140 posts • joined 31 Jan 2012
The question is, do you *have* to use the software SIM card?
-- or can you just swap it like an ordinary one, for whatever other SIM you like? In that case this would be at best a nice feature, at worst a sneak peak of the future you describe.
In any case, if great income fosters great investment - something that does not seem to be borne out by the financial industry, at least not investment into innovation - then it won't matter much, on a global scale, who makes that profit, as they will all have an incentive to make you spend as much as possible for the possibility to send your data around.
Minas - wasn't that the one that looks like Pacman in infrared?
This one really seems to hold mre than meets the eye.
Re: Physics 101
100MW is a lot, but these guys are used to dealing with jet engines, which tend to generate that sort of power. Granted, most of that is produced as kinetic energy, but it does start as heat; so if they can produce the power in the first place, I'm reasonably confident they'll find a way to use it.
Then again, those containment walls are frightfully thick, so to get much power through, they'd probably have to be full of cooling channels. Not sure what that'll do to the design, but I'm fairly confident the Lockheed guys have given it some thought. I've only been thinking about it for as many minutes as they have years, after all.
Re: How is that thing at finding Malaysian airliners?
Quite right. What Cryosat is looking for is more like in the many-million-ton range; and anyway, as a submerged sub has the same density and therefore the same gravity as the surrounding water, it won't lead to a surface-level depression!
If my task was to look for a missing airliner, though, I'd still appreciate a good subsurface map as it would certainly help to interpret what I'd see on my echo sounder. Though I guess I'd end up with a more detailed map from that anyway.
Back to a former topic: A sunken gazillion-ton ancient spaceship, now, that would be something completely different from a sub - that would create a signal.
So, to Hell with the Nobel prize!
Great job Stefan, Eric, Bill, I'll drink to you later tonight.
Re: The puzzle of the Skies
Nope, the island gets invaded every summer, by tourists. That's what they live off.
Re: 12 kilometers of water
See above. The water goes missing at low tide, therefore flying is actually a good idea.
Such a flying machine is available there but operating on a fixed schedule, and the fare would be somewhat high for a single ad-hoc parcel.
Bad weather is a problem, bad tide is not
The ferry boats to Juist normally go only once per day, as they're dependent on tides - it's partly a mudflat sea when the tide is low. So flying is certainly a good option. Hovercrafts would be too, but they're nasty noisy smelly foreign things.
See how efficient space research is?
Rather than just packing a couple of mice and waiting a few weeks, they actually count them up beforehand. Saves loads of prepackaged, sterilized mouse food. And you'll know where to look for them (and how many of them to look for, and after). Smart people.
Re: 3D Printers in SPAAAAAAACE...
... provided you bring amazing quantities of material, and amazing numbers of amazingly powerful 3D printers, plus some amazingly smart controllers.
Re: Practice, Practice, Practice
Bit of a thread drift here, but DON'T use anything Star Wars related as an example of orbital motion, or illumination, or anything at all related to actual physics! It's so bad it's beyond laughing.
Re: That last Daly comment is a joke, or what?
Ya know, put that way it almost makes sense. Will let it stew brainside for a while.
That last Daly comment is a joke, or what?
Since when did NVIDIA get access to the original negatives?
Re: Anyone remember the airline seat pairing app?
So try looking innocent - at least until you're inside.
Mine's the one with the pocket knife inside.
depends where Mickey's big and small hands are...
Anyone remember the airline seat pairing app?
I rather think this one will go the same way. It's all nice and fine letting interested others know you're in search of a mate, but most people will prefer a little bit of discretion with it. Imagine standing in a queue somewhere and being approached with "I see you've got your 3nder on" - it could be just a little bit embarassing. What was wrong about going to parties or clubs?
no-none would own an iphone?
Considering that 500 million of the things had been sold by this March, a lot of people for whom price *ought to be* a significant factor must have bought one anyway.
Watch that watch!
Why, what with watch wizardry, wonder what we will not ever know? Just imagine if Sherlock Holmes could deduce the existence and recent history of Watson's elder brother just by looking closely at his pocket watch, a modern-day analyst should be able to deduce your secret girl friend's existence and her personal tastes by analysing the molecular-level traces of her perfume and hair spray on your watch, and matching those with a data base. They won't even need to bother looking at the actual data stored in the computing bit! Shame and exposure await you all, ye who buy those things.
Creation and Duplication
You mention the salient point, mouse. It is only fair that the creators of intellectual property should be paid by the users of the same. For the distributors, it's a bit different. Producing a copy of a technical book with many graphs on dead trees once cost real money - far more than typesetting, and the books, with short print runs, were correspondingly expensive. Now that's no longer the case, so the price structure of textbooks (and sheet music) should rightly evolve to reflect technological progress. Strangely enough, that reflection appears quite faint in many cases.
For an editor like the house of Eugen Ulmer, the world has changed drastically in the last 20 or so years and I can understand they lag behind in adapting. Nonetheless, the first editors to find a universally accepted business model that enables easy duplication but provides a fair income per reader for the author and for the editor, will stand to make very serious money.
I have some volumes in the rack next to me that cost nearly as much as the laptop I'm typing this on, but most of that really goes into production and distribution; if I could buy newer electronic copies for 20% or so of their price (whatever reflects the fair cost of electronic publishing), I almost certainly would; and I guess the total number of electronic sales would dwarf the printing run.
Re: "the ship from Momo"
It's a 1973 children's novel by Michael Ende about a girl of the same name, who ends up defeating time thieves (the so-called grey men). In one of the early scenes, Momo and her friends play out an adventure in an imaginary ship in an imaginary thunderstorm. And the ship is cast in a single piece. OK, it's outdated, but still quite well known where I live.
Re: Silly idea
Your metallurgy must be longer ago than you realize. Airbus has introduced laser welding on aluminium sheets long ago for the A380. With the right alloy and right welding parameters, you get a better strength-to-weight ratio than with rivets, which are a pain from a production engineering point of view. The latest fab is of course friction stir welding, which is starting to show up in aerospace products.
Nonetheless, no aircraft I am aware of is made 100% of the same material, there are always a number of different production methods used. And I for one would hate to operate an aircraft that, like the ship from Momo, was all in one piece. Imagine the cost of replacing a danged bit!
Re: Silly idea
They've already begun 3D printing little parts. It's safe to expect those'll grow in size and number with each coming model. Nonetheless, at that size (both of company and product) they won't charge headlong into a technology just for the newness of it.
On the other hand, Ryanair might start selling you 3D printed food (probably with someone else's paid advertisement on it) soon enough.
Re: curioser and curiositier
You never know, they might hit upon the Martian equivalent of the dinosaurs in the next weeks. And then of course, Steven Spielberg won't take long to make a movie about them!
ESA has been a bit more forthcoming today
Here are a couple of images - one in 3D - from OSIRIS. Still panchromatic, but this might be due to the low bit rate from Rosie.
In any case, the closer it gets, the nicer it looks.
EDIT: Looking at the jagged cliffs all around the duck's neck, in stark contrast to the cratered surfaces on top and bottom and the smooth surface below, I wouldn't say it's unimaginable that a number of large pieces of the original comet might have broken off there, and debris collected in the "valley" that is now the neck.
Re: This is driving me crazy
I think you have a slight misunderstanding there.
The daily images released by ESA are those made with the NAVCAM navigation instrument. It has a single CCD and, so far as I could ascertain, no colour filter. That wouldn't be needed for navigation anyway. The OSIRIS camera, on the other hand, has IR, multispectral and colour modes - but we've only been treated to a very few images from it so far (and haven't even been told whether they're panchromatic or what, as far as I could make out).
Re the colour of heavenly bodies, yes, comets are very nearly perfectly black (which is kind of a pity 'cause it makes them so hard to see) but the Moon is not. Its overall reflectivity is about 12%. Moon rocks brought back by the Apollo astronauts are darkish grey, with a very slight yellowish hue. So is the dust you can see at various museums, only darker. Nonetheless, there's an interesting anecdote related by Eugene Cernan, the last man on the moon (on Apollo 17), about an endless discussion relating to the Moon's colour which he had on the way back with Harrison Schmitt, the mission's geologist. And indeed, if you increase the colour saturation of some Moon photos by a factor of ginormous, you see yellow, orange, and blue hues coming out in various places; but they can't be discerned by looking at the Moon with the bare eye (even up close), because they're so weak, and the sunlight is so bright up there that the human eye can only distinguish dazzling light and total darkness in the shadow. It'll be different for Rosetta which is now over 3 times as far from the Sun as we are, so gets less stark illumination. With luck and good camera settings, we may actually be allowed to discern colours.
What did you expect a comet to look like in b&w?
What's surprising and beautiful is there actually seem to be patches of lighter gray that look like ET has been skiing down them - not that you could in cometary gravity, but I've seen less attractive slopes in the Alps. Speaking of the Alps, the thing looks a bit like the lower end of the Hochfeiler glacier, wrapped around some fancy thing out of Mathematica. To me, that's all par for the course.
What will be interesting is to see whether, unlike the Moon, it actually has a distinguishable colour. And just how soft the surface is. And what it's really made of. And when the Grebulons come out looking and pointing at Rosetta.
Hm, OK - maybe try a different flavour next.
Incidentally, I think it's rather a good idea to enable mobile banking for the poor - although you need to be careful with it. The many Grameen-bank-like microcredit projects of recent years had a rather mixed record apparently. It's probably best to limit your target group first (I think people who can actually afford a mobile phone might qualify) and try payment first in regions where the rest of a transaction - the actual delivery of goods as ordered - can reasonably be relied upon.
Re: Quite simple really!
Re: Quite simple really!
It's the fur one with the deep pockets.
Quite simple really!
Every time you make a mobile online transaction, it'll pass through a clearing house; let's call that a gate. Then all goods and services paid through mobile transactions are billed by these institutions. So that all future mobile transactions will pass throug bill gates!
Ever seen one of the French cars near the launch site? It was specified to survive that.
With all this transpiration -
Does anyone know how much of the volatile material will recondense on the comet nucleus after it has passed the sun and vanishes into the black yonder, only to return after many years? You'd think that with so much sweating and possible later dirty rain on the comet, its surface composition will change over the eons.
That's soooo 2007!
Not wanting to spoil their enthusiasm, but considering that the German space research center managed a laser comms linke between two orbiting satellites back in 2008, and achieved a data rate of some 5.6 Gigabits/s, I'd say what NASA did just now is a bit old hat.
Of course, ESA has taken this a step further and they're now using laser comms terminals via a relay saetellite, so you don't even need to be overhead California anymore to laze someone there:
Of course, if the astronauts in the ISS had hand-pointe that beam, it'd be something completely different...
Re: SquanderTwo @ Rustident Spaceniak
Actually, a lot can be done to increase social mobility - and at the same time to promote it and show people it works. Education is an important point, possibly the most important one - on all levels, from childhood to universities; but so are public-service careers, diversity, even public employment schemes in some cases (probably not in Britain right now).
Mind, I don't exactly agree with Mr Piketty's ideas and proposals, but I still maintain that his book raises a few rightful concerns. Where I live, the idea of solidarity is quite popular; the rich (mostly) accept relatively high taxes, though far below 80%, as a necessary evil; and those taxes still don't stop most of them from becoming richer, even if maybe at a lesser rate than those in London. I think Mr Piketty has a right to provoke discussion; and if he can do so in such a sedentary and purely academic forum as El Reg, he might have achieved something.
Re: Rustident Spaceniak Theoretically speaking, the article makes a perfectly....
Matt, you raise two very valid points: The rich can get poor and the poor can get rich. Agreed. Absolutely.
Now let's take a look at the averages. Social mobility is certainly higher in Europe now than it was in 1849, and thank your deity of choice for that. Nonetheless, average income and wealth of the top 10% and 1% of the income scale have risen in the last 30 years, despite the various financial crises - and risen more than average incomes have - and the top 1% more than the top 10%. At the same time, the bottom 20% have seen their income remain nearly flat. In some cases, moreover, the part of their income depending on welfare has actually risen, which means they're getting less self-sufficient. That may be due to their lack of skills, as often reported, or of ethic, which you suggest; I tend to agree. But what the reasons are, is not necessarily a factor driving the acts of those trying to capitalize politically on inequality.
My point is, some agitators have managed to turn this insistance on victimhood into bloody revenge (as some agitators are trying against immigrants now). The most prominent example that comes to mind was a Russian medicine student in 1917; result, tens of millions of deaths. It's not something I would like to read in the history of the UK, or any other European country, written in 2114.
Theoretically speaking, the article makes a perfectly valid argument -
however, while we may not be going back to 1849 style of abject poverty of the masses, the inequality curve has certainly changed shape in the last 50 or so years; in fact, it appears to be getting steeper at the very top end, and more so for wealth than for income. That's a natural consequence of high returns on capital; which, in turn, is a predictable consequence of the absence of competition from other economic models. At the same time, we appear to be seeing the formation of a new type of "lower class" - people who are born near the bottom end of the wealth scale and have proportionally little hope of ever making it higher. Never mind they all probably have a nicer TV set than I do, they will still remain essentially dependent on welfare.
What it all boils down to, is that there is a *perceived* level of inequality, not just of wealth but also of development chances, that might very well lead to social unrest and all its wealth-reducing consequences. Or it might not; but any government would certainly be well advised to consider the possibility. If the price to avoid that is to raise taxes for the very rich, I could understand those willing to pay it.
It's the first time in twenty years I've been tempted to write software again!
Really, I never could get used to coding in C, and somehow never had time to learn any of the newfangled ones. But this thing sounds like a nice, clean new approach that migh be easy to learn for someone who still remembers Turbo Pascal. I'll sure give it a try tonight, and see how far I get.
Not that I could lay claim to being anywhere like a developer, just a poor amateur. But if it's something usable for us amateurs, I'll write a personal email of thanks to that Mr Federighi.
Re: Mystic Meg
In general, German unions never expect to get all they ask for. They will typically negotiate with the employers for weeks and then settle for between half and two-thirds. Nonetheless, it's their business to first ask for a lot.
Of course, as some others have pointed out, the point in case here is really "retail wages vs warehouse wages". I don't expect Amazon to give way there, and I don't expect they'll have to. Re seeking employment elsewhere: It's not the 90's anymore either. Amazon is in pretty much the same situation: They need someone to run their warehouses after all. So there's a kind of balance of power, or of risk. Which makes it likely the unions will get at least some of what they ask for.
The batteries of the future -
...might very well not be Li-Ion batteries we know today. They might involve lithium, say as Li-polymer or Li-S batteries; which might be recharged or exchanged at what used to be gas stations. On the other hand, they might just as well be fuel cells or indeed flow cells. In that case we'd probably not be looking for lithium so much bur for vanadium - which conveniently is often found in iron ore. Or indeed, the batteries for the electric car of the future might be based on dilithium crystals. We just can't tell at the moment.
In any case, I shouldn't put my money in lithium mining anytime soon. Much rather into rare earth mining.
I hope they will do another moonshot project -
but they probably won't before other companies like Embraer or Airbus take more of their business away from them.
Dontcha know, there's an app for that!
Or against, whatever...
That's the difference between censorship and privacy
Asking the Spanish website to delete the info would be censorship. Asking Google to remove the link is not necessarily.
In fact, you might create a website about all sorts of people and post a link - say a direkt permanent link - to the Gonzalez story: No problem But it is a problem for Mr Gonzalez if this matter is the first that comes up whenever anyone searches his name.
The case is just a reminder that there's a difference between raw information and search results.
So if a tree falls over in Brooklyn and Google doesn't link it, has it really fallen?
The fact is, the original information about Mr Gonzalez will stay just where it always was, and anyone taking a serious interest in him - such as who might wish to sell him a house - will hopefully not rely on just a quick web search to find out what they know. Doubtless, the local paper or whoever published his little matter back in 1995 has their own searchable archive. If someone is just too lazy for decent research, it's not the end of history!
Trouble with the ipod is, most everyone who wants one, has got one apparently.
The only exception to that rule seem to be kids who're just old enough to write "ipod" on their wish lists; sure a steady market, but also a declining one; and then, people in hitherto-poor countries just coming into the sort of money that affords iThings. Seems to me neither of these populations would mind having an iWatch instead of a Pod; but then I'm not a market analyst.
In any case, I can't see people buying a watch that needs recharging every few days, like the Samsung one that was recently discussed here. That would be too much like rewinding your watch every night and morning!
Then again, I've long dreamed of that laser projector built into my wristwatch... (sigh)
Just to be pedantic: two weeks over 20 minutes calculates as 14*24*3=1008, which is roughly a hundred thousand per cent improvement, or roughly a thousandfold.
Just what are they droning on about?
They photographed the SK president's blue house? A quick google search reveals hundreds of decent-resolution pictures! Or are they really looking for another blue place that's not altogether a residence as such?
Beat me to it! (1.4.)
What the two studies together infer would go a long way towards explaining the sorry state of society. If indeed the very traits that make men attractive to women and influential correlate with their being less than average intelligent, why, we're all doomed!
Glad to see it's April 1st.
Re: Moving at 800 m/s
Relative to the comic, err, comet, parbleu!
- YARR! Pirates walk the plank: DMCA magnets sink in Google results
- Pics Whisper tracks its users. So we tracked down its LA office. This is what happened next
- Review Xperia Z3: Crikey, Sony – ANOTHER flagship phondleslab?
- Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
- Human spacecraft dodge COMET CHUNKS pelting off Mars