Posts by Bleu

Re: Damn horses

Understand, the point, but you must be joking. Dogshit, while less noisome than that of some humans (presumably living on rancid fat, meat, and sugar, thus leaving a toilet smelling like they dropped a dead rat from the arse) has a revolting stench and, unlike humans, many have moronic bipedal owners who get their jollies from encouraging their pet to crap anywhere and sniggering at the thought of the poor bastard who'll later step in it.

Cat is revolting, too, although many cat owners appear to love it, but that is only a problem if you visit one of the many cat lovers who enjoy the stench of catshit.

Horse is quite tolerable.

Re: Sadly, a decade to late

In another decade or two, your progeny will be all the more harshly confronted by those more determined to breed like rabbits; and no, I am not of the school that pretends Erlich's long ago writing had no validity, though overstated for the time, his conclusions will in the end come to pass.

Those who have irresponsibly been breeding like rabbits will breifly inherit control until all becomes unsustainable, or at least irreparably broken.

Don't think it will be in my lifetime, but certainly well before the middle of the next century.

Meanwhile, we have a stream of commentards being displaced by the rabbit-like breeding people centering the discussion on the extent to which self-emasculation (and purely for sex free of responsibilty)hurt.

Re: W

Perhaps the set here doesn't translate to the wider world. Off topic, but a screenshot might be fun.

Viva Edward



Re: First political dissident

`us who admire the best of it would not stoop to such an ignorant stance.'

Suppose I'd better not post from the phone when overly sauced, preview takes too long.

Client-side prob.

Delish , u must eat it!

First political dissident

Wow. another who needs more than a little remedial reading.

*So on this basis Snowden is the US of A's first political dissident*

Those of who admire the best of it would not stoop to such an ignorant, try reading a few books if you have the patience.

Re: Come on you lot...

Whoops, missed a wordor two there.

`not such yet are forcibly accepted as such.'

Re: Come on you lot...

What rubbish, Titus Technophobe, although I wouldn't wish you living in an area dominated by fake `asylum seekers' who just turn up, spout any bullshit, and get free legal aid at the taxpayer's expense, and for greatly self-righteous and self-enriching lawyers. Every English-speaking nation, and most western Europe nations, have similar systems. The US and UK go a little further, automatically offering residence to enemies of places they want to piss off, or just be terrorized by.

A precise list is easy to make.

Like you it seems, the lawyers don't have to live with the situations they create, expense accounts and the ability to ride taxis or limos everywhere keeps them away from the pain they inflict on the hoi polloi.

Snowden is now a genuine political refugee, interesting how much shakier his situation of those who are patently not yet are accepted as such.



Re: The London connection again.

You may benefit from a slightly more expansive reading of history.

BTW, the term you want is `populist' not `popularist', and it doesn't apply to even one of the historical villains you name.

Re: Meh

I am an idiot.

Some of the several driving scenes feature back projection or the digital equivalent.

Forgot because Cinefex didn't mention it.

Re: Meh

The nuclear explosions sequence in T3 is matte painting.

One reason I thought it rather great was the relatively low reliance on CG.

The crew used *all* of the old techniques (with the possible exception of back projection) to great effect.

On that score, prolly not to be repeated any time soon.

Re: Wow...

Consider the Starship Troopers sequel, largely shot in the dark to SAVE MONEY.

Re: you people really need to give arnold some credit!

Nothlng worng with my spelling.

The icon should start with `very arcane' for this.

Seriously, negative opinions on T3 seem to be based on concensus reality rather than tne movie itself.

T1 was an lnstant cult ciassic, 2 and 3 were both enjoyable exploitations of that.

Hell, 3 even has a lovely tribute to the original Django, may well have been the real inspiration for the recent crappy remake.

Re: "how the hell can there be Independence Day 2"

Best, at least only interesting thing about lIndependence Day was the gay (as ln sexual preferece) walking style of Messrs Goldblum and Smith.

If you didn't catch it the first time, watch it again and see.

Re: Hollywood is lazy

Don't you thlnk that is the plan?

Re: Like there never was a matrix 2 and 3

Wow, a confusing topic.

T3 cheated on the story line, sure and all, but it was a bloody good movie, particularly in comparisom with the Matrix crapquels releasad around the same time.

Great use of miniatures?

Yes.

Plot not brain-dead.

Yes.

Great matte art?

Yes.

... and so on.

TSalvation on the other hand, what a piece of shite. I walked out of the cinema well before the end, asked for my money back, not expecting and not receiving.

After some on-line disinfo, sat through the bits I'd walked out on at the cinema, confirmed that it was a prize turkey and a misuse of Mr. Bale.

More sequels?

Likely the same level of crap.

Re: Why Bother with Planets?

BTW, don't take my comment in the wrong way, I'm strongly in favour of humanity making viable habitats off our our still-lovely home world, but three factors remain insurmountable:

radation and protection against that

no closed human-made ecosystem so far has survived for long (yes, I am aware that somewith exclusively aquatic organisms, and a very limited set of species have done alright, but not indefinitely). Withhumans and many otherterrestrial species in the mix, failure has always been too quick for use in a viable outposton Mars.

many elements of humanity being led by atavistic pseudo-religious leaders who treat everytning as a demographic war and invasion (and no, I'm not talking about the Catholic Church,nor the Iranian state).

Re: Why Bother with Planets?

`Wouldn’t take any more technology than we’d need to build ships capable of relativistic speeds'

If only you really were trolling. The one is far closer to practicability than the other ... can you guess which? Sure, that might change if the right trick that works on the right (as in macro) scale is found or donated/left behind by aliens, fantasy territory, not that some writers haven't used some deus ex machina to good effect.

The self-proclaimed boffin who, apparently straight-faced, claims that we have proof of the possibility of life on tidally locked worlds really needs some fantasy cake to live on for a bit.

Re: Not good @ twits R 4 Twats

`should the several hundred law enforcement agencies in the US'

Otherwise a great post, but the election of judiciary and heads of constabulary is to me a fascinating example of where US democracy is a model.

The point of most states (and the major ones in the US) is precisely to deprive the citizenry of any say, the remnants in the few places where real US democracy survives are pretty instructive, also automatically by Guardian and BBC-style outfits where the main aim is dictacting the outlines of permissible thought.

Doesn't make Edward Snowden's tilt at the national security state any less pertinent, tragic, or hilarious.

Viva Edward!

Re: Huh?

Well said. says a lot about the level of today's `journalists', not all illiterate yet, but seems to be the goal.

Re: Where in the world is Edward Snowden?

As the great Scottish nationalist Sean Connery, who chooses not to live in Scotland incidentally once pronunced from a script, `You're the man now dog'.

Re: Bleu Bah @ Bleu

Interestingly testoroneOD post re. moi.

Sure and all, I agree that the man is an egomaniac, comes from his mum it seems. A crappy honey trap doesn't negate the more informative reieases.

As for IT. very likely a lot more than you.

Re: Bah @ Bleu

Interesting how many liars appear on threads like this.

The major chaser of celeb dong is on record as:

boasting about how amazing it was to be with the most happening people in the world *at a party for Jules at which he was present and that she'd helped organise*

was a US agent of influence in Swedish jr politics

colluded with the other celeb dong chaser to trump up the charges.

A lot more.

None of that is from 'net rumours, those of your ilk may have google-bombed those irritating facts to where they are hard to find now, but some of us still remember.

I have no sympathy for celeb-dong chasers who post-facto collude to trump up charges.

Not a great fan of those like Jules who can'tsay no and are stinky to boot, but those repeadly and falsely screaming `rape charges' are simply willful liars.

Re: Bah

Victims? Oh, I see, you mean the woman who bragged about her score and the quieter one who colluded with the other after they'd compared notes.

Only thing they seem to be victims of is a desire for celebrity dong, hell, even Jules's famous lack of taste for the occasional bath or shower didn't put them off.

Background of the first of Jules's very willing conquests is really interesting, as are her known movements immediately after the two `victims' had colluded.

Paris, 'cos we'd like tothink she has the taste to avoid bedding those who enjoy being stinky.

Re: What you post can vanish at any time...

Geocities lives ... in Japan. Not sure if Yahoo Japan owns it, s'pose they do.

Dumping that was a tactical error for Yahoo central, hard to 'monetize' but cheap to run, the lost goodwill must have outweighed the savings.

Re: @DrXym - Should be minimum sentencing guidelines for this sort of thing

God, I forgot about that, all of the images may well have been cartoon characters (I doubt it, but as you say, the ridiculous law makes it possible).

I'm sure people would like to know.