Wrong
Nah mate, get shot. US, UK, who cares. No one I know uses 'shut'. That sounds norvven to me. Like Newcastle.
C.
3261 publicly visible posts • joined 21 Sep 2011
Yeah, well, we don't have large 1970s Crays on our desks, in our pockets, in our bags, and in our 1U racks in 2023. So we'll make do with this.
I love the history, don't get me wrong. But that doesn't make today's implementation, for today's computers and users, any less interesting or useful or relevant.
C.
I don't believe anyone accused him of actual crimes so when you say no crimes were proven, it's a bit of a strawman. ICBW on that: we didn't TTBOMK report him breaking any laws, alleged or otherwise.
The criticisms against him were that he was crashingly insensitive or naive about sensitive topics, and that he allegedly did things like, as a senior academic, ask 19 year old students out on dates within minutes of meeting them. It just creeps people out after a while.
He suggested that the possession of sexual material of minors, and even sex between an adult and a child, should be legal under the assumption that a minor could consent to it and everything would be OK. I believe he later backtracked on all or most of that stuff.
Bottom line is, his colleagues in the community just didn't like him any more. And when the press covered that tension, it was all wrongly interpreted - for some weird reason - as an attack on Free software. Free software has and had nothing to do with it.
This was all on RMS and his behavior. I'm aware of the concept of free speech and that folks should generally support those with differing opinions, and all that, but if people find you sketchy on the basis of your attitude and comments, don't be surprised if they don't want to keep you in their community.
You don't invite back the loudmouth bore who scared away guests at a previous party.
C.
Yeah? That's a tweet from 2017 about the 2016 election in which Russia spammed Facebook and other places with thousands of messages to divide Americans and undermine confidence in the elections.
Tho the 2016 election was nothing like the 2020 one. The 2016 one was mostly all about the media milking the outrage over Trump and that Clinton's campaign was so-so. 2020 was on steroids.
C.
Apple's architectural license is so special, I've sometimes seen it referred to as a founders license, as a reference to the fact that Apple helped get Arm started way back in the day.
This Qualcomm case, from Arm's allegations, seems to boil down to what exactly is in Qualcomm and Nuvia's license fine print, and what exactly is Qualcomm using from Nuvia.
Ever since Arm started touting off-the-shelf server-grade CPU core designs, I can imagine it really wanting to make the distinction between an architectural license for server and mobile processors.
Arm is so incredibly secretive and strict about its licensing that this lawsuit, if it somehow ends up at public trial, will blow the lid off all that. This is quite high stakes for Arm.
C.
Yeah, mea culpa. I was trying to write and edit two pieces at once, as we've got a rush of interesting pieces to get out.
I could have sworn trolls thought she was in either UK or Canada, and when I saw London, I assumed UK when I edited in that paragraph. That was stupid - I hate making mistakes.
It was fixed pretty quick. Don't forget to email corrections@theregister.com if you spot anything wrong.
C.
"What's 'left wing' about campaigning for pay rises that reflect the cost of living?"
The overall policies and wishes of EiE are left wing - classic trade unionism - looking through them. It's not a pejorative, it's an observation.
It's funny how some people think we're beyond-woke liberal morons and others think we're channeling the Daily Mail. It's like there's a spectrum of ideologies and we're trying to find a decent spot in the middle.
I have a feeling some of those upset by 'left-wing firebrands' weren't upset we called Boris Johnson a 'Churchill cosplayer'.
C.
I love it when people try to be pedantic. Love it to bits.
The article says the deal has yet to close - so yes, as you say, and as we acknowledge, Broadcom has not completed the acquisition of VMware.
And don't forget to email corrections@theregister.com if you think you've spotted something wrong.
C.
Yeah, it's fixed. It was a bit obvious from the context in the first par. But, fine.
For those saying why trust a whole article if some simple thing is wrong in it. That's a very 1D way one of looking at it. We're most concerned with making sure the main, sensitive parts of a story are correct.
Sometimes that means little things like saying 10 kWh in the first sentence and 10 kW later get overlooked.
Don't forget to email corrections@theregister.com if you spot anything wrong, please.
C.
It is the summer silly season when actual news is thin on the ground. August is the perfect time of tales that seem too good to be true.
On a more serious note, it is just reporting what Chen said, and that a CVE was assigned, which is funny. No one's confirmed the actual issue.
Our readers are smart enough to know how much weight to put on these sorts of yarns.
C.
FWIW we've added a large update to our piece. I'd like to highlight that we drew attention to the weirdly small sample size and the incorrect use of Autopilot in our initial reporting, which may leave readers rightly healthily skeptical of the project's claims.
C.
Yeah it's poles, not pole. And the ShadowCam is just a super sensitive camera:
http://shadowcam.sese.asu.edu/about
Don't forget to drop an email to corrections@theregister.co.uk, please, if you spot anything wrong or weird, so we can fix it right away.
C.
OK, chill out! The "reasonable comparison" and "less reasonable comparisons" was the paper's viewpoint, not ours, which I've made clearer in the piece. Suffice to say, no, we don't think physical theft of an item is the same as downloading something you weren't going to pay for anyway.
One, this article is critical of the paper in that (for example) we note that the paper cites industry numbers without challenging them, which is not great.
Two, Tom (who wrote the article) is one of our top staff who goes beyond press releases, and routinely ruins an exec's month with original reporting. Gimme a break with this churnalism stuff.
C.
We meant the /19 is announced as part of a larger /9 block, which is in the /8 range. Here's the passage from MANRS:
"Around 21:25 UTC On 26 July 2022, Rostelecom’s AS12389 network started announcing 17.70.96.0/19. This prefix is part of Apple’s 17.0.0.0/8 block; usually, Apple only announces the larger 17.0.0.0/9 block and not this shorter prefix length."
I've edited that part as it seems to be confusing people. A /19 block is smaller than /9 which is smaller than /8.
Also if you think we've written something wrong, please drop us an email to corrections@theregister.com so we can take a look straight away, thanks.
C.
It really isn't. Crypto scams are worthless, yes, so watch out for those. Actual crypto, no.
If you go on Coinbase or Robinhood or WeBull or FTX or whatever, and you spend $1,000 on Ethereum, the price of ETH goes up 10%, and you sell, you just made $100 cash (minus any applicable tax). If the price goes down 10% and you sell, you just set fire to $100.
So yes, real money at play here. $1.5m of it in the alleged Coinbase case.
C.
Yes, if the allegations in that particular case are true, that would be insider trading.
Whenever a coin is listed on a large exchange like Coinbase, its value goes up - at least initially.
Speaking generally: Let's say a CB staffer quietly tips you off that a token is about to be listed. You buy thousands of those tokens from other exchanges, or perhaps mine a load yourself. Then it's listed on CB and the price shoots up as demand kicks in. When it's gone high enough for you, sell the tokens, and bag a profit.
That would be pants-on-head insider trading.
C.