Re: Here's an idea

Can't change the voicemail number? Apparently you can..https://discussions.apple.com/thread/3412917?start=90&tstart=0

Although I expect that's a requirement of the GSM standard rather than a choice by apple..

Re: pre-release software may not be final version

It's not unusual for any company (Apple included) to change things between the first beta and the final release. Whether those changes are bug fixes, new features or even new graphics. That's the reason we have betas. So a company (or individual programmer) can ensure that the software is tested, it functions well and that users can work with the user interface .

This last part is actually important (and seemingly forgotten by some companies). You can have the best functionality available in your program, and the program can pass all the reliability tests with flying colours, but if the users have trouble with the UI, they'll think it is (at best) a good product with a bad UI, and, at worst, a pile of crap.

So, this whole article seems to be saying that iOS 7 has crap icons (and while I like them, I can see why people might have a problem) and that Apple are following normal beta test procedures. Unlike, say, Google who seem to use the "Beta" tag as a sales term to tell people they are getting the most up to date product possible.

Re: Freesat

"From experience it has to be a really bloody tall tree,"

Not necessarily. My friend's old house had the Sky dish on the edge of the roof, but because his garden (and house) backed on to a garden that was nearly 20 feet above it, all it took was a relatively small Oak and a few bushes to essentially torpedo his reception.

That's an extreme example though, and, I'll be honest, I am not sure how good the contractor who installed the dish was.

The problem with the banking industry today is that it (the retail side at least, the investment side brings a whole other set of problems) seems more interested in introducing interesting new ways for customers to get money, and less interested in securing that money.

Think NFC bank cards.. I can think of a number of ways a person could lose money with that..

Also, I am not entirely convinced that the system NatWest uses to give you money if you lose your card is secure (although in fairness, I have not looked in to this so could very well be wrong).

TBH, I fail to see any advantage of this new idea for the customer. I can see the advantage for the banks, in that they don't have to issue cards, which while it may be a tiny cost, is still a cost they can cut, but I feel the potential security problems outweigh the cost savings..

Re: How to save the high street

The other way of looking at it is...

The Cheap simplicity of picking up your computer, ordering the item, then waiting for it for at least a day, only to find that when the courier or delivery service does turn up, they just stick a note through the door saying they attempted to deliver the item but couldn't, and they've taken back to the depot so you can arrange delivery (in which case you may well have wasted 2 days off instead of one), or you can go pick it up (in which case you still have the problem of cost of transport and parking unless you can walk to the delivery centre).

Against the joy of driving to the shops, paying for parking, then driving home a couple of hours later with the item in hand.

Personally I am happy to shop on and off line, but it is a case of swings and roundabouts.

Re: How to save the high street

That may have been the reason in the past, but I don't think it is now. The simple fact is that people need to eat and (in a lot of towns) the only place you can do your food shopping is in the supermarket. I live in quite an affluent town, and until the end of the 90s, we had a good selection of shops you could buy food in. A few butchers, Kennedy's (for sausages), 2 fishmongers, 1 bakery and a couple of greengrocers, one small Sainsbury's and a Safeways. Now, in 2013, we have 1 butcher, 1 baker, 2 branches of Sainsburys (within a few hundred metres of each other, but both are apparently profitable) and one large Tescos a couple of miles away.

Now, any retail expert will tell you that when trying to get people to buy more, over half the battle is getting them in the doors. Once they are in, selling to them is a lot easier. Supermarkets have the advantage that unless you order food online (which isn't an option for a lot of people), in most towns (mine included) you need to go in to a Supermarket. Once you are in there, it's far easier to persuade you to buy all sorts of additional items (CDs, DVDs, Books, Clothes, Electrical items etc) that you wouldn't necessarily buy otherwise.

This also means that the supermarkets can afford to sell those accessories at a loss, driving more of their competitors out of business.

Re: Expandable case design

Imagination and profitability..

I've seen some amazing ideas for interfaces on computers, giving rise to all sorts of expansion ideas. None of which came to pass because the interface was proprietary and the host platform was not profitable. The problem with relying on proprietary interfaces like that is if you buy a device that does, and the company manufacturing it stops (for whatever reason), then you are usually screwed as far as further expansion goes.

Open standards, such as USB, Bluetooth and SD cards (Micro, Mini or whatever) have their faults, but you can guarantee that even if the manufacturer of your phone goes tits up, someone will still be manufacturing peripherals you can use with them.

Yep

You've posted pretty much what I was going to.. So, Upvoted..

The important issue here is consent. It may be that she spends her days wearing very little apart from the tiniest examples of underwear (or even nothing), but the fact is if she does that professionally, she consents to those photographers taking photos. She presumably gets paid as well.

What she has not consented to is having a creep follow her round taking photos of her undies on his iPad.

Because sticking something that looks at least vaguely like a pair of glasses up a woman's skirt would look more normal?

Re: This Cluster is so POWERFUL

What on earth has Windows got to do with it? Your apparent prejudice against Windows aside, it is possible to build a fairly capable Windows machine for 3-400 pounds. OK, it won't play the latest games well (but, neither would a Linux machine costing the same), but it will be a perfectly good workhorse.

Anyway, this guy has done exactly what the Pi was designed to enable. He has found a problem (him needing a cheap cluster) and sat down and and worked out a way to use to Pi to do that..

Re: Fans overkill?

Surely it is better to have too much cooling than not enough?

Re: Whatever...

The problem with that being that what they are doing is legal, so the government would have no basis on which to freeze their assets..

Re: Don't be so quick to mock

On the other hand, Bing Translate was probably designed by a load of geeks.. I think it's a fair bet that at least one would be able to get hold of an English to Klingon dictionary (or some Klingon text and the associated English translation) relatively easily. That isn't necessarily so with more culturally important languages.

Re: I'm pretty sure it's not "telemetrics"

So, it would be telemetrics then, as Microsoft are probably quite far away from the PCs of 99.9% of Windows users. It's just whatever sensors and monitoring systems they used are near the user.

Re: Internet connection required

"It's extremely likely that MS will insist on "Always On". Given that they pressed ahead with (un)Metro UI despite howls of anguish, it's also likely they will not back down here either."

Be careful counting those chickens. There have been rumblings from within MS that the Always On "Requirement" is not a requirement at all. Merely that software publishers can require that the connection is always on. Much like they can do with the current xbox and playstation.

"MS is making a bomb from its "gold" XBox subscription, or whatever it is called, where the peons pay it a monthly tithe, so MS would rather enhance that business model, even it it means a few rebels leave the Xbox platform. MS doesn't care about those weirdos anyway..."

And? MS is a business. You don't want Xbox Gold, not having it will not stop you using the xbox (unless you like multiplayer games).

"On a related note, I hear that there are ads plastered everywhere in the XBox "experience" even for customers that paid in full for the console and for the subscription. That would really p*ss me off, why do people tolerate this abuse of their custom?

In the same way that people tolerate those non-skippable anti-piracy ads on DVDs that they PAID for also, I guess. Fools!"

Get off your high horse and actually *try* an xbox, will you? You get ads for services and products available using the xbox (such as lovefilm and netflix). It's nothing like the Ubuntu Unity style sell out you appear to be implying it is.

Re: saintcrockoshit

"The challenge isn't about experiencing poverty but surely highlighting poverty whilst earning money through sponsorship."

I agree. If Lester had merely wanted to experience poverty, surely he needn't have gone to the bother of writing about it. Writing about it, however, does highlight it.

Also, can you ever truly experience poverty if you know that at the end of the week, you are going to have enough money to cover your bills, other expenses, and, I dare say, a few "luxuries"?

Re: share a drive app ?

You would need Private Hire insurance, as standard car insurance does not cover paying passengers.

Re: Be careful for what you ask for, you might get it!

The NRA may not be a branch of the US Government, but they seem to be able to wield a staggering amount of power over the senate.

Re: Whilst I can see the value.....

"Hang on... but your logic seems incomplete.

You claim that something that costs the utility company (such as a smart meter) is really costing me."

It does.

"But surely this means that something that saves a utility company money (such as not needing to employ meter readers) saves me money too?

You can't claim one without accepting the other... unless you are simply looking for a Daily Mail friendly way to bash the utility companies!"

Yes, you can. What will happen is that any savings they make will be paid to the shareholders as dividends..

Re: Audiophile....

Expectations seem to have dropped considerably, the only plus side seems to be that less people are now satisfied with truly awful bargain basement headphones.

No, seemingly they are happy to pay a small fortune for truly awful bargain basement headphones that have been blinged up a bit.

BTW, although I have always been sceptical about Beats headphones and other Monster products, when I last bought a proper home pair of headphones, I did test a selection of headphones (including various beats models) with various kinds of music. The Beats headphones ranged from £90 to over £200, and did well on hip hop, but awfully on everything else.

Eventually, I settled on a £70 pair of Sennheiser DJ headphones that did a good job on all the music (and, IMO, beat the Beats on hip hop as well). Yes, I did include classical music in the test, and all the music was from Audio CDs.

Re: Time to die

Flash isn't from Microsoft.. You can bet if this artlicle was about Silverlight, he'd be in here criticising it like a shot.

Having said that, Silverlight never really took off anyway so I doubt anyone would bother writing articles about other companies dropping support for it.

Re: The wisdom of the crowd!

I cite Twitter (or at least most of the bits I have seen) as evidence it is true.

Re: I'd completely missed their pricing

I seem to remember when I went from 2g to 3g, initially, I didn't really notice the difference (apart from the fact I was now able to download podcasts on the phone at a reasonable speed). I had one of the early "smart" phones (a T Mobile branded HTC Tytn II running Windows Mobile). I downloaded the odd app, but nothing really heavy on data, but I did download the odd podcast. One thing that I did make a fair amount of use of though was a full web browser (both IE and Opera Mobile). Same on the N95 that replaced it.

Then I got an iPhone. Suddenly I had access to lots of apps that needed data. This is where I feel I really got the full advantage of 3G, but the tariffs were always limited (which limits the use of 3G). Then, T Mobile introduced the Full Monty package, with Unlimited data and now I find I can do things that I'd have never dreamed of before, like listening to higher quality on line radio streams for hours, and thanks to iTunes Match, I can carry my entire record collection (several hundred albums) and just stream the music I want, rather than be limited to whatever happens to be stored on the phone at the time.

Now, I have received all the advertising bumpf from EE telling me how great 4G is and how "little" it costs, although seeing as it would cost me nearly twice what I am paying to get a package anywhere near what I am on now, and I wouldn't actually get that much of an advantage from LTE over 3G, I won't be upgrading for a while.

Maybe when EE has some competition, they'll bring the prices down a little, or up the data allowances, I'll reconsider. However, I've done a little looking into US pricing and based on that, I doubt they'll be improving their offer even when there is competition in the market.

Re: 4KB RAM ?

Agreed...

Actually one of the lecturer's on my degree thought the same.. Even though this was the mid nineties and the average PC had at least a couple of meg of Ram, he set us one of our first programming tests on a "Flight" board. Can't find a link ATM, but these were basic 68000 powered motherboards that had a grand total of 32K of usable RAM. We had to write a few programs in 68K Assembler. These programs were designed for specific tasks.

His reason for teaching us this? That the 68K processor had a nice assembler syntax that was similar enough to Intel x86 to make x86 assembler easier to learn, but different enough that we would have to work to learn it. Also, the 32k of RAM required us to code efficiently. Code efficiently in Assembler and you'll be surprised at what you can achieve with very few resources, even in the bloated world of modern GUIs.

Re: @Tony

One point every who defends this woman (and presumably Amazon, Apple, Google, Starbucks et al who are all doing the same on a larger scale) appears to be missing is that no one has suggested that what is being done is illegal. Immoral and wrong, maybe, but not illegal. But what is legal and what is right aren't always the same things.

Re: Show us the code

"It's about money, period.".

Odd thing to say. Of course it's about Money. Why do you think Microsoft, Samsung, Apple, Foxconn etc are in business? They are in business to make money. Even Google is in business to make money, although they don't make money directly from the users or by selling Android, they do it by selling advertising.

Re: Mmmmmm...

Well, for one thing, I doubt Foxconn manufacture these phones and then give them to the company that ordered them for free, so I suspect the money will come from Samsung, LG, HTC etc..

Re: Live in purgatory.......

This is what happens if you aren't selective with your choice if friends on facebook.

Re: "Tom Cruise" - Hollywoods permier scientology creepozoid

Became corporate? You do realise that Hollywood has been run by corporations since at least the 20s?

Re: No biggie

For one thing, we don't know for sure if MS are doing this (although with the amount of rumours around, TBH, it seems likely).

However, I think requiring an always on connection is a staggeringly bad idea. Not everyone has a reliable connection, and some have a connection that will be too slow, or has data limits.

You say that there are people who live always online lives, They can do so without any requirement for the rest of us to do so.

Now, IF microsoft do enforce this requirment, and IF it offers REAL benefits for the consumer (and I do not mean online play or the ability to communicate with friends as these are already being offered without the requirement for always online), it could be good.

Re: My excuse...

My employer allows me to do outside work, but they do charge for it (which is a good thing as it means I am apparently covered by their liability insurance in the event something should go wrong and I am sued). They charge enough per hour that most people think twice when asking for my help.

It's funny really. People in most careers are not expected to take their work home. People don't ask a surgeon to perform surgery. They don't ask taxi drivers for a lift. They don't ask an undertaker to bury a relative for free. They don't expect shop workers to go and sell them something, yet as soon as you tell people you do anything to do with computers, regardless of what it is, they either come up with problems they are having and ask you about it, or fix their PC.

I'm regularly asked questions like "Which Laptop is better, the Dell XPS-1500 or the Lenovo Thinkpad 7x5" (I know they aren't actual model numbers, just example), when I don't tend to keep up with computer model numbers unless I am actually looking to buy one myself, so wouldn't have a clue.

Re: This just in

Indeed. While I am no expert on hacking (although I did do a CCNA a few years back, so have a fair idea of how networks work at the packet level, if you know what sort of response a given system will give, it's possible to use a script to try a few ports looking for that response.

Going on to the main topic of the article, I think the root of the problem is twofold. First, technology is moving faster than most people can cope with. SCADA systems will stay in place for years. It can cost a lot of money to replace a mid to large size one, and they need as near to 100% uptime as they can get. Even the likes of Npower and other similarly sized companies aren't going to spend potentially millions upgrading their control systems every couple of years. This is a problem because the length of time the control systems are in place gives hackers plenty of time to find vulnerabilities, and it also means the hackers will have had time to develop quicker or more advanced techniques for finding and exploiting those vulnerabilities. It also means that even assuming the SCADA system manufacturer admits there is a problem (and it's not a given that they will), the system owners are less likely to actually patch it.

The second problem is cost cutting. It's far easier (and cheaper) to stick a SCADA system on a publicly accessible IP, then have one or two staff monitoring (and adjusting or repairing, if necessary) several SCADA systems from a central control centre (which can be in a different country). This can be a secure way of doing things, but the connection needs to be on a dedicated line (even a phone line will sometimes do), or you need a VPN connecting the two buildings.

OK, while VPNs are technically still hackable, a well configured one can be a hell of an obstacle to most hackers.

I think the other part of the second problem is that SCADA systems are increasingly being run by what are essentially standard PCs with special hardware so they can interface with whatever machinery they control. This means that not only can the system be attacked using flaws in the SCADA hardware/software, but it can also be attacked using flaws in the PC Architecture and PC OS (usually Windows). Both of which are considerably better known to hackers than specialist SCADA hardware/software.

Some do..

The BBC, ITV and Channel 4 already provide live streams.

They just don't do it on a unified site..

Re: Its a scam

Pretty much sums it up for me..

If there are any scientologists here, please answer me this. If Scientology is so good, why are they not as open as other religions about what they do and what they believe? Most Churches will happily allow public discussion of their beliefs and actions. They even go so far as to allow documentaries on TV. Scientology doesn't. On the contrary, people who try and broadcast what they believe end up getting threatened.

Let me make one thing clear. I have no problem with what Scientologists believe per se. What I do have a problem with is that they are not open about it at all.

You aren't seeing the whole picture..

You appear a little naive. You also appear to be assuming that the corporations willing to pay big bucks for the medical histories of entire sections of the population have those people's best interests at heart.

Now, while I do genuinely believe corporations actually do a lot of good, I don't believe for one second that all of them exist only to do good.

A couple of reasons spring to mind why this is a terrifying idea.

1) Insurance. I don't know how much time you have spent dealing with them, but Insurance companies will use any excuse not to pay, or not to insure you. How easy do you think it be for you to get any kind of insurance if the insurance companies knew your family had (say) a history of heart attacks, cancer or strokes that were somehow genetically caused? What about if the genetic records they obtained about you showed some sort of genetic disposition to suffering those conditions that you were not aware of?

2) Employment. Employers seem to be asking for increasing amount of data about potential employees. For instance, several employers are now insisting on access to employees' social media accounts and in some cases credit checks. How would you feel if you found a well paid job that you were perfect for and were not offered it purely because your parents had bad health?

3) Personalised advertising. While I find this offensive enough anyway, imagine the kind of explaining you'd have to do if you let a mate borrow your laptop for a few days and he (or she) saw a lot of adverts for remedies for sexual diseases just because you'd recently gone to the local GUM clinic with a dose of the clap.

Re: Its thread likes theses which is why pc pro, moderates all posters now...

When did El Reg ever have proper discussions?

I've been reading it pretty much since it started (certainly since they start accepting comments) and I can't recall any thread that was what I would consider a proper discussion.

Re: They need to either fix all the holes or get rid of MSIE

Bearing in mind that a few years ago, IBM did a study and found that on average, for every 1,000 lines of source code, there was at least 1 bug in every piece of software, what would you rather have?

a) A browser whose maintainer freely admits to bugs and fixes them regularly?

b) A browser whose maintainer rarely, if ever, fixes bugs?

The fact is that NO SOFTWARE IS BUG FREE. Whether that software happens to be a Browser, an OS, a complier, a Word processor, a Database or whatever software you care to name.

What matters is the severity of those bugs, how proactive the company behind the software is at finding them, and how quickly they can release tested fixes for those bugs.

I am no fan of any particular OS (although I do like Opera as a browser, followed by Safari), but I do believe that MS have been particularly good recently for both finding bugs in their software, and fixing them quickly.

Re: Microsoft screw up YET AGAIN

So, only Windows is vulnerable to the kinds of remote attacks that lead to viruses? http://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-33/product_id-47/cvssscoremin-7/cvssscoremax-7.99/Linux-Linux-Kernel.html. That's just the vulns in the Kernel. I didn't bother checking all the thousand of packages the average Linux distro comes with.

Also has it occured to you that the reason we are seeing increased attacks on things like Java and Flash is that MS have done a lot of work to improve the security in all it's products?

I am no MS fanboy. I think Windows 8 and recent versions of Office are terrible. But, I don't think MS products are all bad.

Re: MS kills netbook market

They did. It's called the Windows 8 Start Screen and is, IMO, the reason Windows 8 has failed.

Re: Physical security of server room ?

You'd think they do that. Most companies don't..

Where I work, I manage several servers (as part of my job). I can get physical access to the servers, but only if I ask very nicely, and only if accompanied by a senior system admin.

The trouble is, a lot of small to medium sized companies don't bother with this. They might have a few servers, for various aspects of the business, but these servers would probably be stuck in a corner (probably not even in a rack) of someone's office, and that someone would be partially responsible for their maintenance as well as another, totally unrelated, job.

Re: In criticising the BBC and their alleged agenda

I suggest you read more of the coverage. In general, El Reg seems to support the BBC.