So the follow-up question is whether those unspecified "senior managers" were work experience students or cleaning contractors.
555 posts • joined 21 Nov 2011
Anti-failure insurance wouldn't be the worst idea.
KS could make it a requirement that everyone who wants a KS campaign has to pay $1k up front. That money would be used to pay someone to assess the viability of the campaign and determine how much it would cost for a potential backer to insure their pledge.
KS could make a modest fee from selling the insurance, and posting the price of the insurance on a campaign's page would give would-be backers a better feel for the likelihood of the campaign's success.
Re: Bollocks - Right stat wrong conclusion
From a guy described as 'an evangelist'. Nobody could have seen that coming.
Snowden said it best
"Let us speak no more of faith in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of cryptography."
Edward Snowden (paraphrasing Thomas Jefferson)
Disabuse yourselves of the notion that people who make money from tracking you are going to stop trying. Regardless of how many unenforceable laws or feel-good-but-useless protocols (hi there, DNT) are made, the only way they're going to stop is if you leave them no other option.
Block scripts and cookies (unless you absolutely need them for a given site) and browse through a VPN. Let's see how the, "We'll ignore DNT" crowd likes dem apples.
This guy could win.
So they're going to pull twelve regular people off the street and get them savvy enough about CPU architectures and designs to be able to make an informed ruling on this case. And then I'm going to flap my wings and fly to the moon.
This case does have a chance of being successful. Not because it has any merit but because the jury won't have a clue about who is telling the truth.
60 Days to Read the TPP
As You Like It
The Merchant of Venice
A Midsummer Nights Dream
Much Ado About Nothing
Romeo and Juliet
The Taming of the Shrew
If you printed out all of the above plays, at 250 words per page, you'd have a stack of almost 2,000 pages. If you had 60 days, and nothing else to occupy your time, you could read through that much text (a mere 33 pages per day).
But if any politician says they've read through it in that time frame, and understood it all, and carefully considered the pros and cons for their constituents, and actually done their job too... yeah, they're lying.
Re: "so you may want to wait for others to provide summaries."
Charming. So when can we expect to read yours AC?
Re: PC, which has highly standardised hardware
I agree with your assessment, Paul Shirley.
The only way I can see it changing is as a result of a class action. Something like: customers, whose phones are still under contract, sueing Verizon (for example) after the customers get hit with malware which Google issued an update for but which wasn't passed on in a timely manner by either the manufacturer or carrier.
Such a lawsuit would lose but if the plaintiffs make enough noise, the mere possibly of losing money, combined with the bad PR might, just might, make those responsible get off their collective backsides long enough to change the status quo.
The pot and the kettle
Surely someone in Anonymous-land sees the spectacular irony of a group, which identifies itself by its members' anonymity, organising a lynch mob by outing people who wish to remain (you guessed it!) anonymous for the purpose of organising lynch mobs against people they do not like.
@Lost All Faith
You're so right, mate. It's an obscene amount of money to be paying for something which obviously could not possibly be worth that much.
Incidentally, if any Senheiser customer reads this and discovers their €50k headphones don't have a long enough cable, you're in luck! I can sell you a genuine analogue (far warmer and more organic than the digital rubbish you get these days) audio extension cable sheathed in real unicorn scrotum. Sure, it won't be cheap but you just can't put a price tag on the envious looks you'll get from your guests when you brandish your €100k audio cable.
So this is like the JPG 'virus'.
It is another permutation of, "if someone has admin on your system, they can do $BAD_THING".
The last block of code in the article is missing a ")" before the "goto".
That aside, Mr Torvalds is right in this specific case, and in general too. A lot of the constucts used to work with, and around, the preprocessor are just ugly and could quite happily be dragged out behind the back of the shed and shot.
Yay for 'innovation'
As PC hardware improves, software gets progressively slower and more bloated so as to negate any gains in speed or storage space the owner might have otherwise enjoyed.
Obviously the purchase price and power consumption of LED globes have become unacceptably low. So thankfully there are people, like the company in this article, looking to solve that particular problem.
I think you were on the right track with "free software", but think rather "public domain".
The notion of, "this thing I have created is freely available to every member of the public forever", is important.
For one thing, it stops information from getting lost, as used to happen with trade secrets and now happens with, 'nobody can use it because nobody knows who had the copyright and the companies involved folded 20 years ago'*.
Public domain stops us from having to reinvent the wheel ever again.
* The TPP's extending copyright to 'the end of time or thereabouts' will undoubtedly be an unqualified boon to all humanity. /sarcasm
The next sorta-killer app
I suspect there's market out there for a way of allowing people to avoid advertising by making micro-payments to outbid the advertisers.
For example, upon visiting El Reg, this killer app would find out how much advertisers are paying for a page worth of adds on El Reg and then allow the visitor to pay a teensy bit more than that directly to El Reg to get the page without any adds.
The site visitor is happy because they avoid adds while keeping the website in business. The site is happy because they're a little richer than they'd otherwise be. And the spurned advertiser can go burn in the hell from whence they were spawned.
The Worstall Effect
After looking at the comments on this story, I'd like to thank Mr Worstall for his articles.
It's fairly obvious that the readership of El Reg (myself included) has become markedly more economically literate, which in turn has raised the level of discussion.
Cheers to you all!
Not an unreasonable plan.
The execs (as are all employees) are paid on the basis of the value they add to the company. Given that Twitter has not made a profit, does not make a profit, and does not appear to have a viable plan for making a profit in the future, I'm curious about the nature of the value Mr Dorsey is deemed to add to the company.
If cutting staff and thus wages is the path to progress, then they could sack Mr Dorsey and replace him with my corriander* plant. It's just as adept at running a successful company and is quite happy to be paid in water and sunshine.
* Cilantro for any Yanks who've made it this far into my ramble.
Stated vs revealed preferences
"But Zuck and chums didn't offer to fling any cash around at this weekend's UN summit."
And right there is the real indication about their level of sincerity.
Three seriously rich guys advocate for something that they care about so deeply that not one of them is willing to spend a single cent on it.
I find your post interesting.
If Chinese norms are really producing a 10:1 male/female ratio, I'd imagine that would drive up the value of females - each girl would have ten potential hubbies lined up outside her door.
Brothels would make a killing from the nine unsuccessful suitors.
NASA will announce...
The curiosity rover has been destroyed by a disintegration ray gun owned by an irate martian father who claims the perverts at NASA were spying on his sunbathing daughters.
Re: Political nukes
"Since the fifties there's been a general increase in the population of sciencey-things-are-scary. Noone has had the political will to change that since the 80s."
I think the problem began when the children of the 70's hippies were grown up by the early 90's. You know, when suddenly nobody was allowed to smack children any more and nobody was allowed to tell the darlings they're wrong about anything lest you hurt their precious feelings. So they've grown up with the delusion that, regardless of the facts, their opinion is just as valid as anyone else's.
So now we've got homoeopaths and anti-vaxers arguing with doctors, and more recent hippy-throwbacks arguing with people who know the science of nuclear power.
Re: "even though I am not aware of any wrong doing on my part"
At the minimum, the engine design team were lying about how well their engine works and the compliance team were either complicit or were so incompetent they didn't notice that the design team were lying.
I accept that a CEO isn't omniscient but this isn't like two of the cleaning staff sharing a joint on the night shift.
Re: BillG vs Zuckerberg
Ok 9Rune5, just for the sake of it, I'll give you a counter-argument.
Mobile phones and internet access seem less important when someone you love is dying of malaria. It's not purely an emotive argument either. A sick person decreases a workforce's productivity. And those inconsiderate dead people make no contribution to GDP at all.
Technology and wealth will benefit a society but only the ones who are alive to enjoy it.
That all said, access to better medical outcomes and better technology are not mutually exclusive and both together will do more to improve lives than either one alone.
Re: Showing empathy
Yup. "Empathy" without effort corresponds nicely with Facebook's idea of being "social" without any effort towards being sociable enough to spend one's time in the society of one's alleged "friends".
There should be a whipping in the offing for misappropriating our language but I guess that, "I don't give enough of a rat's backside to actually talk to you so I'll click on this", is too wordy to fit on a button.
Re: I suspect a lot of us did this back in the day...
"Funny how some techniques are independently invented by multiple people."
My one (purely academic) go at writing a virus was a straight forward, "overwrite the smallest uninfected file larger than the virus code". To find the ideal target, my virus had to have a way of 'looking' at every file on the disk, so I invented a programming technique commonly known as 'recursion'. Too bad this was the late 80s and some people had already stolen my idea... long before I had it.
'Disruption' is in this century what 'synergy' was in the previous one - a clear sign that the speaker is peddling in vacuous drivel.
Re: Interesting Lies
"Mark my words, when Iran attacks Israel it will mean a war that will [...]“
Imagine, for a moment, that you're running Iran and contemplating an all out military assault on Israel. Given that Israel is known to have a nuclear arsenal, is a 'win' possible? And what would it look like?
I've met a few Iranians and not a single one is the kind of bucolic idiot who thinks a nuclear war ends well. I'll concede that it could be a case of selection bias - as in, the smart ones have skipped the country and left the nutters to run the show back home.
Re: Someone needed to say it.
@ Sarah Balfour & werdsmith
You're both right and I must confess that I don't pay much attention to the wearable gadget market.
Re: Someone needed to say it.
As much as I hate to admit it, I think Sony has perhaps the smartest play in the market. The worst a 'smart' watch band can do is provide no benefit over a 'dumb' watch band - it doesn't detract from the watch's existing function. Nor does it doesn't involve discarding the watch you already have.
It neatly sidesteps the trade-offs involved in the purchase of any of the existing stable of 'smart' watches.
If only they didn't go, as you point out, with such a daft name.
I don't know the legal degree of liability for adverts, either in print or on the web. However if what black hats do is illegal* then the law should apply to everyone, and that could just be a good thing.
Visitors to PoF get malware. They sue PoF. PoF in turn sues the add slinger. The add slinger then has plenty of incentive to make sure the next bunch of adds they sling aren't malware vectors.
* Personally I think the internet should be the wild west with no laws governing what you can and can't do but I do acknowledge that's not the world we live in.
Sorry 'Your Alien Overlord' and 1980s_coder, I can't buy your reasoning.
If a newspaper printed an advert for something unacceptable (Buy African Children As Your Personal Slaves - $10 + S&H), do you reckon they'd get away with saying, "We just take the advertiser's money but we don't screen whatever they want to print"?
So why shouldn't a website be held accountable for the adverts which they choose to display on their site?
Re: A general problem
"You could make the phone suppliers responsible for [...] "
I like the idea but who has the clout to make it more than just wistful dreams?
- Google won't. They want to suck as much data as possible so they won't do anything to limit the number of manufacturers who make android devices.
- The US won't. Regulating anything seems anathema to them. Double that for anything which comes between corporations and profit margins.
- The Chinese might have the clout but don't I can't see them caring enough to bother.
That leaves the EU. They might just get a sufficient bee in their collective bonnet about protecting European citizens, and it's a large enough market that the phone manufacturers can't just ignore them.
I don't think this government is competent enough to be genuinely malicious but I could imagine orders along the lines of, "In the interests of security, all telco kit must now be ordered from BrandisCorp."
Re: Out of curiosity ...
"What is the unique thuggery being displayed by the scramjet?"
Not so much the nature of the technology as the childishly satisfying idea of using bleeding edge tech to play the age old game of throwing rocks at people faster and harder than they can throw 'em back.
Re: Out of curiosity ...
"If they could get Mach24 then who needs explosives"
I agree that conventional rockets are both proven and cheaper but the brute thuggery of a scramjet missile has a certain shock & awe to it, the way the yanks intended but never quite achieved.
Run and hide, mortals. We shall do like Thor and hurl lighting bolts through your capital building, through the basement, and the wine cellar beneath, and the bunker below that, and the special, reinforced bunker under that too!
This bloke is putting together a good quality, hardware RNG for ~$50 USD a pop, which leads me to a couple of observations.
The first is that a few of his RNGs would be a no-brainer purchase for anyone who is serious about crypto-based security. And secondly, I wonder how much it would add to the price of a CPU if someone the scale of Intel or AMD bought him out and gave away a hardware RNG dongle with every CPU sold.
To be fair
The term "pornographer" and "copyright troll" are prejudicial and inaccurate descriptions of the plaintiff. For the sake of simplicity they should henceforth be referred to as "extortionists" and there would be no confusion.
Re: Appeared on /pol/?
That reaction from 4chan is just what the spy agencies would want.
If I were a government bod, I'd litter sensitive documents with 'kewl' and 'wicked', along with a running commentary about what a cutie Amanda Seyfried is.
That way, even if someone did leak the documents, nobody would believe they're genuine.
Re: fat people are the only acceptable group to hate
Well said, mate.
With regards to mental illness, try to be generous to people who don't understand. Most people (myself included) don't have anywhere near the grasp of chemistry needed to understand what goes on in our brain. Or the linkage between the various chemical balances and their effect on our behaviour.
Some of it is that we (humans) don't want to understand. If you mix so much sodium and so much chlorine, you get so much salt. It's entirely deterministic. If we accept that out brains operate on the same laws of chemistry as everything else in the universe, it doesn't leave any room for the free will that many of us hold dear.
If Intel/Google hires a $MINORITY over a more qualified candidate, wouldn't the latter have an almost unlosable employment discrimination lawsuit against that employer?
Because you obviously aren't a "'tards, OCD, etc" I'd like to help you embrace pointless change by randomly remapping the keys on your keyboard on a hourly basis. That old-fashioned but familiar layout must be cramping your non-tard, non-OCD style.
I'll give you 'Outdoors'!
Look! I don't make you out-doorsy types learn the x86 instruction set and how v-tables are used to implement multiple inheritance so don't try to shove your sunlight and fresh air shite down my throat. God'dit?
Ok. Truth be told, I do enjoy bush walking and learning the finer points of photography from the girlfriend along the way, but it's the principle of the matter, dag nabbit! I feel a strange solidarity with my vitamin D adverse brothers and sisters.
"Morton and Barcoo's mayor Julie Groves claim the prime ministerial handshake-promise [...]"
Did the people of Moreton and Barcoo really vote for someone naive enough to believe anything a politician's says?
And at the time I write this you've got 7 downvotes for making a perfectly reasonable observation.
I'd love to see a feature added to El Reg so you can look up who up/downvoted each post because I share your view, James 51 - I think The Register has finally got popular enough that MS is paying some 'image management' mob to downvote anyone who says anything negative about Microsoft.
Having spent 15-odd years getting rid of their last browser, I desperately hope that the world knows better than to fall for Microsoft's shenanigans again.
"Greens deputy leader Scott Ludlam, a vocal opponent of the legislation, said it was "underwhelming" to see Labor raise concerns about the laws after the fact."
The above is quoted from 'The Age' piece mentioned in the article and sums up the Labour party's regrets and in fact the whole party. Is this really the peak of our opposition party's intellectual firepower? To pass laws and only afterwards questions whether it was a good idea.
Land of the (certainly not) Free
If one is willing to assume that Google's people know what they're doing, it's a sad state of affairs that the best way to improve their business is to buy politicians rather than spend the same amount on improving their existing products or researching new ones.
Is this how it's done?
- Buy up junk stocks for the price of a beer or two.
- Use dummy accounts to seed twitter with "bullish".
- Offload junk stocks and use profit to buy Martha's Vinyard.
This is a self-correcting 'problem' (if one chooses to view it that way).
If enough customers are offended by Apple searching it's employee's bags, then Apple has the option to change the policy or lose customers and go out of business.
If enough prospective employees are offended by this policy then Apple will have trouble attracting staff, which means paying higher wages, which in turn means charging more for their products (to make enough to pay the higher wages) which will make their products less attractive to customers.
Regardless of what Apple fans might say, the more they charge for products the more potential customers will decide that a similar Samsung, HTC, or possibly even WinPhone is good enough.