2089 posts • joined 13 Jun 2007
I know this is just a HiFi.
But you missed the ultrasound tweeters and the fan subwoofer.
Re: I honestly COULD NOT TELL
The example that jumped out at me was some Michael Jackson played through some cheap Mission speakers. I'd never heard some of the music in there before and I realised why Quincy Jones was respected -- I am sure anyone would hear the same. Music can just be "BOOM_BOOM_TISH" but it is so much more enjoyable if you hear the nuances, and I think most people feel the same when they hear them.
As for live music, if it's acoustic instruments then yes, if it's amplified instruments you will almost always get a better mix on the CD -- with the possible exception of bands who take their mixing engineer on the road with them and have them test the venue and live mix, but even then you're let down by the venue's acoustics.
The thing is that a lot of people *do* care about sound quality but they never get the chance to find out. When confronted with a sound system that's been given some consideration, and I don't mean costs thousands, most people will notice an improvement. Even modern day pop crap has detail that many people have never heard thanks to today's obsession with Lo-Fi rubbish.
Of course the system in the article is probably not discernibly better than one costing 1000 time less, but that doesn't mean that decent audio gear can't be appreciated by most people.
I really want this to succeed as if a product comes I'm in the target market.
However, I can't see the room in the mobile market for a very good very expensive phone from a relative unknown. Perhaps they'll manage a great launch product they can use to showcase and end up succeeding, but I can't see it.
Please, please let them prove me wrong.
Re: All I can hear...
Nice trolling. I bet those folks at CERN only use old hardware to run their faffy OS.
Of course, that laptop you bought 5 years ago is still new hardware, isn't it? Hardware never ages, people never update their hardware, ever. People never give away hardware to friends and family to get them on the internet, then install Linux because it's better supported than the four-versions-behind-current Windows version that came on it. Nope, you're right, Linux will only ever be run on hardware made before 08/07/2012 and that hardware will, magically, always be just behind state-of-the-art for the rest of its life.
So, that cleared up you ill-informed diatribe, didn't it?
Who in the US patent office is taking bribes?
Other companies have been adding water detection to electronics for years.
Other people have made all sorts of multi-window systems using all sorts of concepts.
Playing songs in order in a shuffled playlist -- isn't that just "add to queue".
Even assuming they're doing something slightly novel in these cases I really fail to beleive that there is anything _that different_ to current technologies that it wouldn't be obvious.
So, either the US Patent Office just pass anything without any checks or Apple are paying someone to do that for them.
What about Chocky?
It was a little frightening to watch as a child and the plot has been pinched by at least one sci-fi TV show.
The book, of course, was even better.
Re: Why would following constitute endorsement?
You raise a good point that the author missed: Who is to say you only follow those you like? If I follow Microsoft, for example, I would likely do it to keep up with developments regarding my work -- despite actually being unimpressed by their software and being a Linux advocate. If I spent more time on Twitter I may well follow the EDF or BNP but should anyone suggest I supported either I would sue for libel if able -- I would follow them to see just how ignorant people can become as that kind of knowledge interess me.
As a lesser example, wouldn't a sensible marketing department follow and friend the competitor to see how they do it?
The problem are the idiots who expect you to be on Facebook.
I have no problem with anyone wanting to use any social media or any other website (certain illegalities aside) . However, when they then expect you to have to sign up to, for example, see the pictures they took of their new baby or to organise a party -- then I have a problem.
As somebody who is opinionated and interested in contentious subjects I am as careful as possible never to use my real name or the real name of my employer (or anyone else) on the internet. This is so that if, for example, I post on El Reg something critical of the Pope I'm not then in the slightest bit worried if I happen to apply for a job which involves mowing some church lawns.
It could be said I could sign up to Facebook and only use it to view baby photographs and check event times but what happens when I don't use it for a year and it's hacked, the privacy settings change, or similar? You also have problems off cross-linking with other things if some twunt uses your handle along with your name or some such which are a lot less likely to happen when real names aren't part of the medium at all.
It also seems the height of pointlessness to sign up to something to not use it.
I love online discussion and find it actually helpful knowing the extent of views and opinions -- online debate has both changed and strengthened my views on many subjects. I doubt, however, that some subjects would even have been discussed with real names attached.
Am I missing something?
My impression from the article was this is about determining whether it is likely to be accident or malice?
I realise the two are hard to separate but, as others have alluded to, things like having somebody else check your work mean you're less likely to the the guy who accidentally removed a disk from the RAID5, went to fix it and hot-swapped the wrong drive, rebuilt it, then tried to restore from a tape you accidentally kept appending to for ten years and have been storing next to a speaker.*
If Dominic Connor's job is merely to "find who is to blame" then it is, indeed, a very sad reflection of corporate culture and a chilling reminder that IT staff are not the ones who get golden parachutes. However, if he's called in to give some indication as to whether an individual responsible for a chain of cock-ups is unlucky, an incompetent liar or bent on destruction I'd say there's less to fear and more articles like this are needed.
*yes, I know, data centres aren't like that.
Re: Cornish electro-geek
According to a couple of articles he's a submarine captain. I do wonder though if he's just bought a nuclear one so he can use the generator to power his GX1.
Re: ..said to have prevented legitimate callers..
It's the lizzards coming from the TV you ought to worry about. Well, that and the screaming, skinny effigy of a Cornish electro-geek.
Re: Re: This wouldn't happen
I prefer netcat to ping for viewing web pages, it formats the content better ;)
"good self winders 'adapt' to your wearing pattern" Citation needed.
If you are correct about the time keeping then you are very, very lucky. I suspect, however, you are mistaken and really ought to pay attention next time you change the date or correct for daylight saving.
There isn't a mechanical watch in the world that can compare in accuracy to a cheap quartz -- and cheap quartz tend to need adjusting every month or so when they're a few seconds out.
Re: USB Charging
Oh, of course, because that £2K Swiss bracelet that you have to be careful not to scratch, get serviced every year and set the time on every couple of months is much better at the job of telling the time than a £40 Japanese digital which will set itself and take a few knocks...
Don't get me wrong, there are some nice pieces of Swiss jewellery out there but in reality they are just that -- nice, fairly functional jewellery.
Of course, the product being reviewed isn't particularly good at being a watch either and given the choice I would pick the Swiss bracelet.
I couldn't care less about the purity of anything, I'm wondering out loud why people who profess to love football pay these leaches and show brand loyalty to something which stopped being a "local team" years ago.
So why does anyone put up with the "football authorities"
It seems they want their match information to be known to all, yet they still want it kept secret so that they can extract more money from people.
They're useless parasites extracting as much money as they can from a game they know people will pay outrageous fees to watch being played both live and broadcast. Why does anyone bother with their product? Imagine if the music industry gave sole "performance listing rights" to one company and sued anyone else who published a list of concerts.
I was about to suggest that Tristan da Cunha is a more villainous-hideout shape and Deception island has a better name, but looking at Lanai it looks like the real-deal!
Perhaps his meddlesome nemesis will be Dog The Bounty Hunter.
Am I the only one who doesn't like the film?
Could never see the attraction. Think I'd rather go to mass and that's saying something.
Am I the only one wondering...
What does the senator have or do in his back yard that he's so worried people will see?
I'm too poor.
So I went for the ATH-M50.
IEMs seem to be more expensive, or perhaps I'm manipulated enough, so I went for some Ultimate Ears -- other manufacturers produce good products also.
Could have been worse.
He could have walked to a friend's and posted racist comments on Twitter.
Remember kids: Drinking and driving costs lives: but it's preferable to being a twat on Twitter.
Re: Message to El Reg
Further to that the "normal" site which used to be browsable on my old "feature phone" is now unusable on it due to a huge popup which will has no button to dismiss it and blocks up to 90% of the page.
My phone shows me your adverts too (PCs always have AdBlock) and I used to use it to browse your site at least as much as my PCs so you'll be losing all my "ad impressions" if you care.
Just bloody annoying.
Now I have to put up with a stupid banner every time I visit El Reg, and other sites, because some twat in Brussels was told it was a good idea?
Wow, yeah, great, way to save the world Eurocrats. Shouldn't you be, I don't know, trying to find a way out of the economic crisis rather than this bullshit?
Re: Where's all the red????
Unless I'm very much mistaken the spiel chocker is built in to your browser. If you're using Firefox then I seem to recall that US English is the default but you can add proper English by right-clicking and selecting Add Dictionaries form the Languages menu.
Re: Re: Cloud is not that useful compared to an open hotspot
@AC: Please provide a citation that this service is not free to the end user.
Fine, you're miffed at having to use a disposable email address but that does not mean the service costs money.
I have no love for any brewery or any other company, neither have I any particular fondness for signing in to WiFi but as fas as I can tell you are talking bollocks. That is unless you have specific information that the company in question is not providing the free service, in which case it might be a good idea to provide that information to the ASA (and the rest of us) rather than just posting anonymous comments.
Re: But it's not "free" is it?
It's "free as in beer", at least the Wetherspoons is where I sign in as Pubby Mcpubson from Stonybridge with password "ThePub".
Granted it is a PITA to have to remember a disposable email address and password, but it's still provided free of charge.
That said, I'm more impressed by places which offer it without login.
Do se need a new error message?
"sda is on fire"?
The last shaved what belonging to the guy? Or do you mean "... you can see when the guy has last shaved." is the correct English?
Re: DAMN RIGHT WERE PARANOID
How dare you sell my country of birth short!!
It's full of drunk _teenage mothers_.
Re: Don't you love when Linux elitists
I think you'll find Linux users who dislike Ubuntu do so for a variety of reasons including not liking Unity, objecting to Canonical dropping "Linux" from its site and seeming to take credit for the work of others, and disliking how some things are automated in such a way that problems occur in slightly out of the ordinary cases.
That said, I've seen very little evidence of people "hating" Ubuntu. Many people still recommend it to new users, though other distros like Mint get a lot of mentions too.
You may not find all that many long-term Linux users, or professional Linux users, running Ubuntu themselves but that is generally because they either want something more stable or they want something lighter or more tweakable with less hand-holding.
Re: £430 for a mono speaker?
Stereo is unfasionable nowadays. You just have to look at all DAB radios and a lot of iPad/iPhone/iPod docks to see that.
Anyone who cares about sound quality will buy an Airport and a pair of decent powered monitors, or similar.
Re: Windows 8 = Downgrade
This is DVD video playback, with CSS and the like, they're talking about and not the ability to read DVDs.
Re: Price of 3D?
I disagree because "Any TV capable of a refresh of 200Hz or greater..." is not a cheap TV by any means. Another way of looking at it is that you have to buy a higher priced TV to get a 3D capable one.
OK, so it's not "adding 3D" that's making the TV more expensive but to somebody on a budget a TV capable of 3D is still too expensive.
Re: Sole satellite?
Only one natural satellite, QI are being silly and playing with definitions. The other objects they refer to are satellites of the sun.
I thought the geeks went ages ago?
Perhaps in my not so varied career I've worked somewhere that's fundamentally different to most but in my last place of employment I could count the number of geeks on the fingers of one hand. I've come across far more women in IT than geeks.
I thought nowadays IT was a service industry like any other and "soft skills" were what mattered.
AGW has done its job now anyhow.
The profit making mechanisms have been set up by governments and those who offer them a cut of the action and Carbon Trading is likely here to stay. People like Lovelock have their small share of the plunder so can retire comfortably and enjoy it.
Now that things are in place the terrifying AGW predictions will dry up and perhaps we'll have another scare..
The problem then is that nothing is actally being done to help plan for climate change, to ensure that energy production meets demand or to ensure our negative impact on the environment is kept to a minimum.
Re: Read the Patent
Doesn't that describe the way you switch "desktops" under Android? I know that's how it works under iOS and I seem to recall it's like that under Android also.
What a strange decision.
Shouldn't the hotel be liable for the injuries due to its fittings not being so fitted, rather than having to claim from the employer? Or is this about missed wages being paid whilst unable to work due to sickness? Either way, I would expect the hotel to be the ones claimed against by either the employee, employer or both.
As for "psychological injuries" why? Of course being injured isn't pleasant but if she dropped something on your foot at work would she suffer from "psychological injuries" also?
Re: Probably wouldn't help the governments either
I think I've read stories on here about people begin prosecuted because of this very data. I believe it was admissible because the evidence wasn't gathered by breaking the law on UK soil and because when it comes to money laundering and tax evasion uk.gov get to keep all the money.
The propoganda is irrelevant.
These people aren't been payed to try to persuade the Russians, or any other country or government, to change their policy. These people are being paid because they're mates with someone who has access to our tax money.
This is nothing but blatent theft of tax money.
Who are these strange, prudish people?
Why on earth would anybody think that a picture of Mr Beckham in his smalls would upset a child? Why would a child think anything of it at all?
Granted, the odd teenager may think "fwwouar, he's hench*" but it's hardly traumatic for them and isn't going to make any difference to the way they're thinking.
*I think that's the term currently in use to describe someone who's attractive.
Re: "The Galaxy S 5.0 makes do with Android 2.2". Pardon? Are they serious?
Who cares? Ice Cream Sandwich a steaming pile of old, slow, buggy, insecure crap. Or, rather , in six months it will be.
In the mean time people who don't base thngs on version numbers being higer will buy devices which do what they want, use them and enjoy them. Some may not even notice that Amdroid 2.2 is a slow, old, buggy, insecure pile of shit.
So nobody has a real answer to my question then?
If ASUS, or whomever, push the update out that's not related to what I'm asking about.
What I am asking about is why people with perfectly useable devices suddenly decide they don't work any more because a new OS is out? Also why are Google not providing security and bug fixes to anything but the latest Android version or, if they are, what does it matter if a new device doesn't have the cutting-edge OS installed?
So why are people obsessed with getting the latest Android?
There was a review on is very site slagging a tablet because it wasn't running ICS. Yet if Sony and an above poster are to be believed it's probably bets not to have ICS unless you have some pressing need for something not available without it.
Also, this surely means that Google must continue to provide security updates and bug fixes for previous Android versions since not all devices can run ICS?
So, HTC hate their fans.
I assume they treat their less enthusiastic customers with even more contempt, so I'll give them a miss in future and advise others to do the same.
Re: Pure stupidity
Of course it won't prevent terrorist attacks the government like them because they're a good excuse to piss more tax money away on the IT systems they've been bribed to implement.
Anybody who still thinks that the govenrnent want to stop terrorism probably also think that Dr Mbenge Ngobo from Nigeria really does want to send them SIX MILLION DOLLARS US.
For the most part I think you will find that the questions on University Challenge were "trivia" so, frankly, I am as unimpressed that Mr Gascoigne researched the questions as I am by Mr Fry's technical ability. They are [were] television programmes made to entertain and, sometimes, impart a little knowledge or get one thinking.
If I want dry science I know where to find it, but reading Scientific American from cover to cover doesn't particularly interest me any more -- I hope that doesn't make me a bad person? I gave up on New Scientist when it turned into "Politics Today" a decade or so ago.
As for venerating Mr Fry's technical knowledge, I would never do such a thing as I know that he is not a technical man and doesn't profess to be -- he's a presenter of an entertainment program. I mentioned the GPS debacle because those were words "put into his mouth" and I feel that people judging him by them are as ignorant of how things work as those who think he's a genius.
I don't understand this negativity.
The GPS thing was stupid, admittedly, but how many people knew what Cruithne before they watched QI? I'd not consider myself overly educated but I'm by no means uneducated and I'd not heard of it. Once I had, of course, I realised it wasn't a moon but I think that's part of the fun of QI.
QI is an entertainment programme which makes one think, why is that irksome?
As to Mr Fry, I don't see that the GPS explanation has anything to do with him. They will likely have script writers fro that kind of thing but if it was an off-the-cuff remark on his part the blame lays with whoever decided to broadcast it. I'm not suggesting that Mr Fry necessarily does know how GPS works but referring to an edited television programme as evidence is stupid.
- Oh noes, fanbois! iPhone 6 Plus shipments 'DELAYED' in the UK
- The sound of silence: One excited atom is so quiet that the human ear cannot detect it
- Bloat-free, unlocked Moto X to be dubbed 'Pure Edition', says report
- In a spin: Samsung accuses LG exec of washing machine SABOTAGE
- Feature Be your own Big Brother: Monitoring your manor, the easy way