Re: price cutting? not for everyone
@DNTP
It is cheaper, the confusion you are having is arising from you reading the fine print :D
the old price SLASHING + fee JACKING rigamaroll
119 publicly visible posts • joined 19 Jul 2011
Quite a simple strategy. Queue the dim lights, the piano music and deep male Brit voice. Start with 'magical' then add a 'first EVER (iPhone) with' ...... carry on to 'revolutionary' (4 inch).... add 'NEVER BEFORE SEEN' (on iPhone) [I can think of a few things there but I digress]
Oh one more thing remember you are the more intelligent and savvy of the human kind.
Insert repeat payment here. Love your purse and heels BTW.
Or converse(tm) shoes and skinny jeans
@rm -rf/
"Yeah right. I'll just get a chromebook and whack Linux on that thanks. Only Windows needs £900 worth of hardware to run it".
Despite me pointing out that obvious inaccuracy, Have you ever considered some people want more than just an 'environment'? How's World of tanks for Linux coming? Runs great on Arm too I suppose? Just because it's not what you want does not rid it of its significant use case.
"Most people with rugged tablet needs will be better served with an iPad and one of the militarized covers."
Most of those control technicians in industry working largely on plc's and windows based infrastructure would make better use of an iPad?? Sysadmins?
Have you ever done compute heavy tasks on an iPad?
I hope for the sake of your IT or control department you aren't involved in procurement
A Tv set, with a screen, from Apple?? Would be doubtless supplied by Sharp, or Japandisplay, whichever display provider they have sourced, will be much better than a TV made by Sharp? Apple does not make any of the Apple displays on any Apple product. They don't 'make' anything, but instead source parts from different suppliers and source an assembler (foxconn) to put all those outsourced parts together, and load Apple software onboard.
But as always, the fanbois just assume the clouds part and down comes a shiny new product from the same apple tree where once under sat Adam&Eve
And yet again.
Since you are incapable of settling the debate without ACTUAL EXPERIENCE IN THE MATTER, I will settle it.
I am on my 9th, count it, 9th, flagship phone in 3 years, because I can, and buy what I WANT, and what has the best feature set, SoC, etc, not what anybody else tells me to buy. I'll tell you what the perfect screen size is, because I have had phones with screen sizes ranging from 3.5 inches all the way up to 5.7 inches. The perfect size for my average sized hands? (I'm 5'8") It's around 5.2 inches. Do I have the LG G2? No, I'm not a fan of the phone. I have two xperia z1 phones instead.
For what it's worth, when apple finally gets around to that size in around 2018, you'll call it perfect and forgot this debate was going on for years, in order to justify using that almost unusable paltry pathetic little screen for so long.
I'm quite sure in fact Intel continues to push the envelope for x86. Love it or hate it, (x86) Intel continues to drive the 'rate of shrinkage,' power efficiency and throughput, and is extremely competitive. If you are planning on building a PC in three years, you will almost certainly want the latest and greatest Intel cpu inside. I'd hardly call them complacent considering how they've manged to make x86 approaching ARM efficiency with the z2580 and it's predecessors which will certainly be more-so. Tri-gate or lightning anyone?
While praising a US firm in the land of EU competition in ARM may not prove popular, it is madness to call Intel a company lacking in innovation and focus.
While it all looks great on paper and at firce glance more efficient, I will leave it to the benchmarks to decide just how effective this proves. I'm reminded of new Opteron cores sharing cache and memory in around 2008 which gave AMD a short-lived lead. Ultimately if Haswell+Discrete dusts Kaveri even at a marginal increase in power consumption, are you going to buy because in a whiny school kid on the playground voice you will shout 'but this is more efficient!!!' Tell it to my fps lead when I no-scope your dome. I miss AMD kicking ass, they just haven't since Athlon 1 in the consumer space. Here's to hoping.
Oh and China is full of 5.7 inch HD android models. Dozens. So many in fact that Apple AND Samsung are taking a besting in China. I actually bought one myself, the Inew I2000, quad core mediatek 6589, HD screen and $200US free shipping unlocked with dual sim, expandable SD, and comes with two batteries. And benches faster than the exynos 4412 Quad. This is nothing anywhere near new, or what Apple will call 'magical' and 'groundbreaking'
I actually posted a comment in another article here six months ago saying that when apple releases a 4.7inch phone in late 2013 they will claim HTC LG Samsung and Sony were for 2 years only copying what Apple had planned for the future. Apple I can read you like a book. Its a children's book and incredibly boring. Every page seems to read exactly like the previous page!?
It is hilarious to think my girlfriend/wife porn is more secure in an AES truecrypt partition than the NSA's most torrid secrets. WTF?? They could have easily mapped a Truecrypt partition to their network which would in no way be accessible to sysadmins that have no access to the credentials. And truecrypt is free and open source ffs
I have owned both the original Xbox 360 and the PS3 since their releases, and have this to contribute:
The ps3 had ever so slightly superior graphics in games
The ps3 UI was much quicker to navigate and therefore was superior for media streaming (using PS media server on the PC (transcoding when needed)
The Xbox controller was far more comfortable to use for long gaming sessions and why I used the Xbox as my primary gaming console
I had to return 3 xbox 360's due to the three rings of death, my fourth has lasted years however.
The latest Ps3 firmware supports 3d blu-ray and looks absolutely stellar on my 3d bravia.
I recently moved deep into the country where broadband doesn't exist, I tether my android to play online, the Xbox 360 is incapable of making use of it, yet PC games run flawlessly (World of tanks does anyhow.) That being said, the Xbox one is out of the question.
Hell I have little faith in either console. I will be sticking with PC games now, but Sony is leading this race if they can make good on their commitments. Although a console should be head and shoulders above the previous generation and have future proofing built in so they both should support 4k and in the h.265 format, and if they do not, both consoles will be antiquated not long after they hit the shelves, and most certainly within three years time. A horrible time to release a console as the both should have a BDXL drive and support the latest and most efficient codec. The ps3 brought blu-ray and now 3d playback (without the need to purchase additional hardware) to the mainstream, what will these consoles bring aside from an incremental upgrade?
RAZR x? Sounds like the still only rumoured X phone. Unless of course you mean the already released RAZR i? In which case I haven't got on at all with it. I wouldn't even consider a paltry 4.3inch screen these days, and would even less consider a qHD screen. That phone belongs in 2010. I'm a fan of Intel but not enough to take leave of my senses. I'd be buying the ZTE Nubia Z7 next, assuming it will work on North American LTE networks and assuming reports of it having the snapdragon 800 are accurate there is a good chance of that. The size is a little much for most, but I tend to use my phablets as WiFi only, and my phones in tether mode.
Oh and... How is a supposedly well threaded cpu benchmark a 'clock advantage' to a dual core 2.0ghz CPU over a 1.9ghz quad core? You must have whizzed right through math. anyways, check out the detailed scores for antutu, it breaks down the integer and float CPU scores. Z2580 is certainly within striking distance of snapdragon 600, all the while consuming less power, having 5nm larger transistors, and half the cores.
60 percent slower, assuming geekbench is NOT optimized for ARM any more than it is for x86 any more than antutu is.. And the galaxy s4 I was referring to was the North American Snapdragon 600 version not the exynos octa that is the geekbench top dog. How about next we compare Qualcomms own vellamo benchmark scores and see how the snapdragon smokes everything including exynos octa. Granted in purely CPU numbers they both best clover trail+ by a reasonable margin but certainly not 60%, and certainly not enough to keep Intel out of the market.
I don't disagree it will be difficult to crack Samsung and its top to bottom manufacturing process, but even in South Korea the relationship between LG and Samsung has soured over the years, vendors are looking for any way they can to get a leg up on the juggernaut that is Samsung. And ZTE and Huawei use chips from both Qualcomm and Mediatek, so using Intel for android will have more to do with performance, feature set, and cost to bring the finished product to market. Mediatek is a unique beast in how it bundles the hardware and software stack and is almost untouchable in the low to medium end market in asia but that clearly isn't the market Intel is after at this point. The smartphone market is all about want and little about need. I have had 7 flagship androids in the past three years, certainly not out of need, and I badly want Intel Inside and will absolutely without question be buying a merrifield handset. Those that have purchased Galaxy S4 or say the HTC One have done so out of a desire to own the latest tech. if Intel Inside becomes the a justifiable fad catch phrase people will buy. Just look at all the people buying the not-even 720p iPhone 5 because it is 'magical' Speaking of which, I wouldn't be surprised to see Apple vying to be part of the North American and European Intel launch, they have always been keen to be part of Intel's latest and greatest. (See Core and thunderbolt)
What an irrelevant response. 'Blow the top off' implies that yes in the 64bit and high performance space they will be the chip to beat in 2014. A dual core clover trail+ already equals the performance of the quad-core snapdragon 600 and bests the quad stock A15. If you are under the illusion that both the consumer and handset vendors won't want the most powerful chips in their handsets you are badly mistaken. Why on earth would the average home user NEED a Corei7? For email and web browsing? Do they sell? Absolutely. Intel's partners from the PC era (see SAMSUNG) would be happy to stamp Intel Inside if it proves to be far superior to exynos. Its a name synonomous with high end computing and a fantastic marketing pitch. And since Intel has their own fabs for their chips why would they need fab partners for their SoCs? Again, see lenovo K900 benchmarks. And FYI Lenovo is a household name in the MASSIVE Asian market, which dwarfs that of Europe and North America combined. A good place to start. Not a bad handset partner either right out of the gate.
Do you actually do any research or just post comments without any knowledge whatsoever? Check out the dual core atom clover trail+ in the gorgeous lenovo k900 phone. its EVERY BIT as fast as a quad core with A15 cores. Check out the antutu score of 24000. Add that to the fact that Intel THIS YEAR will be pumping out merrifield which is much faster AND consumes less power than clover trail+ it will leave A15 IN THE DUST. Add to that ARM has nothing on the horizon save for a chip SLOWER than the power hungry A15 this year, Intel is set to blow the top off the mobile market. Add to that the great lesps intel has made in the graphics arena, it all spells trouble for ARM. Sign me up.
Very true. I recall the time (and perhaps even thinking) 'urrgh just look at that prick talking on his cell phone'. And for what it is worth, I'd welcome Google glass to watch news and videos while exercising (treadmill, spin bike, rowing etc..) where a display is not otherwise readily available (and the price were $200 or less.) Also, everybody HAS worn glasses. Tim have you ever heard of sunglasses? Prick.
---> @ iuniverse2.0
filled with uppity girls drinking flavoured water and walking staring at their chick iphones omg'ing all over twittbook and faceter to prove their worth and great knowledge of hollyworld while professing right from wrong and how killing animals is wrong while eating fish sushi. (urrgh my ex-gf comes exactly to mind, completely itarded oh and SO tech savvy, like.. come on, cause like, all these apps I have), and men's jeans only coming in 'skinny' where men are longer men but we should all just be 'metro' (isn't that ironic)
-- just fkn shoot me since the hipsters refuse to all die
technically elevators do not 'fall' as you and Hollywood have proposed unless the many multiple safety factored cables were to be cut, as the counter weight is in fact considerably heavier than the elevator itself. If the brakes and stopping systems were to completely fail the elevator would in fact shoot upwards at breakneck speed. I admit though that jumping out to the alternate universe of steady ground would still prove hazardous.
as an aside and back to topic, sounds like I have plenty of time to buy more sweet sweet tech devices and bust plenty of nuts all over my hot girlfriend before we are completely wiped out so frankly dear i don't give a damn