95 posts • joined 26 Sep 2011
Re: BBC Worldwide
They are stating there should be mechanisms to verify that the traffic is legitimate
Own a screwdriver? You must be a burglar then. Knife? Must be a murderer then.
But don't worry. There's mechanisms to prove your innocence.
Takes years, money, and many who are innocent wind up being convicted. But that's ok. there's these mechanisms to make sure that never happens.
(Got a nice bridge to sell you too if you're interested...)
As to all those who brush off their reliance on cloud with "I have nothing to hide, so nothing to fear" - you fucking well have plenty to fear now!
I don't rely on it, but I do use it as an integral tool for backing up the servers (data that needs to be protected is encrypted at the server level, stuff too sensitive for cloud backup won't be on the web servers anyway), and for some web dev work - syncing files between machines (must set up Owncloud if it's any good).
Used right "cloud" is a good tool that makes life (especially some distributed backups) easier, and can be used to shift some load off the server (ala CDN and a few other services). Used wrong, it's an embarrassment looking for a paper to be published in.
I don't have anything to fear from using it. I am quite selective in what I allow on there, and the only thing I could be embarrassed about is some of the test code that may reach that level.
I am somewhat more seasoned than the average netizen, and I'm quite sure that many of the average ones will put all sorts of wrong stuff on there. But that's not me - I know I have nothing to fear from a breach at my provider because I don't put data on there that could be a problem.
Treat the net as the front page of the local rag. If you won't want it in one, don't put it in the other.
(SaaS is another matter - I like my machines to be able to be offline and still usable without any "phone home" nonsense, and over here the cost of mobile bandwidth has me counting every byte -so I don't want any extra programs dialing out)
Re: This may be very relevant..
(this, btw, is taken from Google - I took the identifier out because I use this often in presentations. It gets interesting reactions when people realise just what they have agreed to when using Googleb services).
When starting to build the online presence for our company we had a look at such licenses (thankfully I had an inkling we'd see this and worse from FB, LI etc).
Even then I was somewhat shocked at how bad Google is, so our G+ page has had little work. I refuse to put our logo or other graphics on there because of this license. Might pinch their streetview photo for a picture of the shop front (let them steal their own IP) but anything I value? No.
LI is worse than Google - not only does it have much the same license, but you have to wade through a hell of a lot more text to reach it. And IIRC it's not in the area you'd expect to find it (so any company who has a logo on Linked In - guess what, you don't own the rights to your logo any more, you've given them an eternal to use it in any way they want, to make derivatives of it, to sell your logo or any derivatives and so on, you've lost control of it).
I was shocked and very pleasantly surprised to see that FB promise that anything you delete is deleted (with a caveat that it may linger in backups for a few weeks but will be deleted in due course and not human-reachable). Their licensing basically reads (at least when we put our logo and other artworks there, hope they haven't changed) that you have full rights over your work, but you give them a license to modify it for the purpose of displaying it in the manner you allow, and only for so long as you have an account with them.
(Note : Not a farcebook user (that's entirely the business partner's job!), nor a fan or supporter of FB. The less people on it the better.. Though it does take attention away from the more interesting places out there...)
Probably been said but..
#1, these are generally rather low-importance people anyway (with the exception of US officials, who for many of us rank lower even than the decaying faeces of pond-scum but whom some yanks seem strangely attached to)
#2 They chose to take the pictures with electronic devices, connect those devices to the 'net, and store those pics online
#2b Or they were taken by by paparazzi, in which case a long prison sentence is inappropriate - immediate execution is more appropriate. Not of the hacker who brought such idiocy to light, but of the 'razzis and maybe of the celebs..
#3 In many cases, 10 hours prison time would be far too much for such things (and I say this as someone who has been a "victim" of one nasty stalker, who went to extreme lengths to cause problems).
The old rule still applies, if you don't want it published don't put it in writing.
Re: Nowhere near satnav @Richard Tobin
They're at about 13,000 miles, so nowhere near this asteroid.
Given the numbers, the sats were closer to the asteroid then they are to us when it passed.
[That or I was really badly taught maths at school!]
Re: Practice makes perfect
Someone must have a really big gun, because they keep loading it with asteroids. I don't know who it is but me thinks their aim is improving with each one....
It's the Moon Riders..
Well, the Academy wanting us to think it's them anyway...
If my missus is named Jess, and in a post-crash stupor I call her name, the machine may be asking "Are you alright?" and make a slight mistake with what it thinks is my answer.
The idea I like. Maybe some things need a little re-working, but over all the idea is good. I've known a couple of cases where someone's outcome would've been a hell of a lot better had there been something that called out as soon as they crashed. And I'd prefer an accidental false call a few times when there's the chance that by the time I know I'm hurt, the ambulance is already coming.
(Actually, I wonder if they thought of the helmet being placed in a locker or something in range of the phone, and falling off a shelf/hook triggering a call... definitely needs some sort of "I am now or just was on a head" sensor (clip being closed may not be enough as some people ride with the straps undone)
Re: All that safety...
being able to see them without having to twist your head around so much you end up falling off or veering into traffic yourself.
I have to say that, if you can't control your bike enough to maintain direction should you need to turn your head, maybe you need another mode of transport? (Preferably one that DOESN'T use roads/tracks that other people might?)
Also, as Sarkster said, NOT turning your head to check what is behind you when you change lane/position etc is stupid and negligent. It's not just your life you're risking by relying only on your ears where you should be using your eyes.
Similar thing applies on the cycle-paths with earphone wearers (on and off bikes) who are so engrossed in the ride and the music that they don't think anyone else may also be using the paths.
I guess you really don't ride very often, maybe never? If you did, experience would've taught you by now to give you sufficient space around your
intended victims other road/path users to avoid a collision.
Re: As a motorbike rider...
Also long term rider and (semi-former*) advanced safety instructor.
HUD could be good, but I think I'd prefer to have my viewing space un-cluttered. Maybe something I can activate eg with a button near my left thumb.
For shorter trips no music. But for longer trips, music can help maintain focus - for some anyway. For me, it stops me remembering past conversations. As a CPTSD sufferer if something triggers certain memories it could prove fatal. Like all things riding, it's a risk that I've learned to manage.
Also, at least with my helmet and bikes, at highway speeds I cannot hear much (you do use earplugs to protect your hearing I hope?) so with music on I do not lose anything. If I'm riding right, I'm aware of the vehicles and other things around me with a 12sec scan pattern.
( * NZ government do nothing to encourage rider training, or to even mention it exists. As such, few organizations survive and those that do are struggling to attract students. I'd train for fuel costs if the schools I know could get more than two or three students for a weekend session - but even at barely-break-even prices many riders consider it too expensive)
Re: Recent news on Page 2 @JeffyPoooh
For a start, there's a hell of a lot more than the 1/60 sec involved.
As a plumber friend of mine says, and as another poster has already basically covered, it's not the press of the button you're paying for but the knowledge behind it.
have an add blocker enabled, you get told to turn it off or signup for a premium account.
Or go elsewhere.
I discovered AB due to my frustration of trying to read a largely technical article, and having animated ads moving all over the screen. I used to manually block them until infrustration I searched for "better ways to block ads" .
Have the video ads play through ONCE then come to a static image, or have a static image. Anything else and I block it.
If your site annoys me, I won't visit your site. I'd quite happily look at and even sometimes follow ads on sites (if the ad is for something I have an interest in), and really don't want to block them, but as so many ads are just plain annoying and have no way to turn them off (whatever happend to the "play once" function in Flash? - or right-click and turn off "loop" or "play"?), I won't allow them. (You can still advertise y'know - plain text in the article, with a picture and link.. Even something PHP generated to give you dynamic content while appearing static to the blocker... Not that hard!)
Probably already been said but...
The page pictured reminds me very much of one of the variants of the "Fake Police" virus.. Actually several variants of it..
oh.. City of London Police..
Appropriate imagery then...
Re: This is what happens when it's time to vote @ DiViDeD
Someone with more nonce than me once said that Australian elections are not won by anyone. They're simply lost by governments.
Actually I think they meant it's the citizens who are the loosers. Until we're allowed to, er, "forcibly remove politicians from office" for poor performance, they generally tend to keep their jobs - with some (at least in NZ) rather nasty "perks" which they get for life. Even if they get out of government in the election, most of them will keep the same roles and the few who do get retired or otherwise moved on will be appointed to some cushy job or ambassadorial(sp) role or something like that.
There does seem to be a general sense of 'It's time for a change, so let's give the other lot a go, regardless of how far they fucked things up the last time they were in power'
With the NZ elections coming up, it's not so much "time for a change because we forget", more like taking a drug with nasty side effects to counter-act a different drug with different nasty side effects. Just because we want to feel different pain and/or a different mindf**k.
Re: Easy to make @janimal and others
Freshly ground, strong roast, Arabica for me every time thanks.
[Not just at janimal]
Do you also spend $5k on oxygen-free copper gold-appointed mono-directional super-low-impedence ultra-fart-deodorizing audio cables?
Put my vote in for "Instant all the way". I have to put up with "real" coffee at work and friends places. That fancy stuff is enough to make you drink herbal tea!
Icon coz the more "burnt" (closer to atually boiling water) the better!
Re: Spanners Vs. Wrenches @Mr_Pitiful
The rest appear to have de-materialised or turned into carpet mats for an Astra!
It's simple. They, like socks, are the larval form of wire coathangers. That's why houses like mine are full of wire coathangers even though I never brought them into the house and there were none there when I moved in, whereas my tools and socks go missing despite careful management of them.
Re: Can of worms opened. @CliveM
"A set screw will invariably have a finished point - on the "not a screw" picture it's clearly what is left after casting and thread cutting."
Used to work in the manufacture of these things.. Only handled a few million of them personally.
The ones pictured are absolutely definitely called "Set Screws". And Set Screws, quite variably, do not always have a finished point. Sometimes a finished point would actually be a very bad idea in these sorts of things, sometimes you want a larger active surface area.
And speaking from experience in automotive and engineering (electrical and mechanical) industries, sometimes the set screw acts on a mechanism, not directly on the item being "set" or held. Again, in many of these cases a point would be pointless.
</post 3hr sleep rant :) >
Re: Third time lucky ... @Charles9
Just out of interest...
How many "normal people" could afford to fly to the next airport, let alone twice around the world?
Re: XP @Goat Jam
Could be worth a try - you never know your luck!
Keithpeter suggests using a live CD and I'd agree. I have an elderly gent customer who was having no end of problems with XP. He was upgraded to 7 and still had all sorts of problems. I set up a dual-boot with Mint.
Not only has he never looked back, he swears by how easy it is to use for most things. He upset my *nix-hating boss by coming in one day and saying how much he loved Mint, and how easy he found his computer to use. He's gone on to get his elderly sister and a few other friends using Mint as well.
Who also all come to love it.
With a Live CD, you have no install to do. Reverting to XP is as easy as pulling the disk out. You may find your life gets that much easier (not a good thing to do for all your customers though - the loss of revenue from no longer having to fix their regular messes can be considerable!)
HTH, as late as it may be :)
Not too long ago set up a Skype account, using a phrase much like the Shakesperean one mentioned in the article. About 7 words, a sentence but one that only really makes sense to me (well,maybe to others but you wouldn't guess it no matter how well you know me), and with random number/letter substitutions as well as random replacements for spaces. Skype said it was too guessable.
So I went with a sequence of characters that IIRC makes it into the top 10 (and certainly top 20) passwords at least by style. 8 characters, involving upper and lower case letters, numbers and punctuation.. That it's !QAZxsw2 doesn't at ALL matter to Skype, it's perfectly acceptable. Bloody common, but acceptable.
Really, when it comes down to password security, if you close out the account after x tries (and make x reasonably low, eg 100) so that any re-activation has to be done via email or some other contact with "support", then we should be able to use whatever password we want so we can remember it (or just do what I do, reset it every bloody time because I can no longer remember them and resetting them takes less effort!)
Re: Blake's 7 @Sir Runcible Spoon
"Having said that, Blakes 7 is still awesome !!"
B7 can't be good, they copied crApple! They stole the iphone!
In one episode of the first season (IIRC) you see Blake holding a smart-phone sized device while he talks his shipmates through a battle strategy. He's showing using his finger to draw on the device (could've been a stylus but fairly sure he used his finger) and what he's drawing on the device comes up on the main screen. Later in that episode or the next you see the device sitting near the transporter controls in a wider shot, and its screen clearly has a grid of icons just like a modern smart phone (well the few I've seen anyway.
The special effects? Crap by almost any standards (mis-matched 1970's wheelie chairs for the prisoners' seats on the transport ship???), but the story lines were quite good.. And watching them fumble around trying to learn about the Liberator, how to fly it and how to use it was a lot more believable than many stories that've followed.
Re: Where have I heard all this before?
"I don't think any even remembers what "bum the code" means any more."
Phrased like that? No, I don't remember it. But in practice I do. I remember a time when an update to a program either added significant new features, significantly improved speed and reliability (not one or the other, but BOTH), or significantly reduced the program size while also removing some bugs.
These days "upgrades" seem to do all the opposites - add bloat, remove functionality, slow the program and maybe your machine (bye bye Firefox, you've usually been good to me for all these years but latest update is last straw). I can't think of when I saw any real improvements in an update (aside from security fixes)
Lost art sadly, code optimization.
Oh, and I agree - a lot of the "new" isn't that new and less of it is useful. We did a lot of this "cloud" stuff back in the "grid" days. Name has changed but the guilt is the same...
Any demo scene @Leeroy
Still have a few PC demos around somewhere, on one of my current machines. Fire them up under Dosbox sometimes.
We lost something alright. Some of those took less space than an article (with comments) on El Reg..
The amount of work those guys must have put in optimizing their code.. Those who write today owe so much to those guys. Computers may not have exploded the same without their work, and certainly games would not be where they were without their work.
"...apply the ultimate patch to your computer: http://www.linuxmint.com/ "
Works well for Fista, 7, and other malware-infested shitfests.. Er, I mean other versions of Windoze..
Have had a neat challenge this week.. A Mac with suspicion of malware on it. Unlike that other thing which is so certainly infected, not as sure with the Mac and it has taken and tested all of my skills to try to track down what may be causing the issues that cause the suspicion of malware..
Next week I may go for a lifetime achievement aware : find an infected Linux machine (although that'd take a lifetime to achieve!)
Re: Well...if one doesn't USE Windows Defender... @ Eddy Ito
Any test that rates Norton highly has got to be false.
I'm talking real-world experience here. Norton misses so much compared to MSE, and it's something I reccomend to a number of customers if they want a free AV product (of course I reccomend Linux first :) ), or one that generally works.
I don't think I've yet seen a machine with Norton on it that hasn't been infected in some manner, and the worst infections I've seen in over 20 years in this industry have been machines with legit, paid up and up to date versions of Nortons.
Oh, I have a passionate dislike for all things MS (comes from years of bitter experience with their crap), so MSE has to be doing something right for me to like it in any fashion. It could be stronger but not bad as it is, and it is much better than many of the paid AV (especially Norton).
Feeding the trolls works best with rat poison...
" For them Modern work just fine."
If that were true, then why do so many of them complain bitterly about how horrible TIFKAM is?
I only say this as someone at the coal face of IT.
Still.. I personally love TIFKAM, it's really helping me get people to switch to Linux with the sensible (and optional) UI's, faster and more stable system, and no more need for AV... Old folks especially love Linux as it makes their computers easy for them to use! :)
Yes that's right.. Elderly grandmothers find Mint easier than TIFKAM, and say Linux makes their comptuers enjoyable!
Re: An accident waiting to happen? @ChrisBedford
Hmm.. That hub gives me some ideas..
We get some pricks who insist on plugging their kit into my network before they get proper authorization.. A simple "Do not plug your kit in or it will be destroyed" warning notice should suffice, with one of these babies in play..
And of course some prick who needs a bit of sparkle added to their life...
So glad I'm not alone (@AC 2153513)
"Or even into the ethernet socket just on the other side"
So glad I'm not the only one..
The number of times I've plugged something in, felt the plug go in right (or what feels right) only to wonder why the device that was working not so long ago isn't even being detected now...
Even worse when in front of a relly or customer (esp one you've just bolloked about doing something silly).
On the other hand, I find men being effeminate distasteful and greatly dislike the Graham Norton/Alan Carr style
You're not alone.. I also find effeminate men quite offputting... I like my men to be men, not to act like they're something else.
That said, I find the Graham Norton show to be interesting at times..
Re: Subconscious homophobia showing here.
If you support freedom of speech for everyone then you should support the right of people to campaign for slavery, legalising rape, using living small puppies as blowtorch holders... Whatever.
That's what freedom of speech is, that you can speak for and support what you want. Prefereably things that you believe are right for whatever reason, but freedom to speak your mind. Freedom means without limits.
Oh, and while I hope to find some handsome hunk to marry in the not-too-distant future, I do find it quite acceptable for someone to finance campaigns against gay marriage. If the person's a good friend I might even loan them the money. I would not be happy with people financing everything on your list BUT I support their right to do so. I know I am weird, but I do admire people who stand up for what they believe. Not just angry words at the TV in their living room but actually getting out there and fighting for that they believe in.
Re: Gay rage, because of what somebody believes?
"So... what I understand now to be true *here* is that if I stand on God's Word, I am supposed to be crucified for what God says. Correct?"
Don't forget that our Lord said "The world will hate you because of me" (paraphrased), and that Paul (or was it Peter?) said that we should be happy when we're persecuted for our faith (again paraphrased). Also it is said that we would be handed over to the authorities to be tried, condemned, and executed.
You can go the way of the world, which is a fun and relatively easy trip. You can claim to be Christian and go the way of the world, which is a relatively fun and easy trip.. Or you can go the way of Christ - which means that even many of those who claim to follow Christ will hate you.
"Besides I could give a lengthy theological rant about why the people who rail against gay marriage should spend less time looking at others and more time taking care of their own sins."
Sadly I can only upvote you once.. Is there a place I can nominate you for "Post of the decade"?
If only a few more Christians would live by this, the rest of us would have a much better name/reputation!
Thank you for posting that.
Re: The witch hunt continues
" unlike Eich, who supported an effort to deny them equal rights."
Just wondering... Did Catlin put money or other resources towards the pro-marriage movements? Did he put his money where his mouth was so-to-speak (get that smirk off your face!)? Did he use whatever resources he had at his disposal to help further his cause?
If so, how is he different from Eich, who used his money to forward what he (hopefully) believed to be the right thing? If Eich truly believes that we who are "gay" should not be allowed to marry, then he did the right thing by using what resources he has to support and promote that cause.
Re: Oh, a new outrage of the week. Finally, I was getting worried.
I very nearly became a statistic on more than one occaision because I am gay.
I still believe that if people are opposed to my being gay then that is their problem and their right. If they want to fund organisations to "cure" gays or whatever, because they believe that they are doing the right thing (or they're total [insert your choice of term] and doing it to be nasty) then that is also their right, priviledge, and problem.
I have been beaten many times because of being gay, and came close to suicide more than once because of the abuse. It's only be the grace of God that I am not one of that "body count". But I still stand up for peoples right to speak their beliefs, even if that upsets others (what, you think your beliefs don't upset others?). Maybe not speaking with fists or property damage, but speak them you may.
Re: Shakes Head (@grammaphobe)
"Day cannot be renamed night just as marriage no matter what the state says cannot be between a man and man."
Between one man and one woman, right?
But what about the Biblical definition of marriage, ie between one man and many (sometimes VERY many) women, at the same time. Sometimes even between brother and sister..
Just because people of certain beliefs define marriage in one way, it does not mean that should or has to apply to others.
As one who is gay..
Have read some of the comments here, but will post before I read further..
I am gay. I've been somewhat closeted because of cultural issues here in NZ (I grew up in small town NZ, back then it was a very dangerous place to be seen to be anything BUT straight), but I am happy so speak under my "real name" rather than AC.
I'm also Christian, and somewhat conservative/fundamentalist in many of my views.
If an athiest/Muslim/Hindu/whatever wants to promote their views, either directly or by funding causes that they believe in, they should have every right to do so. Likewise, I am very much pro-life, but if someone who is pro-choice (and/or pro-euthanasia) wants to promote their views or pay someone else to do so, that is their right and they should be allowed to do so.
And I am more than happy for someone to promote their belief that I should die because I am Christian, or rot in hell because I am gay. That's their belief, wrong as I may believe it to be, and that is their right to speak it.
That's what a free society means - people are free to speak their minds and act on their convictions. Sure, it may upset me or even hurt me when I get some stuff directed at me, but if a person is speaking what they believe then that is their right. I cannot get upset about how I feel my sensibilities might be infringed when someone says something I dislike and then try to claim I should be free to speak my mind. That would be hypocritical.
I will not stop using a product because someone there has done something in their capacity as an individual person. I might if those views are expressed as part of or on behalf of the company, ie that it's a company position, but not if it's individual staff within the company. If I was to take it to that sort of thing, well I can bet there're anti-gay people involved with the makers of all browsers.
TL;DR : I'm gay, and I support EVERYONE'S right to speak their views and act on their convictions (where that doesn't involve real harm to others, and no - hurting feelings is not "real" harm). It's hypocrisy to want to speak your views but prevent others from speaking theirs. I admire those who have the courage to stand up and speak up for what they believe.
New functionality is still a selling point, but the manufacturers now have a trickle-through of 'exciting new' functions which...aren't.
We've had so much over the years, and much of it never had content. How much truly HD content is there out there today? (and why is it that my old CRT TV could disply a higher resolution from the computer than my new and very expensive (thank God for the extended warranty that brought it for me!) "HD" TV?) Screen resolutions seemed to do a huge drop not long before "HD" came out.
Couple of years back "3D" was the big thing.. And the content for it would come, just buy the TV's...
Now, well I am wondering if 4k is already dead and buried, certainly haven't seen anyone advertising it here for many months.
So.. Should I buy new&shiny every year or so like some of my friends do, in the hopes that the promised content will finally show up [briefly looks away to watch airborne pigs], or should I wait until there is some content that is soooo good that I just can't bear watching it on some less-than-new TV?
Given the quality of so much TV today, you really do have to push the envelope with the content for me to buy new. I don't care what the picture quality is like, if a show isn't worth watching for the overall content, I'm not wasting my money.
"You would think the bot would be smart enough to realize the page doesn't exist before trying 7000 more passwords, but no."
Well... You might need to try something like Fail2ban. I think it works in those situations. Basically x failed attempts to log in, IP is banned for Y time (both can be set by you). I used to see stuff like that in my logs before I put that in to help block it.
Me, I cheat with PMA. If I am feeling significantly dumb enough to want to use it, I'll install it and use it, then dump it before I close the session.
"If the system allowed (for instance) weak passwords to be used, then the system is flawed."
Question is... What is a weak password? Try something on say Skype, which has a requirement of a strong password.. Now, I tried one there that is a 10 word phrase with number subs and also various bits of punctuation, Skype wouldn't allow it as "to weak". I put in one that makes it into the top 10 most common passwords, accepted as it's long enough with psuedo random letters and numbers.
Any password can be strong or weak, depending on what is known about a person. 21_JHG$45 might look like a strong password to any system., but if you know me well enough you might guess it within a small number of tries.
Strong passwords are good, but we do need a bit more than that to keep systems secure.
Have to say thanks..
I love what you're trying to do and would love to see the result, or at least see a good write up on the finished product - and not just a how-to or basic list of configs like many are. Sounds like an interesting project.
I've learnt a bit more about what's there VM wise myself. I've used them a fair bit over the last few years, but never really pushed them - only using them to run test/safely infectable(sp) installs of Windows and test/learn software and so on. But now am inspired to take a deeper look into what's there now :)
Have to thank you for your questions, and for putting up with the people who haven't read your message, like the important bits where you say you don't have room for another machine and so on, and go on to tell you why you really only need a second box when you've made it clear that's not an option :)
That said, if you're letting others (especially the kids) get on you really should think of ways to give them a totally seperate machine, even a laptop or cheap tablet. I've seen too many cases where kids manage to screw up machines quite badly - or at least get blamed for it. For now you may be quite secure, but they'll be watching and learning every little bit they can, they'll grow older and bolder/stupider, and given a chanve they will think they know everything, try something, and you end up in a world of hurt.
Don't get me wrong, I really want you to succeed with your plan and I want to see how it's done in the end, but back up everything, and back it up well. External drives in another location (in case said kids screw up and try to recover screwing up the backup), and when you can manage to give the brats their own machine so yours survives :)
Good luck with it :)
Re: Stable Door, boys and girls
You could get a Pay As You Go mobile and not register it.
Just don't forget to leave it somewhere randomly away from you home and your work. You may not register it, but tracking it will tell the trackers who you are within a fair amount of certainty by watching the locations.
(Of course, that is if they're interested in your phone's movements enough to bother tracking it - I don't like that they can do it but doubt that they do it to everyone)
Re: How it ought to be,
I believe it's called "winflash" or something similar. I've seen a few computers with a windows-based BIOS updater. Has been a while but from what I recall it is a nice looking convenient little windows utility to update your bios.
And it would be just as scary if there was a Linux version, unless you have a sure way of reverting to an earlier version.
Such a tool could be used remotely.
For that matter, look at the issues with Samsung UEFI some months back. IIRC it was booting Ubuntu from USB stick OR something in MS Office that could trash the UEFI BIOS enough that the machine would be bricked (for the average home user anyway). Something like that could also be triggered remotely I expect.
(It was a blacked out room so you can imagine how exiting that was for a 10 year old boy :) )
Now I think about it... I was someone who came to computing quite late, too late to do it at school . But i do recall that the computer rooms were always either in windowless areas or all the windows were covered. Why was it that we mere mortals were never allowed to see into the computer rooms? AV rooms being blacked out I can understand, but computer rooms?
Re: So fix it!
Popular music proceeds in fads caused exactly by the fact that people like the things they are exposed to early on,
if that line of reasoning was even remotely true, I should like Bing Crosby/Val Doonican, Eartha Kitt, Winifred Atwell, Frank Sinatra, movies by Fred Astair/Ginger Rodgers, and other assorted stuff that makes me leave the room and could make me end friendships, whereas stuff like Hard Rock and Heavy Metal which I've loved since my mid-late teens would not be stuff I still love today.
The idea of trying to get kids to love music that they don't like simply by playing it to them is pure and simply child abuse, and should be treated as such. I suffered a lot of pain at the hands of people trying to force me to like some noise that they thought I should do, while not having the simply decency themselves to try the same experiments on themselves with the sort of music I liked.
it's rubbish, and abusive, and people like this should be treated like the criminals they are.
Re: So fix it!
This is not true. [..]everyone's pretty well on a par at birth, and that includes all but the very rarest of artists.
Not true. I had friends at school who had less encouragement than I did to become better at art, but from their first drawings were better than I was. Likewise, they did more study and homework and so on yet I usually did better on tests.
Even today, having tech drawing and years of engineering work and work involving "graphic design" behind me, I am beyond hopeless at even basic kindergarten level of art. I can hand-make complex parts with basic tools, but I couldn't draw a random squiggly line to save my life.
Re: So, a hard to repair solar panel..
... and a toxic battery that will wear out, be heavy and costly, and need replacing is a good idea for the target market?
You do get that this unit requires someone to lift a bag weighing a hell of a lot more than several laptop batteries several times a night, right?
Nonsense, pure nonsense. Their first design WAS to do exactly that, and then, like any sensible person, they realised that is basically handing a hopeless black box that will break down to people who cannot repair it or have it serviced easily.
Last week I picked up a half a dozen solar powered garden lights. Cost a couple of bucks each, (maybe) give more light than these "gravity" units do, and they come on when it gets dark enough at about 8:30pm and are still giving strong light at 2am. I couldn't tell you the actual wattage involved but it's enough that $10 worth of these will reasonably light a large room (normal Western house). How long they'll perform to the same level for is another matter, the batteries will probably start to fail in a few years depending on how cheap/nasty they really are.
Complexity? Solar panel, battery (admittedly nicad which was a bit of a surprise), wires, probably some basic voltage or charge regulation, and a plastic case. Oh, and a very complex mechanical part called a "switch". No gears, no belts and pulleys, and so much effort to run that a physically drained or disabled mother could get it to work.
Oh, and servicing? As much as I like to recycle and re-use, I doubt I would bother. The power used in heating up the soldering iron would almost outweigh the cost of a replacement.
This way, unless it is abused, it will give service for an extraordinarily long time, with nothing but simple lifting motion required when light is needed.
Simple. Several times a night. A bag weighing what, 5-10kg? In areas perhaps where there could be a large number of weakened or disabled people who will struggle to do that as much as needed? Also it is a mechanical device that relies on suspended weight. I would expect that the materials used are the most re
not to mention handing out tons of toxic batteries is not exactly a great idea in a poor region with no recycling capability.
Batteries can be contain quite nasty chemicals. Not sure on the chemistry of capacitors but guess they're not much better. But plastics can be quite bad as well, although I guess/hope these people are using something relatively "green".
That said, I do like the concept. Anything that is able to help people to a better life (while still being resource/pollution etc friendly) I am happy with. Just not sure about the work (energy) input and the light output.
It's worth mentioning that from the target audience's perspective, that $10 cost is the equivalent of something like $800 or $1000 to most of us reading this.
True, $10 to them is like a lot to us (I've supported kids overseas through certain organisations in the past - the piddly little sum I pay per week is more than both parents can earn working full time!).
But I think one of the key things is that to us this is a trifling amount. A few thousand westerners spend an extra $10 at Christmas, a few thousand 3rd world families get cheap light.
Not sure if that's their plan or not, but it's something I could consider (i would also make sure there isn't something better first).
Re: All I can say is this...
1000 guesses per second is stupidly slow. Try 30 billion per second!
And how many websites let you ender that many guesses a second, or even a year?
If they have the password file, they have your password. Reading the articles you linked (thanks!), no matter how stupidly complex your password is you're screwed. It's a matter of time and like the article says, some passwords fell very quickly but others took a while. Once the software/techniques and of course source lists were enhanced, those harder passwords were cracked.
Re: Hentai ?
.These days IE is the best browser at blocking malware and phishing attempts....
So why is it then that all the machines I see that've had a "web based" infection (including the likes of "drive by downloads") are all from IE-only households, and nothing for FF/Chrome/Safari then? If it's so much more secure than other browsers it should be performing so much better.
Or maybe the performance in all areas is poor because the product is poor? IME (which is gained from currently working at the front lines of IT repair for the last few years and a couple of decades largely in IT elsewhere) IE is still much (and noticeably) slower than anything else and security is still such an afterthought that it has yet to actually appear on IE.
Re: This makes me sad
Hear Hear, the BOFH is the reason I started coming here in the first place (I stayed for the articles).
Much the same.. Some BOFH stories used to float around Fidonet (yes, I am that old!), then I found more on some news site (well IIRC it had "news" in the name) with my early forays into the web, and later they disappeared from there and I found El Reg. Been a regular reader ever since. In fact in some of the earlier days (especially before comments) I'd read every article.. Yeah I needed a life back then! :)
(Still need one now.. Anyone got one to spare? Or shall I just take the boss's one?)
Re: Ashamed to say
Our customers pay me. Without exception from large corporate to loaner granddad they hate 8.
Those that didn't buy 7 in time are starting to learn the wonders of Linux.. Interesting to watch - I am seeing less machines coming back for problems, but referrals for new business are way up. Thanks Microsoft, you're really helping me promote Linux! :)
- Infosec geniuses hack a Canon PRINTER and install DOOM
- 'Windows 9' LEAK: Microsoft's playing catchup with Linux
- Boffins say they've got Lithium batteries the wrong way around
- Game Theory Half a BILLION in the making: Bungie's Destiny reviewed
- Phones 4u slips into administration after EE cuts ties with Brit mobe retailer