1430 posts • joined 16 Jul 2011
...when you have access to an 802.11 network but no cellular...
E.g, when you're a T-Mobile US customer.
What's in a Name?
What's Battle Forth Enet supposed to mean?
More like MPU.
Re: re: There are also many who aren't happy with the limitations of Windows
AC: " '...iPad?' We're talking about buying cheap hardware..."
The 'Apple tax' on the $280Cdn iPad Mini (non-retina) versus the $280Cdn Google Nexus 7 is approximately ZERO.
Now you're just comparing Apples to Apples, which would be fine if Apples were the subject of discussion. But we're discussing Lemons here.
To paraphrase that into the literal, Google Nexus is a prime brand in the Android ecosystem, as Samsung is, as Microsoft is in the Windows tablet ecosystem, and as Apple is in the iThing ecosystem.
But we're talking about Acers and the like here, devices which have much the same features, but usually lower-power CPUs/GPUs, maybe a little less RAM, etc. For 7" tablets, these generally retail in the $100-$175 range, far lower than the prime brands.
These entry-level Windows netbooks fall into that category as well, as they are below average spec for the Windows portable ecosystem in all respects.
The Chromebooks they compete with actually don't fall into that category, though, because they are the average spec for their ecosystem.
Re: Lots of stats, but...
Really? Just out of curiosity, what would such a pattern tell you?
Re: If you arew going to teach coding
Yes and no.
BlueGreen, John G Imrie said nothing about a full course in logic; he said a primer. An understanding of the basics of logic (Boolean algebra especially) is absolutely a requirement for even the simplest of programming tasks.
However, I think it would be a mistake to separate the principle and the practice in early courses, as the practice in this case is the best way to illustrate the principle. The ideal would be a series of programming projects which illustrate the different Boolean operators and principles of precedence while allowing students to create applications relevant to their interests..
Actually, the way you formatted the sentence makes it read like the updates were only posted for those customers who had repeatedly apologised to EE.
Which perversely makes sense, given their general customer support attitude.
A cursory glance at my back catalogue of product reviews through the 1990s and 2000s reveals I was extremely critical of digital photography and inkjet printing in their early days, and look where they are today.
Yes, in the former, you have "professional" models which start at hundreds of pounds (or dollars) more than the "snapshot" models solely because they have interchangeable lenses (which themselves merit a second mortgage), and in the latter, you have cheap, efficient machines which work wonders provided you can put a third mortgage on your house to supply them with ink.
Re: Slanted hard disk bays???
Those aren't hard disk bays -- they're video cards. There are no hard disks or recognizable bays for them in the shot of this side, and no shot of the other side. So we have no info on how they're mounted.
I love it
When my two favorite web sites converge, if only for a brief moment.
Re: I fear for the future
Oh, and why are so many uninformed crazy folk suggesting that Daleks should be lumped in with robots? Don't you crazy people realise that there is a living creature inside a Dalek?
To be fair, El Reg itself is already lumping cyborgs, including Cybermen, in with robots too, even though cyborgs run the gamut from electronically-enhanced creature (e.g, Johnny Mnemonic, Captain Cyborg) through living brain in a machine body (e.g, Darth Vader, also roughly where the Daleks would fall on the scale -- technically there's more than a brain inside there, but depending on where exactly in the series you take them from, the organism's actual capabilities vary) or living body with an electronic brain, all the way to organically-enhanced machine (e.g, T-800 Model 101 [NOT T-101, BTW])
Re: I fear for the future
More likely, as this is a "who would win in a fight"* type study, the less deadly-seeming ones were voted against in an attempt to avoid extraneous low-level rounds against lightweights.
Me, I'm an empiricist. Just because something appears to be wimpy doesn't mean anything; they need to be tested in battle.
It's too bad the comments are being voted against; I was hoping to nominate such luminaries as:
Charles Bronson (makes Chuck Norris look like the mewling pretty-boy he is)
The Vogons (not so hot with weapons, but the things they can do with a properly authorized requisition form [or more to the point, the things they can not get done for lack of the proper paperwork]...)
Betty White (seriously, do NOT cross her.)
*Although that in itselft might say something about our proclivity for violence as a race...
Half of the Story
It's not just a debt owed to the open source community. It's also a responsibility to your customers. This side of the story doesn't even depend on whether the software is open- or closed-source.
OpenSSL [Heartbleed] is a good open-source example of what can happen when many parties rely on a particular bit of software, but don't invest in the maintenance of that software. The best closed-source example might be Microsoft's unending train of patch management, often fixing bugs in decades-old software, because in the past they didn't take security seriously enough.
With closed-source software, your options are pretty much limited to paying license fees for the software and hoping that the developer uses those fees wisely in development and support.
With open-source software, there are more options, including direct involvement in development, code review, testing. Even a good bug report is a boon to developers.
Long story short: Open-source software (or even prebuilt closed libraries) isn't a way to build something for free: it's a way to build it fast. You always pay, whether it's in license/support fees, community involvement, or in lost reputation and income because your customers lose data or can't secure it properly with your systems.
One of the European Commission’s targets at the IGF is to move it on from being “a mere talking shop”.
“The time is ripe to produce outcome documents, such as policy recommendations for voluntary adoption,” said a Commission source.
So rather than making statements that nobody pays attention to, they'll be producing documents that nobody pays attention to. PROGRESS!
The Solution is Obvious
Look for new rules requiring every site to have a unique IP address soon.
... a stricken sad-nav.
Re: This article's about the minority
No, you should be offended by those people (men and women) who are pigs. As the article says:
This isn't about gender wars: it’s not about men vs women, this is about acting like a grown up at a professional conference.
The author's examples are of being harassed by men, because she's been harassed by men. But her point is that such behavior is unprofessional regardless of source or target.
Re: @ Khaptain (was: Personally ...)
BSD and Linux (and Minix, Coherent, et alia) were written in vi...
Remind me again which of those is a science fiction novel?
What about the people who filmed it originally?
They're the ones who should be jailed...
So have they...
fixed the massive holes in their coverage yet?
"You can look at the results for ICT as well as computing below."
If you want to strain your eyes looking at an incredibly small, blurred screenshot.
I thought EVO was an SSD line from Samsung...
Re: Standard Windows timings
Wait, you've done one Windows install (two if you count the repeat), so you feel qualified to generalize how it installs on any hardware?
Re: Sauce For The Goose...
"Try working in local government before you rattle on about how corrupt/wasteful/secretive it is."
Straw man argument - I didn't single out local government for criticism, but don't let that interfere with your right to feel offended.
So you pick out one sentence of a longer, more complicated post, and use a technical discrepancy between that sentence and your post to try to invalidate the poster's entire argument...and you call their argument a straw man?
Please learn about logic before posting again.
Re: we need the public to become educated in the tools they are using and what can be installed
"Unlike El Reg and its commentards, not everybody devotes their whole life to being a tech expert. IMO, pins set by default would help those normal people."
And not everyone becomes a car mechanic, but we still expect them to be able to change a tyre, replace a fuse/bulb, check pressure/oil/water etc. This is no different.
Oh goody, the automobile analogy. Let's run with that one:
Does your auto dealer sell you a car with no door locks and an arcane document telling you how to install your own? 'cos that's essentially what you get with phones today.
"and omit the ActiveX support."
That's rarely an issue these days. Over 90% of desktop / laptop exploits in the last year involved Java....
...which in IE is implemented as an ActiveX control...
Re: Well, but in this case HTTPS wouldn't help
Most governments already run their own CAs which means they can easily issue fake certificates which will be accepted by the browser.
Only if your browser is configured to trust the government-run CA. If you don't know how to change the CAs your browser will trust, google <your browser> manage certificates.
So how long until...
Cortana goes titsup...?
(The dirty mac, please.)
"...which it difficult to print them a business card..."
That's not a typo on my part (or El Reg's for that matter); that's a direct copy from his blog post.
... the extrapolated trend would show TLC NAND costing the same as SATA disks after 2070.
Did you just try to extend a technology-specific trend line out for 50 years!?
I don't know whether to laugh or cry.
Re: A US Judge has smited an attempt
Yes, but an even better phrasing would be:
Apple, Google, et al. smitten by Judge Lucy Koh.
Re: Reinventing the flat tyre
That's what it's designed for. See the PRNGs in the diagram? They're there to provide the unreliability*, essentially.
* Specifically, they're there to add noise to the spike thresholds for the neurons. The desired effect is neurons may fire before their threshold is reached (?intuition?) or may not fire when they "should" (?anyone got a good term for this -- ironically, I can't think of one!?).
Given the quality I've seen from Citrix of late...
$100 sounds about right.
Re: The real question is "who is really behind Cryptolocker" ?
No, these are well-known security companies who participated in the recent takedown of some C&C servers. The tool didn't appear like magic; it's pretty well explained in the article.
The truth is known, you just don't want to accept it.
Re: "Big Blue is believed to leak a billion or two dollars each year"
Well? Don't leave us hanging!
Europe space team scores WORLD FIRST
Comet first, shurely...
Re: slippery slope or lawsuit magnet?
At no point did I suggest that Google was breaking the terms of its contract.
I didn't say that you did. I was pointing out that what you said was "not Google's job" was also not prohibited, and so your using that to rebut AndyS's argument that law enforcement properly obtained their warrant was specious.
I was suggesting that this kind of data mining is not in the long term interests of society (although I am very persuaded by the postcard argument).
I think you need to be more specific about "this kind of data mining". Do you mean specifically what Google did to find out about these images? Does "this kind of data mining" extend to what the NSA's doing? What about to what Assange, Manning, and Snowden did? That was data mining, too.
As to the slippery slope, what is fallacious about it?
The presumption that one instance will necessarily lead to another, which is necessarily worse. That's the definition, and the flaw, of a slippery-slope argument.
Re: slippery slope or lawsuit magnet?
It is the job of the law enforcement agencies to approach Google with a warrant, not for Google to approach law enforcement agencies and suggest that they might want to take a warrant out on one of their clients.
But it is not illegal for Google to do so if they tell the client they might do so and the client agrees. When you sign up for gmail, you are agreeing to let them do all sorts of stuff with your data.
If you're a witness to a crime, you are not necessarily required by law to report it, but that doesn't mean it's wrong for you to report it.
I concede that, in this case, the right outcome was achieved - but I worry that this will make it harder for the right outcome to be achieved in the future, and that it could result ...blah blah blah.
Do you have an argument that isn't based on the slippery slope fallacy?
Something along the lines of, maybe, "Google's terms and conditions don't adequately spell out that they'll be scanning your images for child abuse images" or "<insert locality privacy law here> prohibits Google from performing this scanning" would be appropriate, if borne out by the evidence.
I don't have a gmail account, so I can't be arsed to research this, but I think you'll find that Google has. They've been wrong before, though.
Re: That's just plain wrong...
Solicitors don't agree cases in front of judge.....
Well, that's certainly true. The last five words are practically superfluous.
Whether solicitors argue cases in front of judges depends on the specific country's justice system and specific court (and even time period.)
Even if you meant to contrast solicitors with barristers in England, now solicitors can argue cases in court, and in the past the hiring of a solicitor was a prerequisite to the engagement of a barrister. In any case, whilst a barrister might be a benefit, a good solicitor would be as well...
Re: but I thought
The assertion that the evidence was not obtained properly is not tied to his assertion of innocence. Before the second can be tested, the first must be resolved, because the evidence is what must be used to test the assertion of innocence.
Or to put it more simply, the fact that evidence was obtained from a person, legally or not, does not mean that that person is guilty of something.
I thought it was 0.01 degree.
You are correct. I'm not sure if I misread or mistyped it. But the point is that Celsius and Centigrade differ by a known, constant quantity which is less than the precision used in the article. So for the purposes of this discussion, they are interchangeable.
Celsius and Centigrade agree to within 0.1 degree. So if you know one, you know the other to within 0.1 degree.
Since the level of precision used in the article is either 1 or 10 degrees, either label is accurate.
NO international standard of measure requires the use of specific equipment or methodology to use, as you wrongly claim. There are specific standards against which any equipment or methodology must be calibrated and proven, but once properly calibrated any equipment and methodology which has been proven can be used.
Re: Mobile-specific web pages are usually a UI travesty
Unfortunately pinch to zoom does more than just enlarge things - it starts mangling coordinate systems and triggering events and overflows. So people sometimes disable it to prevent a site from breaking in other ways.
Rather than redesigning their sites to take into account the fact that HTML was designed from the beginning to flow.
Even El Reg is guilty of this. See those giant empty bands on either side of your widescreen display? Those are there because web designers are too stupid to make the content pane dynamically resize to fit the screen. So readers have to scroll more and read less at a time, because most sites are still based on a horribly ill-fitting fixed-width model of the antiquated print industry.
The only reason so many web designers still have work is because they keep having to come up with more shite hacks to make their original shite hacks compatible with new standards.
" I was always taught when looking at a paper then I needed to consider the perspective of the writer and the context of the paper."
A true observation is a true observation, it shouldn't matter who says it.
A statement needs to be shown to be true before being accepted as true.
But if you are adopting this approach then you'll have to take into account the fact that those working in climate 'science' have a massively vested interest in not de-railing the funding bandwagon. What are they all going to do when the sham is exposed?
Well, with that modelling expertise, they could work in financial systems. In fact, if the money is their motivation, they should do that now. <a href="http://arstechnica.com/science/2011/02/if-climate-scientists-push-the-consensus-its-not-for-the-money/>http://arstechnica.com/science/2011/02/if-climate-scientists-push-the-consensus-its-not-for-the-money/</a>
Re: Maths is not science?
"Science is an acceptance of a working hypothesis, a model, ready to be struck down and replaced at any moment, when a better one is found,"
A better one doesn't have to be found.
If an experiment shows a hypothesis to be wrong, then it's wrong.
Not quite, especially in physics.
Observation in the nineteenth century showed that Newton's hypotheses were wrong, but they were accepted because the variances were a) generally found in edge cases, b) not significant for most purposes, and c) sometimes discarded as observational error.
Now we know that Newton was indeed wrong, but his equations are still used, because a) and b) above are still true, and his equations are easier to wrangle than Einstein's.
Hypotheses and models aren't disposed of immediately upon discovery (or even verification) of counterevidence; they are still valuable provided they are the closest or even an acceptable approximation.
Re: Medical Doctor
Because this is a Lewis Page article on climate change. Anything which doesn't fit his narrative is quietly ignored.
Re: Serious (maths) question ...
In this context, "chaotic" means "complex and highly sensitive to initial conditions", and not "non-deterministic" as commonly interpreted. The short answer is that regular sampling can give insight into trends and correlations.
Wikipedia is a surprisingly good starting point for questions like these: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaotic_systems#Distinguishing_random_from_chaotic_data. As usual, don't take it as gospel, but you can get the basic idea, and follow the references for more detail.
"About one third of all the CO2 emitted by mankind since the industrial revolution has been put into the atmosphere since 1997; yet there has been no statistically significant increase in the mean global temperature since then," the two MPs state.
Why did they pick 1997? Because 1997 and 1998 were high-anomaly years,so they skew short-term analysis. Had they started from 1999, or 1996, they would have seen a clear trend. The overall trend is clearly warming, even from 1997 onward. http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs_v3/Fig.A2.txt
"By definition, a period with record emissions but no warming cannot provide evidence that emissions are the dominant cause of warming!"
This statement ignores so many factors (e.g, selective dataset, overall chaotic nature of the system being studied, delaying factors) that I'm ashamed it was released by human beings, let alone ones with "scientific training."
Even someone trained as a scientist can fall prey to poor (or even intentionally biased) data selection. This is why we have the scientific method.
Based on the comparison picture, it appears that the 800MH.B has a daughterboard (and hence more flash total than the 1600s -- makes sense for the write-intensive application.)
But what's more interesting is that the MM and MR appear to use the same board, indicating perhaps just a firmware change to differentiate between balanced and read-intensive operations.
However, I thought that it had been medically proven that regular reading does not harm your eyesight -- so what accounts for the read-intensive MR being so much blurrier...?
- Infosec geniuses hack a Canon PRINTER and install DOOM
- 'Windows 9' LEAK: Microsoft's playing catchup with Linux
- Boffins say they've got Lithium batteries the wrong way around
- Game Theory Half a BILLION in the making: Bungie's Destiny reviewed
- Phones 4u slips into administration after EE cuts ties with Brit mobe retailer