Re: Who says they can?
Of course! The main customer is the military, but the company is allowed to make a little more money by selling data elsewhere, and the military will probably want a discount.
184 publicly visible posts • joined 25 Oct 2011
I'm struggling to think of uses for this resolution, apart from military ones. There's also the refresh rate to specify. And who will pay for a licence to use it?
I've found something by the Earth Imaging Journal: oil, gas or mineral exploration will pay good money for images, and the higher resolution is good for the required detailed analysis. But otherwise, who will pay lots of money for these:
Geological studies, cliff erosion. 1m, monthly or less frequent
Geological studies, glacier movement. >1m, yearly
Animal population distribution. 1m but possibly less, monthly or yearly
Weather. >10m, daily
Policing (environmental): mining, settlement, building, deforestation. 1m, yearly or more frequent
Policing safety concerns: oil spills, toxic waste, fires. <10m, weekly (or more frequent?)
Policing: mass graves/genocide. <1m, monthly
Enlighten me!
"...and matches the emulator model exactly – modulo yield faults – so you can develop the model on the emulator and then download it to the chip for real-time use..."
Modulo? MODULO?!
x mod y < y
So there is something worth having that is less than the number of yield faults?
"...and matches the emulator model exactly – minus yield faults – so you can develop the model on the emulator and then download it to the chip for real-time use..."
FTFY
But, then again: “Words strain, Crack and sometimes break, under the burden, Under the tension, slip, slide, perish, Decay with imprecision, will not stay in place, Will not stay still.”
And back to Eeyore mode.
I used to joke about these things along with the best of them: "just because you're not paranoid doesn't mean that they aren't out to get you". But having seen symptoms of psychosis, too close for comfort, it's too painful for me. The rest of you carry on.
Various things can trigger it, e.g. stress and drugs, so it is easier to point to the drugs than twitter, especially the marijuana in this case.
Whereas the psychiatrists investigated whether she had a history of psychosis in her family, I should have expected them to check for other mental illnesses with milder symptoms, because they also are indicative of risk.
And yet I recall the case of some psychiatrists who wanted to prove the inadequacy of diagnosis in mental hospitals. They presented themselves as schizophrenic, acting out the symptoms, and were duly admitted. Later, they played their hand as intended, and challenged the institution for having misdiagnosed. And so they proved their point. But, having behaved in a certain way, they had actually become schizophrenic, and had to undergo treatment themselves.
So bad behaviour can make you mentally ill. You must decide for yourselves whether Twitter is healthy.
There's an Asimov story that pre-dates the Macroscope by 13 years: The Dead Past, Asimov, where being able to see and hear anything in the past, including only 1 second ago, has devastating implications for everyone's privacy.
(Not that I'm casting aspersions on The Macroscope: I'd not heard of it, and now I want to read it.)
MATLAB?! I've heard MATLAB referred to as "FORTRAN meets APL in car crash", but my point is that it is useful (very very useful) to prove an algorithm but not as quick as "proper code". (Oh, and it does very pretty graphics for little effort.)
So I wonder what 2 hours would come down to.
I thought that the laser technique required a splitter, sending one ray via the moving surface (window), and then combining them, and looking at the intensity of the combined rays. The phase modulation is thus recovered, but you clearly need some very stable fixings for the laser, the splitter, the combiner, etc. And anyway, every time a lorry goes by everything will move and the wanted signal will be drowned out.
That's one seriously difficult technique.
Unnecessary instructions have been noted before.
"Hold stick near centre of its length. Moisten pointed end in mouth. Insert in tooth space, blunt end next to gum. Use gentle in-out motion."
—The toothpick instructions that annoyed Wonko
(from http://hitchhikers.wikia.com/wiki/Wonko_the_Sane)
If the food chain were precarious, then a meteor is only one option to topple the dinosaurs. It doesn't sound like luck to me.
See "Foundation", Asimov, (and even "The End of Eternity") for theories of things taking their course in spite of perturbations. In that sense, perhaps the end of the dinosaurs was inevitable.
That takes a bit of unpacking, but I still think there is some muddled thinking there.
Perhaps he is trying to emulate G K Chesterton's style where the paragraph finishes with a witty apparent paradox as a summary. Unfortunately, there was no closely argued paragraph to summarize.
ASICs are unfashionable because it requires an accurate market assessment, a lot of development up front, and there is a risk of an extra design iteration blowing your budget. If you get it right, there are enviable space and power savings, and performance improvements. Much incremental development goes for the low risk quick win.
I was going to say that keeping XP alive can only hold back PC sales, surely? (I think this takes your point on a bit, rather than disagreeing with it.)
Based on these ideas:
1) I expect that, if the typical PC owner cannot use XP any more, then he might buy another PC, even if some people can actually make Win7 run on a lesser PC.
2) There must be many PC users who keep their PCs running XP by upgrading hardware and hanging on to old versions of applications.
3) IIRC, XP resists being transplanted into different hardware.
It is inevitable that most customers will choose the cheapest broadband service, so the service providers struggle to make money from raw packets. I contribute to this effect :-(
I too hope that there will be premium services where, in an upside-down sort of way, you pay more for less functionality at the ISP end. The trouble will be finding a provider who bothers, like providing static IP addresses.
(I sound more and more sad with each post. Let's hope it is only because I am particularly depressed today.)
I have always said:
The internet is the best of anarchy, and the worst of anarchy.
and
There is always the trade-off between security and facility.
Over recent years (a relative term that encompasses more and more as I grow older), internet banking etc. has tried to make the internet look organised and safe, so Joe Public is even less inclined to listen to me.
And another saying:
Eyore was an optimist
"The data is also in too raw a format to be of any use to a Genius Bar tech support team."
I am offended that he seems to be trying to pull the wool over my eyes. OK, most Genius Bar staff might be unable to hack the raw data, but the implication is that no-one can hack it.
There are, after all, code breaking competitions where the challenge is to decrypt a block of raw data.
That's an interesting list, and is very clear about things that companies should not be compensated for. Can we find things things that companies should be compensated for? The law (as reported) is absurd, but, just possibly, there is something sane intended.
Actually, if the proposed law really is that dumb, can we get out of it because it is an unfair contract?!
Snowden is right that Joe Public trusts technology too much.
It's been going on for decades: I heard of a GP who thought that use of a modem to send data down a telephone line meant it could not be intercepted. And a GP is a few levels up from Joe Public.
I wonder if we should blame marketing hype too: "Our product will protect you from all viruses, secure your data, and make all your communications secure".
I remember Cypherpunks recommending that everyone use encryption so that occasional use did not attract attention.
"no support for Shi’s assertion that there was ever any sexual relationship between her and Zhang – much less that there was a non-consensual sexual relationship."
OK, so how do you get "much less" than "no support"? It's like Billy Bunter claiming innocence and extenuating circumstances.
(Icon also in respect of Greyfriars)
I often point out that, whereas I can spend ages looking for a leak in a boat and not find it, when I put the boat in water the water finds the leak immediately. Open source makes the fight more evenly matched by allowing many more people to look for the leak. (Yes, I know that this helps the hackers too, but I reckon it improves the ratio of effort, hackers vs debuggers)
I haven't heard that melody since I was a lad. I found a version of the song I knew:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3798TcSq9vY
But this one caught my eye:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cgzl1Sai4Y0 "I'm gonna be an engineer", and I can't help thinking that as a male engineer I share some of the frustrations. There, that's almost restored the IT content :-)
I've been using vim too much.
See:
http://vim.wikia.com/wiki/Simplifying_regular_expressions_using_magic_and_no-magic
So much for this reassurance:
"Vim's default 'magic' setting makes characters have the same meaning as in grep, and \v (very magic) makes them the same as the extended regular expressions used by egrep."
In my day, we made our own entertainment. Yon urchin looked out window, the missus complained t' steward, and I tried to get some kip.
When "voice activated" gizmos started pokin' their noses in, t' urchin would say loudly "DELETE FILE YES", and all the silly buggers would turn their stupid boxes off.
Now 'es got a twinkle in his eye when we talk about WiFi: I can't can't see it endin' well.
Is the CRAY able to test the nukes? Because it's connected?
HAL: I know that you and Frank were planning to disconnect me. And I'm afraid that's something I cannot allow to happen.
Or, better, The Forbin Project (excerpt from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colossus:_The_Forbin_Project):
It also states that it had detected the attempt to disarm the missiles and detonates two of them in their silos "so that you will learn by experience that I do not tolerate interference". Guardian/Colossus tells Dr. Forbin that "freedom is just an illusion" and that "In time, you will come to regard me not only with respect and awe, but with love". Forbin replies, "Never!"
The time from the theft to the time of arrest might lead to security agencies claiming a need to store data for years, so that they can trawl back over it at leisure. But that's a lot of data.
Did they have trouble finding where he was so that they could arrest him? That would be weird. Of course, I could interpret the article as saying that they only gave the location when they were ready with sufficient evidence, but years?!
I understood that Comms Data is only the "who contacted whom, when, how, and possibly email subject", not all the voice recording or email content.
This affects the amount of data to store, obviously. And it affects how the data helps the police, obviously. It is not quite the Big Brother activity, where every thought is judged.
I believe that a warrant is not required for Comms Data, which fact may raise a few eyebrows.
Only if you get a warrant can you get all the elements of the specified communication, i.e. the police cannot intercept en masse, let alone store it for 5 minutes.
Good point. But is it a case of "better the devil you know"? I can see two possibilities for new currencies:
a) Someone is trying to make money out of you (also applies to banks dealing with conventional currency etc.)
b) The virtual currency is along the lines of "free software"
And, real or virtual currency, someone might hack your account.
... but not any more. There are still some knowledgeable staff, but the prices for materials puts me off every time.
I still browse Maplin's stores, but it's increasingly disappointing. It's trying to go the way of B&Q, except that their business model for selling components needs a big re-think.
Is it just me, and other enthusiasts from the 70's and 80's, or do younger folk prefer wall to wall dusty shelves choc-full of components?
If the world of bitcoin is considered a business, where bitcoins themselves are shares, should we expect rules about insider trading? But who are the directors and employees? Do we consider un-mined bitcoins as shares that are issued at zero value, or the current bitcoin value? Will there be rules about manipulating the market? Is it possible to regulate the market?