591 posts • joined 12 Sep 2011
If he wants folk to support his platform, then he needs to make his platform an attractive proposition, either through numbers of devices in the wild, or some attractive business enticement.
To arrogantly demand support in this fashion shows that he has a poor grasp of business (effectively wanting something for nothing) as well as a misunderstanding of what net neutrality is about.
Mr. Chen has made himself look a tad foolish.
For a little risk, the SAAB Gripen - BAe helped work on it (so PC), already capable of short take off in adverse conditions, so probably wouldn't take much to navalise.
Of course, with the carriers we have, with no catapults, and nor are they likely to, it needs to be ski-jump capable, which somewhat precludes the Rafale or the F/A-18. Perhaps some mice Russkie numbers might work though...ha ha ha ha...!
"Does anyone over 12 years old use the upvote/downvote buttons?"
Down voted 'cause I is down wid de kidz, innit? LOLZ!!!
(40 year old trying too hard...)
@ Lars "problem in the UK is all the low bridges you run under"
A fine point. The East Midlands line is gradually being electrified and even this requires substantial works on bridges and tunnels to fit train plus overhead lines.
The problem the UK rail network has is that it survived the war largely unscathed - so no need to rebuild as happened across Europe. So we have a network designed for steam engines carrying masses more than it was ever designed to do.
"I think the real problem is the cargo cult approach to any methodology that is taken by many users."
Well said. I once had to tell a project manager in rather blunt terms that PRINCE is not a religion.
Try processes, sure, but drop what isn't working. Don't keep it purely out of stubbornness.
"The Captur is made in Spain..."
Many folk don't let the facts get in the way of a good bit of nationalism and the French are more nationalistic than most (even Alex Salmond would tell them to calm down). After all, its a Renault, therefore it is French!
I had similar discussing a (then) recently acquired German car with an elderly gentleman who hadn't cottoned on that the war ended a little while before. I pointed out that my 'German' car was built in Portugal - at which point his rant changed to fits of laughter and derogatory descriptions of Hispanic working practices. Some people are just that way inclined....
"Let's not forget, it was beancounters who ultimately did for the UK car industry. It was run by them, whereas the German one was (and still is) run by engineers."
Nationalisation handed it over to the unions and the bureaucrats in Whitehall. The former destroyed the work ethic and drove wages to uncompetitive levels and as a consequence, we built expensive, shoddy cars. The latter lead to poor business management leading to designing cars for non-existent markets, sometimes products that competed amongst themselves (better than they do against imports anyway!) and selling products at a loss because they couldn't 'do the numbers'.
Government intervention in the UK from the 50's onwards was a heavy-handed disaster. The only segments not nationalised are the only ones that remain in any size and made money later - the financial and service industries.
Google aren't the police or some government agency (though the ad-peddling data scavengers do see themselves as all powerful). I can go with the 90 day disclosure, but releasing exploit code is dubious to say the least.
Google are treading on dangerous ground - would they like MS (or anyone else?) dropping code for vulnerabilities in Android or ChromeOS 90 days after finding them? A harmful precedent set by Google that could backfire on them.
Putin the kettle on for a cup-a-soup...?
Baaad pun time!
Couldn't agree more. How many beige PCs do you see in the shops these days?
Jenga? Nah - Twister. Less a board game, more an act of sado-masochism.
"Where you goin' to, fool?!"
"This ain't no plane, fool!"
"Hey, fool, you've reached where you goin'...fool!"
"Quick! Supreme reader must reboot the modem!"
All this talk "ancient systems" and "skimping" - all sounds like he wants to push for a nice new system. No doubt the usual "government IT" project suspects are rubbing their hands with glee at mega-££££ quotes in the off'ing. I'd have expected such talk from an old school Tory looking for a directorship, but not so much from a senile LibDem'er looking for the nearest retirement home.
24? The ultimate answer? Kiefer Sutherland will be pleased.
The problem becomes - if not touch screens, then what?
Customers are increasingly after twiddly features - SatNav, climate control, media services etc. These all require control of some sort.
Having masses of clear, single function buttons won't cut the mustard - too many would be more distracting than a touch screen. BMW use a wheel type device (other multifunction button solutions exist too, of course) - this too is distracting as you have to scroll around masses of menus etc (I know - I've had one). Voice control simply isn't up to snuff - most struggle with the combination of ambient noise, variation in accents etc.
So, really, how much worse is touch screen than any of the above if customers want these modern functions? Voice may be the answer in the long term for input, but audio feedback is point-in-time, so only of limited use (you don't have an audio output telling you speed). Like voice control, head up display is in it's early days, but a combination might work for some functions - but you don't want surplus stuff like air con splashed across the windscreen.
I'd also say a touch screen satnav on the dashboard is a heck of alot safer than a road atlas on the lap - and this was alarmingly common once.
I almost sympathize with car manufacturers trying to balance the wants/needs of the consumer with functionality and safety.
Bring on the neural interface!!!!!
Scirocco's dull, practical, humdrum sister for those who's budget doesn't stretch to an Audi A3.
"But they're still waiting for the small lemon-soaked paper napkins"
They serve KFC on their flights? Now THAT is proper in flight catering!
In some ways, I rather agree. I have a Samsung 40 inch 1080p screen that also has your TAS feature (loving the acronym). It has a good picture, plenty of ports and works fine (though I'd love to be able to disable the analogue tuner...). At the moment, the only thing smart about my Samsung is a Chromecast up one HDMI port and an XBOX 360 up the other. I can do most things a smart TV would do quite easily.
3D doesn't make me rush out to buy a TV, and really, the smart trinkets haven't sold me (especially as they seem to be very model-specific and poorly maintained as models age). 4K is probably about the only thing that interests me and even then, only if I got a bigger panel and the price/quality ratio was right.
Silicone chips -
elastic compute resources!
Warning - Daily Mail style joke response...
Oh, you know those clever legal types - The German lawyers will say "Ach! Our BORA has ze kapital letters, jah?"
The Italians will nod there heads and then beat a hasty retreat....
Pleased to note that there are six factual books, with the remainder firmly rooted in the fiction category.
As works of fiction, the Qu'ran and the Bible are respectable collections of short stories, poetry etc, not too dissimilar to Aesop's Fables or any number of anthologies.
I always thought Animal Farm was a better Orwell book than 1984. It's easier to read, more accessible to a broader audience and is just as well crafted as 1984.
Works for BMW. I rather like the 6 Series.
Audi naming sounds like European paper sizes and they don't seem to have a problem either.
Counterpoint - can I buy a Samsung S5 or an iPhone 6, format it and put Windows Phone on it? That kind of flexibility would be nice. I suppose being able to by the M8 as either Android or Windows Phone might be nice - but a truly customizable 'Pick Hardware then pick OS' would be nice too.
I've had Android and I currently have Windows Phone. I have far less trouble and have a far more seamless user experience with my Nokia (or NOTkia now, I suppose) than my kids have with there flaky Android equipped Samsungs.
Well, for me, my battery life on my power-hungry monster Lenovo improved markedly when I switched out to an SSD, and it also ran quite a bit cooler too.
And that's before I start looking at performance.
For enterprise applications, there's a place for both. It's a bit like shiny 15K SAS/FC disks versus 7.2K SATA disks - performance quality balanced against capacity quantity, only with shinier SSDs at the performance end.
They should count themselves lucky as they had a u-boat sized mega-shark patrolling the waters...
"Will it open my beer bottle at 50 paces?"
I'd buy that for a dollar!
Given MS are rather late to this somewhat narrow market, I really wonder why they're bothering. A smarter move would have been to buddy up with someone established, perhaps Samsung to do something around compatibility with existing kit. Let someone else do the leg work on this one instead of sinking money into yet another also-ran.
Missile defences are somewhat over hyped. Build smaller nukes, smuggle them over the border (and big countries with long border regions have a problem here) and your missile defense is an expensive trinket.
China used quite a big missile to take a pop at a satellite. The US achieved the same with a ship launched souped-up SAM, so don't believe the Chinese propaganda completely.
Perhaps were our heroic tailor a bit more product agnostic, he could cover other jumbo-phones, such as the Galaxy Note or the Nokia 1520. Might be a growth industry....
Dropping 18,000 staff? Satya won't be needing help creating space it appears.
Mine streams to a Logitech bluetooth speaker and my car without issue. The camera (as with any camera) is only as good as the photographer - I'm not David Bailey, but the results are way better than my efforts with an iPhone 5. I have yet to see a smartphone that hasn't suffered bizarre behaviour, regardless of OS - having seen a friend lose his rag with a Motorola and demonstrate that they don't bend very well (the hard way) proved to me that no phone OS is infallible.
I sympathize to a degree. I have a Nokia 1020. Runs rings around the iPhone and most Droids, but since the 8.1 update, there have been a number of crashes (apparently a known problem on the 920 and 1020, but with a lack of response from ex-Nokia or Microsoft). Mine is the 64GB version that O2 had for a while as an exclusive - and boy, those 40 megapixel hi-res photos like storage like a fat boy likes cake!
I otherwise like the WinMo ecosystem - I prefer it to the somewhat haphazard nature of Droid (and I do have a Droid tablet that I like, and I put my daughter on a Samsung S4 Mini as it was a good fit at the time), and the stupid pricing of Apple devices and increasingly unreliable iOS. However, if the Denim update doesn't improve matters, my opinion might be swayed.
...found any cats yet?
After all, we all know what Curiosity has form for.
Pensioners, drivers of a nervous disposition or (somewhat affluent) parents buying a first car for their little girl in funky colours might go for the less urgent model, if only for the cheap insurance.
Putin wants a secret lair where he can sit in a ridiculously oversized 60's style chair and stroke a cat, plotting world domination. Think Bond villain or Dr Evil...
2000 was very much 50℅. It always seemed like a product rushed out the door, with XP being the intended finished product.
I had one of the early betas when it was still labeled NT5. Basically NT4 with plug'n'pray plus a few bells and whistles.
That's largely why I describe 2000 as 'meh' - it wasn't bad, but it wasn't finished either.
I ignored Windows ME because I'm in obviously in denial - I'd forgotten possibly the worst Windows release of all. I hang my head in shame.
It would appear that the negative ranters have already started.
Perhaps a pause for thought is in order. MS definitely have a subconscious alternating between releases. 98 was good (particularly SE), 2000 was meh. XP was good, Vista was an abomination. 7 was good, 8 - well beauty is in the eyes of the beholder. Maybe 9 will be just fine. Take 8's underpinnings and fix the GUI and who knows...
I always wondered how all the cheap stuff on Amazon etc from China seems so ridiculously cheap given the shipping etc - they get the Yanks to ship it!
A number of options...
1 - Spell "Blu" properly, and as it's 4K, hence more - Bluer Ray
2 - Purple Ray (or any other colour of choice "the new blu"...)
3 - I'd say Ultraviolet-ray, but as UV is already used for the DRM shackled download service...
4 - Don't bother with a new name as the adoption won't be high enough to warrant mass production and the associated marketing (cynical answer).
If I put nude selfies up, any thief would be straight down the pshrinks with PTSD. They'd be that bad, they'd probably qualify as WMD.
For that matter, I'd be ill if I saw my own (hypothetical) nude selfies....
Well, having read this report, I'm not only glad I own a Nokia, but one that doesn't even register as a model worthy of thieving. Phew! I can leave my phone in the car etc and not worry.
Gotta love them statistical reports. I am definitely in the wrong job.
"Unless of course you mean a Microsoft Monopoly Sponsored portable."
Would that be as opposed to Google Monopoly Sponsored portables? Compare the number of Android tablets and phones to Windows and I think you'll see my point.
The days of MS being a full-on monopoly are largely over (and a good, healthy thing too - though now we have Google going down a similar road), however, bleating on about the bad old days does rather sound like a pensioner still refusing to buy German because of the war.
Let's take these a point at a time:
Windows Phone rot - 1.5% market share? According to IDC, it's 2.5%, and higher in the US. Even so, 1.5% is a good few handsets in its own right. It's squeezed out Blackberry, which isn't a bad performance for a platform that really is (too?) late to the party.
Nobody writes apps for that platform - OK, how about Cisco for a start, or Microsoft themselves. Maybe EA if you're into games. 120,000 apps isn't too shabby, so to say nobody is stretching it.
Consumers consider apps a must - Really? After a few games, it's mainly social media apps, email, browser and music apps. While a geek consumer may want a hundred apps to do the same job, average Joe, isn't nearly as fussed. Businesses might like to see more focused business apps.
MS has a poor record on hardware - Consumers don't currently 'see' MS hardware on phones - they see Nokia (or the odd HTC WinPho). Even if they did, poor record on hardware? MS have had the odd issue, but no worse than any other manufacturer. Look how many old MS mice there still are out there for a start.
...lies and mistruth - General consumers, again, haven't seen headlines on that area from MS in the mainstream press for sometime and they aren't so fickle anyway. If they were, more recent stores about Google's policies on information peddling would have them flocking away from Android and Chromebook, but they don't.
To close, vive la difference. If everything collapsed down to Android and a niche of iOS (now there is a declining share), where's the choice? Do we really want Google 'owning' all mobile devices in the same way MS 'owned' PCs? Why trust Google any more than MS?
Windows Phone is a worthwhile, easy to use, lean platform, even if MS haters are blinded by prejudice and Fandroids sneer. Its biggest sin? It was too late to a market already invaded by dumpster loads of cheap Android and established Apple.
So proving the superiority of Windows Phone - no problems with theft as thieves apparently aren't interested!
I've had no problems with Office 2013 docs on OneDrive, however, I am VERY foolish.