Regarding
"It was not a [targeted] malicious attack, it was a random attack," Stefanek says.
Ah - that is so good to know ... or is it?
The last thing we need is public acceptance that random attacks is good?
1288 publicly visible posts • joined 8 Sep 2011
Maybe like all prey such as mackerel in the deep salty blue, bison on the plains (well historically I mean), burgers in a MacD, ... the best protection a single of the species has is in big numbers.
Same with pooter users on new kit (but I bet the cell phones/mobile phones are far more wildly and popularly hoovered, slurped and vacuumed for user data)
Now were I a betting man sir I'd probably bet on this or something quite like it:
http://www.currys.co.uk/gbuk/computing/desktop-pcs/desktop-pcs/lenovo-ideacentre-300-21-5-touchscreen-all-in-one-pc-10141695-pdt.html
Play on the Mac lookalike-ness of it in white all-in-one form with optional switch from tablet UI to trad(ish) UI incorporating keyboard shortcuts that go back to Windows 3 or even DOS and all the way up to Win10 with added plusability in that user experience that is so intuitive with fingers onscreen the tablet glitterati will excel in their excllence
But that is just me
EDIT: but as for any lego-like pooter of much complicated-ness = uh-huh baby
But that means (IT angle here folks) that when paid for after three months of ownership said or implied bit of IT-KIT (that is IT kit to the great uninitiated) is even more obsolete than when the item reference were placed into an online order thingy or writ onto an instore paper wotsit using one of those stubby writing things.
But may be that is the future of purchasing experiences no?
Now this is why public funding and public fundedness is or should be a dead dodo, a parrot that ain't a parrot no more, and a trex fossil of gargantuan portions and proportions no?
It just kills the passion, motivation and aspiration replacing it with necromantic book(slogging) keeping and should be committed committee inspired design.
Or is it just me?
While Austerity runs in the foreground, Realignment runs in the background and eurobods draw the UK ability to huff-n-puff-n go blue in the face over renegotiating UK membership.
Like all good west end musicals this one too will run for a good many years (and what does that tell us about of freedoms of reporting?)?
What if the EU boots out the UK?
Scotland goes UDI (Unofficial Declaration of Independence) and UK (well, England mostly) sends in SAS and 2 Para to secure RN nuclear sites in UDI Scotland?
Huh? Huh?
Besides UK (well England really) is much well on t'royd t'Duchy of Londres state with predictably landed gentry getting richer at expense of working or unworking folk.
Nothing changes yet everything changes and all stays the same?
... isn't this what Microsoft, intel, AMD, Apple, google, ... have been doing for years?
Making IT and digital stuff doable, accessible and workable to the greater populace out there?
No?
EDIT: plus it reads more like Windows PowerToys than Excel macros (or even more like .bat workery)
Truth is procurement primarily goes to what once were publicly funded employees in a process designed by publicly funded employees so it isn't really surprising that this working method has yet to become unblocked and favours still publicly funded employees.
Attempting to unblock it must have been going on for at least 30 years.
The bureaucracy involved is (or was unless it has changed) chilling - European level, National level, local level (is there such a thing any more or is it another term for the public works department?)?
Then there is BT, or ... (usually gas, water or leccy utilities?) ...
Does it really matter what the end users device does anyway?
As soon as it connects to a network (any network?) the network server can slup all that up any way?
So why be coy?
Google Drive really is your friend?
Any way it is all sort of turning irrelevant as (haven't you heard?) China has crashed (probably means there is no dosh to bail out Corbyn, Greece, all the rest of defray-payment-policy-strategy-executive shmuchery(?) and besides the UK has always depended upon slaves and/or empire to pay for its costs of livings (plural and plurality seems important no? Alternatively: Get out of that TW?)?
Look - what is BT?
In terms of global enterprises it is a splat, splot, spot, UK dependent thingy.
Invoke a principle of reciprocity and watch BT subsequently squirm, squash, die as Ruski, Merican, Canadian, ... telecoms come in and compete on even levels?
Dear BT: some swords are two edged, watch which ones you dare and/or care to use?
Corbyn = return to stealth taxation and your money being spoken for just after you receive it with what little that is left over not being worth very much?
Unless, of course, your income is publicly funded, with no redundancy rules writ in L-A-R-G-E, guaranteed increases in income, astounding pension paid for out of the public purse, wonderful rellocation T&Cs, ... in which case you will probably covertly, overtly or covertly & overtly pushing, influencing, taunting the Corbyn way?
The poor wee man probably has no idea why he has been catapulted to fame and notoriety (also described as: we got a right pussy cat here?)?
No?
(Or to put it colloquially: the daft t*at?)?
If recent worldwide revelations (and in the UK non-revelations?) are anything to go by senior power brokers in the UK are above the law anyway?
Not by legislation, not by rule but merely by day-to-day practice of mis-filing, non-enacting, misplacing or turning a Nelsonian blind eye to whatever spins your boat?
... an over bureaucratized state?
1 - the incident only become important when pwage affects employees (bureaucrats in the bureaucracy?)?
2 - it does not matter a jot what the content or risks to those individuals are (in fact its leaks are worse in effect than its whistleblowers stuff?)?
I could go on but you get the drift and all it boils down to is a "You did it-No, you did it" whitewash coverup.
Shame innit?
You humans - wot yoo like?
Okay the hardware is inexpensive but will my Creative Suite CS3 (or 4 or 5 or 6) run in that environment.
The above is an example and maybe the problem is not as much hardware but "will my favourite and/or bespoke but certainly adorable and very expensive at the time software work ticketty-boo too?"?
No?
True, true, ...
The trouble is in UK that the strong tradition of Tort, vicarious liabilities, redress, ... sort of is overlooked and ignored by recent practice of not holding individuals to account with a preference to apply a fine to an organisation.
It seems a bit of a strange set-up considering England's attraction to Common Law?
I suppose we may draw our own conclusions as to why this set of circumstances comes about.
Point well made and taken.
But the banks use customers money to do risky stuff that creates profits or losses for the bank (and increasingly these days particularly in days of high inflation? - there is attitude: get your money working for you. Meaning any organisation handling money speculates with that money in its possession with a view to creating profits or at least covering staff costs and staff bonus for those involved?)? In UK Icelandic bank "crash" (term used loosely) cost local and central guvmint administrators quite a bit as they had dosh (that is customers dosh and profits made from handling that dosh) tied up in Icelandic funds no?
What good does it do fining an organisation - where is there justice in that?
That 56 millions of squids would be better spent in relief to those directly affected and making infrastructure improvements so it limits chance of things happening again.
There aint no justice in a fine. And a fine has potential to harm those already harmed by the earlier incidents by diverting dosh away from where it is needed? (If a fine is required it is better to fine those individuals directly rather than the organisation itself?)
Organisations do not create money and any money in an organisation is generally and principally provided by its customers. High earners in the company are likely to remain unaffected however ...
Far better for the authorities to instruct organisation to implement an improvement plan and compensation plan to 56 millions squids level. (Just like Health & Safety inspections in uk - there are no justifications for slapping on a fee because additional improvements are required?)
Do we really accept that the nation capable of keeping (almost?) all things secret until whistleblower(s) happen along will so readily and easily-peasily put its hands in the air and say "Cor Blimey! Yes Guv! We az ad our data nicked innit?"?
While at the same time cold shoulder or incarcerate whistleblowers?
Is it rat smelling time?
(But first - Joke Alert: Local guvmint in the UK should have a large penis drawn about it?)
Any way it doesn't matter too much if the data were uploaded realtime - guvmint computer operators are dab hands at manipulating the databases anyway.
So really the best place the data should be uploaded to is our UK friendly and independent motoring bodies (RAC, AA, National or even Halfords?) with copies going automatically to guvmint database.
In fact, the data should be uploaded to an independently run database allowing free access by all and any with no editing rights afforded to either?
Definitely not to Highways Agency, local guvmint, central guvmint or any direct/indirect guvmint funded organisation.
Does dodgy politics deny the cost made and sacrifices given?
If so what should the England do about their -ahem- *cough* *cough* excesses in Africa, India (as in Indian continent now making India, Pakistan and Bangladesh) and would that extend to the Americas too?
And what about the Irish, Scots and Welsh clearances as well as those inflicted upon the English poor themselves?
Pray tell
And what should the West do about blind eyes inflicted simulaneously upon Roosevelt (?), Churchill and Stalin post-war when it was permitted ti despatch about a third os all unarmed military, civilians, children held in captivity?
Pray tell on that too s'il vous plait
I think t'other side of the iron curtain has been sorely misrepresented in the UK.
Heavens! We might even have been so brainwashed and mind warped into believing that the UK won WW2 on its own, Russian contribution to the WW2 was minimalist and all of Eastern (well Central?) Europe's woes rest on Ruski
Sad innit
Banks: How can we get more money? We need more to meet bonus requirements of our staff(s)?
Guv: Why don't we encourage the minions to buy their own homes? In good times we get more dough, you get more dough.
I tough times we repossess (okay - rephrase that to: repossess with much wailing and hand-wringing but repossess nonetheless) and we still get more dough.
A more interesting modelling might be predator-prey ratio analysis for those on the public take?
Tsk! Humans? Honestly?
Alternatively we can take the Alien Analogy and talk of impending doom that will befall soon unless (like those Princes in Uganda?) we get lots of monies first?