820 posts • joined 7 Dec 2011
This survey seems confused and is aimed at two different types of people. Did someone knock this out quickly before leaving for the day?
Do google test?
Surely this is one if the things you'd test before releasing it or do google assume all their users are super cheap.
Who says he wants to spy on his people?
Maybe rather than doing this for spying reasons they're doing it to stop the US from spying on them. Uneven if it's for the purpose of spying on Russians in a NSA / GCHQ way it would be hypocritical for us to complain and point fingers at Russia.
Re: Good. Now it's time to end retransmission fees.
Of course the cost gets passed onto the customer like every other cost because companies have to earn enough money to cover their cos and make a profit to allow for bad times or expansion. To do it any other way is a failure.
Re: London is a stupid, stupid place to encourage a technology startup boom
Cambridge also nearly London prices for homes, it has London style traffic problems and yet it has none of the conveniences of London including the wages.
That's why a lot of companies struggle to find talent in Cambridge despite the university being there and then they end up moving down to London.
I would say tax avoidance is most certainly evil.
Those taxes help keep everything running. Even though google claims they make intangibles their goods still rely on utilities working so helping pay for them isn't asking too much.
Just look at the US with it's infrastructure slowly starting to fall apart. Is that what everyone else wants? A handful if super rich monopolies a bunch of life-threatening busted up roads and bridges?
I certainly don't.
Re: He's an actor
No one expects him to know everything but when you're a reasonably intelligent chap you realise it's best not to talk about things you don't have any idea about especially if your fans are going trust you.
First blackberry, then apple and this
Wow, is there no one Google won't "borrow" from?
That's not completely true. It has to apply to google as much as anyone else.
Google takes a copy of my data for their cache and to be honest they hold onto it for too long. They certainly don't come around the next day and see a page is removed then just update their cache.
Re: Firefox all the way !
Still on snow leopard? Let me guess you're one of those texh "geniuses" that can't handle change due to not really being all that bright with tech but that hasn't stop you from mucking about and putting your computer in such a state that any change actually bad.
Firefox works like a dream on my 2013 MBP, my 2006 thinkpad and my eee 901. My guess is your real problem is behind the keyboard.
Yeah except Google is taking all the profit for someone else's work. They're basically providing content rather than being a search engine. That's fine except they're not generating their own content. They're mooching off someone else and then not allowing them to profit from it.
The numbers aren't entirely accurate as NPD exclude custom built laptops. Everyone reporting on their findings misses that bit out. Given both windows and MacBooks allow customised system purchases I would say their numbers are higher (especially windows).
Chromebooks are toys. I can't see how anyone would take them seriously especially given that storing everything in the cloud means the NSA has access to all your stuff.
You can't screw your employees on wages and expect consumer spending to climb. That and wearable computing devices still largely look like something strictly for dorks.
4k TVA look absolutely gorgeous so I'd say they are very welcome. The only reason I'd pass on one now is the lack of content that really takes advantage of it.
Re: Excuse me?
Because poor people in SF aren't like poor people in the UK. They don't lay there and take the shafting like a bitch and the local government realises that.
Re: GitHub & businesses
Who let grandpa on the internet again? Time to give him his pills.
Which version are you including? Windows 7 ultimate is showing up as $179 on amazon.com right now.
Vista ultimate was far more expensive..like over $250. Windows 7 was over $200 too if you had bought it in 2009.
and vista's launch cost was $450 http://www.engadget.com/2006/05/30/windows-vista-ultimate-450-us/
But even if you take your prices into account, that only just works out because of Apple's price structure change. In the next 8 years, if prices stay the same, OS X is 80% cheaper.
That and $19 covers as many installs as you want. Apple even has a help article on it http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4854
If you want to stay legal on Windows, it'll cost you for each machine.
Don't worry fandroids, I'm sure Apple will completely disappear next year. Then you won't have to be angry and butt hurt.
There aren't too many comments here. The fandroids must have to get over some serious butt hurt before they come in.
The reg keeps taking a bigger dive into the shitter anyway so it's no surprise.
And the reg has no right to call something a pisspoor redesign when they've got this dumbass flash heavy O2 business theme going on that brings the website to a crawl.
Yeah, thanks Reg for running an ad theme that cripples a computer capable of running high end games, visually processing gigs of mapping data and many other tasks that should be more processor intensive than a lame ad campaign.
I'm ad blocking this site permantly. It's freaking ridiculous.
I really like amazon but it's really hypocritical of them to complain about apple doing something similar with ebooks when they're basically doing it with everything.
This is a good change.
Got to make life easier for the NSA.
Re: Battery life
My MacBook Pro is at least 2 years old and the battery life is pretty much the same. Maybe paying a bit more for a computer results in better hardware or maybe you don't use your computer in such a way that's good for the battery.
Re: You are the Product.... Just accept it
Your analogy would make more sense if rather than you buying me a free drink you got paid for me being seen drinking your drink. Their whole business model revolves around "free" services and I'm positive they're not a charity.
Re: Apple's brand requires keeping out the plebs
I'm not sure you even understand what Chav means. Perhaps you shouldn't repeat things your grand kids say when they visit you in the retirement home.
It takes time to remove the NSA packages.
Are they that deseperate to appeal to people that they're going to add what is perhaps the most broken language to app engine? If you can't grasp python then you shouldn't be writing code.
Beards and masculinity go together because women generally can't grow beards. Some nations have a corporate culture that frowns upon facial hair but these are generally nations that are run by sexually repressed religious nut bags.
And anyone saying facial hair is unhygienic is just butt hurt that they can't grow a beard.
Re: Beards are Best?
Yeah, if you eat like a pig. For people who eat like humans it's not an issue.
Re: Maybe they just don't want to!
I worked at a company where the majority of employees (and managers) where women and IT was very much a man's department with the exception of the IT director. There could possibly be a more woman friendly company and they still opted to avoid IT both internal and external applicants.
I'm sure sexism plays a part in area like Silicon Valley where you have a bunch of 20 year old guys in a company but that is not the vast majority of IT work and I suspect any reasonable human understands that. I suspect women just aren't attracted to it.
Who can blame them? I question why guys want to work on a IT help desk or even as a Db admin. The only attractive job imo is programming and while I enjoy it the job can be unnecessarily stressful and unrewarding in some companies.
Re: forced obsolescence, Apple douchebaggery
I know, I'm hoghly upset the latest copy of OSX doesn't run on my early 90's mac. They just don't care.
Duh, it's hard to do real work on a touch screen just like it's hard to play games on a touch screen. It's a poor interface for a lot of things but no one wants to admit it.
Depends if they're necessary patents or not. If its not then they can get away with charging more because you don't need it. If everyone needs it then you get a smaller chunk per company but probably make more over all.
I'm glad they're attempting to secure their device but it does make google look like complete hypocrites given the way they install chrome is done to by pass windows restrictions. I guess it's only acceptable when they do it.
Re: So we know who the replacement for Anna Leach is
I think the register hires people that aspire to become daily mail writers. Can't call them journalists, that'd be a lie.
They should have told people to suck it up on dividends and put the money to better use.
What did people expect?
You're supposed to pay sales tax already. No one wants to report it, they're shopping online more so they will come after you. They're not going to just give up the majority of their sales tax income.
Re: Several problems however.
It's google's problem because they built a very insecure way of adding other sources. The problem is already solved. You do it like a package managed and only allow sources you've added.
If I had to guess google didn't want to that because they can appear open while at the same time scaring most people into staying with them. If my guess is wrong, I'd like them to explain why they've implemented it so poorly and require me to make my phone vulnerable to anything just to use one credible source of my choice.
Re: I'm confused...
You can give it away for free. A change in habits or accounts isn't enough to prove anything.
So how much do you get paid to spout such rubbish? If you're having to jump through hoops that's more a sign of your mental capacity.
A 3 year old android phone simply will not out perform any reasonably priced current release tablet. If you're going to say something so stupid then back it up with proof.
Re: Cure worse than disease
It's rates as one of the worst at catching problems. What did you expect from a freebie that generates no revenue?
It's nice having a phone whose ecosystem isn't a complete cock-up because it means having iplayer for years and it just works.
Makes me want to buy a chromebook so I can make it exciting and lose access to everything.
Re: Smartphones are for yesterday's cool kids.
I'd argue they still do why else wear pita contacts or risk laser eye surgery?
Nice work on try make it look like some sort payback in and on going feud. Chrome isn't part of WebKit so any component developer would remove the unused code.
Re: Wow so he knew about all the chip roadmaps.....
So he was a designer but designed nothing? That's some great logic there. Are you 10 years old?
Maybe no one cares about playboy
Nothing stops you from view porn on the web with an iPhone and surely it benefits playboy to make one mobile site that both android and iOS and whoever else can use rather than a bunch of custom apps to support. If they have that already then maybe they're finding it hard to accept a lot of young people find it too tame.
So really it should say assembled in the US.
Isn't this what the reg implemented awhile ago? Seems a bit hypocritical to have a go a Facebook for something you're doing already.
Re: That'll upset the Apple Cart(el)
They don't providing you're not so stupid to assume you should go through some random installer asking for your root password.
- Review Is it an iPad? Is it a MacBook Air? No, it's a Surface Pro 3
- Game Theory The agony and ecstasy of SteamOS: WHERE ARE MY GAMES?
- Hello, police, El Reg here. Are we a bunch of terrorists now?
- Worstall on Wednesday Wall Street woes: Oh noes, tech titans aren't using bankers
- Kate Bush: Don't make me HAVE CONTACT with your iPHONE