1452 posts • joined 16 Jul 2011
The output can [should] not be determinable by any means other than actually running the hash function against the data, at which point you haven't predicted it; you've calculated it.
There are also rumours suggesting the government has ordered staff to use domestically manufactured phones in the wake of the Snowden leaks.
Why should that be a problem for the iPhone (or almost any other electronic device)?
Re: "an INTELLIGENT science vs religion film"!?
I believe you did misunderstand me. I understand the difference between empiricism and empirical knowledge, and I respect science specifically because it does acknowledge that it is limited to empirical knowledge. A true scientist, when presented with a question or idea which is not empirically testable, will take the position you have: it is outside the realm of science, and any position taken on it would not be scientifically valid.
My problem is with those who don't recognize or respect that limit; those who truly are dogmatically empiricists, adamantly asserting that empirical knowledge is the only knowledge, in spite of the contradiction that said assertion is not empirically determinable. They are taking that assertion as truth because they say it is, and for no other reason. That is dogmatic empiricism.
Structured religion is, as you say, dogmatic. That still does not change the fact that clinging to such dogma will eventually kill it.
Re: "an INTELLIGENT science vs religion film"!?
Or, to put entirely too fine a point on it:
Dogma's a bitch.
"an INTELLIGENT science vs religion film"!?
There's no such thing. The intelligent recognize that "science vs religion" is a false dichotomy.
There is a very real conflict between dogmatic empiricism and dogmatic supernaturalism, but that's because those are diametrically opposed dogmas.
Dogmatism is death, for both science and religion, if not in the short term then certainly in the long term.
At what point?
Consumer Reports explained that it stress tested the mobes by supporting them at two points on either end. Force was then applied at a third point on the top of the device.
That is false. You can clearly see from the Consumer Reports video that the force is applied at a line on the top of the device.
The other videos and pictures I've seen demonstrate applying force at a particular point.
Different structural designs react differently to stress at a point and stress across a line, so while Consumer Reports' numbers may be correct for what they tested, they are likely not relevant to the actual issue being discussed.
Re: It is not (of course) that simple
I understand there is additional complexity, but
"requires a 2X infrastructure"
is completely wrong.
Either you're making this up or you do not understand how to manage a virtual infrastructure. You could do this with a single additional host with enough resources to support your largest single-unit guest environment. That would be quite slow of course, but you could do this in a reasonable amount of time with 1.25 to 1.5x the current utilized infrastructure.
And if you don't already have at least 1.25x utilized infrastructure available to begin with, I definitely don't want to be playing in your cloud.
And if your infrastructure isn't capable of live-migration of guests from host to host, you need to invest in technology less than five years old.
Do they not have the capacity or capability...
To spin up a patched host cluster, migrate existing guests to the patched cluster, elastically growing the cluster as necessary?
Wasn't that the promise of the cloud? No downtime because if there was an issue your guest could be dynamically moved to a fixed environment, which could grow as the buggy environment shrunk?
Where I work, our network admin has done that many times with our little VMWare cluster, migrating live clients to new hosts, patching the orginal hosts, and migrating back, allowing maintenance to have exactly 0 impact on operations.
I know, I know, Rackspace and Amazon are massively more complex environments. But if the increased complexity doesn't give you even equivalent stability, WTF is the point!?
Read the original
This is not a bad article, but it is a small percentage of the information and perspective available in the original paper, which anyone can read here: http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/IW3P/IB/2012/11/06/000158349_20121106085546/Rendered/PDF/wps6259.pdf
(Oh, and Tim, if you really wanted a representative chart of the state of global inequality, you should have used the chart on page 9 of the original paper. The chart you chose actually does not show changes in inequality, but changes in distribution. There's a subtle but important difference.)
They should play to their real strengths...
and call it Microsoft GOSH [Gaming, Office, and SQL (Server) Host]
Makes sense to me. As of next year, whatever's left of this company certainly won't be Yahoo!
Re: "Everything between sample points is lost"
There is no error there: it stands to reason that if you are ignoring the input at any given point what happens during that time cannot be passed through to the output.
This is true if and only if there is no deterministic relationship between the samples and the unsampled data (i.e, there exists no function f where f(s) = u.)
Re: Relief from above
Juist in time?
Re: That's what makes horse-racing
There are those who think the market is always right. They just may, in the long run*, be correct but many of us will not live that long. One only needs to look at the day-to-day fluctuations to know that on a shorter time frame, valuations may be wrong. Sometimes, the net asset value of an issue is greater than the price. We call that a bargain, and those with patience and perspicacity often benefit.
I think you've got that exactly backwards. The market is always right, but only in the immediate term. The current market price cannot be more or less than the aggregation of current valuation by potential stakeholders at the given point in time.
Calling any of those individual valuations right or wrong presumes a fully objective valuation method, which doesn't exist. Some individuals base their valuations on short-term goals and others on long-term goals. Some base them on careful analyses, whilst others are completely irrational. The market doesn't care. There is no objective method for calculating an intrinsic value of an organization; the value always comes back to the subjective desires of the individual stakeholders.
What you call a bargain is simply a difference in strategic opinion.
"Oh and it comes in black and white."
Really? Rather retro, don't you think?
Are there people out there who don't want a colour screen?
Re: The difference is not traffic priority....
The camp that is most guilty of ignoring this fact is the con-net neutrality camp.
Because they know that if they let on that the ISPs already can and do prioritize traffic based on technical requirements, they lose the argument that the ISPs "have to" do their prioritizing based on source and/or destination.
As Andrew showed with the RFCs, the internet is already built to allow traffic to be prioritized based on need. What the ISPs want to do is to change it to allow traffic to be prioritized based on greed.
As Sir Jonathan Ive mused on 2012’s iPhone 5...
Shouldn't that be "As Sir Jonathan, I've mused on 2012's iPhone 5..."?
Re: The measure of Poverty
Actually, the US government doesn't base the two major poverty definitions it uses on median income at all. They're based on the cost of food for a particular agricultural program in 1963, multiplied by 3 (to account for costs other than food), and then multiplied by the Consumer Price Index.
They are neither pre- not post- tax, nor are they gross or net. They are simply raw values. What they are compared to depends on the definition of the specific program they are applied to.
In short, like many statistical measures established by popularist fiat and then filtered through bureaucratic "efficiency", US poverty figures are not really a good absolute measure. They are essentially unproven arbitrary figures perpetuated beyond their relevance and applied inconsistently.
For more detail and links to a lot more information, see US Department of Health and Human Service - Frequently Asked Questions Related to the Poverty Guidelines and Poverty
There is another reason to buy a particular car
If you look at numbers and depreciation, you buy a BMW...
It's interesting how brand value propositions differ region-to-region.
Here in the States, for example, people who buy BMWs are, as over there, not deciding with their hearts. Generally they are not, however, deciding with their heads, either.
Well, not the heads you're speaking of, anyway.
Re: "Stray positrons"
... are there any negatives to owning one?
No, just a very small positive.
Re: Surely the release of this apparently "reliable" prediction could influence the result?
The more the prediction is percieved to be credible...
No, this is Bing we're talking about.
Security? We've heard of it...
...have to swipe an on-screen bar to get in, something Touchi-Peters thinks will fend off automated attacks.
Sure, because nobody's ever found a way to programmatically inject input into a process before.
...when you have access to an 802.11 network but no cellular...
E.g, when you're a T-Mobile US customer.
What's in a Name?
What's Battle Forth Enet supposed to mean?
More like MPU.
Re: re: There are also many who aren't happy with the limitations of Windows
AC: " '...iPad?' We're talking about buying cheap hardware..."
The 'Apple tax' on the $280Cdn iPad Mini (non-retina) versus the $280Cdn Google Nexus 7 is approximately ZERO.
Now you're just comparing Apples to Apples, which would be fine if Apples were the subject of discussion. But we're discussing Lemons here.
To paraphrase that into the literal, Google Nexus is a prime brand in the Android ecosystem, as Samsung is, as Microsoft is in the Windows tablet ecosystem, and as Apple is in the iThing ecosystem.
But we're talking about Acers and the like here, devices which have much the same features, but usually lower-power CPUs/GPUs, maybe a little less RAM, etc. For 7" tablets, these generally retail in the $100-$175 range, far lower than the prime brands.
These entry-level Windows netbooks fall into that category as well, as they are below average spec for the Windows portable ecosystem in all respects.
The Chromebooks they compete with actually don't fall into that category, though, because they are the average spec for their ecosystem.
Re: Lots of stats, but...
Really? Just out of curiosity, what would such a pattern tell you?
Re: If you arew going to teach coding
Yes and no.
BlueGreen, John G Imrie said nothing about a full course in logic; he said a primer. An understanding of the basics of logic (Boolean algebra especially) is absolutely a requirement for even the simplest of programming tasks.
However, I think it would be a mistake to separate the principle and the practice in early courses, as the practice in this case is the best way to illustrate the principle. The ideal would be a series of programming projects which illustrate the different Boolean operators and principles of precedence while allowing students to create applications relevant to their interests..
Actually, the way you formatted the sentence makes it read like the updates were only posted for those customers who had repeatedly apologised to EE.
Which perversely makes sense, given their general customer support attitude.
A cursory glance at my back catalogue of product reviews through the 1990s and 2000s reveals I was extremely critical of digital photography and inkjet printing in their early days, and look where they are today.
Yes, in the former, you have "professional" models which start at hundreds of pounds (or dollars) more than the "snapshot" models solely because they have interchangeable lenses (which themselves merit a second mortgage), and in the latter, you have cheap, efficient machines which work wonders provided you can put a third mortgage on your house to supply them with ink.
Re: Slanted hard disk bays???
Those aren't hard disk bays -- they're video cards. There are no hard disks or recognizable bays for them in the shot of this side, and no shot of the other side. So we have no info on how they're mounted.
I love it
When my two favorite web sites converge, if only for a brief moment.
Re: I fear for the future
Oh, and why are so many uninformed crazy folk suggesting that Daleks should be lumped in with robots? Don't you crazy people realise that there is a living creature inside a Dalek?
To be fair, El Reg itself is already lumping cyborgs, including Cybermen, in with robots too, even though cyborgs run the gamut from electronically-enhanced creature (e.g, Johnny Mnemonic, Captain Cyborg) through living brain in a machine body (e.g, Darth Vader, also roughly where the Daleks would fall on the scale -- technically there's more than a brain inside there, but depending on where exactly in the series you take them from, the organism's actual capabilities vary) or living body with an electronic brain, all the way to organically-enhanced machine (e.g, T-800 Model 101 [NOT T-101, BTW])
Re: I fear for the future
More likely, as this is a "who would win in a fight"* type study, the less deadly-seeming ones were voted against in an attempt to avoid extraneous low-level rounds against lightweights.
Me, I'm an empiricist. Just because something appears to be wimpy doesn't mean anything; they need to be tested in battle.
It's too bad the comments are being voted against; I was hoping to nominate such luminaries as:
Charles Bronson (makes Chuck Norris look like the mewling pretty-boy he is)
The Vogons (not so hot with weapons, but the things they can do with a properly authorized requisition form [or more to the point, the things they can not get done for lack of the proper paperwork]...)
Betty White (seriously, do NOT cross her.)
*Although that in itselft might say something about our proclivity for violence as a race...
Half of the Story
It's not just a debt owed to the open source community. It's also a responsibility to your customers. This side of the story doesn't even depend on whether the software is open- or closed-source.
OpenSSL [Heartbleed] is a good open-source example of what can happen when many parties rely on a particular bit of software, but don't invest in the maintenance of that software. The best closed-source example might be Microsoft's unending train of patch management, often fixing bugs in decades-old software, because in the past they didn't take security seriously enough.
With closed-source software, your options are pretty much limited to paying license fees for the software and hoping that the developer uses those fees wisely in development and support.
With open-source software, there are more options, including direct involvement in development, code review, testing. Even a good bug report is a boon to developers.
Long story short: Open-source software (or even prebuilt closed libraries) isn't a way to build something for free: it's a way to build it fast. You always pay, whether it's in license/support fees, community involvement, or in lost reputation and income because your customers lose data or can't secure it properly with your systems.
One of the European Commission’s targets at the IGF is to move it on from being “a mere talking shop”.
“The time is ripe to produce outcome documents, such as policy recommendations for voluntary adoption,” said a Commission source.
So rather than making statements that nobody pays attention to, they'll be producing documents that nobody pays attention to. PROGRESS!
The Solution is Obvious
Look for new rules requiring every site to have a unique IP address soon.
... a stricken sad-nav.
Re: This article's about the minority
No, you should be offended by those people (men and women) who are pigs. As the article says:
This isn't about gender wars: it’s not about men vs women, this is about acting like a grown up at a professional conference.
The author's examples are of being harassed by men, because she's been harassed by men. But her point is that such behavior is unprofessional regardless of source or target.
Re: @ Khaptain (was: Personally ...)
BSD and Linux (and Minix, Coherent, et alia) were written in vi...
Remind me again which of those is a science fiction novel?
What about the people who filmed it originally?
They're the ones who should be jailed...
So have they...
fixed the massive holes in their coverage yet?
"You can look at the results for ICT as well as computing below."
If you want to strain your eyes looking at an incredibly small, blurred screenshot.
I thought EVO was an SSD line from Samsung...
Re: Standard Windows timings
Wait, you've done one Windows install (two if you count the repeat), so you feel qualified to generalize how it installs on any hardware?
Re: Sauce For The Goose...
"Try working in local government before you rattle on about how corrupt/wasteful/secretive it is."
Straw man argument - I didn't single out local government for criticism, but don't let that interfere with your right to feel offended.
So you pick out one sentence of a longer, more complicated post, and use a technical discrepancy between that sentence and your post to try to invalidate the poster's entire argument...and you call their argument a straw man?
Please learn about logic before posting again.
Re: we need the public to become educated in the tools they are using and what can be installed
"Unlike El Reg and its commentards, not everybody devotes their whole life to being a tech expert. IMO, pins set by default would help those normal people."
And not everyone becomes a car mechanic, but we still expect them to be able to change a tyre, replace a fuse/bulb, check pressure/oil/water etc. This is no different.
Oh goody, the automobile analogy. Let's run with that one:
Does your auto dealer sell you a car with no door locks and an arcane document telling you how to install your own? 'cos that's essentially what you get with phones today.
"and omit the ActiveX support."
That's rarely an issue these days. Over 90% of desktop / laptop exploits in the last year involved Java....
...which in IE is implemented as an ActiveX control...
Re: Well, but in this case HTTPS wouldn't help
Most governments already run their own CAs which means they can easily issue fake certificates which will be accepted by the browser.
Only if your browser is configured to trust the government-run CA. If you don't know how to change the CAs your browser will trust, google <your browser> manage certificates.
So how long until...
Cortana goes titsup...?
(The dirty mac, please.)
- +Comment Anti-Facebook Ello: Here's why we're still in beta. SPAMGASM!
- Vid+Pics Microsoft declares WINDOWS 10: Seven, ate, Nine. Or 8 did, anyway
- NASA rover Curiosity drills HOLE in MARS 'GOLF COURSE'
- George Clooney, WikiLeaks' lawyer wife hand out burner phones to wedding guests
- Business is back, baby! Hasta la VISTA, Win 8... Oh, yeah, Windows 9