Re: It asks for your location?
SW1A 0AA?
6299 publicly visible posts • joined 28 Oct 2011
UK finds itself almost alone
Well, that "almost" covers a pretty wide range!
"that other nations have decided to adopt." is also an interestingly vague phrase. The article seems to make out that Britain is alone in choosing a centralized tracking app that the government can abuse, while all other right-thinking nations have stood up for personal liberty.
It isn't that simple. France, for example, is also sticking with the EU-recommended centralized PEPP-PT model (and privacy organizations like the CNIL are complaining). Norway has a centralized model, while Germany Austria, Estonia and Switzerland have chosen the decentralized DP-3T one. Other nations have chosen other approaches. Privacy International has some figures and articles which are a little less shouty.
Even the newer ones weren't perfect. Back in the late 80s a colleague was preparing for Christmas shopping, and asked an ATM for £200. It hummed & clicked, and reported that it only had £150 left, and would he take that. He selected "yes", took the cash, and fortunately kept the receipt showing the issue of £150. A few weeks later he got his bank statement, which showed a debit of the originally-requested £200.
It took a lot of arguing with the bank ("that isn't possible, Sir"), but they did eventually agree to refund him the missing £50. We assume that somewhere a bank software engineer had to hastily create a software fix...
I would NEVER consider driving my petrol car down to 5% of a tank of fuel, but with a battery electric car, it's quite safe to do and not uncommon.
Buit that wasn't the question. You don't get less energy from your petrol when the tank is 10% full than when it's 90% full, but does a battery have the same characteristics?
And we're currently proving that this is perfectly viable.
No, we're currently proving that it is very, very painful. I won't get to see my family for months, I've had to cancel vacations.
One of my colleagues has been stuck in another country, unable to get home, for 6 weeks.
We need to develop ways to use sustainable fuels, not to just give up on travel.
Can anyone explain why an electric plane would be a good idea? Aircraft are far more sensitive to weight than any other form of travel, so hauling a set of batteries around as dead weight just doesn't seem logical. Not to mention that recharging an aircraft during the typical 2 hour turnaround would be a challenge. Even with a super-small generator as described here, where's the benefit over just using the fuel to feed a turbine engine directly, instead of carrying fuel + generator + engine?
For environmental concerns, I'd have thought that air travel would be a prime target for hydrogen or alcohol fuel, which could be obtained from sustainable sources & consumed in a largely-standard engine (turbo-fan or turbo-prop). Since the journeys are well-known in advance, and they always start and end in places with refuelling infrastructure, the logistics would seem easier.
It's a genuine question, I'm not an aero engineer but I struggle to see the benefits of electrical propulsion beyond the "look how clever my engine is" bragging rights.
I remember reading about an old system (80's, maybe?) which would occasionally throw a wobbly. Debugging revealed that one particular byte in a program structure was being corrupted, but despite much digging they couldn't find out what was doing it.
As a temporary workaround a piece of dummy data was added at that address, moving the real data one byte down in memory, so that corruption didn't zap the important stuff. Everything worked fine from then on, and I don't think it was ever actually fixed.
You know what helps the lower and middle-class? Unions.
Only when they, too, are kept under reasonable control. The biggest boost to the middle class in the past 50 years was during the Thatcher era, when the government firmly stamped on union abuses of power and gave power back to ordinary people.
Uncontrolled unions are just as bad as uncontrolled companies.
Not a call-out situation, but years ago the guys at CERN used to see a strange wave pattern superimposed on test data from time to time. Then for a while it stopped. After some headscratching they realized that the stop coincided with a French train strike. Turns out that running a TGV drawing ~9MW of power from overhead wires creates a significant earth current, enough to deviate the beam in the nearby underground accelerator.
The remaining members of the EU are the ones that brought in the charter of human rights that the UK refused to sign up to
If by "charter of human rights" you mean the European Convention on Human Rights it was drawn up by the Council of Europe long before the EU existed. The Council of Europe itself was proposed by the UK (Winston Churchill) after WW2 and although there is some overlap with EU membership it is a distinct organization, and the UK is still a member.
The remaining members of the EU are the ones that brought in the European Court of Justice that among other things allows any EU citizen the right to challenge any EU government on anything.
The ECJ (or more correctly the CJEU) is the supreme court that rules on EU law, just as the UK Supreme Court does for UK law. Ordinary citizens cannot appeal to the CJEU, only courts of member nations can do so. Its job is to rule on whether national law is compatible with EU law, and is not specific to human rights.
You seem to be confusing it with the European Court of Human Rights, to which any European citizen can turn for a judgement on matters of Human Rights within Europe. The UK is still a member of that, too, because it isn't an EU body. It has 47 members, the EU has 27.
A court that the UK has a poor history with and has been trying to get out from under for years.
Which one? The UK is no longer subject to the CJEU, it is still subject to the ECHR. There have certainly been controversial judgements handed down by the ECHR which the UK has disagreed with, often because it seems to put the individual rights of criminals ahead of those of their victims.
If you're going to speak in favour of the EU you should at least learn what it is actually responsible for, and not blindly give it credit for anything with "Europe" in its name, even when it has nothing to do with the EU.
I still think that DEC PDP11 kit was the best teaching platform ever.
I really should fire mine up again, after I check the PSU caps. I could do with more storage, but Q-Bus SCSI cards are like hen's teeth, and similarly priced. The existing RD52 still works, but 30MB is a bit tight these days...
I still have a couple in a desk drawer. And the bit of veroboard with a 25-pin D-type on each end and a selection of LEDs and resistors to show line state. It must be getting on for 40 years old now, best debugging tool I ever made.
Then again I've only recently scrapped an HP 4951C protocol analyzer, complete with pods for RS 232/423 and serial synchronous comms. Nice kit, but none of our recent serial lines ran at less than 2Mbit/s, and it topped out at 64kbit/s.
The Reg is curious why NASA, which has a budget of $22.6bn for this year, appears to have essentially admitted that it cannot remote into the high-performance PCs or create a GPU-packing virtual desktop in the cloud
If the NASA techs are using special goggles connected to high-performance graphic cards then remoting into the controlling PC won 't help, the goggles probably have a hard-wired cable to the card. Unless you have the same card in your home PC you're out of luck. Still, it's good to see that NASA are still masters of the workable string & duct tape backup plan.
True, but the mortality rate of those testing positive in the UK is around 15%
That's not the point I was making. I'm saying that the number of deaths is sufficiently low that most people in the UK will not know anyone in their immediate entourage who is affected, so it will seem (to many people) not to be serious. It's a perception issue.
Sure it is - you just make the penalty for breaking it similar to Italy - £3000 fine for breaking lock down, 1 year in jail if you lie to the police when questioned about it, and 3 years in jail if you then test positive for COVID.
Only works if people go along with it. If a million or so people decided to ignore lockdown there's no way the civil authorities in any country could cope, the system would be overwhelmed. At the moment the authorities are banking on the deterrent value of a hefty fine, but how many months of lockdown will people tolerate before civil disturbance explodes? We've seen that happen many times across the decades, for various reasons.
I want this all to end so I can travel again, go for a drive, eat out, watch a movie or hit the theater, maybe go see a lecture some place or a concert. Mostly I want it to end so I can visit my parents.
Me too, of course. My Mum is in her 80s and lives in another country, it will be months before I can see her again.
Normality isn't coming back until at the latter half of next year if we can;t find some effective treatments for COVID in lieu of a vaccine. People may as well start mentally adjusting for the fact. We're not sacrificing Gen Xer's parents lives because Gen Y are bored at home. Sorry.
Easy to say, but I really don't think society as a whole will tolerate it. No matter how hard you screw down the lid on a boiling pot, it will eventually explode without a safety valve. I'm not saying that I want or advise that, of course not, but we have to face the reality that you can't keep 70m people bottled up in their homes for a year "just in case". We need a realistic medium-term plan to get out of this, even if we can't cure or palliate the effects of the virus, the alternative is likely to be worse.
Not if it's not doing anything, it isn't.
It's always doing something, even if just waiting for a connect request from a paired device. I normally have BT turned on (but discovery off, of course) so that it links to my car when I start the engine. When I was on holiday I didn't have a car with me, so after a few days I remembered to turn the BT off. The effect on battery life was noticeable (this was a Samsung Android phone).
As I've been saying from the start, lockdown or some flavor of it will be with us until we're all vaccinated or until there are effective treatments to significantly reduce the death rate.
I doubt that, for many reasons.
A prolonged lockdown will do huge economic damage, which itself could result in many deaths, so there has to be a measure of balance somewhere. Vaccines usually take 12-18 months to develop, even if one can be found. We can't stay locked down for that long.
We also have to recognise that, so far, this virus has been linked to the deaths of 0.02% of the UK population. That means that most of the people on lockdown have neither been affected, nor know anyone affected. Sooner or later people will, rightly or wrongly, decide that they've had enough. They will either assume it's all a waste of time, or decide "what the hell, just catch it & get it over with". Not necessarily sensible attitudes, but inevitable ones, and faced with a backlash like that it simply won't be possible to maintain a lockdown.
I'd say that governments have about a month to start easing the lockdown for most people (elderly/vulnerable ones excluded) if they want to keep control of the situation. By that time the contagion rate should have dropped, most people who would have spread it will be either cured or dead. With sensible distancing measures, testing, and large events like festivals (where good hygiene is difficult) banned, things should stabilise. It wouldn't surprise me to see travel bans or quarantines in effect as well, at least to/from countries considered to still be risk areas.
The comments on their twitter page are saying much the same thing, albeit more succinctly:
"I lost a grandmother to Coronavirus. In 2013 ... But f**k me I'd lose her over again rather than have my son grow up in an informant-led police-state."
I predict a rash of reports about police walking around together but not keeping 2m apart...
Don't forget to announce you are taking a 25% pay cut and remember to leave out that you just took 20% options in shares.
Taking a payment in stock options instead a salary isn't an entirely unreasonable approach, options like that only pay out if you stay and the share price goes up. If the company doesn't survive the crisis, or if you bail out, then you get nothing, but if it weathers the storm & returns to profitability those options will be valuable.That's why they are used as bonuses, as a way to persuade senior employees not to leave, and to commit to making things work.
I would think that the problem isn't so much the language as the environment. Anyone who's familiar with modern procedural langauges shouldn't have much of a problem picking up COBOL. More of an issue will be finding people who are trained on Windows or Unix/Linux and getting them used to working in 1970s/1980s terminal-based environments with line editors, batch processing, obscure toolsets and all on systems with limited storage. Can you imagine a millenial Python/Linux programmer having to get to grips with IBM JCL and overlays configured by link-editors, all in maybe 1MB RAM and possibly with intermediate storage on serial tape? On a 3270 terminal?
This. With webex it was easy, when you started a meeting as host you had to give a password, it could be different for each meeting. Zoom makes it a real PITA to do. You can set a default password for your personal room, but once that becomes common knowledge it serves little purpose. They need to add a way to easily choose a password each time you host a call.
If, say, 5 people die in the trial, and you have no control group, you have no idea if the death rate wthout the treatment would have been 0 or 10, so for all you know the treatment might make things worse. You have to have a control group, it has nothing to do with " the good of medical science".
When I was learning French years ago, I remember one of the most satisfying moments was when I "got" a pun in an Asterix book. Even the jokes based on national stereotypes were well done, like the Britons drinking their hot water with a splash of milk (tea hadn't been 'discovered' in Europe in Roman times).
I really must get round to completing my collection.