31 posts • joined 5 Sep 2011
Seeing as they were showing these things off at trade shows...2+ years ago? Yeah, most likely.
Re: vertical search?
More than anything this is an attack by Microsoft to slow down Google so they can get to do the same stuff.
MS has always tried to get 50% of a market, then snipe away, but in this case, critical mass has been against them, and accuracy of data Now Bing isn't /that/ bad (not AS bad, but those google vs bing test is trivial to work out which site is which), MS are cranking up the attacks. Which, to be a bit fair to MS, they did get bashed over the head for their dominance and probably want everyone dragged down to their level.
But they're behind, and doing anything they can to knobble Google, and it looks like these funded 'fairsearch' organisations and the money being thrown about is working.
Wait, Koh again?
She used to do work for Apple, and keeps finding in Apple's favour? Eh?
I don't get how she's able to keep getting these cases when there's prior business dealings.
If this is true (and I'm truly hoping it is), then it's the right thing to do.
Chuck on a wig, wrap him in the scarf, and let those dulcet tones flood over you.
A lot of hype here, but considering all the misdirections (and flat out lies!), I wouldn't put it past them.
"Rumors that Elop was grooming Nokia for an eventual sale to Microsoft began shortly after he joined the company,"
After? Before, during, after, and every week until it finally happened. Was incredibly obvious this was MS's plan all along and it was only a matter of time of when, not if.
Nokia staff leaving knew what was about to happen, for Nokia to feign shock at eventual outcomes is... well, it's not working. But, the right people have had their cut, so business as usual.
Turn on the GPS remotely, take a picture, send round the police to arrest the person with stolen goods.
A) no-one will steal phones
B) buy stolen phones.
And the problem is solved, as well as lots of other local burglary crimes too most likely.
It wasn't unexpected the direction they'd be going. They'd really backed themselves into a corner, and WP8/Android were showing that functionality beats pretty UI's that need extra clicks.
The Notification bar, the quick settings, it's obvious that Apple have sat down with everything out there and /really/ looked carefully at it, probably had meetings on what to take it, improve it, and make it look 'appley' but it's incredibly obvious to anyone who looks at them where the ideas are coming from.
And that's ok! It really is! Palm had some great ideas too, as can be seen by the switcher.
You know deep down every iPhone user is going to look at this and think "well, they kept telling me this was better than the competition for all those years, and that they were copying MY phone, but now they're copying them and... I just feel uncomfortable. What else do other phones do better?"
Then again, maybe it'll get a few others to re-look at iPhones and say 'oo, nice hardware and now a nice OS that works like i'm used to'.
Shame they're going to Bing though, to get away from Google, they're once again willing to break their functionality. Unless they think Bing's good enough now. But as bad as Google may be perceived to Apple, have they REALLY forgotten how Microsoft works?
Shows an Apple that's following, following, racing around, sniffing for clues. And at last, the general press seems to be aware that the smoke and mirrors are just that.
This makes the Ouya look highly impressive!
Stunning that all this is blowing up in MS's face now. With E3 coming up, there's not going to be chance to talk about games. It won't be just games journalists there, but regular press (I hope) badgering MS execs on providing information to the Government.
Always on? Kinect always running? Listening in? Identifying who's in the room?
No wonder it's already being known as the Xbox1984
This is the first step though for a lawsuit to get cash from all those prior sales though.
Yeah, MS didn't even try to negotiate right, just ran to the judge.
So they get the patents they need for next to nothing, can't be punished for not paying, but can lock out others from using any of their tech.
No-one will submit anything of worth to a patent pool in future, it's just been shown to give away everything for no benefit, and you're far better off keeping it to yourself to allow room to sue later.
Very odd ruling, and something MS will end up also being hurt by at later points in time.
If Google's breaking the law, where is it. Point them to the exact wording, let them fix/work around it, AND hold other companies to the same standard. Otherwise this just looks like a huge shakedown.
Can you implement a law in the EU that's only applicable to one company? No? then show us the law. List exactly how Google are breaking it. Otherwise this is simply corruption.
I'm sure there's other companies cheering them on, offering support, who'll run into huge problems themselves if such laws are implemented. Needing user confirmation on using the search engine, the mapping, the email, the printing (these services can cost money), the... everything.
Funnily enough, Google's method, obvious on why it's the way it is, really is the simplest way to manage this, and thus most likely for a user to tweak. Having different options all over the place is only going to make things worse.
Re: Apple is more than just a tech company...
" but mobile makers don't earn any money from content sold on Android"
I suspect that eventually they'll all hammer on Google for a share of that revenue too. Google will take 30% of the app price, take 10% for themselves, 10% for the carrier (if it IS a phone or tablet with wireless), 10% for the device maker it was bought on. It's certainly something I'd negotiate for when Google came knocking on the door wanting cheap but quality devices.
You know, of all the other times we've seen this, it was those 80's games that was my first thoughts too. Fairy Tale Adventure;
18 seconds into the vid. 1986
If this was running on a handheld device, it'd be prior art? Or just mind numbingly bleeding obvious.
Re: That's just brightened my day.
Alas not, as this has been brought up. They're allowed to comment that they disagree with the judgement (after all, I'm sure many murderers disagree that they were found guilty "he was asking for it!"), but that's pretty much it.
Re: Anyone know what he said?
Slashdot has in the 1st post the offending joke
And later down in the comments, more detail that the joke was posted to a dedicated group on facebook, so it wasn't just joking amongst known friends, but an attempt to upset. This may/may not influence your opinion on what he did.
Re: Well, DUH!
Sure, but we're keeping Jonny Ive, and the Web.
Re: Meh ...
From what I understand, the turn by turn was actually licensed by Google from elsewhere, and they weren't able to re-sell it for ios.
Article hits the nail on the head, if this flops, Nokia's no more, but MS just tries again.
These DO seem decent. I wonder how many people will get them though, if you like the Metro looks, you'd have one of the older ones, and not being able to run WP8 apps will be a kicker. The adverts were 'the beta test is now over' and it turns out it was nothing BUT a beta. That's going to leave a sour taste in many early adopters.
Shame there's a MS plant in charge in Elop, as it'd be good to have the option to have WP8/Android on the same hardware. Alas, we'll never have that option until he's booted out, and it'll be too late by then.
Re: @Mark . - that would be a "yes" then
Tax stuff? sure, 7(ish) years. But general e-mail? Most utilities I'd dealt with, it's 30 days, some as short as 10 days.
Appears she used to work for the company that handled IP issues for Apple in the past. There's been a few links to her previous work before, and it does seem odd that she's got prior experience with the company here. To be seen as unbiased, it's odd she didn't excuse herself from the start, as time and time again she appears to be favouring Apple.
I still maintain it'll be an iPod Max, instead of an iPad Mini.
Lets them keep the same price for the iPads, and sell the iPods a /bit/ cheaper to the 7" market.
Re: The theory behind these pre-trial bans
Aye, for someone with her background working on Apple IP before, it's certainly odd Samsung haven't raised this as a concern, unless that's going to be the basis for the appeal.
I kinda see it
I can see the point they're making /slightly/. The top end brightness does seem to merge a bit, the curve I guess? But I've only noticed it as I've a GalaxyTab7 sat next to it, and the same images on both screens show the comparison. But I think half the problem is the Tab's colours are VERY saturated. Almost cartoonish sometimes, so it looks worse than it is.
By itself, watching films, playing games, it doesn't look washed out at all. Wouldn't mind a twee fix perhaps, some method to control the contrast, but happy to wait for a CM10 rom that lets something like that be done as it's perfectly fine.
Flour, sugar, chocolate powder, margarine.
mixed up, chucked on a baking tray, and left to slightly overburn/overcook. It was rock hard solid slices for pudding, often served with the aforementioned pink custard (yeuch).
As kids, we'd bend cutlery trying to cut the stuff, and as were were all young 'uns at the time, I recall a few kids losing teeth (that were wobbly anyway) to it.
I still maintain;
C64 > Spectrum > Amstrad.
(though the Speccys Amstrad made weren't that bad eventually).
Re: In the 80's
For future reference for further playground arguments;
C64 > ZX Spectrum
Amiga > Atari ST
Android > iOS
Depeche Mode > Human League
Chocolate Concrete > Spotted Dick
Regular Custard > Pink Custard
Tiswas > Anything Noel Edmunds EVER does
Re: $49 for 8GB
Read an interesting reason to exclude it was that by having it there, it opens them up to MS knocking on their door asking for royalties for FAT, something the Nook fell foul of. Not having that in reduces costs a fraction, gets people going for the bigger tablet, and stuffs MS asking for cash. It's a pain it's not there, but with that point, understandable.
Reason I was told was that they can continue to sell that old hardware in new markets with the updated software. The prices of that old hardware can drop a decent amount and it sustains a decent profit margin. So they've got new software, put it in a new box, new people are happy, old customers are happy it's being support and the brand is raised. They can keep selling that older hardware for a /bit/ longer in older markets.
XDA forums have some excellent ics roms for the original tab. Really gives it a new burst of life and appears to run great (apart from the Camera, that works/doesn't work every release, but 3rd party cameras appear to work around that for now).
True, chatting to some techs from one of the bigger hardware providers, who probably wouldn't want their remarks to get back to the telco's, it's all the telcos fault.
They've had ICS ready for their devices for MONTHS. Tried/tested before the public ASOP release of ICS. It's the carriers that are dragging their heels and not wanting to upgrade. And if they DO want to upgrade, they insist on their own testing (which is only fair of course), AND their own bloatware added (that then takes yet further testing, and if there's a problem found with THEIR bloatware, they apparently do everything they can to blame the phone manufacturer).
Very frustrating for the hardware sellers. They get the reputation as not wanting to support their hardware and nothing could be further from the truth. Well, sure they're not against someone buying new phones/tablets from them of course, but long term they know it's working against them when customers think they won't upgrade their phones.
They wouldn't let me register www.xxx, though http.xxx was still available last time I looked so you'd be able to have the address email@example.com xxx.xxx is gone, probably all the 3 lettered ones grabbed too. firstname.lastname@example.org would have been an awesome email address too. Oh well. could have been greate for some email filter testing/spam collecting!
Which also makes me wonder, is anyone going to have non-www things going on with .xxx? Are people going to have email@example.com email addresses? And would having a .xxx be MORE or LESS likely to get spam email?
Very curious how this plays out from, uhm, a purely technical aspect. Yes, that's it. Purely technical.
(seriously, how could would firstname.lastname@example.org have been!)
The 7" too?
Wasn't it the 7" tablet that Jobs made jokes about before that it wasn't a real tablet?
And now it's too close and confusing to Apple's Tablets?
What planet are the lawyers living on that they're able to get away with all this? And why aren't Samsung's lawyers knocking these things down easily?
Perhaps they're building up a huge list of issues to assault at once, as what's currently going on (and how obvious it'd be to knock these points down) doesn't appear to make much sense to me.
Photoshopped evidence, prior art, Jobs himself saying it's not comparable.
I mean, instead of the doctored evidence, couldn't Samsung just say to the Judge. Take these 2 products fresh, no-one else touching them, fresh from the factory. Turn them on. Do they look/work the same? (and throw in PalmPilot Colour/Symbian/Meego/WindowsCE devices to add to the fun)
- Vid Hubble 'scope snaps 200,000-ton chunky crumble conundrum
- Bugger the jetpack, where's my 21st-century Psion?
- Windows 8.1 Update 1 spewed online a MONTH early – by Microsoft
- Google offers up its own Googlers in cloud channel chumship trawl
- Something for the Weekend, Sir? Why can’t I walk past Maplin without buying stuff I don’t need?