your own currency (whether from foreigners or not) or borrowing in another currency. Because if it's your own you can just print more. If someone else owns the printing press you can't."
Given that North Korea may be doing exactly that ("super"dollars), what's to stop Greece printing "supereuros"?
If they didn't get too crazy with it, would we even find out?
"You could always upgrade to Mr Bean type locks."
Not really, the Bean car security system requires another action to work as designed, and steering wheels are too heavy these days to carry around with you.
As an alternative to bail-outs, how about making it illegal for a limited liability company to hold a banking licence?
It would certainly increase the scrutiny of management by shareholders, although I'd consider the main benefit to be the comedy value of bank share prices occasionally going negative. (Are the exchanges even set up to do that?)
Also, "ATM machines". Don't do that.
Police presence at the embassy, their salaries, overtime, NI, other employment costs.
Yes, they'd get paid anyway, but the assumption is that other police would be needed to do what the new embassy guards were doing before.
I'd assume the designers thought of that - either the clearance is enough that it won't, or it should detach in a non-dangerous (but probably expensive) manner.
edit: just had a look at some photos - it seems to be located in the middle of the fuselage (on the bottom) and doesn't appear to be longer than the main gear.
New readers may not be aware, but Mr. Shapps once decided to try his hand at writing for El Reg:
Equivalents from catering, when the new kitchen porter gets sent to the supplier for:
1lb bell-end cheddar
20 salmon legs
Any predictions about the Next Big Thing associated with bitcoin?
It does sound very much like Sweden is preparing the ground for a "hey guys - not our problem any more" statement. It would be extremely easy to revert to the original decision of the other prosecutor.
What this would mean for the extradition is unclear though - if the reason for the extradition is retrospectively done away with, is the extradition itself is no longer valid (or considered never valid)?
Probably not, but it could easily be enough for the (future Labour?) government to justify washing their hands of it all and telling him to bugger off to Ecuador.
Probably not. If the applicant simply refuses to supply the information, they won't get the job offer and there's nothing for them to reject.
"If you watch live TV over iplayer or on a website, you still need a license though. I'd imagine if you have a TV with a tuner in it capable of picking up telly signals the effort in convincing the TV licensing bods you don't watch any live TV is probably more effort than the £145 saving. Pointing out you don't watch live telly to the bailiffs or the chaps in the court when the summons arrives is probably a lot of aggro too?"
Thing is, I don't actually bother convincing them of anything; thanks to the presumption of innocence, it's THEIR job to prove their case through some sort of judicial process, not mine. I probably could make their lives easier by being a bit more open, but I like the idea of wasting the time of an organisation of which I disapprove.
I don't have a TV (not really relevant anyway), but they don't know that. I've had them come to the door, and the response is "No thank you, I don't need one.", before turning off the intercom, which takes seconds. Hardly worthy of the term "effort".
The threatening letters (full of "could"s, "may"s, "up to"s, etc., nothing formal like a court summons) get filed in the recycling. They can't be bothered taking anything further when there are easy victims who actually invite the inspectors in, or answer their questions.
Coming up on 5 years without a TV licence here, and I certainly don't regret it.
If this type of thing bothers you, take some time to figure out whether you need a licence. It's only required if you watch or record TV transmissions as they are being broadcast.
Merely owning a TV or recording device doesn't require a licence.
Watching catch-up services (e.g. iplayer) doesn't require a licence.
You do not have to let TV licence inspectors into your home, or even answer their questions (they need to get the police for that - and rarely bother).
Isn't there something on which you'd rather spend the £145.50?
As opposed to doing what?
Expecting the SNP, in particular, to renounce its core policy / wither up and die would be laughable.
The main reasons it's doing well, therefore "carrying on as if they won"? Pick any of the following:
45% loses a referendum, but in almost anything other than a pure two-party system, it landslides a first-past-the-post election - like the rest of the UK, the big thing in politics at the moment is the May general election which looks to be shaping up very well indeed for the SNP - some of the wilder polls predict a constituency map looking like Bart Simpson with a couple of plooks (spots, for the English-speakers) - i.e. most of Scotland going SNP (yellow) with two (red) bits holding out for Labour.
Speaking of Labour, its support appears to have withered spectacularly. Some of this is probably due to the referendum - Labour and the Tories shared a platform, and it should not be underestimated how much some voters in Scotland still hate the Tories. Considering it was the Labour areas that, on the whole, voted "Yes", it's not difficult to see how this political realignment happened. The Lib-Dems are still suffering from being in coalition with the Tories who will be lucky to keep their one Scottish seat.
However, the most sensible reason is probably that a large enough percentage of voters see Lib/Lab/Con as predominantly English parties, focussed (understandably, considering England's far greater population, number of seats, etc.) on delivering what English voters want with little regard for Scotland. The SNP can make a good case for being the only party that will try to get the best deal for Scotland in Westminster, especially if they become the third largest party and either Labour or the Conservatives are unable to govern alone or with the other parties. Lots of Scots find the idea of Ed or Dave being impotent unless conforming to Scottish interests extremely appealing. (Having said that, there is the nightmare option of a Labour/Conservative coalition...)
Superfluity, we're all on them already because the knowledge that David Cameron and his accomplices are deeply and blithely IT-illiterate is considered sufficiently dangerous.
'cos then anyone with an inconvenient person in a British embassy on their territory would have justification (in their opinion) to do the same.
Screwing around with other countries' embassies sets a dangerous precedent, if they don't force entry when the occupants start taking pot shots at police officers (see Yvonne Fletcher), they're not going to do it to put a stop to Assange's couch surfing.
Can't be bothered doing the sums, but as well as wages, there's going to be NI, presumably someone in charge back at the station, they've probably got a van parked nearby which is practically useless for anything else now.
Still seems high though.
I preferred the option of the embassy shipping out a few hundred packing crates labelled "not Julian Assange", while a ghetto blaster on their balcony plays Yakety Sax.
I expect it's also good for the other residents/businesses in the area. Shouldn't they be able to get discounts on their insurance due to the increased plod levels?
"seals degrade and would erode performance"
If they're tubes, the sections could perhaps be friction welded together as they're laid down (which would be quite impressive to watch/hear).
It's, AFAIK, possible to sue anyone for anything. Whether or not it gets thrown out within seconds of hitting the court is another matter.
It may be a coincidence, but I saw an Asus GTX 750ti graphics card for £23.99 on Amazon at the weekend and realistically I'd expect there to be a 1 in front of that price.
It's meant to ship today, so hoping it goes through without someone picking up on it.
If it wasn't for camelcamelcamel I'd have missed it.
Digging up the moles is hard/expensive work.
I've had mine for ~8 years, and it still works as intended.
Do you realise that he's probably given the worst ("worst" defined by the resultant damage to the USA) stuff to a trusted associate who is under instructions to release the whole lot if he disappears/dies under any kind of remotely suspicious circumstances?
It's obviously a tricky area, but I can't imagine that anything other than a driverless car doing "its best" to protect its passengers would be acceptable to the customer.
Would anyone ride in a vehicle they knew/suspected would go into "sacrifice" mode if came off worse in a costs/benefit analysis when compared with a packed school bus?
The outcome will probably be that, taking the example given, no vehicle swerves to certain doom and both end up colliding. That's if the algorithms decide a head-on is slightly-less-certain doom.
The person shouting "My car tried to kill me!" will probably receive more attention than the person shouting "Their car didn't try to sacrifice them to save my life!" and I'd bet on a judge and jury being more likely to favour the former.
"That's bad because, presumably, dumped Ralphs will go feral, eat local wildlife and perhaps breed."
Iguanas don't eat meat, unless accidentally (for example, an insect minding its own business, sitting on a tasty leaf) or when forced (by humans fattening them for later eating, both of which are extremely unhealthy for the iguana).
If Google's Ara idea takes off, the junk generation rate might drop slightly. If your phone is modular enough that the individual components can be replaced, then there's no need to bin it if one bit is too crap/broken.
It'll end up a bit like the Trigger's broom of phones if it does happen.
"Expect a large uptake in apps making fart noises..."
I recommend "Farting Boaby" on Android for this purpose.
It's also a one-dimensional flight sim...
Nurse! More dried frog pills!
I hope for a "Yes", but am predicting a narrow "No" win.
The 97% registration does have the potential to shake things up though; many of these people have never voted before; the pollsters have never had to take their effect on elections into account before - so a 65% (either way) should probably not be seen as unthinkable.
Unless it's *seriously* unreliable (i.e. sending the work experience kid to the nearest polling station to ask a couple of people leaving) it would just be too much work.
Proper exit polling is seriously expensive, for little gain - they'd be better just making it up for all anyone will care about predictions when they get the actual result tomorrow.
ISTR something about the criteria only applying over some particular length of time before now.
I think it means we're now regarded as "stale" and are being encouraged to post more upvote-worthy thoughts.
Perhaps we should be represented by some sort of baked good that's obviously past its best?
He's no hero, but can (along with others) be justifiably proud of his successes; he's brought the prospect of independence from laughable to within a reasonable error bar of 50%. Before that, the SNP got a majority in a parliamentary system which could be argued was specifically designed to stop any one party (i.e. the SNP) from doing so.
Also, the best chance of him retiring (and the SNP fading away) would be a "Yes" result - it's sort of like Cancer Research - they say their goal is to put themselves out of business. OK, the SNP don't actually say that, but a lot of their voters probably think that way - once their purpose is served, what point to keeping them around?
I realise I wasn't as clear as I could be - I meant Scots, possibly born in Scotland, currently working for GCHQ/MI5/MI6/etc., probably (based on how these entities are organised) living in England.
If, in 2016, they decide to head back north, and seek employment helping set up the various Scottish equivalents of the above, you can imagine that the former UK counter-intelligence people might be a bit worried.
Would, and to what extent, the Official Secrets Act (or whatever it's currently called) even apply?
"There will also be specific government ICT issues: an independent Scotland may have to build its own communications intelligence and surveillance capacity - GCHQ's three main offices are all in England - and the same may be true for defence ICT. "
This is an interesting one - what do those organisations do if next week they discover that within about ~2 years a certain percentage of their employees, with varying levels of security clearance, are possibly going to be citizens of another state?
Maybe they could go on a fact-finding mission to Moscow and ask the KGB and GRU how they coped?
It's due to centre of gravity issues.
It's more complicated than I will/can explain, but the greater the distance the CofG is from the tail, the more torque will be generated by aerodynamic effects on the tailplane/elevator (and fin/rudder).
Roughly speaking, the further forward the CofG, the more stable it will be (like a dart) and vice versa.
In extreme cases of instability the aircraft may be uncontrollable; if it's too stable, the pilot may be unable to flare (pitch up) on landing, causing a harder impact and/or bounce.
re your last paragraph - I hope you didn't do it in that order, or at the least, were very careful.
It doesn't say, but I understood it to be referring to taking phone videos of the TV while it's showing a goal.
Weirdly, it was usable from my phone (3) but completely unreachable from my office machine (which goes through JANET).
Seems fine now though.
edit: I could still log in to everything because it could still use its offline storage
This will be amusing if it actually works.
For testing, try this: http://eeemo.net/
Tannin: please read the relevant RFCs, or, preferably, use a validator produced by someone who has.
Just because you have never seen a particular character in an email address, or an email address without a domain name, doesn't mean they aren't valid.
I'm a definite "Yes" voter on the day, but this is close to a tinfoiler rant.
Most of the voters will have been able to see it, whether those in the rest of the UK, or abroad, did, it won't influence the result much.
I'm not saying the UK Government isn't trying to keep Scotland, and are probably using dodgy tactics to do so, but this isn't a useful example.
The silver lining here is that some clever people will now be very interested in finding a way to create a system performing a similar function to tor that does not have the particular vulnerability that allowed the police to identify Mr. Weber as the operator of the exit node concerned.
I do hope those clever people are much cleverer than I am, because I have no idea how this could even be accomplished; any ideas?