Re: Not quite the same
Look, you're preaching to the converted here! Amen, fella!
226 posts • joined 1 Dec 2011
Look, you're preaching to the converted here! Amen, fella!
Sure, I've got the previous generation of that, and I use it for my NAS. But the difference is this thing comes setup with all the software you need - plug and play. The HP box is just hardware.
I'm not saying the Qnap isn't overpriced (as is most of their stuff), but it's not an apples to apples comparison, and they have to make money somewhere.
> and 83x83 is less than 7000 pixels
Sure, but it's hard to have 0.6660026534 of a pixel.
"Sharp's new TV has over 7,000 pixels"
Wow, an 83x83 pixel resolution? Welcome to 20th century mobile phone screen technology.
@ Carling > "Then Download and install Linux on your old Mac"
This is an 18 month old MBA. And thanks, I'm not going to willy-wave, but yes, I knew Mac OS is based on FreeBSD. In fact, I pre-date FreeBSD by a good 15 years.
My Mac, since Yosemite, is slowly and surely pushing me back to Windows... and from what I've seen of Windows 10 on my experimentally cheap tablet (Linx 8), I quite like it!
I must be misunderstanding something - if these bad boys are so easily customisable, why is it so hard to put in a nice clean Euro VI or VII (or whatever it will be in 2020) compliant engine?
Or if it's the average of a company's range of vehicles which have to be below an amount of something, do what Aston Martin did and have one small model to balance it out?
They can sure stuff a lot of data in their ring.
I was about to say the same thing - using a 3D scale which goes up towards the right, means you can have declining values without it looking quite as bad as if it was flat!
I love the fact that it's Cable talking about the merits of streaming TV. I thought Virgin and the like hated Netflix.
"Apple icon's deposition won't be given to the public"
I read that as Apple icon's decomposition won't be given to the public.
But isn't this draft law designed to be generalised and a catch-all? So it's basically a law against using legal and obviously immoral loopholes?
It's basically saying, "if you utilise a scheme which clearly diverts profits out of the UK, you have to tell us, and then justify those actions"
I'm not sure how you'd work around something like that, but then I'm not a devious wanker corporate accountant.
Yes, indeed - I was also disappointed Goonhilly was no longer open, though I wish I knew about the Segway tours then! And yes, big recommendation for Porthcurno too, I was the only one there when I went (out of season), and had a personal guided tour everywhere, even to the beach to go cable spotting!
Vodafone. Say no more.
Dr Gui, do you reckon he's a down to earth guy - ie. WYSIWYG?
The one I'm picturing (and just confirmed with a Google image search) is the word Vans with the trailing top of the V extending over the ans:
Weird - I'm the least fashion-concious person around, and I can even picture the Vans logo without having to look it up. I thought it was quite a distinctive and well known logo, not sure why the EU (or whoever) came to a different conclusion.
I thought going the soft-SIM route violated the requirements of GSM certification, or something? Or have Apple managed to work out (bribe/convince/blackmail) these issues with the relevant authorities?
Couldn't agree more. As much as I love my tricked out Phantom and its capabilities, my Hubsan gets many hours more use day to day.
The Phantom only comes out on special occasions, when I can really be bothered - it feels more like work, more of a chore.
I suspect maybe a small portion of the former, but more likely a large helping of the latter.
> You're missing the bit about the brick only having 1/2 the size battery capacity compared to the paddle phone
<thuds head against desk>
> Why is it some people are so insanely angry about the idea of a telephone just being a telephone?
Insanely angry is a bit melodramatic, but anyway; because people keep coming into stories about pocket sized but virtually fully fledged computers - commonly known as "smartphones" - and writing sneery comments about how an old fashioned brick of a telephone which could do nothing but make calls and send texts lasts twenty times longer on a charge.
Well, duh, no shit.
What the fuck is a GTE1170???
After a quick internet search, I think you should consider the following:
Infinite battery life - much better than your Samsung GTE1170 and Nokia 515 - and about as much functionality.
6s = 6sapphire
It makes it more snarky, for sure, and as much as I zzzzz at Apple stuff, I zzzzz tenfold at snark. Maybe I'm getting old, but there's a bit too much snark round here for my liking, and the snark is increasing. Maybe it should be renamed The Snark Register.
Just wanted to see how many times I could mention snark in one comment.
Just sprinkle hash and salt and whatever on the stolen plaintext passwords, and compare to the hashed values in the database. You don't need to know the plaintext password in the database to be able to compare it to the "stolen" one.
Given Helium floats up, which would be lighter, a Helium filled drive or a vacuum filled drive?
Not only "Apple owners" - didn't even work via Firefox on my work-supplied MacBook, had to use *spit* Safari
Will they fit a lightning conductor?
> "RootMetrics tries to make calls in areas where there is no coverage"
In other news, man dies while trying to breathe underwater.
Indeed - if I caught this, I'd swear, then factory reset, resync all my contacts, calendar, etc from Google, be glad I had my photos auto-uploading to Dropbox, and be on my way with a clean phone.
Indeed, though I suspect if it was that simple, it would have been done.
I don't think anyone's ever thought it sensible to entrust hotel provided safes with their priceless family jewels, but unless the cleaner also dabbles in locksmithing and/or hacking electronics, they're probably still fine for keeping housekeeping's opportunist mitts off my passport and a paltry bit of foreign shrapnel.
You're still missing the point.
1. Firstly, people spend lots of money (more than £200) on things of dubious value all the time (toys). I, for instance, dropped £500 on a quadcopter just last year, and I can count on one hand the number of times it's been used. I'm not going to apologise for being a somewhat frivolous wealthy geek.
2. You're still thinking that people want this to use just as a watch.
3. There's nothing wrong with manufacturers trying new things - this may not be a perfected concept yet, but it could be a stepping stone to something which is. If human-kind sat back and didn't bother with that first (likely to fail) concept, we'd still be sitting in the dirt and bashing each other with animal bones. Every piece of technology you use has likely had many generations/iterations before it, some which may have failed, not sold well, and were criticised by idiots saying "I don't see the point in this, this is of dubious value", but without them, we wouldn't be where we are.
Not sure where you got "integrated strap" from.
From the article: "The watch's strap is a rather ugly grey plastic thing, but the device can use any 22mm-wide strap."
So you're free to use any 22mm-wide circus-tent lanyard that fits round your gargantuan wrist.
Oh, as a manufacturer of smartwatches, I didn't realise you alone represented all of humanity.
My apologies, I'll go away and create something else, and also let Pebble know - though given they only sold 400,000 smartwatches last year, they're probably already aware.
When the glasses are pretty much a fully-fledged computer on your face, 300MB isn't so depressing.
Jesus, how much of an old fart do I feel when someone describing themselves as an "old fart" thinks 300MB was a large hard drive.
Your 300MB hard drive computer with an OS taking up just 3MB; did it have a 5MP camera capable of 720P recording, 1.2GHz processor, Wifi, Bluetooth, gyroscope, accelerometer, magnetometer, ambient light sensor, proximity sensor, and all the drivers, stacks and APIs to support the above and more?
RAM != Storage
Hmm, that's true. Kind of like how silly it would be to start running many different postal systems across the nation, duplicating infrastructure, feet on the ground covering the same areas, backhauls, etc, we'd never start doing tha...oh
As P Lee said, that's A Good Thing. If you have a load of contactless cards in your wallet, surely you want control over which one the till takes payment from?
Regarding the guy's failed attempt to pay by bonk, quite possibly either he'd spent up to his contactless transaction limit for that day, or maybe it had randomly decided to make him use a PIN. Y'know, like it's designed to do. For security.
Interestingly, and the opposite side of the coin, when Barclaycard foisted a contactless card onto me a couple of years ago, because I hardly used the credit card (rather use my bank's debit card), I phoned up my bank to see if they could give me a contactless debit card. When told they didn't do them yet, I found my usage of the contactless credit card going up - when faced with paying for something small, I'd look at my wallet and see two cards; one which you just tap on the till and you're on your way, and the other which you slide it in, wait a second, try to remember the PIN on that card, enter it, find one of the keys doesn't work properly, re-enter it, wait a second, then you're through.
Given I often have to mash the card against the reader to make it recognise it, I think the fears about thieves being able to "nick £10 from my by just walking past" are typical tin-foil luddite views with no basis in fact.
Sure, if someone nicks your wallet, you're more exposed to small (sub-£20) losses, but I've found I can't make more than one or two contactless purchases in a short space of time before it refuses and prompts to do it the old way (PIN), and anyway, your bank is still liable for the loss if you've taken "reasonable precautions" (ie. don't leave your wallet on your dashboard) and let them know as soon as you know it's gone.
Hmm, uptake of pay-by-phone is slow? Well, I've had NFC capable phones for oooh 3 years, and through all that time none of them have supported a payment provider (or no payment provider has supported it due to their overbearing requirements).
No, they bought Beats for $3 BILLION, not $3 million.
No, you're absolutely right, silly me.
It'll be in the last place they look. Always is.
While I don't wholly agree with the fervent anger there, it did make me smile, so I applaud and thumbs up your rant
What's amazing is I hadn't even heard of Beats' streaming service before news of this deal broke, and apparently it's highly successful and/or worth a massive amount of money.
Sheesh, now I feel old and out of touch.
> The article keeps changing, the string quoted in this title isn't there any more.
Otherwise known as "developing news"
BAH, the bootnote wasn't there before!!!